skip to main content
10.1145/2876034.2876041acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of In-Video Quizzes on MOOC Lecture Viewing

Published: 25 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Online courses on sites such as Coursera use quizzes embedded inside lecture videos (in-video quizzes) to help learners test their understanding of the video. This paper analyzes how users interact with in-video quizzes, and how in-video quizzes influence users' lecture viewing behavior. We analyze the viewing logs of users who took the Machine Learning course on Coursera. Users engage heavily with in-video quizzes -- 74% of viewers who start watching a video will attempt its corresponding in-video quiz. We observe spikes in seek activity surrounding in-video quizzes, particularly seeks from the in-video quiz to the preceding section. We show that this is likely due to users reviewing the preceding section to help them answer the quiz, as the majority of users who seek backwards from in-video quizzes have not yet submitted a correct answer, but will later attempt the quiz. Some users appear to use quiz-oriented navigation strategies, such as seeking directly from the start of the video to in-video quizzes, or skipping from one quiz to the next. We discuss implications of our findings on the design of lecture-viewing platforms.

References

[1]
Robert Allen. 1998.The Web: interactive and multimedia education. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30, 16 (1998), 1717--1727.
[2]
Ashton Anderson, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2014.Engaging with massive online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 687--698.
[3]
Philip J Guo, Juho Kim, and Rob Rubin. 2014.How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. ACM, 41--50.
[4]
Philip J Guo and Katharina Reinecke. 2014.Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. ACM, 21--30.
[5]
Mina C Johnson-Glenberg. 2010.Embedded formative e-assessment: who benefits, who falters. Educational Media International 47, 2 (2010), 153--171.
[6]
Juho Kim, Philip J Guo, Carrie J Cai, Shang-Wen Daniel Li, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Robert C Miller. 2014a.Data-driven interaction techniques for improving navigation of educational videos. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 563--572.
[7]
Juho Kim, Philip J Guo, Daniel T Seaton, Piotr Mitros, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Robert C Miller. 2014b.Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks in online lecture videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@at Scale conference. ACM, 31--40.
[8]
René F Kizilcec, Chris Piech, and Emily Schneider. 2013.Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. ACM, 170--179.
[9]
Rene F Kizilcec and Emily Schneider. 2015.Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners: Towards Data-Driven Design with the OLEI Scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22, 2 (2015), 5.
[10]
Henry L Roediger III and Andrew C Butler. 2011.The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in cognitive sciences 15, 1 (2011), 20--27.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
April 2016
446 pages
ISBN:9781450337267
DOI:10.1145/2876034
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. in-video quizzes
  2. lecture navigation
  3. lecture viewing
  4. moocs
  5. seeking behaviors

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

L@S 2016
Sponsor:
L@S 2016: Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
April 25 - 26, 2016
Scotland, Edinburgh, UK

Acceptance Rates

L@S '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 18 of 79 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media