article

Free access

Methods & tools: the rich picture: a tool for reasoning about work context

Editor: Steven Pemberton Authors:

Andrew Monk,

Steve HowardAuthors Info & Claims

Interactions, Volume 5, Issue 2

Pages 21 - 30

https://doi.org/10.1145/274430.274434

Published: 01 March 1998 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

Avison, D. and Fitzgerald,information system Development: Methodologies, techniques and Tools. Blackwell scientific publishers, oxford, 1988.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[2]

Avison, D.wood Harper, T. MultiviewMethodology. Blackwell Scientific Publishers,Oxford, 1990.

Google Scholar

[3]

Checkland, P.systems Thinking,systems practice,john Wiley and So~s',!',',',~'~iic~e~s~ter, 1981.

Google Scholar

[4]

Checkland, E and Scholes, J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1990.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

Clegg, C., Wart, P., Green, T., Monk, A., Kemp, N., Allison, G., and Lansdale, M. People and Computers: How to Evaluate Your Company's New Technology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1988.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[6]

Dearden, A. and Wright, P. Experiences Using Situated and Non-situated Techniques for Studying Work in Context. In S. Howard, J. Hammond, and G. Lindgaard, eds., Human Computer Interaction--INTER- ACT'gZ Chapman and Hall, London, 1997.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

Howard, S. and Smith, R. Using the Soft Systems Methodology to Front-end Task Analysis. In HCL" A Light Into the Future, Proceedings of OZCHI'95 (Wollongong, Australia, November 1995), pp. 88-94.

Google Scholar

[9]

Johnson, E Human Computer Interaction: Psychology, Tasks Analysis and Software Engineering. McGraw-Hill, London, 1992.

Google Scholar

[10]

Khushalani, A., Smith, R., and Howard, S. What happens when designers don't play by the rules: towards a model of opportunistic behaviour in design. Australian Journal of Information Systems 1, 2 (1994), pp. 13-31.

Google Scholar

[11]

Kraut, R. E., and Streeter, L. A. Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM 38, 3 (1995), pp. 69-81.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[12]

Monk, A. E Lightweight techniques to encourage innovative user {nterfacei:desiiigni:~:~:~!n L. Wood & R. zeno eds, brigdging the gap: Transforming user requirements into user interface design,CRC press Boca raton,1997.

Google Scholar

[13]

Monk, A. E, Wright, P., Haber, J., and Davenport, L. Improving your human-computer interface: a practical techmique. BCS Practitioner Series. Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead, 1993.

Google Scholar

[14]

Muller, M.j.PICTIVE-An exploration in particign. In S. P. Robertson, G. M. Olson, and J. S. Olson, eds., CHI'91 Human Factors in Computer Systems (New Orleans, 1991). ACM, New York, pp. 225-231.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[15]

Mumford, E. Sociotechnical system design: evolving theory and practice. In G. Bjernes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng, eds., Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, Aldershot, UK, 1987.

Google Scholar

[16]

Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering at a Discount. In G. Salvendy and M. J. Smith, eds., Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI-International '89, Boston, September, Elsevier Science, 1989, pp. 394-401.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[17]

Nielsen, J. and Mohlich, R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In J. C. Chew and J. Whiteside, eds., Human Factors in Computer Systems, CHI'90. CHI '90, Seattle, April, ACM, New York, 1990, pp. 249-256.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[18]

Patching, D. Practical Soft Systems Analys#. London, Pitman Publishing, 1990.

Google Scholar

[19]

Smith, R., Howard, S., Sutherland, T., and Khushalani, A. TheoryBuilder: A Behavioural Perspective on Modelling and Improving Systems Development. Proceedings of First Australian Seminar on Modelling and Improving Systems Development. School of Information Technology, Swinburne University, 1994. ~)

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Foth MForlano LBilandzic M(2025)Nomadic Work Practices in the Smart City RevisitedHandbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten10.1007/978-3-658-08460-8_33-2(1-15)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08460-8_33-2
Niccolas-Morales HLicona-Olmos JGarnica González JOrtega Reyes A(2024)La imagen rica como herramienta de expresión de la desigualdad de género en las organizaciones: una aproximación a través de sistemas suavesINTER DISCIPLINA10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2024.33.8824012:33(85-115)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2024.33.88240
Lambert L(2024)Ecological empathy: relational theory and practiceEcosystems and People10.1080/26395916.2024.239691920:1Online publication date: 20-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2396919
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Methods & tools: the rich picture: a tool for reasoning about work context

Recommendations

CASE tools: understanding the reasons for non-use

Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) technologies are tools that provide automated assistance for software development [3]. The goal of introducing CASE tools is the reduction of the time and cost of software development and the enhancement of the ...
Making active CASE tools—toward the next generation CASE tools

In CASE field, there is a long-standing topic, i.e. the reason that CASE tools seem to be dearly bought but sparsely used. Based on our practical experience of making and using CASE tools, we point out the reason is that today's CASE tools are actually ...
Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review

Context: This systematic mapping review is set in a Global Software Engineering (GSE) context, characterized by a highly distributed environment in which project team members work separately in different countries. This geographic separation creates ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Interactions Volume 5, Issue 2

March/April 1998

54 pages

ISSN:1072-5520

EISSN:1558-3449

DOI:10.1145/274430

Editor:
Steven Pemberton

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 March 1998

Published in INTERACTIONS Volume 5, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

114
Total Citations
View Citations
24,928
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)2,008
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)778

Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Foth MForlano LBilandzic M(2025)Nomadic Work Practices in the Smart City RevisitedHandbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten10.1007/978-3-658-08460-8_33-2(1-15)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08460-8_33-2
Niccolas-Morales HLicona-Olmos JGarnica González JOrtega Reyes A(2024)La imagen rica como herramienta de expresión de la desigualdad de género en las organizaciones: una aproximación a través de sistemas suavesINTER DISCIPLINA10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2024.33.8824012:33(85-115)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2024.33.88240
Lambert L(2024)Ecological empathy: relational theory and practiceEcosystems and People10.1080/26395916.2024.239691920:1Online publication date: 20-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2396919
Youn HBaek J(2024)Assemblage-based stakeholder analysis in design: a conceptual framework through the lenses of post–anthropocentrismCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2024.2358966(1-22)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2024.2358966
Marnewick CRomero-Torres ADelisle J(2024)Rich pictures as a research method in project management – A way to engage practitionersProject Leadership and Society10.1016/j.plas.2024.1001275(100127)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100127
Langendorf LKhalid M(2024)Discovering Improvement Opportunities and Challenges for Pharmaceutical Companies Adopting Digital Training Technologies: A Case StudyLearning and Collaboration Technologies10.1007/978-3-031-61672-3_13(196-213)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-61672-3_13
Xames MTopcu T(2024)A Rapid Review of How Model‐based Systems Engineering is Used in Healthcare SystemsINCOSE International Symposium10.1002/iis2.1321834:1(1447-1462)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.13218
Luva BNaweed A(2023)King of the castle: Organisational influences on authority gradients between network controllers and other team membersErgonomics10.1080/00140139.2023.2202844(1-23)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2023.2202844
Naweed AMurphy P(2023)One-track mind: Investigating positive and negative applications of non-technical skills in rail network controlApplied Ergonomics10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103840106(103840)Online publication date: Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103840
Tretow-Fish TKhalid MLeweke V(2023)Prototyping the Learning Analytics Dashboards of an Adaptive Learning Platform: Faculty Perceptions Versus Designers’ IntentionsLearning and Collaboration Technologies10.1007/978-3-031-34411-4_36(531-545)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-34411-4_36
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

CASE tools: understanding the reasons for non-use

Making active CASE tools—toward the next generation CASE tools

Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review