skip to main content
10.1145/2839509.2844570acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Differentiating for Diversity: Using Universal Design for Learning in Elementary Computer Science Education

Published: 17 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

As computer science moves from an outreach activity to a normal classroom activity in the multi-subject, mainstream elementary school classroom, curricula need to be examined to ensure they are meeting the needs of diverse students. In this paper, we present how Universal Design for Learning (UDL) was used to develop and refine a programming environment and curriculum for upper-elementary school classrooms (students aged 9-12). We then present our accommodations and modifications to emphasize the ways our development environment and/or curriculum enabled such uses. Ensuring introductory computer science experiences are equitable and accessible for a wide range of student learners may broaden the diversity of individuals who perceive themselves as capable of pursuing computer science in the future.

References

[1]
Alvarado, C. (2014). CS Ed Week 2013: The hour of code. ACM SIGCSE Bull, 46,1, 2--4.
[2]
U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, (2009).
[3]
College Board. (2011). The 10th Annual AP report to the nation. Retrieved from: http://apreport.collegeboard.org.
[4]
Tai, R. H. (2006). Career choice: Enhanced: Planning early for. Life Science, 1, 0-2.
[5]
Guzdial, M. J., & Ericson, B. (2009). Introduction to Computing and Programming in Python, A Multimedia Approach. Prentice Hall.
[6]
Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
[7]
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., ... & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119--145.
[8]
Santamaria, L.J. (2009). Culturally responsive differentiated instruction: Narrowing gaps between best pedagogical practices benefiting ALL learners. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 214--247.
[9]
Idol, L. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education a program evaluation of eight schools. Remedial and Special education, 27(2), 77--94.
[10]
Osborne, A. G., & Dimattia, P. (1994). The IDEA's least restrictive environment mandate: Legal implications. Exceptional Children, 61(1), 6--14.
[11]
Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society, 11(1), 49--76.
[12]
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. AM EDUC RES J, 32(3), 465--491.
[13]
Howard, T. C. (2012). Culturally responsive pedagogy. Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education, 1--7.
[14]
Moll, L. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 32, 2, 132--141.
[15]
Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, 8--33.
[16]
King-Sears, P. (2014). Introduction to Learning Disability Quarterly Special Series on Universal Design for Learning. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 68--70.
[17]
PACER Center. (2013). School accommodations and modification ideas for students who receive special education services.
[18]
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., ... & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. COMMUN ACM, 52(11), 60--67.
[19]
Hill, C., Dwyer, H. A., Martinez, T., Harlow, D., & Franklin, D. (2015). Floors and flexibility: Designing a programming environment for 4th - 6th grade classrooms. SIGCSE '15. ACM.
[20]
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. J LEARN SCI, 13(1), 1--14.
[21]
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Tech Research and Development, 53(4), 5--23.
[22]
Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[23]
Agar, M. (2000). Border lessons: Linguistic "rich points" and evaluative understanding. New Directions for Evaluation, 2000(86), 93--109.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Differentiating for Diversity: Using Universal Design for Learning in Elementary Computer Science Education

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '16: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education
      February 2016
      768 pages
      ISBN:9781450336857
      DOI:10.1145/2839509
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 17 February 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. computer science education
      2. culturally responsive pedagogy
      3. differentiation
      4. elementary school
      5. graphical programming

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • National Science Foundation

      Conference

      SIGCSE '16
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 297 submissions, 35%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE TS 2025
      The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 26 - March 1, 2025
      Pittsburgh , PA , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)104
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media