skip to main content
10.1145/2507065.2507087acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reducing complexity using an interaction room: an experience report

Published: 30 September 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Large-scale information system evolution projects often place high demands on both business and technical stakeholders' cognitive and communication skills. Especially if the need for evolution is not confined to a particular feature, but affects the whole value chain, finding dependencies and interrelationships between processes and components is challenging as it requires cross-departmental understanding. These issues can be even more challenging for management stakeholders who need to make high-level and far-reaching decisions on implementation strategies despite not being deeply involved in the technical details. One of the main problems in such projects is that the stakeholders who have expert knowledge typically have only little methodical experience, while the method experts lack the business experience. In this paper, we report on experiences and lessons from a large systems evolution project in a German insurance company, where we applied a new approach -- the so-called "Interaction Room" -- to improve stakeholders' understanding of the project's risks and dependencies in a pragmatic way, without overwhelming them with a heavyweight analysis method.

References

[1]
Mike Beedle and Ken Schwaber. Agile Software Development with Scrum. Prenctice Hall, 2002.
[2]
Barry Boehm. Value-based software engineering. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 28(2):4, 2003.
[3]
Matthias Book, Simon Grapenthin, and Volker Gruhn. Seeing the forest and the trees: Focusing team interaction on value and effort drivers. ACM SIGSOFT 2012 / FSE-20, New Ideas Track, art. no. 30. ACM, 2012.
[4]
Erran Carmel, Randall D. Whitaker, and Joey F. George. PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison. Commun. ACM 36(6):40--48. ACM, 1993.
[5]
The European Union. Regulation No 260/2012 - Technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:094:0022:0037:EN:PDF.
[6]
Gabriela Goldschmidt. The dialectics of sketching, Creativity Research Journal 4:123--143. Taylor & Francis, 1991.
[7]
William Pietri. An XP Team Room. http://www.scissor.com/resources/teamroom/, 2004.
[8]
Alfonso Rodriguez, Eduardo Fernandez-Medina, and Mario Piattini. Security requirement with a UML 2.0 profile. 1st Intl. Conf. on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2006), pp. 670--677. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
[9]
Alfonso Rodriguez, Eduardo Fernandez-Medina, and Mario Piattini. A BPMN Extension for the Modeling of Security Requirements in Business Processes. IEICE - Trans. Inf. Syst. E90-D(4), pp. 745--752. Oxford University Press, 2007.
[10]
Kawther Saeedi, Liping Zhao and Pedro R. Falcone Sampaio. Extending BPMN for Supporting Customer-Facing Service Quality Requirements. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Web Services (ICWS 2010), pp. 616--623. IEEE Computer Society, 2010.
[11]
Joe Zou and Christopher Pavlovski. Control case approach to record and model non-functional requirements. Inf. Syst. E-Business Management 6(1):49--67. Springer, 2008.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGDOC '13: Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on Design of communication
September 2013
200 pages
ISBN:9781450321310
DOI:10.1145/2507065
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 September 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cognitive load of methods
  2. complexity reduction
  3. heterogeneous teams
  4. interaction room
  5. software evolution

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGDOC'13
Sponsor:
SIGDOC'13: The 31th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
September 30 - October 1, 2013
North Carolina, Greenville, USA

Acceptance Rates

SIGDOC '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 21 of 38 submissions, 55%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media