skip to main content
10.1145/2124295.2124374acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The life and death of online groups: predicting group growth and longevity

Published: 08 February 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We pose a fundamental question in understanding how to identify and design successful communities: What factors predict whether a community will grow and survive in the long term? Social scientists have addressed this question extensively by analyzing offline groups which endeavor to attract new members, such as social movements, finding that new individuals are influenced strongly by their ties to members of the group. As a result, prior work on the growth of communities has treated growth primarily as a diffusion processes, leading to findings about group evolution which can be difficult to explain. The proliferation of online social networks and communities, however, has created new opportunities to study, at a large scale and with very fine resolution, the mechanisms which lead to the formation, growth, and demise of online groups.
In this paper, we analyze data from several thousand online social networks built on the Ning platform with the goal of understanding the factors contributing to the growth and longevity of groups within these networks. Specifically, we investigate the role that two types of growth (growth through diffusion and growth by other means) play during a group's formative stages from the perspectives of both the individual member and the group. Applying these insights to a population of groups of different ages and sizes, we build a model to classify groups which will grow rapidly over the short-term and long-term. Our model achieves over 79% accuracy in predicting group growth over the following two months and over 78% accuracy in predictions over the following two years. We utilize a similar approach to predict which groups will die within a year. The results of our combined analysis provide insight into how both early non-diffusion growth and a complex set of network constraints appear to contribute to the initial and continued growth and success of groups within social networks. Finally we discuss implications of this work for the design, maintenance, and analysis of online communities.

References

[1]
S. Aral, L. Muchnik, and A. Sundararajan. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51):21544--21549, Dec. 2009.
[2]
L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '06, pages 44--54, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[3]
R. Burt. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. Social capital: Theory and research, pages 31--56, 2001.
[4]
B. Butler. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: The internal dynamics of networked social structures. Information Systems Research, 12(4):346--362, 2001.
[5]
D. Centola. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science (New York, N.Y.), 329(5996):1194--1197, Sept. 2010.
[6]
D. Centola and M. Macy. Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3):702--734, Nov. 2007.
[7]
N. Ducheneaut, N. Yee, E. Nickell, and R. J. Moore. The life and death of online gaming communities: a look at guilds in world of warcraft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '07, pages 839--848, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[8]
R. Dunbar. Coevolution of neocortex size, group size, and language in human. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4):681--735, 1993.
[9]
R. M. Fernandez and D. McAdam. Social networks and social movements: Multiorganizational fields and recruitment to mississippi freedom summer. Sociological Forum, 3:357--382, 1988. 10.1007/BF01116431.
[10]
M. Givan and M. E. J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. PNAS, 99(12):7821--7826, June 2002.
[11]
M. Gomez Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and A. Krause. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '10, pages 1019--1028, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[12]
M. Granovetter. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6):1360--1380, 1973.
[13]
P. Holme. Core-periphery organization of complex networks. Physical Review E, 72(046111), 2005.
[14]
Q. Jones, G. Ravid, and S. Rafaeli. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces. Information Systems Research, 15(2):194--210, 2004.
[15]
J. Leskovec, K. J. Lang, A. Dasgupta, and M. W. Mahoney. Statistical properties of community structure in large social and information networks. In Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '08, pages 695--704, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
[16]
G. Marwell and P. Oliver. The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[17]
D. McAdam and R. Paulsen. Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. In D. McAdam and D. A. Snow, editors, Social Movements: Readings on Their Emergence, Mobilization, and Dynamics, pages 145--157. Roxbury Publishing Co., 2007.
[18]
S. Milgram. The small-world problem. Psychology Today, pages 60--67, 1967.
[19]
A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, IMC '07, pages 29--42, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[20]
E. D. Mynatt, A. Adler, M. Ito, and V. L. O'Day. Design for network communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '97, pages 210--217, New York, NY, USA, 1997. ACM.
[21]
M. E. J. Newman. Detecting community structure in networks. Eur. Phys. J. B, 38:321--330, 2004.
[22]
J. E. Oliver. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Political Science Review, 94(2):361--373, 2000.
[23]
D. Prentice, D. Miller, and J. Lightdale. Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5):484--493, 1994.
[24]
Y. Ren, R. Kraut, and S. Kiesler. Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities. Organization Studies, 28(3):377--408, Mar. 2007.
[25]
C. T. Reviews. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Cram 101. Academic Internet Publishers Incorporated, 2007.
[26]
E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. Free Press, 5th edition, 2003.
[27]
F. Salem and R. Mourtada. Civil movements: The impact of facebook and twitter. The Arab Social Media Report, 1(2), 2011.
[28]
D. A. Snow, L. A. Zurcher, and S. Ekland-Olson. Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment. In D. McAdam and D. A. Snow, editors, Social Movements: Readings on Their Emergence, Mobilization, and Dynamics, pages 122--131. Roxbury Publishing Co., 2007.
[29]
R. Stark and W. S. Bainbridge. Networks of faith: Interpersonal bonds and recruitment to cults and sects. American Journal of Sociology, 85:1376--1395, 1980.
[30]
J. Waddington and C. Whitston. Why do people join unions in a period of membership decline? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 35(4):515--546, 1997.
[31]
E. Zheleva, H. Sharara, and L. Getoor. Co-evolution of social and affiliation networks. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '09, pages 1007--1016, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The life and death of online groups: predicting group growth and longevity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSDM '12: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
    February 2012
    792 pages
    ISBN:9781450307475
    DOI:10.1145/2124295
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 February 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. group formation
    2. information diffusion
    3. online communities
    4. social networks

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)74
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media