skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979138acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Grips and gestures on a multi-touch pen

Published: 07 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

This paper explores the interaction possibilities enabled when the barrel of a digital pen is augmented with a multi-touch sensor. We present a novel multi-touch pen (MTPen) prototype and discuss its alternate uses beyond those of a standard stylus, such as allowing new touch gestures to be performed using the index finger or thumb and detecting how users grip the device as a mechanism for mode switching. We also discuss the hardware and software implementation challenges in realizing our prototype, and showcase how one can combine different grips (tripod, relaxed tripod, sketch, wrap) and gestures (swipe and double tap) to enable new interaction techniques with the MTPen in a prototype drawing application. One specific aim is the elimination of some of the comfort problems associated with existing auxiliary controls on digital pens. Mechanical controls such as barrel buttons and barrel scroll wheels work best in only a few specific hand grips and pen rotations. Comparatively, our gestures can be successfully and comfortably performed regardless of the rotation of the pen or how the user grips it, offering greater flexibility in use. We describe a formal evaluation comparing MTPen gestures against the use of a barrel button for mode switching. This study shows that both swipe and double tap gestures are comparable in performance to commonly employed barrel buttons without its disadvantages.

Supplementary Material

WMV File (paper941.wmv)

References

[1]
1. Apitz, G. and F. Guimbretiere. CrossY: A Crossing-Base.
[2]
Drawing Application. In Proc. UIST'04. ACM Press. p. 3-1.
[3]
2. Baudisch, P. and G. Chu. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proc. CHI'09. ACM Press. p. 1923--193.
[4]
3. Benko, H. Beyond flat surface computing: challenges o.
[5]
depth-aware and curved interfaces. In Proc. Multimedia'09.
[6]
ACM Press. p. 935--94.
[7]
4. Bi, X., T. Moscovich, G. Ramos, R. Balakrishnan, and K.
[8]
Hinckley. An exploration of pen rolling for pen-base.
[9]
interaction. In Proc. UIST'08. ACM Press. p. 191--20.
[10]
5. Brandl, P., C. Forlines, D. Wigdor, M. Haller, and C. Shen. Combining and Measuring the Benefits of Bimanual Pen. In Proc. AVI'08. ACM Press. p. 154--16.
[11]
6. Card, S.K., T.P. Moran, and A. Newell, The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems, in Communications of the ACM. 1980. p. 396 - 410.
[12]
7. Dillon, R.F., J.D. Edey, and J.W. Tombaugh. Measuring th.
[13]
true cost of command selection: techniques and results. I.
[14]
Proc. CHI'90. ACM Press Press. p. 19 - 2.
[15]
8. Grossman, T., K. Hinckley, P. Baudisch, M. Agrawala, and R. Balakrishnan. Hover widgets: using the tracking state t.
[16]
extend the capabilities of pen-operated devices. In Proc.
[17]
CHI'06. ACM Press. p. 861--87.
[18]
9. Guimbretiere, F., Fluid Interaction for High Resolution Wall size Displays. 2002, Stanford University. p. 157.
[19]
10. Hinckley, K., P. Baudisch, and F. Guimbretière. Design and Analysis of Delimiters for Selection-Action Pen Gestur.
[20]
Phrases in Scriboli. In Proc. CHI'05. ACM Press. p. 451--46.
[21]
11. Hinckley, K. and M. Sinclair. Touch-sensing input devices. In Proc. CHI'99. ACM Press. p. 223--23.
[22]
12. Hinckley, K., K. Yatani, M. Pahud, N. Coddington, J.
[23]
Rodenhouse, A. Wilson, H. Benko, and B. Buxton. Pen.
[24]
touch = new tools. In Proc. UIST'10. ACM Press. p. 27--3.
[25]
13. Jones, L.A. and S.J. Lederman, Human hand function. 2006: Oxford University.
[26]
14. Kim, K.-E., W. Chang, S.-J. Cho, J. Shim, H. Lee, J. Park, Y. Lee, and S. Kim. Hand grip pattern recognition for mobile user interfaces. In Proc. Innovative applications of artificial intelligence. AAAI Press. p. 1789--179.
[27]
15. Li, Y., K. Hinckley, Z. Guan, and J.A. Landay. Experimental analysis of mode switching techniques in pen-based user interfaces. In Proc. CHI'05. ACM Press. p. 461--47.
[28]
16. LiveScribe, http://www.livescribe.com.
[29]
17. Matsushita, N. and J. Rekimoto, HoloWall: designing.
[30]
finger, hand, body, and object sensitive wall, in UIST'97.
[31]
1997, ACM: Banff, Alberta, Canada. p. 209--210.
[32]
18. Napier, J.R., The prehensile movements of the human hand. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 38(B): p. 902--904.
[33]
19. Ramos, G., M. Boulos, and R. Balakrishnan. Pressur.
[34]
Widgets. In Proc. CHI'04. ACM Press. p. 527 - 53.
[35]
20. Ravindra S. Goonetilleke, Errol R.Hoffmann, and A.
[36]
Luximon, Effects of pen design on drawing and writin.
[37]
performance. Applied Ergonomics 2009: p. 292--301.
[38]
21. Rosenberg, I. and K. Perlin, The UnMousePad: a.
[39]
interpolating multi-touch force-sensing input pad, i.
[40]
SIGGRAPH 2009. 2009, ACM. p. 1--9.
[41]
22. Subramanian, S., D. Aliakseyeu, A. Lucero. Multi-laye.
[42]
interaction for digital tables. In Proc. UIST'06. p. 269--27.
[43]
23. Suzuki, Y., K. Misue, and J. Tanaka. Stylus Enhancement to Enrich Interaction with Computers. In Proc. HCII'07. LNC.
[44]
4551 Press. p. 133--14.
[45]
24. Taylor, B.T. and J. V. Michael Bove. Graspables: grasp recognition as a user interface. In Proc. CHI'09. p. 917--92.
[46]
25. Tian, F., L. Xu, H. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Liu, V. Setlur, and G. Dai. Tilt menu: using the 3D orientation information of pen devices to extend the selection capability of pen-based user interfaces. In Proc. CHI'08. ACM Press. p. 1371--138.
[47]
26. Villar, N., S. Izadi, D. Rosenfeld, H. Benko, J. Helmes, J. Westhues, S. Hodges, E. Ofek, A. Butler, X. Cao, and B.
[48]
Chen. Mouse 2.0: multi-touch meets the mouse. In Proc.
[49]
UIST'09. ACM Press. p. 33--4.
[50]
27. Wacom Technologies, http://www.wacom.com/index.htm.
[51]
28. Wang, F. and X. Ren. Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction. In Proc. CHI'09. ACM Press. p. 1063--107.
[52]
29. Wimmer, R. and S. Boring. HandSense: discriminatin.
[53]
different ways of grasping and holding a tangible use.
[54]
interface. In Proc. TEI'09. ACM Press. p. 359--36.
[55]
30. Wu, F.-G. and S. Luo, Design and evaluation approach fo.
[56]
increasing stability and performance of touch pens in scree.
[57]
handwriting tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 2006. 37: p. 319--327.
[58]
31. Zeleznik, R., A. Bragdon, F. Adeputra, and H.-S. Ko. Hands-on-math: a page-based multi-touch and pen desktop fo.
[59]
technical work and problem solving. In Proc. UIST'10. AC.
[60]
Press. p. 17--26.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Grips and gestures on a multi-touch pen
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2011
    3530 pages
    ISBN:9781450302289
    DOI:10.1145/1978942
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 May 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. digital pen
    2. digital stylus
    3. grip detection
    4. multi-touch

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '11
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 410 of 1,532 submissions, 27%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)133
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media