research-article

How fast is fast enough?: a study of the effects of latency in direct-touch pointing tasks

Authors:

Daniel WigdorAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 2291 - 2300

https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481317

Published: 27 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Although advances in touchscreen technology have provided us with more precise devices, touchscreens are still laden with latency issues. Common commercial devices present with latency up to 125ms. Although these levels have been shown to impact users' perception of the responsiveness of the system [16], relatively little is known about the impact of latency on the performance of tasks common to direct-touch interfaces, such as direct physical manipulation.

In this paper, we study the effect of latency of a direct-touch pointing device on dragging tasks. Our tests show that user performance decreases as latency increases. We also find that user performance is more severely affected by latency when targets are smaller or farther away. We present a detailed analysis of users' coping mechanisms for latency, and present the results of a follow-up study demonstrating user perception of latency in the land-on phase of the dragging task.

References

[1]

Allison, R. S., Harris, L. R., Jenkin, M., Jasiobedzka, U., and Zacher, J. E. (2001). Tolerance of Temporal Delay in Virtual Environments. IEEE VR 2001, 247--254.

Digital Library

[2]

Anderson, G., Doherty, R., and Ganapathy, S. (2011). User Perception of Touch Screen Latency. Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theory, Methods, Tools, and Practice. 195--202.

[3]

Baudisch, P., Tan, D., Collomb, M., Robbins, D., Hinckley, K., Agrawala, M., Zhao, S., and Ramos, G. (2006). Phosphor: explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects. User interface software and technology (UIST '06). ACM, New York, USA, 169--178.

Digital Library

[4]

Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., and Robertson, G. G. (1991). The Information Visualizer: An Information Workspace. Proceedings of (CHI '91), 181--188.

Digital Library

[5]

Ellis, S. R., Breant, F., Manges, B., Jacoby, R., and Adelstein, B. D. (1997). Factors influencing operator interaction with virtual objects viewed via head-mounted see-through displays: viewing conditions and rendering latency. Virtual Reality 1997, 138--145.

Digital Library

[6]

Ellis, S. R., Young, M. J., Adelstein, B. D., and Ehrlich, S. M. (1999). Discrimination of changes of latency during voluntary hand movements of virtual objects. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1182--1186.

Digital Library

[7]

Fitts, P. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, volume 47, number 6, June 1954.

[8]

Holz, C. and Baudisch, P. (2011). Understanding touch. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2501--2510, 91--139.

Digital Library

[9]

ISO/DIS9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. International Standard, International Organization for Standardization, 2000.

[10]

Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method, Perception & Psychophysics 49, 227--229.

[11]

Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2): 467--477.

[12]

MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction.

[13]

MacKenzie, I. S., and Ware, C. (1993). Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. ACM CHI 1993.

Digital Library

[14]

Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Whitton, M. C., and Brooks, F. P. (2003). Effect of Latency on Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments. In IEEE VR 2003, 141--138.

Digital Library

[15]

Nelson, W. T. and Roe, Merry M. and Bolia, Robert S. and Morley, Rebecca M. (1998). Assessing Simulator Sickness in a See-Through HMD: Effects of Time Delay, Time on Task, and Task Complexity. Proceedings of the 2000 IMAGE Conference.

[16]

Ng, A., Lepinski, J., Wigdor, D., Sanders, S., Dietz, P., Designing for Low-Latency Direct-Touch Input. To appear in Proceedings of the ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM, New York, NY, USA. (in press).

Digital Library

[17]

Pavlovych, A., Gutwin, C. (2012). Assessing Target Acquisition and Tracking Performance for Moving Targets in the Presence of Latency and Jitter, Graphics Interface 2012, May 2012.

Digital Library

[18]

Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W. (2011), Target Following Performance in the Presence of Latency, Jitter, and Signal Dropouts, Graphics Interface 2011, 33--40, May 2011.

Digital Library

[19]

Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W. (2009). The Tradeoff between Spatial Jitter and Latency in Pointing Tasks, ACM Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems 2009, 187--196, July 2009.

Digital Library

[20]

So, R. H. Y., and Chung, G. K. M. (2005). Sensory Motor Responses in Virtual Environments: Studying the Effects of Image Latencies for Target-directed Hand Movement. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE-EMBS 2005, 5006--5008.

[21]

Soukoreff, W. and MacKenzie, I. (2004). Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 61, 6 (December 2004), 751--789.

Digital Library

[22]

Steed, A. (2008). A simple method for estimating the latency of interactive, real-time graphics simulations. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology (VRST '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 123--129.

Digital Library

[23]

Teather, R., Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W., and MacKenzie, S. (2009). Effects of tracking technology, latency, and spatial jitter on object movement, IEEE 3DUI 2009, 43--50.

Digital Library

[24]

Ware, C. and Balakrishnan, R. (1994). Reaching for objects in VR displays: lag and frame rate. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1, 4, 331--356.

Digital Library

[25]

Wigdor, D., Williams, S., Cronin, M., Levy, R., White, K., Mazeev, M., and Benko, H. (2009). Ripples: utilizing per-contact visualizations to improve user interaction with touch displays. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--12.

Digital Library

[26]

Wigdor, D., Wixon, D. (2011). Brave NUI World: Designing Natural User Interfaces for Touch and Gesture (1st ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.

Digital Library

[27]

Zhai, S. Characterizing computer input with Fitts' law parameters - The information and non-information aspects of pointing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(6), 791--809. December 2004.

Digital Library

[28]

Zhai, S., Kong, J., Ren, X., Speed-accuracy trade-off in Fitts' law tasks - On the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(6), December 2004.

Digital Library

Cited By

Beech SStanton Fraser DCorston-Petrie AGower AGilchrist I(2024)How Changes in the Mean Latency, Jitter Amplitude, and Jitter Frequency Impact Target Acquisition PerformanceACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/370198422:2(1-18)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701984
Schmid AAmbros MBogon JWimmer R(2024)Measuring the Just Noticeable Difference for Audio LatencyProceedings of the 19th International Audio Mostly Conference: Explorations in Sonic Cultures10.1145/3678299.3678331(325-331)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678299.3678331
Kim DWhitmire EBoldu RKienzle WBenko HKostakos VKay JHoang T(2024)SoundScroll: Robust Finger Slide Detection Using Friction Sound and Wrist-Worn MicrophonesProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676614(63-70)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3675095.3676614
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

How fast is fast enough?: a study of the effects of latency in direct-touch pointing tasks
1. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications
    1. Multimedia information systems

Recommendations

How Much Faster is Fast Enough?: User Perception of Latency & Latency Improvements in Direct and Indirect Touch
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This paper reports on two experiments designed to further our understanding of users' perception of latency in touch- based systems. The first experiment extends previous efforts to measure latency perception by reporting on a unified study in which ...
Designing for low-latency direct-touch input
UIST '12: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology

Software designed for direct-touch interfaces often utilize a metaphor of direct physical manipulation of pseudo "real-world" objects. However, current touch systems typically take 50-200ms to update the display in response to a physi-cal touch action. ...
Software-reduced touchscreen latency
MobileHCI '16: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services

Devices with touchscreens have an inherent latency. When a user's finger drags an object across the screen the object follows with a latency of around 100ms for current devices. Previous work showed that latencies down to 25ms reduce users' performance ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2013

3550 pages

ISBN:9781450318990

DOI:10.1145/2470654

General Chair:
Wendy E. Mackay
INRIA
,
Program Chairs:
Stephen Brewster
Glasgow University
,
Susanne Bødker
University of Aarhus

Copyright © 2013 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 April 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '13

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '13: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 27 - May 2, 2013

Paris, France

Acceptance Rates

CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 392 of 1,963 submissions, 20%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

130
Total Citations
View Citations
2,408
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)135
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Beech SStanton Fraser DCorston-Petrie AGower AGilchrist I(2024)How Changes in the Mean Latency, Jitter Amplitude, and Jitter Frequency Impact Target Acquisition PerformanceACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/370198422:2(1-18)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701984
Schmid AAmbros MBogon JWimmer R(2024)Measuring the Just Noticeable Difference for Audio LatencyProceedings of the 19th International Audio Mostly Conference: Explorations in Sonic Cultures10.1145/3678299.3678331(325-331)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678299.3678331
Kim DWhitmire EBoldu RKienzle WBenko HKostakos VKay JHoang T(2024)SoundScroll: Robust Finger Slide Detection Using Friction Sound and Wrist-Worn MicrophonesProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676614(63-70)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3675095.3676614
Richardson MBotros FShi YSnow BGuo PZhang LDong JVertanen KMa SWang R(2024)StegoType: Surface Typing from Egocentric CamerasAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686762(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672539.3686762
Richardson MBotros FShi YGuo PSnow BZhang LDong JVertanen KMa SWang R(2024)StegoType: Surface Typing from Egocentric CamerasProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676343(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676343
Lee JKim HKim MChun BLee YOkoshi TKo JLiKamWa R(2024)Maestro: The Analysis-Simulation Integrated Framework for Mixed RealityProceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services10.1145/3643832.3661891(99-112)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643832.3661891
Su YJin YWang ZShi YHuang DHan TYang X(2024)Laser-Powered Vibrotactile RenderingProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314497:4(1-25)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3631449
Yamanaka SStuerzlinger W(2024)The Effect of Latency on Movement Time in Path-steeringProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642316(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642316
Niwa KTsumugiwa TYokogawa R(2024)Effect of System Response Time on Brain Activity and Sense of AgencyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.344515812(126818-126828)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3445158
Ge YChen HWang YQu WZhang YLiu Y(2024)User perception of animation fluencyInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103257186:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103257
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents