skip to main content
research-article

Robotics camps, clubs, and competitions

Published: 01 January 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Funded by the US National Science Foundation, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln has spent the last eight years developing and implementing a comprehensive educational robotics program for youth ages 9-14. The program was delivered in informal (out-of-school) learning environments through robotics camps, clubs, and competitions and provided robotics experiences to over 5000 youth and 400 educators. The goal of the project was to positively impact the youths' science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) knowledge and attitudes - and to foster an interest in STEM careers. Results of extensive research and evaluation showed that youth participation in the robotics activities increased their STEM content knowledge (particularly engineering and computer programming), their perceived problem solving skills and their interest in engineering careers. Youth also perceived that the robotics activities were different from those in school, reporting that the robotics camp was more interesting and involved more hands-on activities. Robotics camps, clubs and competitions foster youth STEM content knowledge.Robotics camps and competitions promote youth problem solving skills.Robotics camps are effective in promoting interest in engineering careers.Youth reported that the camp activities were more interesting than those in school.

References

[1]
H.S. Barrows, Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview, New Dir. Teach. Learn., 68 (1996) 85-89.
[2]
B. Barker, J. Ansorge, Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment, J. Res. Technol. Educ., 39 (2007) 229-243.
[3]
G. Nugent, B. Barker, N. Grandgenett, V. Adamchuk, Impact of robotics and geospatial technologies interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes, J. Res. Technol. Educ., 42 (2010) 391-408.
[4]
D. Williams, Y. Ma, L. Prejean, M.J. Ford, Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp, J. Res. Technol. Educ., 40 (2007) 201-216.
[5]
E. Mauch, Using technological innovation to improve the problem solving skills of middle school students, Clearing House, 75 (2001) 211-213.
[6]
M. Robinson, Robotics-driven activities: Can they improve middle school science learning, Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc., 25 (2005) 73-84.
[7]
E. Jojoa, E. Bravo, E. Cortes, Tool for experimenting with concepts of mobile robotics as applied to children's education, IEEE Trans. Educ., 53 (2010) 88-95.
[8]
R. Beer, J. Hillel, J. Chiel, R. Drushel, Using robotics to teach science and engineering, Commun. ACM, 42 (1999) 85-92.
[9]
I.R. Nourbakhsh, K. Crowley, A. Bhave, E. Hamner, T. Hsiu, A. Perez-Bergquist, The robotic autonomy mobile robotics course: Robot design, curriculum design and educational assessment, Auton. Robots, 18 (2005) 103-127.
[10]
A. Van Langen, H. Dekkers, Cross-national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology engineering and math education, Comp. Educ., 41 (2005) 329-350.
[11]
D.P. Miller, C. Stein, So that's what pi is for and other educational epiphanies from hands-on robotics, in: Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning Experiences, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2000.
[12]
A. Welch, D. Huffman, The effect of robotics competitions on high school students' attitudes toward science, Sch. Sci. Math., 111 (2011) 416-424.
[13]
G. Nugent, B. Barker, N. Grandgenett, The impact of educational robotics on student STEM learning, attitudes and workplace skills, in: Robotics in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2012, pp. 94-119.
[14]
G. Nugent, B. Barker, M. Toland, N. Grandgenett, V. Adamchuk, Measuring the impact of robotics and geospatial technologies on youth STEM attitudes, in: Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, AACE, Cheasapeake, VA, 2009, pp. 3331-3340.
[15]
R. Bybee, Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision, Technol. Eng. Teach., 70 (2010) 30-35.
[16]
V. Adamchuk, B. Barker, G. Nugent, N. Grandgenett, M. Patent-Nygren, K. Morgan, C. Lutz, Learning geospatial concepts as part of a non-formal education robotics experience, in: Robotics in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2012, pp. 284-301.
[17]
G. Nugent, B. Barker, G. Welch, N. Grandgenett, C. Wu, C. Nelson, A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 37 (2015) 1067-1088.
[18]
B. Barker, G. Nugent, N. Grandgenett, Examining fidelity of program implementation in a STEM-oriented out-of-school setting, Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., 24 (2013) 39-52.
[19]
B. Barker, N. Grandgenett, G. Nugent, V. Adamchuk, Pairing educational robotics with geospatial technologies in informal learning environments, J. Youth Dev., 5 (2010).
[20]
B. Barker, N. Grandgenett, G. Nugent, V. Adamchuk, Robots, GPS/GIS, and programming technologies: The power of "digital manipulatives" in youth extension experiences, J. Ext., 45 (2010).
[21]
B. Barker, N. Grandgenett, G. Nugent, A new model of 4-H Volunteer development in science, engineering, and technology programs, J. Ext., 47 (2009).
[22]
B. Barker, G. Nugent, N. Grandgenett, A. Hampton, Examining 4-H robotics in the learning of science, engineering and technology topics and the related student attitudes, J. Youth Dev.: Bridg. Res. Pract., 2 (2008).
[23]
B. Barker, G. Nugent, N. Grandgenett, Examining 4-H robotics and geospatial technologies in the learning of science, technology, and mathematics topics, J. Ext., 46 (2008). www.joe.org/joe/2008june/rb7.shtml
[24]
G. Nugent, B. Barker, A. White, N. Grandgenett, The impact of robotics competitions on youth STEM learning, attitudes, and 21st century skills, in: Proceedings of the Ed Media 2011 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lisbon, Portugal, AACE, Chesapeake, VA, 2011, pp. 3614-3619.
[25]
K. Gomez, D. Bernstein, J. Zywica, E. Hamner, Building technical knowledge and engagement in robotics: An examination of two out-of-school programs, in: Robotics in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2012, pp. 94-119.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Robotics and Autonomous Systems  Volume 75, Issue PB
January 2016
582 pages

Publisher

North-Holland Publishing Co.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2016

Author Tags

  1. Educational robotics
  2. Research
  3. STEM interest
  4. STEM knowledge

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media