skip to main content
10.1145/2370216.2370238acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ubicomp's colonial impulse

Published: 05 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Ubiquitous computing has a grand vision. Even the name of the area identifies its universalizing scope. In this, it follows in a long tradition of projects that attempt to create new models and paradigms that unite disparate, distributed elements into a large conceptual whole. We link concerns in ubiquitous computing into a colonial intellectual tradition and identify the problems that arise in consequence, explore the locatedness of innovation, and discuss strategies for decolonizing ubicomp's research methodology.

References

[1]
Abowd, G. and Mynatt, E. 2000. Charting Past, Present and Future Resarch in Ubiquitous Computing. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 29--5.
[2]
Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large: cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
[3]
Bardzell, S. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2010, 1301--1310.
[4]
Bowker, G. and Star, S. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. MIT Press.
[5]
Brockway, L. 1979. Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens. American Ethnologist, 6(3), 449--465.
[6]
Brynjarsdóttir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., and Sengers, P. 2012. Sustainably Unpersuaded: How Persuasion Narrows our Vision of Sustainability. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2012, 947--956.
[7]
Callon, M. 1986. Elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In John Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? 196--233. London, Routledge.
[8]
Christen, K. 2005. Gone Digital: Aboriginal Remix and the Cultural Commons. Intl. Journal of Cultural Property, 12, 315--345.
[9]
Cole, S. 2001. Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Harvard University Press.
[10]
Crosby A. 1997. The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society, 1250--1600. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Davis, S. and Kiczales, G. 2010. Registration-based Language Abstractions. Proc. Onward! 2010, 754--773.
[12]
Dey, A. K., Salber, D., and Abowd, G. D. 2001. A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context-Aware Applications. Human- Computer Interaction, 16(2--3), 97--166.
[13]
Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2006 (Montreal, Canada), 541--550.
[14]
Dourish, P. and Bell, G. 2011. Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[15]
Edwards, K. and Grinter, R. 2001. At Home with Ubiquitous Computing: Seven Challenges. Proc. Intl. Conf. Ubiquitous Computing Ubicomp 2001 (Atlanta, GA).
[16]
Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton.
[17]
Fabian, J. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object. Columbia University Press.
[18]
Ferguson, J. 1990. The anti-politics machine: "development," depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge University Press.
[19]
Hindus, D. 1999. The importance of homes in technology research. In N. Streitz, J. Siegel, V. Hartkopf, S. Konomi (Eds.), Cooperative Buildings - Integrating Information, Organizations, and Architecture. Proc. Second International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings (CoBuild'99). 199--207
[20]
Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. 2010. Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2010 (Atlanta, GA), 1311--1320.
[21]
Galloway, A. 2004. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. MIT Press.
[22]
Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1996. The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Wiley.
[23]
Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
[24]
Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575--599.
[25]
Lampland, M. and Star, S. 2008. Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life. Cornell University Press.
[26]
Latour, B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Harvard.
[27]
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton.
[28]
Li, T. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practive of Politics. Duke Univesity Press.
[29]
Miller, D. 2003. The Virtual Moment. Jnl. Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 57--75.
[30]
Mueller, M. 2010. Networks and States: The Global Politics of Network Governance. MIT Press.
[31]
Muller, M. J. 2003. Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI. In Jacko, Sears (eds.), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1051--1068.
[32]
Parsons, J. and Wand, Y. 2000. Emancipating Instances from the Tyranny of Classes in Information Modeling. ACM Trans. Database Systems, 25(2), 228--268.
[33]
Philip, K., Irani, L., and Dourish, P. 2012. Postcolonial Computing: A Tactical Survey. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 37(1), 3--29.
[34]
Rose, D. 2004. Reports from a Wild Country: Ethics for Decolonization.
[35]
Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[36]
Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.
[37]
Smith, B. C. 1996. On the Origin of Objects. MIT Press.
[38]
Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Dunedin, NZ: University of Otaga Press.
[39]
Suchman, L. 2002. Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 14, 2, 91--105
[40]
Suchman, L. 2011. Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 1--18.
[41]
Van House, N. 2011. Feminist HCI Meets Facebook: Performativity and Social Networking Sites. Interacting with Computers, 23, 422--429.
[42]
Verran H. 2001. Science and an African Logic. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
[43]
Weiser, M. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, 256 (30), 94--104.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Ubicomp's colonial impulse

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
    September 2012
    1268 pages
    ISBN:9781450312240
    DOI:10.1145/2370216
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 September 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design rhetoric
    2. discourse
    3. partiality
    4. postcolonialism
    5. research practice

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    Ubicomp '12
    Ubicomp '12: The 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
    September 5 - 8, 2012
    Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh

    Acceptance Rates

    UbiComp '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 301 submissions, 19%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)151
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media