skip to main content
research-article

Microsoft Tells Court That Without FRAND, Standard-Setting Would Be "Blatant Antitrust Violation"

Published: 01 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

This column discusses Microsoft's attempt to argue the necessity of fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) licensing for patents essential to practicing a standard. In regard to a case under appeal in which Apple and Motorola sued each other over several Moto standards-essential patents (SEPs), Microsoft argues that standardization is anticompetitive unless owners of SEPs promise to license on FRAND terms and keep their promises. Otherwise, the SEP owners will hold the industry up for exorbitant fees.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image IEEE Micro
IEEE Micro  Volume 33, Issue 4
July 2013
75 pages

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society Press

Washington, DC, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2013

Author Tags

  1. Antitrust legislation
  2. Apple
  3. Business
  4. FRAND
  5. Licenses
  6. Microsoft
  7. Motorola
  8. Patents
  9. SEP
  10. Telecommunication standards
  11. antitrust
  12. standard-setting
  13. standards-essential patent

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media