research-article

Simulation of cavitating fluid–Structure interaction using SPH–FE method

Authors:

Farhoud Kalateh,

Ali KooshehAuthors Info & Claims

Volume 173, Issue C

Pages 51 - 70

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.01.019

Published: 01 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In the present paper, a modified version of SPH–FE is proposed to study the cavitating fluid interaction with the convergent–divergent nozzle. The additional terms of mass/momentum transfer, surface tension and pressure based phase change are added to the standard SPH equations to track the growth, convection and collapse of the cavitation phenomenon. Due to using the particle-based method for the fluid, no transitional phase is defined and the certain particle phase is determined by the absolute pressure value in comparison with vapor pressure. The comparison of the results of modified SPH with those of finite volume as a grid-based method shows that the cavitating region can be accurately modeled in the convergent–divergent nozzle. Then, the interaction of cavitating fluid flow–nozzle wall is simulated by the improved SPH–FE algorithm for the different types of steel where the good agreement is obtained in comparison with the other similar numerical methods. Also, it is concluded that considering cavitation in the fluid flow can generally change the nozzle behavior slightly and increase the stress values inside its body.

References

[1]

Adami S., Hu X.Y., Adams N.A., A new surface-tension formulation for multi-phase SPH using a reproducing divergence approximation, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (13) (2010) 5011–5021.

Digital Library

[2]

Ahuja V., Hosangadi A., Arunajatesan S., Simulations of cavitating flows using hybrid unstructured meshes, J. Fluids Eng. 123 (2) (2001) 331–340.

[3]

Arndt R.E., Cavitation in fluid machinery and hydraulic structures, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13 (1) (1981) 273–326.

[4]

Attaway S.W., Heinstein M.W., Swegle J.W., Coupling of smooth particle hydrodynamics with the finite element method, Nucl. Eng. Des. 150 (2–3) (1994) 199–205.

[5]

Batchelor G.K., An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge university press, 2000.

[6]

Blessing M., König G., Krüger C., Michels U., Schwarz V., Analysis of flow and cavitation phenomena in diesel injection nozzles and its effects on spray and mixture formation, SAE Trans. (2003) 1694–1706.

[7]

Canelas R.B., Crespo A.J., Domínguez J.M., Ferreira R.M., Gómez-Gesteira M., SPH–DCDEM model for arbitrary geometries in free surface solid–fluid flows, Comput. Phys. Comm. 202 (2016) 131–140.

[8]

Cleary P.W., Monaghan J.J., Conduction modelling using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 148 (1) (1999) 227–264.

[9]

Colagrossi A., Landrini M., Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 191 (2) (2003) 448–475.

Digital Library

[10]

Cummins S.J., Rudman M., An SPH projection method, J. Comput. Phys. 152 (2) (1999) 584–607.

[11]

Das A.K., Das P.K., Modeling of liquid–vapor phase change using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 303 (2015) 125–145.

[12]

De Vuyst T., Vignjevic R., Campbell J.C., Coupling between meshless and finite element methods, Int. J. Impact Eng. 31 (8) (2005) 1054–1064.

[13]

Deshpande M., Feng J., Merkle C.L., Cavity flow predictions based on the Euler equations, J. Fluids Eng. 116 (1) (1994) 36–44.

[14]

Deshpande M., Feng J., Merkle C.L., Numerical modeling of the thermodynamic effects of cavitation, J. Fluids Eng. 119 (2) (1997) 420–427.

[15]

Donea J., Giuliani S., Halleux J.P., An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid–structure interactions, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 33 (1–3) (1982) 689–723.

[16]

Dular M., Bachert R., Stoffel B., Širok B., Experimental evaluation of numerical simulation of cavitating flow around hydrofoil, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 24 (4) (2005) 522–538.

[17]

Federico I., Marrone S., Colagrossi A., Aristodemo F., Antuono M., Simulating 2D open-channel flows through an SPH model, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 34 (2012) 35–46.

[18]

Fourey G., Oger G., Le Touzé D., Alessandrini B., Violent fluid–structure interaction simulations using a coupled SPH/FEM method, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 10(1), IOP Publishing, 2010, 012041.

[19]

Gingold R.A., Monaghan J.J., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 181 (3) (1977) 375–389.

[20]

Gröbelbauer H.P., Fanneløp T.K., Britter R.E., The propagation of intrusion fronts of high density ratios, J. Fluid Mech. 250 (1993) 669–687.

[21]

Groenenboom P.H., Cartwright B.K., Hydrodynamics and fluid–structure interaction by coupled SPH-FE method, J. Hydraul. Res. 48 (S1) (2010) 61–73.

[22]

Hejranfar K., Ezzatneshan E., Fattah-Hesari K., A comparative study of two cavitation modeling strategies for simulation of inviscid cavitating flows, Ocean Eng. 108 (2015) 257–275.

[23]

Hou T.Y., Shi Z., An efficient semi-implicit immersed boundary method for the Navier–Stokes equations, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (20) (2008) 8968–8991.

[24]

Hou G., Wang J., Layton A., Numerical methods for fluid–structure interaction—a review, Commun. Comput. Phys. 12 (2) (2012) 337–377.

[25]

Hron J., Turek S., A monolithic FEM/multigrid solver for an ALE formulation of fluid–structure interaction with applications in biomechanics, in: Fluid–Structure Interaction, 2006, pp. 146–170.

[26]

Hu D., Long T., Xiao Y., Han X., Gu Y., Fluid–structure interaction analysis by coupled FE–SPH model based on a novel searching algorithm, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 276 (2014) 266–286.

[27]

Johnson G.R., Linking of Lagrangian particle methods to standard finite element methods for high velocity impact computations, Nucl. Eng. Des. 150 (2–3) (1994) 265–274.

[28]

Kalateh F., Attarnejad R., A new cavitation simulation method: dam-reservoir systems, Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech. 13 (3) (2012) 161–183.

[29]

Kalateh F., Koosheh A., Comparing of loose and strong finite element partitioned coupling methods of acoustic fluid–structure interaction: concrete dam-reservoir system, KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21 (3) (2017) 807–817.

[30]

Kalateh F., Koosheh A., Application of SPH-FE method for fluid–structure interaction using immersed boundary method, Eng. Comput. 35 (8) (2018) 2802–2824.

[31]

Kalateh F., Koosheh A., Finite element analysis of flexible structure and cavitating nonlinear acoustic fluid interaction under shock wave loading, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19 (5) (2018) 459–473.

[32]

Khorasanizade S., Sousa J.M.M., An innovative open boundary treatment for incompressible SPH, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 80 (3) (2016) 161–180.

[33]

S. Khorasanizade, J.M.M. Sousa, J.F. Pinto, On the use of a time-dependent driving force in SPH simulations, in: Proceedings of 7th International SPHERIC Workshop, 2012.

[34]

Kim J.H., Nishida K., Hiroyasu H., Characteristics of the internal flow in a diesel injection nozzle, Int. J. Fluid Mech. Res. 24 (1–3) (1997).

[35]

Kinnas S.A., Fine N.E., A numerical nonlinear analysis of the flow around two-and three-dimensional partially cavitating hydrofoils, J. Fluid Mech. 254 (1993) 151–181.

[36]

Kunz R.F., Boger D.A., Stinebring D.R., Chyczewski T.S., Lindau J.W., Gibeling H.J., et al., A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction, Comput. & Fluids 29 (8) (2000) 849–875.

[37]

Liang C., Huang J., Shi W., A new treatment for boundary of laminar flow inlet or outlet in SPH, J. Softw. Eng. 8 (2014) 321–327.

[38]

CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, vol. 85, CRC press, 2004.

[39]

Long T., Hu D., Wan D., Zhuang C., Yang G., An arbitrary boundary with ghost particles incorporated in coupled FEM–SPH model for FSI problems, J. Comput. Phys. 350 (2017) 166–183.

[40]

Long T., Hu D., Yang G., Wan D., A particle-element contact algorithm incorporated into the coupling methods of FEM-ISPH and FEM-WCSPH for FSI problems, Ocean Eng. 123 (2016) 154–163.

[41]

Lucy L.B., A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis, Astron. J. 82 (1977) 1013–1024.

[42]

May R.W.P., Cavitation in hydraulic structures: Occurrence and prevention, 1987.

[43]

Mikola R.G., Sitar N., Next generation discontinuous rock mass models: 3-D and rock-fluid interaction, in: Frontiers of Discontinuous Numerical Methods and Practical Simulations in Engineering and Disaster Prevention, 2013, pp. 81–90.

[44]

Monaghan J.J., Simulating free surface flows with SPH, J. Comput. Phys. 110 (2) (1994) 399–406.

Digital Library

[45]

Monaghan J.J., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 (8) (2005) p. 1703.

[46]

Monaghan J.J., Kocharyan A., SPH Simulation of multi-phase flow, Comput. Phys. Comm. 87 (1–2) (1995) 225–235.

[47]

Monteleone A., Monteforte M., Napoli E., Inflow/outflow pressure boundary conditions for smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of incompressible flows, Comput. & Fluids 159 (2017) 9–22.

[48]

Mori Y., Peskin C.S., Implicit second-order immersed boundary methods with boundary mass, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 (25) (2008) 2049–2067.

[49]

Morris J.P., Simulating surface tension with smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 33 (3) (2000) 333–353.

[50]

Nugent S., Posch H.A., Liquid drops and surface tension with smoothed particle applied mechanics, Phys. Rev. E 62 (4) (2000) 4968.

[51]

Ozbulut M., Yildiz M., Goren O., A numerical investigation into the correction algorithms for SPH method in modeling violent free surface flows, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 79 (2014) 56–65.

[52]

Peng X., Yu P., Chen G., Xia M., Zhang Y., Development of a coupled DDA–SPH method and its application to dynamic simulation of landslides involving solid–fluid interaction, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. (2019) 1–19.

[53]

Peskin C.S., Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method, J. Comput. Phys. 10 (2) (1972) 252–271.

[54]

Peskin C.S., Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart, J. Comput. Phys. 25 (3) (1977) 220–252.

[55]

Ren B., Jin Z., Gao R., Wang Y.X., Xu Z.L., SPH-DEM modeling of the hydraulic stability of 2D blocks on a slope, J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 140 (6) (2013).

[56]

Ritchie B.W., Thomas P.A., Multiphase smoothed-particle hydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 323 (3) (2001) 743–756.

[57]

Robinson M., Ramaioli M., Luding S., Fluid–particle flow simulations using two-way-coupled mesoscale SPH–DEM and validation, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 59 (2014) 121–134.

[58]

Sato K., Shimojo S., Detailed observations on a starting mechanism for shedding of cavitation cloud, 2003.

[59]

Shi Y., Pan G., Huang Q., Du X., Numerical simulation of cavitation characteristics for pump-jet propeller, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 640 (1) (2015).

[60]

Srinivasan V., Salazar A.J., Saito K., Numerical simulation of cavitation dynamics using a cavitation-induced-momentum-defect (CIMD) correction approach, Appl. Math. Model. 33 (3) (2009) 1529–1559.

[61]

Stockie J.M., Wetton B.T., Stability analysis for the immersed fiber problem, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55 (6) (1995) 1577–1591.

Digital Library

[62]

Stockie J.M., Wetton B.R., Analysis of stiffness in the immersed boundary method and implications for time-stepping schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 154 (1) (1999) 41–64.

[63]

Takashi N., Hughes T.J., An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for interaction of fluid and a rigid body, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 95 (1) (1992) 115–138.

[64]

Trulev A.V., Trulev Y.V., Theoretical fundamentals of cavitation in turbomachines, Chem. Pet. Eng. 33 (2) (1997) 189–195.

[65]

Tu C., Peskin C.S., Stability and instability in the computation of flows with moving immersed boundaries: a comparison of three methods, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 13 (6) (1992) 1361–1376.

[66]

Valizadeh A., Shafieefar M., Monaghan J.J., Neyshaboori S.A.A.S., Modeling two-phase flows using SPH method, J. Appl. Sci. 8 (21) (2008) 3817–3826.

[67]

Venkateswaran S., Lindau J.W., Kunz R.F., Merkle C.L., Computation of multiphase mixture flows with compressibility effects, J. Comput. Phys. 180 (1) (2002) 54–77.

[68]

Ventikos Y., Tzabiras G., A numerical method for the simulation of steady and unsteady cavitating flows, Comput. & Fluids 29 (1) (2000) 63–88.

[69]

Wang W., Chen G., Zhang Y., Zheng L., Zhang H., Dynamic simulation of landslide dam behavior considering kinematic characteristics using a coupled DDA-SPH method, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 80 (2017) 172–183.

[70]

Xu Y., Yu C., Liu F., Liu Q., A coupled NMM-SPH method for fluid–structure interaction problems, Appl. Math. Model. (2019).

[71]

Yang X.F., Liu M.B., Improvement on stress instability in smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Acta Phys. Sin. 61 (2012).

[72]

Yuan W., Sauer J., Schnerr G.H., Modeling and computation of unsteady cavitation flows in injection nozzles, Mec. Ind. 2 (5) (2001) 383–394.

[73]

Zhang G., Wang S., Sui Z., Sun L., Zhang Z., Zong Z., Coupling of SPH with smoothed point interpolation method for violent fluid–structure interaction problems, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 103 (2019) 1–10.

[74]

Zienkiewicz O.C., Paul D.K., Hinton E., Cavitation in fluid–structure response (with particular reference to dams under earthquake loading), Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 11 (4) (1983) 463–481.

Cited By

Park JSon G(2024)Numerical investigation of acoustic droplet vaporization and tissue deformationMathematics and Computers in Simulation10.1016/j.matcom.2024.05.030225:C(412-429)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.matcom.2024.05.030

Index Terms

Simulation of cavitating fluid–Structure interaction using SPH–FE method

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Transient simulations of cavitating flows using a modified volume-of-fluid (VOF) technique
CFD 2006 Held at Queens University at Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 1519 July 2006

In this study, transient 2D/axisymmetric simulations of cavitating flows are performed using a modified 'Volume-of-Fluid' (VOF) technique. Simulation of the cavitation is based on a homogenous equilibrium flow model. To predict the shape of the cavity, ...
Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH

A Lagrangian model for the numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction problems is proposed in the present paper. In the method both fluid and solid phases are described by smoothing particle hydrodynamics: fluid dynamics is studied in the ...
Simulation of single mode Rayleigh---Taylor instability by SPH method

A smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) solution to the Rayleigh---Taylor instability (RTI) problem in an incompressible viscous two-phase immiscible fluid with surface tension is presented. The present model is validated by solving Laplace's law, and ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Mathematics and Computers in Simulation

Mathematics and Computers in Simulation Volume 173, Issue C

Jul 2020

120 pages

ISSN:0378-4754

Issue’s Table of Contents

International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (IMACS).

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2020

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Park JSon G(2024)Numerical investigation of acoustic droplet vaporization and tissue deformationMathematics and Computers in Simulation10.1016/j.matcom.2024.05.030225:C(412-429)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.matcom.2024.05.030

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents