skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208671acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A longitudinal study of Facebook, LinkedIn, & Twitter use

Published: 05 May 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We conducted four annual comprehensive surveys of social networking at Microsoft between 2008 and 2011. We are interested in how employees use these tools and whether they consider then useful for organizational communication and information-gathering. Our study is longitudinal and based on random sampling. Between 2008 and 2011, social networking went from being a niche activity to being very widely and heavily used. Growth in use and acceptance was not uniform, with differences based on gender, age and level (individual contributor vs. manager). Behaviors and concerns changed, with some showing signs of leveling off.

References

[1]
Burke, M., Kraut, R. & Marlow, C. 2011. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Proc. CHI 2011, 571--580. ACM.
[2]
Carr, A. July 8, 2010. Twitter now the world's fastest growing search engine. Fast Company. http://www.fastcompany.com/1667617/twitterisworlds-fastest-growing-search-engine
[3]
DiMicco, J. M., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B. & Muller, M. 2008. Motivations for social networking at work. Proc. CSCW 2008, 711--720. ACM.
[4]
Efimova, L. & Grudin, J. 2008. Crossing boundaries: Digital literacy in enterprises. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (eds.). Digital Literacies: Concepts, policies, practices. New York: Peter Lang.
[5]
Ehrlich, K. & Shami, N. S. 2010. Microblogging inside and outside the workplace. Proc. ICWSM 2010. IEEE.
[6]
Finley, K. 2010. To block or not to block Facebook and social media in the workplace. ReadWrite Enterprise. http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2010/07/cisco-security.php
[7]
Gaudin. S. July 22, 2009. Facebook use cuts productivity at work. Computerworld. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135795
[8]
Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., Masli, M., Daly, E. & Millen, D. R. 2011. An open, social microcalendar for the enterprise: Timely? Proc. CHI 2011, 247--256.
[9]
Half, R. 2009. Technology. Whistle - but don't tweet while you work. http://rht.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=131&item=790
[10]
Helft, M. July 7, 2010. Facebook makes headway around the world. New York Times.
[11]
Hesse, M. Status symbol: Facebook Is ubiquitous, but is it really an antisocial network? Washington Post, July 23, 2010.
[12]
Leahul, D. 2009. Twitter users abandon website after one month. BrandRepublic. http://www.brandrepublic.com/News/901752
[13]
Morris, M. R., Teevan, J. & Panovich, K. A 2010. Comparison of information seeking using search engines and social networks. Proc. IWCSM 2010. IEEE.
[14]
Naaman, M., Boase, J. & Lai, C. H. 2010. Is it really all about me? Message content in social awareness streams. Proc. CSCW 2010, 189--192. ACM.
[15]
Romeo, P. Aug. 13, 2009 & Aug. 4, 2010. Personal communications.
[16]
Skeels, M. & Grudin, J. 2009. When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. Proc. GROUP 2009, 95--104.
[17]
Sophos. August 21, 2007. 50% of employees blocked from accessing Facebook at work. http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2007/08/block-facebook.html
[18]
Turner, T., Qvarfordt, P., Biehl, J. Y., Golovchinsky, G., & Back, M. 2010. Exploring the workplace communication ecology. Proc. CHI 2010, 841--850.
[19]
Wu, A., DiMicco, J. & Millen, D. R. 2010. Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site. Proc. CHI 2010, 1955--1964.
[20]
Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Cody, J. & Wu, Y. 2010. A case study of micro-blogging in the enterprise: Use, value, and related issues. Proc. CHI 2010, 123--132. ACM.
[21]
Zhao, D. & Rosson, M. B. 2009. How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. Proc. GROUP 2009, 243--252. ACM.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A longitudinal study of Facebook, LinkedIn, & Twitter use

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2012
    3276 pages
    ISBN:9781450310154
    DOI:10.1145/2207676
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 May 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. enterprise
    2. facebook
    3. linkedin
    4. social networking
    5. twitter

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)79
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
    Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media