Microsoft Tells Court That Without FRAND, Standard-Setting Would Be "Blatant Antitrust Violation"
Abstract
Recommendations
Federal Appeals Court Sees Potential Antitrust Violation in Standardization Skullduggery
The US court of appeals in Philadelphia recently ruled that intentional deception of a private standard-setting organization, when used to acquire or maintain monopoly power, can be an illegal monopolistic practice. The ruling reversed a trial court ...
Standardization Skullduggery Never Ends: Apple v. Motorola
In February 2012, Apple sued Motorola to block the latter's alleged standardization skullduggery of the 3G/UMTS technology. This column examines the charges and explores the issues of patent rights; standards-essential patents; and what are fair, ...
New Jersey federal court holds Qualcomm's unFRANDly acts no antitrust violation
A New Jersey federal district court recently threw out Broadcom's suit against Qualcomm, in which Broadcom charged that Qualcomm'sreneging on promises to make its technology available to standard adopters on "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society Press
Washington, DC, United States
Publication History
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0