skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557364acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards a closer dialogue between policy and practice: responsible design in HCI

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Given the potent and pervasive nature of modern technologies, this paper lays out the complexities involved in achieving responsible design. In order to do this we will first compare an emerging policy-oriented programme of research known as RRI (Responsible Research and Innovation) with initiatives in HCI. A focus on the similarities and differences may highlight to what extent responsibility is already and successfully embedded within the concerns and practices of design and use, and what may yet need to be incorporated for responsible design. The paper then discusses the challenges of 'naturalising' the very ambitious programme of RRI within specific design activities and concerns, through the lens of four analytic concepts: reflexivity; responsiveness; inclusion; and anticipation. Finally, we make a case for a pragmatic, 'unromantic', but engaged reinterpretation of RRI for HCI.

References

[1]
Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C., and Guston, D. Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration. In The Handbook of Science and technology Studies, Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., Wajcman, J., eds., MIT Press, Cambridge (2007), 979--1000.
[2]
Baumer, E.P.S., and Silberman, M.S. When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2271--2274.
[3]
Beck, U. Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London ; Newbury Park, Calif, 1992.
[4]
Botero, A. Expanding design space(s) - design in communal endeavours, PhD Thesis. Aalto University, School of Arts, Design and Architecture, 2013.
[5]
Bowen, S. Critical theory and participatory design. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010).
[6]
Eden G., Jirotka, M. and Stahl, B. Responsible Research and Innovation: Critical reflection into the potential social consequences of ICT. IEEE RCIS 2013 (2013).
[7]
Franqueira, T. Reshaping urban lives - design as a social intervention towards community networks. In Proc. IASDR 2007 (2007).
[8]
Friedman, B. Value-sensitive design. Interactions November + December (1996), 17--23.
[9]
Gaver, W.W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N., and Walker, B. The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 885.
[10]
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Hinder, S., Procter, R., and Stones, R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Social Science & Medicine 93 (2013), 86--94.
[11]
Gregory, J. Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. Internat. J. of Engineering Education 19, 1 (2003), 62--74.
[12]
Guston, D.H., and Sarewitz, D. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24 (2002), 93--109.
[13]
Hallnäs, L., and Redström, J. Slow technology -- designing for reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5 (2001): 201--212.
[14]
Hanson, V.L. Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interacting with Computers 22 (2010), 502--509.
[15]
Haraway, D. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. Free Association Books, London (1991), 183--201.
[16]
Harper, R., Randall, D., Smyth, N., Heledd, L. And Moore, R. The past is a different place: they do things differently there. In Proc. DIS 2008, ACM Press (2008), 271--280.
[17]
Healy, T. The unanticipated consequences of technology. In Nanotechnology: ethical and social Implications, A.S. Khan, ed. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL (2012), 155--174.
[18]
Hill, L., Roberts, G., Wildgoose, J., Perkins, R., and Hahn, S. Recovery and person-centred care in dementia: common purpose, common practice? Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 16 (2010), 288--298.
[19]
Hofmann, J. B. http://www.janellburleyhofmann.com/slow-techmanifesto/
[20]
Holmes, M. Emotional reflexivity in contemporary friendships: understanding it using Elias and Facebook etiquette. Sociological Research Online 16, 1 (2011).
[21]
Hyysalo, S. Health technology development and use. From practice bound imaginations to evolving impacts. Routledge, London, 2010.
[22]
Inside Out of Mind. http://www.meetinggroundtheatrecompany.co.uk/projec ts/inside-out-of-mind
[23]
Jackson, S., and S. Barbrow. Infrastructure and vocation: field, calling and computation in ecology. In Proc CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 2873--2882.
[24]
Kelly, P., Marshall, S.J., Badland, H., Kerr, J., Oliver, M., Doherty, A.R., and Foster, C. An ethical framework for automated, wearable cameras in health behavior research. Am. J. of Prev. Medicine 44 (2013), 314--319.
[25]
Larab, A., Conchon, E., Bastide, R., and Singer, N. A sustainable software architecture for home care monitoring applications. In Proc. IEEE DEST (2012).
[26]
Latour, B. We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1993.
[27]
Lynch, M. Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory Culture Society 17 (2000): 26--54.
[28]
Leadbeater, C. The user innovation revolution: how business can unlock the value of customers' ideas. National Consumer Council, London, 2006.
[29]
Lezaun, J., and Soneryd, L. Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 16 (2007), 279--297.
[30]
Moncur, W. The emotional wellbeing of researchers: considerations for practice. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 1883--1890.
[31]
Mort, M., Roberts, C., and Milligan, C. Telecare and older people: Re-ordering social relations. In Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields, R. Schomberg, ed. Publications Office of the EU, Luxemburg, (2011), 149--164.
[32]
Owen, R., Stilgoe, J.,Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., Guston, D. A framework for responsible innovation. In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, Owen, R., Bessant, J., and Heintz, M., ed., Wiley (2013), 27--50.
[33]
Page, X., and Kobsa, A. The circles of latitude: adoption and usage of location tracking in online social networking. In IEEE Comp. Science & Eng. (2009), 1027--1030.
[34]
Pellizzoni, L. Responsibility and environmental governance. Environm. Politics 13 (2004), 541--565.
[35]
Pollock, N., and Williams, R. Who decides the shape of product markets? The knowledge institutions that name and categorise new technologies. Information and Organization 21 (2011), 194--217.
[36]
ProGReSS. http://www.progressproject.eu/
[37]
Randles, S., Youtie, J., Guston, D., Harthorn, B., Newfield, C., Shapira, P., Wickson, F., Rip, A., von Schomberg, R., and Pidgeon, N. A trans-atlantic conversation on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Governance. 2012. http://works.bepress.com/pshapira/54/
[38]
Reeves, S. Envisioning ubiquitous computing. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1573--1582.
[39]
Rosner, D., and Bean, J. The Weapons Factory in the Den. Interactions May + June (2013), 80--81.
[40]
Schienke, E.W., Tuana, N., Brown, D.A., Davis, K.J., Keller, K., Shortle, J.S., Stickler, M., and Baum, S.D. The role of the National Science Foundation Broader Impacts Criterion in enhancing research ethics pedagogy. Social Epistemology 23 (2009), 317--336.
[41]
Sellen, A., Rogers, Y., Harper, R., and Rodden, T. Reflecting human values in a digital age. Comm. of the ACM 52 (2009), 358--366.
[42]
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. "Jofish". Reflective design. In Proc. Critical Computing 2005, ACM Press (2005), 49--58.
[43]
Singer, N., Trouilhet, S., Rammal, A., and Pécatte, J.-M. Collecting and classifying large scale data to build an adaptive and collective memory: A case study in eHealth for a pro-active management. In Multi-Agent Systems - Modeling, Interactions, Simulations and Case Studies, F. Alkhateeb, E. Al Maghayreh, and I. Abu Doush, eds. (2011), 439--454.
[44]
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., and Macnaghten, P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42 (2013), 1568--1580.
[45]
Sutcliffe, H. A report on Responsible Research & Innovation., 2011. http://www.matterforall.org/pdf/RRIReport2.pdf
[46]
Sweeney, L. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. Queue 11, 3 (2013).
[47]
Ure, J., Pinnock, H., Hanley, J., Kidd G, McCall Smith, E., Tarling, A., Pagliari, C., Sheikh, A., MacNee, W., McKinstry, B. Piloting telemonitoring in COPD: a mixed methods exploration of issues in design and implementation. PRIM Care Resp J 21, 1 (2012), 57--64.
[48]
Vincent, N.A. A structured taxonomy of responsibility concepts. In Moral Responsibility, N.A. Vincent, I. van de Poel, and J. Hoven, eds., Springer (2011), 15--35.
[49]
Yetim, F. Bringing discourse ethics to value sensitive design: pathways toward a deliberative future. AIS Trans. on Human-Comp. Interact. 3, 2 (2011), 133--155.
[50]
Von Schomberg, R. A vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, Owen, R., Bessant, J., and Heintz, M., ed., Wiley, Hoboken (2013), 51--74.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2014
4206 pages
ISBN:9781450324731
DOI:10.1145/2556288
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 April 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. critical design
  2. ethics
  3. governance
  4. innovation
  5. participatory design
  6. responsible design
  7. risk society
  8. user-centered design
  9. value-sensitive design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHI '14
Sponsor:
CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2014
Ontario, Toronto, Canada

Acceptance Rates

CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 465 of 2,043 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)99
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media