skip to main content
research-article

Minimizing Movement for Target Coverage and Network Connectivity in Mobile Sensor Networks

Published: 01 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Coverage of interest points and network connectivity are two main challenging and practically important issues of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Although many studies have exploited the mobility of sensors to improve the quality of coverage and connectivity, little attention has been paid to the minimization of sensors' movement, which often consumes the majority of the limited energy of sensors and thus shortens the network lifetime significantly. To fill in this gap, this paper addresses the challenges of the Mobile Sensor Deployment (MSD) problem and investigates how to deploy mobile sensors with minimum movement to form a WSN that provides both target coverage and network connectivity. To this end, the MSD problem is decomposed into two sub-problems: the Target COVerage (TCOV) problem and the Network CONnectivity (NCON) problem. We then solve TCOV and NCON one by one and combine their solutions to address the MSD problem. The NP-hardness of TCOV is proved. For a special case of TCOV where targets disperse from each other farther than double of the coverage radius, an exact algorithm based on the Hungarian method is proposed to find the optimal solution. For general cases of TCOV, two heuristic algorithms, i.e., the Basic algorithm based on clique partition and the TV-Greedy algorithm based on Voronoi partition of the deployment region, are proposed to reduce the total movement distance of sensors. For NCON, an efficient solution based on the Steiner minimum tree with constrained edge length is proposed. The combination of the solutions to TCOV and NCON, as demonstrated by extensive simulation experiments, offers a promising solution to the original MSD problem that balances the load of different sensors and prolongs the network lifetime consequently.

References

[1]
R. Huang, W.-Z. Song, M. Xu, N. Peterson, B. Shirazi, and R. LaHusen, “ Real-world sensor network for long-term volcano monitoring: Design and findings,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 321 –329, Feb. 2012.
[2]
G. Blumrosen, B. Hod, T. Anker, D. Dolev, and B. Rubinsky, “Enhancing rssi-based tracking accuracy in wireless sensor networks,” ACM Trans. Sens. Netw., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–29, 2013.
[3]
M. Lu, J. Wu, M. Cardei, and M. Li, “Energy-efficient connected coverage of discrete targets in wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. of 3rd Int. Conf. Netw. and Mobile Comput. , pp. 43–52, 2005.
[4]
B. Liu, O. Dousse, P. Nain, and D. Towsley, “Dynamic coverage of mobile sensor networks, ” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 301–311, Feb. 2013.
[5]
G. Wang, M. Z. A. Bhuiyan, J. Cao, and J. Wu, “Detecting movements of a target using face tracking in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 939-949, 2014.
[6]
R. Tan, G. Xing, J. Wang, and H. C. So, “Exploiting reactive mobility for collaborative target detection in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 317–332, Mar. 2010.
[7]
Z. Fu and K. You, “ Optimal mobile sensor scheduling for a guaranteed coverage ratio in hybrid wireless sensor networks, ” Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., vol. 2013, article no. 740841, pp 1–11, 2013.
[8]
R. C. Luo and O. Chen, “Mobile sensor node deployment and asynchronous power management for wireless sensor networks, ” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 2377–2385, May 2012.
[9]
A. A. Somasundara, A. Ramamoorthy, and M. B. Srivastava, “ Mobile element scheduling with dynamic deadlines,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 395–410, Apr. 2007.
[10]
T. lin Chin, P. Ramanathan, K. K. Saluja, and K. Ching Wang, “Exposure for collaborative detection using mobile sensor networks,” in Proc. IEEE 2rd Int. Conf. Mobile Adhoc Sen. Syst. , 2005, pp. 743–750.
[11]
N. Bisnik, A. A. Abouzeid, and V. Isler, “ Stochastic event capture using mobile sensors subject to a quality metric,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 676–692, Aug. 2007.
[12]
L. He, J. Pan, and J. Xu, “A progressive approach to reducing data collection latency in wireless sensor networks with mobile elements,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1308– 1320, Jul. 2013.
[13]
X.-Y. Liu, K.-L. Wu, Y. Zhu, L. Kong, and M.-Y. Wu, “Mobility increases the surface coverage of distributed sensor networks, ” Comput. Netw., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 2348–2363, 2013.
[14]
J. Luo, D. Wang, and Q. Zhang, “Double mobility: Coverage of the sea surface with mobile sensor networks,” ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 52–55, 2009.
[15]
S. He, J. Chen, X. Li, X. Shen, and Y. Sun, “Cost-effective barrier coverage by mobile sensor networks,” in Proc. IEEE 31st Annu. Int. Conf. Comput. Commun., 2012, pp. 819–827.
[16]
G. Wang, M. J. Irwin, P. Berman, H. Fu, and T. L. Porta, “Optimizing sensor movement planning for energy efficiency, ” in Proc. Int. Symp. Low Power Electron. Des., 2005, pp. 215–220.
[17]
H. Mahboubi, K. Moezzi, A. G. Aghdam, and K. Sayrafian-Pour, “Self-deployment algorithms for field coverage in a network of nonidentical mobile sensors,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., 2011, pp. 1–6.
[18]
H. Mahboubi, K. Moezzi, A. G. Aghdam, and K. S. Pour, “Distributed deployment algorithms for efficient coverage in a network of mobile sensors with nonidentical sensing capabilities, ” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.. 2014.
[19]
Y. Yang, M. I. Fonoage, and M. Cardei, “ Improving network lifetime with mobile wireless sensor networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 409–419, 2010.
[20]
Y.-C. Wang and Y.-C. Tseng, “Distributed deployment schemes for mobile wireless sensor networks to ensure multilevel coverage,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1280–1294, Sep. 2008.
[21]
W. Luo, J. Wang, J. Guo, and J. Chen, “Parameterized complexity of max-lifetime target coverage in wireless sensor networks,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 518, pp. 32–41, 2014.
[22]
J. Wang, W. Luo, Q. Feng, and J. Guo, “Parameterized complexity of min-power multicast problems in wireless ad hoc networks,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 508, pp. 16–25, 2013.
[23]
E. Mathews and C. Mathew, “Deployment of mobile routers ensuring coverage and connectivity,” Int. J. Comput. Netw. Commun., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 175–191, 2012.
[24]
S. Zhou, M.-Y. Wu, and W. Shu, “Finding optimal placements for mobile sensors: wireless sensor network topology adjustment,” in Proc. IEEE 6th Circuits Syst. Symp. Emerging Technol.: Frontiers Mobile Wireless Commun., 2004, vol. 2, pp. 529–532.
[25]
I. E. Korbi and S. Zeadally, “Energy-aware sensor node relocation in mobile sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 247–265, 2014.
[26]
X. Bai, S. Kumar, D. Xuan, Z. Yun, and T. H. Lai, “Deploying wireless sensors to achieve both coverage and connectivity,” in Proc. 7th ACM Int. Symp. Mobile Ad Hoc Netw. Comput., 2006, pp. 131– 142.
[27]
M. van de Vel, Theory of Convex Structures. Amsterdam, The Netherlands : North Holland, 1993, vol. 50.
[28]
R. M. Karp, Reducibility among Combinatorial Problems. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 1972.
[29]
E. L. Lawler, “The quadratic assignment problem,” Manage. Sci., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 586–599, 1963.
[30]
Z. Liao, S. Zhang, J. Cao, W. Wang, and J. Wang, “Minimizing movement for target coverage in mobile sensor networks, ” in Proc. 32nd Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Syst., 2012, pp. 194–200.
[31]
H. W. Kuhn, “The hungarian method for the assignment problem, ” Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 1/2, pp. 83 –97, 1955.
[32]
R. Cole, “Parallel merge sort,” SIAM J. Comput., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 770–785, 1988.
[33]
Z. Liao, J. Wang, S. Zhang, and J. Cao, “Clique partition based relay placement in wimax mesh networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf., 2012, pp. 2566–2571.
[34]
M. de Berg, M. van Kreveld, M. Overmars, and O. C. Schwarzkopf, Computational Geometry. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2000.
[35]
M. I. Shamos, “Geometric complexity,” in Proc. 7th Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput., 1975, pp. 224–233.
[36]
M. Dorigo and M. Birattari, “Ant colony optimization,” in Encyclopedia of Machine Learning , C. Sammut and G. I. Webb, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2010, pp. 36–39.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Minimizing Movement for Target Coverage and Network Connectivity in Mobile Sensor Networks
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Information & Contributors

              Information

              Published In

              cover image IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
              IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems  Volume 26, Issue 7
              July 2015
              286 pages

              Publisher

              IEEE Press

              Publication History

              Published: 01 July 2015

              Author Tags

              1. energy consumption
              2. Wireless sensor networks
              3. target coverage
              4. connectivity
              5. mobile sensors

              Qualifiers

              • Research-article

              Contributors

              Other Metrics

              Bibliometrics & Citations

              Bibliometrics

              Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
              Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

              Other Metrics

              Citations

              Cited By

              View all

              View Options

              View options

              Figures

              Tables

              Media

              Share

              Share

              Share this Publication link

              Share on social media