skip to main content
10.1145/2508859.2516700acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quantifying the security of graphical passwords: the case of android unlock patterns

Published: 04 November 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Graphical passwords were proposed as an alternative to overcome the inherent limitations of text-based passwords, inspired by research that shows that the graphical memory of humans is particularly well developed. A graphical password scheme that has been widely adopted is the Android Unlock Pattern, a special case of the Pass-Go scheme with grid size restricted to 3x3 points and restricted stroke count.
In this paper, we study the security of Android unlock patterns. By performing a large-scale user study, we measure actual user choices of patterns instead of theoretical considerations on password spaces. From this data we construct a model based on Markov chains that enables us to quantify the strength of Android unlock patterns. We found empirically that there is a high bias in the pattern selection process, e.g., the upper left corner and three-point long straight lines are very typical selection strategies. Consequently, the entropy of patterns is rather low, and our results indicate that the security offered by the scheme is less than the security of only three digit randomly-assigned PINs for guessing 20% of all passwords (i.e., we estimate a partial guessing entropy G_0.2 of 9.10 bit).
Based on these insights, we systematically improve the scheme by finding a small, but still effective change in the pattern layout that makes graphical user logins substantially more secure. By means of another user study, we show that some changes improve the security by more than doubling the space of actually used passwords (i.e., increasing the partial guessing entropy G_0.2 to 10.81 bit).

References

[1]
atom. HashCat. Online at http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/.
[2]
A. J. Aviv, K. Gibson, E. Mossop, M. Blaze, and J. M. Smith. Smudge Attacks on Smartphone Touch Screens. In USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies (WOOT), 2010.
[3]
J. A. Bargh, M. Chen, and L. Burrows. Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Priming on Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71:230--244, 1996.
[4]
R. Biddle, S. Chiasson, and P. Van Oorschot. Graphical Passwords: Learning From the First Twelve Years. ACM Computing Surveys, 44(4):19:1--19:41, Sept. 2012.
[5]
G. Blonder. Graphical Passwords. US Patent 5559961, 1996.
[6]
M. Bond. Comments on gridsure authentication. Online at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/ mkb23/research/GridsureComments.pdf.
[7]
J. Bonneau. Guessing Human-chosen Secrets. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, May 2012.
[8]
J. Bonneau. The Science of Guessing: Analyzing an Anonymized Corpus of 70 Million Passwords. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2012.
[9]
J. Bonneau, S. Preibusch, and R. Anderson. A Birthday Present Every Eleven Wallets? The Security of Customer-chosen Banking PINs. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC), 2012.
[10]
S. Brostoff, P. Inglesant, and M. A. Sasse. Evaluating the Usability and Security of a Graphical One-time PIN System. In BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference (BCS), 2010.
[11]
S. Brostoff and A. Sasse. Are Passfaces More Usable Than Passwords? A Field Trial Investigation. In Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), 2000.
[12]
C. Cachin. Entropy Measures and Unconditional Security in Cryptography. PhD thesis, ETH Zürich, 1997.
[13]
C. Castelluccia, M. Dürmuth, and D. Perito. Adaptive Password-Strength Meters from Markov Models. In Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security (NDSS), 2012.
[14]
S. Chiasson, R. Biddle, and P. van Oorschot. A Second Look at the Usability of Click-based Graphical Passwords. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), 2007.
[15]
S. Chiasson, A. Forget, R. Biddle, and P. C. van Oorschot. Influencing Users Towards Better Passwords: Persuasive Cued Click-points. In British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (BCS HCI), 2008.
[16]
S. Chiasson, A. Forget, R. Biddle, and P. C. van Oorschot. User Interface Design Affects Security: Patterns in Click-based Graphical Passwords. International Journal of Information Security, 8(6):387--398, 2009.
[17]
S. Chiasson, P. Oorschot, and R. Biddle. Graphical Password Authentication Using Cued Click Points. In European Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS), 2007.
[18]
D. Davis, F. Monrose, and M. K. Reiter. On User Choice in Graphical Password Schemes. In USENIX Security Symposium, 2004.
[19]
R. Dhamija and A. Perrig. Deja Vu: A User Study Using Images for Authentication. In USENIX Security Symposium, 2000.
[20]
A. E. Dirik, N. Memon, and J.-C. Birget. Modeling User Choice in the PassPoints Graphical Password Scheme. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), 2007.
[21]
P. Dunphy and J. Yan. Do Background Images Improve "Draw a Secret" Graphical Passwords? In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 2007.
[22]
H. Gao, X. Guo, X. Chen, L. Wang, and X. Liu. YAGP: Yet Another Graphical Password Strategy. In Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), 2008.
[23]
P. Golle and D. Wagner. Cryptanalysis of a Cognitive Authentication Scheme (Extended Abstract). In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2007.
[24]
I. Jermyn, A. Mayer, F. Monrose, M. K. Reiter, and A. D. Rubin. The Design and Analysis of Graphical Passwords. In USENIX Security Symposium, 1999.
[25]
S. Komanduri, R. Shay, P. G. Kelley, M. L. Mazurek, L. Bauer, N. Christin, L. F. Cranor, and S. Egelman. Of Passwords and People: Measuring the Effect of Password-Composition Policies. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2011.
[26]
J. Massey. Guessing and Entropy. In IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), 1994.
[27]
R. Morris and K. Thompson. Password Security: A Case History. Communications of the ACM, 22(11):594--597, 1979.
[28]
A. Narayanan and V. Shmatikov. Fast Dictionary Attacks on Passwords Using Time-space Tradeoff. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 2005.
[29]
M. Orozco, B. Malek, M. Eid, and A. El Saddik. Haptic-based Sensible Graphical Password. Proceedings of Virtual Concept, 2006.
[30]
Passfaces Corporation. The Science Behind Passfaces. White paper, available at http://www.passfaces.com/enterprise/resources/white_papers.htm.
[31]
A. Salehi-Abari, J. Thorpe, and P. van Oorschot. On Purely Automated Attacks and Click-Based Graphical Passwords. In Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), 2008.
[32]
Solar Designer. John the Ripper. Online at http://www.openwall.com/john/.
[33]
L. Standing, J. Conezio, and R. N. Haber. Perception and Memory for Pictures: Single-trial Learning of 2500 Visual Stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19(2):73--74, 1970.
[34]
X. Suo. A Design and Analysis of Graphical Password. Master's thesis, College of Arts and Science, Georgia State University, 2006.
[35]
H. Tao and C. Adams. Pass-Go: A Proposal to Improve the Usability of Graphical Passwords. International Journal of Network Security, 7(2):273--292, 2008.
[36]
J. Thorpe and P. C. van Oorschot. Human-seeded Attacks and Exploiting Hot-spots in Graphical Passwords. In USENIX Security Symposium, 2007.
[37]
P. C. van Oorschot and J. Thorpe. Exploiting Predictability in Click-based Graphical Passwords. Journal of Computer Security, 19(4):669--702, 2011.
[38]
C. Varenhorst, M. V. Kleek, and L. Rudolph. Passdoodles: A Lightweight Authentication Method. Online at http://people.csail.mit.edu/emax/public_html/papers/varenhorst.pdf, 2004.
[39]
D. Weinshall. Cognitive Authentication Schemes Safe Against Spyware. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2006.
[40]
M. Weir, S. Aggarwal, B. de Medeiros, and B. Glodek. Password Cracking Using Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2009.
[41]
R. Weiss and A. De Luca. PassShapes: Utilizing Stroke Based Authentication to Increase Password Memorability. In Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI), 2008.
[42]
S. Wiedenbeck, J. Waters, J.-C. Birget, A. Brodskiy, and N. Memon. Authentication Using Graphical Passwords: Basic Results. In Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), 2005.
[43]
S. Wiedenbeck, J. Waters, J.-C. Birget, A. Brodskiy, and N. Memon. Authentication Using Graphical Passwords: Effects of Tolerance and Image Choice. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), 2005.
[44]
S. Wiedenbeck, J. Waters, J.-C. Birget, A. Brodskiy, and N. Memon. PassPoints: Design and Longitudinal Evaluation of a Graphical Password System. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(1--2):102--127, July 2005.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Quantifying the security of graphical passwords: the case of android unlock patterns

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CCS '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC conference on Computer & communications security
      November 2013
      1530 pages
      ISBN:9781450324779
      DOI:10.1145/2508859
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 November 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. android
      2. mobile security
      3. passwords

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CCS'13
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CCS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 530 submissions, 20%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,261 of 6,999 submissions, 18%

      Upcoming Conference

      CCS '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)71
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media