skip to main content
10.1145/2806416.2806485acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extracting Situational Information from Microblogs during Disaster Events: a Classification-Summarization Approach

Published: 17 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Microblogging sites like Twitter have become important sources of real-time information during disaster events. A significant amount of valuable situational information is available in these sites; however, this information is immersed among hundreds of thousands of tweets, mostly containing sentiments and opinion of the masses, that are posted during such events. To effectively utilize microblogging sites during disaster events, it is necessary to (i) extract the situational information from among the large amounts of sentiment and opinion, and (ii) summarize the situational information, to help decision-making processes when time is critical. In this paper, we develop a novel framework which first classifies tweets to extract situational information, and then summarizes the information. The proposed framework takes into consideration the typicalities pertaining to disaster events where (i) the same tweet often contains a mixture of situational and non-situational information, and (ii) certain numerical information, such as number of casualties, vary rapidly with time, and thus achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art tweet summarization approaches.

References

[1]
M. A. Cameron, R. Power, B. Robinson, and J. Yin. Emergency Situation Awareness from Twitter for Crisis Management. In Proc. Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2012.
[2]
D. Chakrabarti and K. Punera. Event summarization using tweets. In Proc. AAAI ICWSM, 2011.
[3]
C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2:27:1--27:27, 2011.
[4]
G. Erkan and D. R. Radev. LexRank:Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Artificial Intelligence Research, 22:457--479, 2004.
[5]
Gurobi -- The overall fastest and best supported solver available, 2015. http://www.gurobi.com/.
[6]
A. Hannak, E. Anderson, L. F. Barrett, S. Lehmann, A. Mislove, and M. Riedewald. Tweetin' in the Rain: Exploring societal-scale effects of weather on mood. In Proc. AAAI ICWSM, 2012.
[7]
C. Kedzie, K. McKeown, and F. Diaz. Summarizing Disasters Over Time. In Proc. Bloomberg Workshop on Social Good (with SIGKDD), 2014.
[8]
M. A. H. Khan, D. Bollegala, G. Liu, and K. Sezaki. Multi-Tweet Summarization of Real-Time Events. In Proc. IEEE Socialcom, 2013.
[9]
L. Kong, N. Schneider, S. Swayamdipta, A. Bhatia, C. Dyer, and N. A. Smith. A Dependency Parser for Tweets. In Proc. EMNLP, 2014.
[10]
C.-Y. Lin. ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Proc. Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out (with ACL), 2004.
[11]
2015 Nepal earthquake -- Wikipedia, April 2015. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Nepal_.
[12]
G. Neubig, Y. Matsubayashi, M. Hagiwara, and K. Murakami. Safety information mining -- what can NLP do in a disaster. In Proc. IJCNLP, 2011.
[13]
A. Olariu. Efficient online summarization of microblogging streams. In Proc. EACL, 2014.
[14]
M. Osborne et al. Real-Time Detection, Tracking, and Monitoring of Automatically Discovered Events in Social Media. In Proc. ACL, 2014.
[15]
O. Owoputi, B. O'Connor, C. Dyer, K. Gimpel, N. Schneider, and N. A. Smith. Improved part-of-speech tagging for online conversational text with word clusters. In Proc. NAACL-HLT, 2013.
[16]
D. Parveen and M. Strube. Multi-document Summarization Using Bipartite Graphs. In Proc. TextGraphs Workshop on Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing, pages 15--24, October 2014.
[17]
Y. Qu, C. Huang, P. Zhang, and J. Zhang. Microblogging After a Major Disaster in China: A Case Study of the 2010 Yushu Earthquake. In Proc. ACM CSCW, 2011.
[18]
R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik, and D. Crystal. A comprehensive grammar of the English language, volume 397. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[19]
T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proc. World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2010.
[20]
N. B. Sarter and D. D. Woods. Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1(1):45--57, 1991.
[21]
L. Shou, Z. Wang, K. Chen, and G. Chen. Sumblr: Continuous summarization of evolving tweet streams. In Proc. ACM SIGIR, 2013.
[22]
H. Takamura, H. Yokono, and M. Okumura. Summarizing a document stream. In Proc. ECIR, 2011.
[23]
K. Tao, F. Abel, C. Hauff, G.-J. Houben, and U. Gadiraju. Groundhog Day: Near-duplicate Detection on Twitter. In Proc. World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2013.
[24]
TREC Temporal Summarization, 2015. http://www.trec-ts.org/.
[25]
REST API Resources, Twitter Developers. https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api.
[26]
I. Varga, M. Sano, K. Torisawa, C. Hashimoto, K. Ohtake, T. Kawai, J.-H. Oh, and S. D. Saeger. Aid is out there: Looking for help from tweets during a large scale disaster. In Proc. ACL, 2013.
[27]
S. Verma, S. Vieweg, W. J. Corvey, L. Palen, J. H. Martin, M. Palmer, A. Schram, and K. M. Anderson. Natural Language Processing to the Rescue? Extracting "Situational Awareness" Tweets During Mass Emergency. In Proc. AAAI ICWSM, 2011.
[28]
S. Vieweg, A. L. Hughes, K. Starbird, and L. Palen. Microblogging During Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI, 2010.
[29]
S. Volkova, T. Wilson, and D. Yarowsky. Exploring Sentiment in Social Media: Bootstrapping Subjectivity Clues from Multilingual Twitter Streams. In Proc. ACL, 2013.
[30]
J. Yin, A. Lampert, M. Cameron, B. Robinson, and R. Power. Using Social Media to Enhance Emergency Situation Awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(6):52--59, 2012.
[31]
A. Zubiaga, D. Spina, E. Amigo, and J. Gonzalo. Towards Real-Time Summarization of Scheduled Events from Twitter Streams. In Proc. ACM Hypertext, 2012.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Extracting Situational Information from Microblogs during Disaster Events: a Classification-Summarization Approach

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '15: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
          October 2015
          1998 pages
          ISBN:9781450337946
          DOI:10.1145/2806416
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 17 October 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. classification
          2. disaster events
          3. situational information
          4. summarization
          5. twitter

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Funding Sources

          • Flipkart Travel Grant
          • Information Technology Research Academy (ITRA) DeITY Government of India
          • Google Travel Grant

          Conference

          CIKM'15
          Sponsor:

          Acceptance Rates

          CIKM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 165 of 646 submissions, 26%;
          Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

          Upcoming Conference

          CIKM '25

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
          Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media