Bell, B. (1992). Using programming walkthroughs to design a visual language. Technical Report CU-CS-581-92 (Ph.D. Thesis), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Bias, R. (1991). Walkthroughs: Efficient collaborative testing. 1EEE Software 8, 5 (September), 94-95.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Bias, R. G. (1994). The pluralistic usability walkthrough: Coordinated empathies, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 65-78.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

Desurvire, H. W. (1994). Faster, cheaper!! Are usability inspection methods as effective as empirical testing? In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 173-202.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Desurvire, H. W., Kondziela, J. M., and Atwood, M. E. (1992). What is gained and lost when using evaluation methods other than empirical testing. In Monk, A., Diaper, D., and Harrison, M.D. (Eds.), People and Computers VII, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 89-102.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Fagan, M.E. (1986). Advances in software inspection. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12, 7 (July), 744- 751.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Jeffries, R., Miller, J.R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K.M. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, April 28 - May 2), 119-124.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Kahn, M. J., and Prail, A. (1994). Formal usability inspections. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, Johrn Wiley & Sons, New York, 141-172.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Karat, C. (1994). Comparison of user interface evaluation methods. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 203- 232.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

Karat, C., Campbell, R. and Fiegel, T. (1992). Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In Proceedings of CHI'92 (Monterey, California, May 3-7, 1992), ACM, New York, 397-404.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

Lewis, C., Poison, P., Wharton, C., and Rieman, J. (t 990). Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI' 90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, April 1-5), 235-242.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

Mack, R. L., and Montaniz, F. (1994). Observing, predicting and analyzing usability problems, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 293-336.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[14]

Mack, R. L., and Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability inspection methods. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 25, 1 (January), 28-33.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

Molich, R., and Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a humancomputer dialogue. Comm. ACM 33, 3 (March), 338-348.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

Nielsen, J. (1989). Usability engineering at a discount. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M.J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 394-401.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[17]

Nielsen, J. (1990). Paper versus computer implementations as mockup scenarios for heuristic evaluation. Proc. IFIP INTERACT' 90 Third Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., August 27-31), 315-320.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[18]

Nielsen, J. (1990). Traditional dialogue design applied to modem user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 33, 10 (October), 109-118.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[19]

Nielsen, J. (1992). The usability engineering life cycle. IEEE Computer 25, 3 (March), 12-22.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[20]

Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proc. CHI'92 Conf. (Monterey, CA, May 3-7), ACM, New York, 373-380.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[21]

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Boston, MA.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[22]

Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proc. A CM CHI'94 Conf. (Boston, MA, April 24-28).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation, in Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 25--64.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

Nielsen, J. (1994). Scenarios in discount usability engineering. in Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Scenario Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology. Book under preparation.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.) (1994). Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[26]

Nielsen, J., and Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proc. ACM INTER CHI' 93 Conf. (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 24-29 April), 206-213.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[27]

Nielsen, J. and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, April 1- 5), 249 - 256.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[28]

Nielsen, J., and Phillips, V. L. (1993). Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: Heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conf. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 24--29), 214-221.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[29]

Poison. P. Lewis, C. Rieman. J., and W2aarton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man- Machine Studies, 36, 5, 741-773.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[30]

Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C, and Poison, P. (1994). The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 105-140.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[31]

Wixon, D., Jones, S., Tse, L., and Casaday, G. (1994). Inspections and design reviews: Framework, history, and reflection. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 79-1 04.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Elnagar S(2025)Is software design gender biased? A study on software-design effect on task performanceInternational Journal of Information Management Data Insights10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.1003125:1(100312)Online publication date: Jun-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100312
De Souza RPortela NDe Campos Filho A(2024)Avaliação de usabilidade de ambiente virtual de aprendizagem com profissionais de saúdeUsability evaluation of a virtual learning environment with healthcare professionalsEvaluación de usabilidad de un entorno virtual de aprendizaje con profesionales de la saludJournal of Health Informatics10.59681/2175-4411.v16.iEspecial.2024.125716:EspecialOnline publication date: 19-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v16.iEspecial.2024.1257
Vindigni G(2024)Enhancing Human-Computer Interaction in Socially Inclusive Contexts: Flow Heuristics and AI Systems in Compliance with DIN EN ISO 9241 StandardsEuropean Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(4).102:4(115-139)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(4).10
Show More Cited By

Usability inspection methods
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Usability inspection methods: report on a workshop held at CHI'92, Monterey, CA, May 3–4, 1992

Usability inspection methods, based on informed intuition s about interface design quality, hold promise of providing faster, more cost-effective ways to generate usability evaluations, compared to empirical user evaluation methods . Examples of ...
Perspective-based Usability Inspection: An Empirical Validationof Efficacy

Inspection is a fundamental means of achieving software usability. Past research showed that the current usability inspection techniques were rather ineffective. We developed perspective-based usability inspection, which divides the large variety of ...
User Interface Inspection Methods: A User-Centered Design Method

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

CHI '94: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 1994

483 pages

ISBN:0897916514

DOI:10.1145/259963

Editor:
Catherine Plaisant

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 April 1994

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CHI94

Sponsor:

CHI94: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems

April 24 - 28, 1994

Massachusetts, Boston, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1,342
Total Citations
View Citations
37,351
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3,718
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)394

Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Elnagar S(2025)Is software design gender biased? A study on software-design effect on task performanceInternational Journal of Information Management Data Insights10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.1003125:1(100312)Online publication date: Jun-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100312
De Souza RPortela NDe Campos Filho A(2024)Avaliação de usabilidade de ambiente virtual de aprendizagem com profissionais de saúdeUsability evaluation of a virtual learning environment with healthcare professionalsEvaluación de usabilidad de un entorno virtual de aprendizaje con profesionales de la saludJournal of Health Informatics10.59681/2175-4411.v16.iEspecial.2024.125716:EspecialOnline publication date: 19-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v16.iEspecial.2024.1257
Vindigni G(2024)Enhancing Human-Computer Interaction in Socially Inclusive Contexts: Flow Heuristics and AI Systems in Compliance with DIN EN ISO 9241 StandardsEuropean Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(4).102:4(115-139)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(4).10
Oliveira RLins FCorreia Neto J(2024)Avaliação de Usabilidade de Jogos Educacionais para pessoas com a Síndrome de Williams-BeurenRevista Brasileira de Informática na Educação10.5753/rbie.2024.245232(181-212)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2024.2452
Victorelli EDos Reis J(2024)Adopting Human-data Interaction Guidelines and Participatory Practices for Supporting Inexperienced Designers in Information Visualization ApplicationsJournal of the Brazilian Computer Society10.5753/jbcs.2024.259230:1(35-54)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.5753/jbcs.2024.2592
Şimşek ABilgi Batar ŞSaypınar MÇakmak F(2024)Evaluating the Usability of a Virtual Classroom Application from the Educator PerspectiveManisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi10.52826/mcbuefd.137347012:1(46-65)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.52826/mcbuefd.1373470
Svarre TSkov M(2024)The Online presence of the Danish public sector from 2010 to 2022: Generating an archived web corpusExploring the Archived Web during a Highly Transformative Age10.36253/979-12-215-0413-2.17Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0413-2.17
Subahi A(2024)Advancing Sustainable Cyber-Physical System Development with a Digital Twins and Language Engineering Approach: Smart Greenhouse ApplicationsTechnologies10.3390/technologies1209014712:9(147)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12090147
Carvalho DDias Jde Abreu J(2024)Sensing in Inland Waters to Promote Safe Navigation: A Case Study in the Aveiro’s LagoonSensors10.3390/s2423767724:23(7677)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237677
Rangarajan VShahbaz Badr ADe Amicis R(2024)Evaluating Virtual Reality in Education: An Analysis of VR through the Instructors’ LensMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80800728:8(72)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8080072
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Recommendations

Usability inspection methods: report on a workshop held at CHI'92, Monterey, CA, May 3–4, 1992

Perspective-based Usability Inspection: An Empirical Validationof Efficacy

User Interface Inspection Methods: A User-Centered Design Method