skip to main content
10.1145/1376616.1376675acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient aggregation for graph summarization

Published: 09 June 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Graphs are widely used to model real world objects and their relationships, and large graph datasets are common in many application domains. To understand the underlying characteristics of large graphs, graph summarization techniques are critical. However, existing graph summarization methods are mostly statistical (studying statistics such as degree distributions, hop-plots and clustering coefficients). These statistical methods are very useful, but the resolutions of the summaries are hard to control.
In this paper, we introduce two database-style operations to summarize graphs. Like the OLAP-style aggregation methods that allow users to drill-down or roll-up to control the resolution of summarization, our methods provide an analogous functionality for large graph datasets. The first operation, called SNAP, produces a summary graph by grouping nodes based on user-selected node attributes and relationships. The second operation, called k-SNAP, further allows users to control the resolutions of summaries and provides the "drill-down" and "roll-up" abilities to navigate through summaries with different resolutions. We propose an efficient algorithm to evaluate the SNAP operation. In addition, we prove that the k-SNAP computation is NP-complete. We propose two heuristic methods to approximate the k-SNAP results. Through extensive experiments on a variety of real and synthetic datasets, we demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed methods.

References

[1]
L. A. Adamic and N. Glance. The political blogosphere and the 2004 US Election: Divided they blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, pages 36--43, 2005.
[2]
D. A. Bader and K. Madduri. GTgraph: A suite of synthetic graph generators. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~kamesh/GTgraph.
[3]
G. Battista, P. Eades, R. Tamassia, and I. Tollis. Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Prentice Hall, 1999.
[4]
D. K. Blandford, G. E. Blelloch, and I. A. Kash. Compact representations of separable graphs. In Proceedings of SODA'03, pages 679--688, 2003.
[5]
P. Boldi and S. Vigna. The WebGraph framework I: Compression techniques. In Proceedings of WWW'04, pages 595--602, 2004.
[6]
D. Chakrabarti and C. Faloutsos. Graph mining: Laws, generators, and algorithms. ACM Comput. Surv., 38(1), 2006.
[7]
D. Chakrabarti, C. Faloutsos, and Y. Zhan. Visualization of large networks with min-cut plots, A-plots and R-MAT. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 65(5):434--445, 2007.
[8]
D. Chakrabarti, Y. Zhan, and C. Faloutsos. R-MAT: A recursive model for graph mining. In Proceedings of 4th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2004.
[9]
D. G. Corneil and C. C. Gotlieb. An efficient algorithm for graph isomorphism. J. ACM, 17(1):51--64, 1970.
[10]
I. Herman, G. Melançon, and M. S. Marshall. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 6(1):24--43, 2000.
[11]
J. Huan, W. Wang, J. Prins, and J. Yang. SPIN: Mining maximal frequent subgraphs from graph databases. In Proceedings of KDD'04, pages 581--586, 2004.
[12]
M. Ley. DBLP Bibliography. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/ ley/db/.
[13]
M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45:167--256, 2003.
[14]
M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E, 69:026113, 2004.
[15]
S. Raghavan and H. Garcia-Molina. Representing Web graphs. In Proceedings of ICDE'03, pages 405--416, 2003.
[16]
F. S. Roberts and L. Sheng. How hard is it to determine if a graph has a 2-role assignment? Networks, 37(2):67--73, 2001.
[17]
J. F. Rodrigues, A. J. M. Traina, C. Faloutsos, and C. Traina Jr. SuperGraph visualization. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, pages 227--234, 2006.
[18]
J. Sun, Y. Xie, H. Zhang, and C. Faloutsos. Less is more: Sparse graph mining with compact matrix decomposition. Stat. Anal. Data Min., 1(1):6--22, 2008.
[19]
W. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Zhu, B. Shi, J. Pei, X. Yan, and J. Han. GraphMiner: A structural pattern-mining system for large disk-based graph databases and its applications. In Proceedings of SIGMOD'05, pages 879--881, 2005.
[20]
T. Washio and H. Motoda. State of the art of graph-based data mining. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 5(1):59--68, 2003.
[21]
D. R. White and K. P. Reitz. Graph and semigroup homomorphisms on semigroups of relations. Social Networks, 5(2):193--234, 1983.
[22]
X. Xu, N. Yuruk, Z. Feng, and T. A. J. Schweiger. SCAN: A structural clustering algorithm for networks. In Proceedings of KDD'07, pages 824--833, 2007.
[23]
X. Yan and J. Han. gSpan: Graph-based substructure pattern mining. In Proceedings of ICDM'02, pages 721--724, 2002.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGMOD '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
June 2008
1396 pages
ISBN:9781605581026
DOI:10.1145/1376616
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 June 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. aggregation
  2. graphs
  3. social networks
  4. summarization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGMOD/PODS '08
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)99
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media