Does Intentional Psychology Need Vindicating by Cognitive Science?
Pages 347 - 377
Abstract
I argue that intentional psychology does not stand in need of vindication by a lower-level implementation theory from cognitive science, in particular the representational theory of mind (RTM), as most famously Jerry Fodor has argued. The stance of the paper is novel in that I claim this holds even if one, in line with Fodor, views intentional psychology as an empirical theory, and its theoretical posits as as real as those of other sciences. I consider four metaphysical arguments for the idea that intentional psychological states, such as beliefs, must be seen as requiring in-the-head mental representations for us to be able to understand their characteristic causal powers and argue that none of them validly generate their desired conclusions. I go on to argue that RTM, or some computational version thereof, is not motivated by appeal to the nature of cognitive science research either. I conclude that intentional psychology, though an empirical theory, is autonomous from details of lower level mechanism in a way that renders RTM unwarranted.
References
[1]
Baker, L. (1991), 'Has content been naturalised?', in B. Loewer and G. Rey, eds., Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell.
[2]
Baron-Cohen, S. (1985), Mindblindness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[3]
Bermúdez, J. (1995), 'Non-conceptual content: from perceptual experience to subpersonal computational states', Mind and Language 10, 203-218.
[4]
Boghossian, P. (1991), 'Naturalising content', in B. Loewer and G. Rey, eds., Meaning in Mind. Fodor and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell.
[5]
Botterill, G. and Carruthers, P. (1999), The Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[6]
Child, W. (1992), 'Vision and experience: the causal theory and the disjunctive conception', The Philosophical Quarterly 42, pp. 297-316.
[7]
Chomsky, N. (1959), 'Review of Skinner's Verbal Behaviour', Language 35, pp. 26-58.
[8]
Chomsky, N. (1986), Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
[9]
Chomsky, N. (1995), 'Language and nature', Mind 104, pp. 1-61.
[10]
Churchland, P. M. (1979), Scientific Realism and Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Churchland, P. M. (1981), 'Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes', Journal of Philosophy 78, pp. 67-90.
[12]
Churchland, P. S. & Sejnowski, T. (1988), 'Neural representation and neural computation', in W. Lycan, ed., Mind and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
[13]
Clark, A. (1993), Associative Engines. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[14]
Crane, T. (1990), 'An alleged analogy between numbers and propositions', Analysis 50, pp. 224-230.
[15]
Crane, T. (1991), 'All the difference in the world', Philosophical Quarterly' 41, pp. 1-25.
[16]
Crane, T. (1992), 'Mental causation and mental reality', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92, pp. 186-202.
[17]
Crane, T. (1998), 'How to define your (mental) terms', Inquiry 41, pp. 341-354.
[18]
Crane, T. and Mellor, H. (1990), 'There is no question of physicalism', Mind 99, pp. 185-206.
[19]
Cussins, A. (1990), 'Connectionism, competence, and explanation', in M. Boden, ed., The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[20]
Davidson, D. (1971), 'Philosophy as psychology', reprinted in his Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
[21]
Davidson, D. (1977), 'Reality without reference,' reprinted in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
[22]
Davies, M. (1991), 'Concepts, connectionism, and the language of thought', in D. Rumelhart, W. Ramsey and S. Stich, eds., Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum and Associates.
[23]
Dennett, D. (1987), The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[24]
Dupré, J. (1993), The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
[25]
Egan, F. (1992), 'Individualism: computation and perceptual content', Mind 101, pp. 443-459.
[26]
Fodor, J. (1975), The Language of Thought. Sussex: Harvester Press.
[27]
Fodor, J. (1980), 'Methodological Solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology', Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 63-72.
[28]
Fodor, J. (1983), The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[29]
Fodor, J. (1987), Psychosemantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[30]
Fodor, J. (1990a), 'Substitution arguments and the individuation of beliefs', in his A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[31]
Fodor, J. (1990b), 'Making mind matter more', in his A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[32]
Fodor, J. (1991), 'Replies', in B. Loewer and G. Rey, eds., Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell.
[33]
Fodor, J. (1994), The Elm and the Expert. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[34]
Fodor, J. (1998), Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[35]
Fodor, J. and McLaughlin, B. (1990), 'Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: why Smolenksy's solution doesn't work', Cognition 35, pp. 183-204.
[36]
Fodor, J. and Pylyshyn, Z. (1988), 'Connectionism and cognitive architecture', Cognition 28, pp. 3-71.
[37]
García-Carpintero, M. (1995), 'The philosophical import of connectionism: A critical notice of Andy Clark's Associative Engines', Mind and Language 10, pp. 370-401.
[38]
Gopnik, A. (1996), 'Theories and modules; creation myths, developmental realities, and Neurath's boat', in P. Carruthers and P. Smith, eds., Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[39]
Haugeland, J. (1978), 'The nature and plausibility of cognitivism', Behavioural and Brain Sciences 2, pp. 215-260.
[40]
Higginbotham, J. (1987-8), 'Is semantics necessary?', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88, pp. 219-241.
[41]
Kim, J. (1996), The Philosophy of Mind. Colorado: Westview.
[42]
Knowles, J. (1998), 'The language of thought and natural language understanding', Analysis 58, pp. 264-272.
[43]
Knowles, J. (1999), 'Physicalism, teleology and the miraculous coincidence problem', The Philosphical Quarterly 49, pp. 164-181.
[44]
Knowles, J. (2000), 'Is folk psychology scientific?', unpublished ms.
[45]
Kripke, S. (1979), 'A puzzle about belief', in A. Margalit, ed., Meaning and Use. Dordrecht: Reidel.
[46]
Lewis, D. (1970), 'How to define theoretical terms', reprinted in his Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.
[47]
Lewis, D. (1972), 'Psychophysical and theoretical identifications', reprinted in N. Block, ed., Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980.
[48]
Lycan, W. (1993), 'A deductive argument for the representational theory of thinking', Mind and Language 8, pp. 404-422.
[49]
Marr, D. (1982), Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
[50]
Matthews, R. (1988), 'The alleged evidence for representationalism', in S. Silvers, ed., Rerepresentations . Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[51]
McDowell, J. (1985), 'Functionalism and anomalous monism', in B. McLaughlin and E. Lepore, eds., Actions and Events. Blackwell.
[52]
McDowell, J. (1986), 'Singular thought and the extent of inner space', in J. McDowell and P. Pettit, eds., Subject, Thought, and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[53]
McGilvray, J. (1998), 'Meanings are syntactically individuated and found in the head', Mind and Language 13, pp. 225-280.
[54]
Peacocke. C. (1981), 'Demonstrative thought and psychological explanation', Synthese 49, pp. 187- 217.
[55]
Pickering, M. and Chater, N. (1995), 'Why cognitive science is not formalised folk psychology', Minds and Machines 5, pp. 309-337.
[56]
Pinker, S. and Prince, A. (1988), 'On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition', Cognition 28, pp. 73-193.
[57]
Pylyshyn, Z. (1984), Computation and Cognition: Towards a Foundation for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[58]
Ramsey, W., Stich, S. and Garron, J. (1991), 'Connectionism, eliminativism, and the future of folk psychology', in D. Rumelhart, W. Ramsey and S. Stich, eds., Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum & Associates.
[59]
Sejnowski, T. & Rosenberg, C. (1987), 'Parallel networks that learn to pronounce English texts', Complex Systems 1, pp. 145-168.
[60]
Shoemaker, S. (1984), Identity, Cause and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[61]
Smolensky, P. (1988), 'On the proper treatment of connectionism', Behaviourial and Brain Sciences 11, pp. 1-74.
[62]
Stalnaker, R. (1984), Inquiry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[63]
Stich, S. (1983), From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[64]
Stitch S. (1996), 'Naturalism, positivism, and pluralism', in his Deconstructing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[65]
Stich, S. and Laurence, S. (1996), 'Intentionality and naturalism', in S. Stich Deconstructing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[66]
Tye. M. (1992), 'Naturalism and the mental', Mind 101, pp. 421-441.
Recommendations
The Explanatory Role of Computation in Cognitive Science
Which notion of computation (if any) is essential for explaining cognition? Five answers to this question are discussed in the paper. (1) The classicist answer: symbolic (digital) computation is required for explaining cognition; (2) The broad digital ...
Inside Doubt: On the Non-Identity of the Theory of Mind and Propositional Attitude Psychology
Eliminative materialism is a popular view of the mind which holds that propositional attitudes, the typical units of our traditional understanding, are unsupported by modern connectionist psychology and neuroscience, and consequently that propositional ...
Beyond the frame problem: what (else) can Heidegger do for AI?
AbstractAbout three decades ago, AI theory underwent a sharp turn as a consequence of criticism that pointed out the problem of externalism in the cognitivist position. Hubert Dreyfus, undoubtedly the main exponent of this criticism, opened the ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © Copyright © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 August 2001
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024