Sharing my way to success: : A case study on developing entrepreneurial ventures using social capital in an OSS community
Pages 23 - 40
References
[1]
T. Baker, Doing social research, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.
[2]
B. Batjargal, Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: A longitudinal study, Organization Studies 24 (2003) 535–556.
[3]
Y. Benkler, A. Shaw, B.M. Hill, Peer production: A modality of collective intelligence, in: T.W. Malone, M.S. Bernstein (Eds.), The collective intelligence handbook, MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, Cambridge, MA, 2013.
[4]
K. Bettenhausen, J.K. Murnighan, The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups, Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (1986) 350–372.
[5]
S. Birley, The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process, Journal of Business Venturing 18 (1985) 301–332.
[6]
O. Bodin, B. Crona, H. Ernstson, Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective?, Ecology and Society 11 (2) (2006).
[7]
M. Bogers, J. West, Managing distributed innovation: Strategic utilization of open and user innovation, Creativity and Innovation Management 21 (1) (2012) 61–75.
[8]
S.P. Borgatti, M.G. Everett, L.C. Freeman, UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis, Analytical Technologies, Harvard, 2002.
[9]
P. Bourdieu, Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1977.
[10]
D.C. Brabham, Crowdsourcing: A model for leveraging online communities, in: A. Delwiche, J.J. Henderson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of participatory culture, Routledge, New York, NY, 2012.
[11]
J. Brüderl, P. Preisendörfer, Network support and the success of newly founded business, Small Business Economics 10 (3) (1998) 213–225.
[12]
R.S. Burt, Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
[13]
L.W. Busenitz, G.P. West, D. Shepherd, T. Nelson, G.N. Chandler, A. Zacharakis, Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions, Journal of Management 29 (3) (2003) 285–308.
[14]
D.M. Cable, S. Shane, A prisoner's dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationship, Academy of Management Review 22 (1) (1997) 147–176.
[15]
P.G. Capek, S.P. Frank, S. Gerdt, D. Shields, A history of Ibm's open-source involvement and strategy, IBM Systems Journal 44 (2) (2005) 249–257.
[16]
D. Cheal, The gift economy, Routledge, London, 1998.
[17]
H. Chesbrough, Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2003.
[18]
H. Chesbrough, Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2006.
[19]
H. Chesbrough, Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation, in: H.W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, Vol. 21, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 1–12.
[20]
N. Choi, J.A. Pruett, The characteristics and motivations of library open source software developers: An empirical study, Library & Information Science Research 37 (2) (2015) 109–117.
[21]
A. Chua, The influence of social interaction on knowledge creation, Journal of Intellectual Capital 3 (4) (2002) 375–392.
[22]
A.V. Cicourel, Cognitive sociology, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1973.
[23]
J.S. Coleman, Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology 94 (1988) 95–120.
[24]
J.S. Coleman, Foundations of social theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1990.
[25]
B.L. Connelly, S.T. Certo, R.D. Ireland, C.R. Reutzel, Signaling theory: A review and assessment, Journal of Management 37 (2011) 39–67.
[26]
R. Cross, W. Baker, A. Parker, What creates energy in organizations?, MIT Sloan Management Review 44 (4) (2003) 51–56.
[27]
L. Dahlander, Penguin in a new suit: A tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities, Industrial and Corporate Change 16 (5) (2007) 913–943.
[28]
L. Dahlander, M.G. Magnusson, Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms, Research Policy 34 (4) (2005) 481–493.
[29]
L. Dahlander, M.W. Wallin, A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets, Research Policy 35 (2006) 1243–1259.
[30]
S.L. Daniel, K.J. Stewart, Open source project success: Resource access, flow, and integration, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 25 (3) (2016) 159–176.
[31]
M. Dodgson, D. Gann, A. Salter, The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble, R&D Management 36 (3) (2006) 333–346.
[32]
P. Drucker, Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles, Harper&Row, New York, 1985.
[33]
N. Duhan, A. Kaur, Sangeeta, Lexicon based opinion mining system using Hadoop, Journal of Network Communications and Emerging Technologies 5 (2) (2015) 93–100.
[34]
K. Faust, Centrality in affiliation networks, Social Networks 19 (1997) 157–191.
[35]
B. Fitzgerald, The transformation of open source software, MIS Quarterly 30 (3) (2006) 587–598.
[36]
J. Florin, M. Lubatkin, W. Schulze, A social capital model of high-growth ventures, Academy of Management Journal 46 (3) (2003) 374–384.
[37]
L.C. Freeman, Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification, Social Networks 1 (1979) 215–240.
[38]
F. Fukuyama, Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace, Stern business, 1997.
[39]
M.D. Gallego, S. Bueno, F.J. Racero, J. Noyes, Open source software: The effects of training on acceptance, Computers in Human Behavior 49 (2015) 390–399.
[40]
M. Gargiulo, M. Benassi, Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaption of social capital, Organization Science 11 (2) (2000) 183–196.
[41]
A.H. Ghapanchi, Rallying competencies in virtual communities: A study of core processes and user interest in open source software projects, Information and Organization 23 (2) (2013) 129–148.
[42]
A. Giddens, Positivism and sociology, Heinemann, London, 1974.
[43]
P.A. Gloor, P. Dorsaz, H. Fuehres, Analyzing success of startup entrepreneurs by measuring their social network distance to a business networking hub, MIT Center for Collective Intelligence Working Paper, 2011.
[44]
G. Gousios, E. Kalliamvakou, D. Spinellis, Measuring developer contribution from software repository data, in: Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on mining software repositories, 2008, pp. 129–132.
[45]
P.G. Greene, T.E. Brown, Resource needs and the dynamic capitalism typology, Journal of Business Venturing 12 (3) (1997) 161–173.
[46]
R. Grewal, G.L. Lilien, G. Mallapragada, Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems, Management Science 52 (7) (2006) 1043–1056.
[47]
M. Gruber, J. Henkel, New ventures based on open innovation: An empirical analysis of start-up firms in embedded Linux, International Journal of Technology Management 33 (2006) 356–372.
[48]
R. Gulati, M. Gargiulo, Where do interorganizational networks come from?, American Journal of Sociology 104 (5) (1999) 1439–1493.
[49]
R. Gulati, P. Puranam, M. Tushman, Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework, Strategic Management Journal 33 (6) (2012) 571–586.
[50]
K.L. Gwebu, J. Wang, Adoption of open source software: The role of social identification, Decision Support Systems 51 (1) (2011) 220–229.
[51]
H. Hakansson, I. Snehota, Developing relationships in business networks, Routledge, London, 1995.
[52]
A. Hemetsberger, Fostering cooperation on the internet: Social exchange processes in innovative virtual consumer communities, in: S.M. Broniarczyk, K. Nakamoto (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, Vol. 29, 2002, pp. 354–356.
[53]
J. Henkel, Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux, Research Policy 35 (7) (2006) 953–969.
[54]
J.J. Higgins, An introduction to modern nonparametric statistics, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 2004.
[55]
S.Y. Ho, A. Rai, Continued voluntary participation intention in firm-participating open source software projects, Information Systems Research 28 (3) (2017) 603–625.
[56]
V.T. Ho, J.M. Pollack, Passion isn't always a good thing: Examining entrepreneurs' network centrality and financial performance with a dualistic model of passion, Journal of Management Studies 51 (3) (2014) 433–459.
[57]
E. Huizingh, Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives, Technovation 31 (1) (2011) 2–9.
[58]
P.H. Kim, H.E. Aldrich, Social capital and entrepreneurship, Foundations and trends in entrepreneurship 1 (2) (2005) 55–104.
[59]
B. Kogut, The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure, Strategic Management Journal 21 (3) (2000) 405–425.
[60]
S. Krishnamurthy, S. Ou, A.K. Tripathi, Acceptance of monetary rewards in open source software development, Research Policy 43 (4) (2014) 632–644.
[61]
K. Lakhani, B. Wolf, Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects, in: J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, K. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software, MIT Press, Boston, MA, 2005.
[62]
G.K. Lee, R.E. Cole, From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development, Organization Science 14 (6) (2003) 633–649.
[63]
J. Lerner, J. Tirole, The simple economics of open source, The Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (2) (2002) 197–234.
[64]
R.J. Lewicki, B.B. Bunker, Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships, in: R.M. Kramer, T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations, Sage Publications, London, 1996.
[65]
J. Liao, H. Welsch, Roles of social capital in venture creation: Key dimensions and research implications, Journal of Small Business Management 43 (4) (2005) 345–362.
[66]
N. Lin, Social capital: A theory of social structure and action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
[67]
Lopez-Fernandez, L., Robles, G., & Gonzalez-Barahona, J., M. (2004). Applying social network analysis to the information in CVS repositories. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on mining software repositories (MSR2004), pp. 101–105.
[68]
R.D. Macredie, K. Mijinyawa, A theory-grounded framework of open source software adoption in Smes, European Journal of Information Systems 20 (2) (2011) 237–250.
[69]
J. Marsan, G. Pare, A. Beaudry, Adoption of open source software in organizations: A socio-cognitive perspective, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 21 (4) (2012) 257–273.
[70]
M. Mauss, The gift, Free Press, New York, 1954.
[71]
B. McEvily, A. Zaheer, Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities, Strategic Management Journal 20 (12) (1999) 1133–1156.
[72]
R.G. McGrath, I.C. MacMillan, S. Scheinberg, Elitists, risk-takers, and rugged individualists? An exploratory analysis of cultural differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs, Journal of Business Venturing 7 (1992) 115–135.
[73]
B. Mehra, K. Black, S. Lee, Perspectives of East Tennessee's rural public librarians about the need for professional library education: An exploratory study, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 51 (3) (2010) 142–157.
[74]
R. Méndez-Durón, C.E. García, Returns from social capital in open source software networks, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19 (2) (2009) 277–295.
[75]
J. Mingers, Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology, Information Systems Research 12 (3) (2001) 240–259.
[76]
D.L. Morgan, Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research, Qualitative Health Research 8 (3) (1998) 362–376.
[77]
S. Naan, J.S. Krauss, M. Schober, P.A. Gloor, K. Fischbach, H. Fuhres, The power of alumni networks - success of startup companies correlates with online social network structure of its founders, in: MIT sloan research paper no. 4766–10, 2010.
[78]
J. Nahapiet, S. Ghoshal, Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review 23 (2) (1998) 242–266.
[79]
F.A. Nielsen, A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs, in: Proceedings of the ESWC2011 workshop on making sense of microposts, 2011.
[80]
T. Opsahl, F. Agneessens, J. Skvoretz, Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths, Social Networks 32 (3) (2010) 245–251.
[81]
G. Peng, Y. Wan, P. Woodlock, Network ties and the success of open source software development, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 22 (4) (2013) 269–281.
[82]
C.W. Phang, A. Kankanhalli, B.C.Y. Tan, What motivates contributors vs. lurkers? An investigation of online feedback forums, Information Systems Research 26 (4) (2015) 773–792.
[83]
E. Piva, F. Rentocchini, C. Rossi-Lamastra, Is open source software about innovation? Collaborations with the open source community and innovation performance of software entrepreneurial ventures, Journal of Small Business Management 50 (2012) 340–364.
[84]
W.W. Powell, Learning from collaboration, California Management Review 40 (1998) 228–240.
[85]
R. Putnam, Making democracy work, civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1993.
[86]
R. Putnam, Bowling alone revisited, in: The responsive community, 5, 1995, pp. 18–33.
[87]
R. Putnam, Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America, Political Science & Politics 28 (4) (1995) 664–683.
[88]
R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016, http://www.R-project.org/.
[89]
K. Randhawa, R. Wilden, J. Hohberger, A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda, Journal of Product Innovation Management 33 (6) (2016) 750–772.
[90]
E. Raymond, The cathedral and the bazaar, Knowledge, Technology, and Policy 12 (3) (1999) 23–49.
[91]
T. Risse, Let's argue: Communicative action in world politics, International Organization 54 (1) (2000) 1–39.
[92]
J.A. Roberts, I. Hann, S. Slaughter, Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects, Management Science 52 (7) (2006) 984–999.
[93]
B. Rossi, B. Russo, G. Succi, Adoption of free/libre open source software in public organizations: Factors of impact, Information Technology & People 25 (2) (2012) 156–187.
[94]
T.C. Russo, J. Koesten, Prestige, centrality, and learning: A social network analysis of an online class, Communication Education 54 (3) (2005) 254–261.
[95]
C. Santos, G. Kuk, F. Kon, J. Pearson, The attraction of contributors in free and open source software projects, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 22 (1) (2013) 26–45.
[96]
T. Schadler, Open source moves into the mainstream, Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA, 2004.
[97]
J. Scott, Social network analysis: A handbook, Sage, London, 1991.
[98]
M. Shaikh, O. Henfridsson, Governing open source software through coordination processes, Information and Organization 27 (2) (2017) 116–135.
[99]
S. Shane, S. Venkatraman, The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research, Academy of Management Review 25 (1) (2000) 217–226.
[100]
C. Smith, J. Brock Smith, E. Shaw, Embracing digital networks: Entrepreneurs' social capital online, Journal of Business Venturing 32 (1) (2017) 18–34.
[101]
S. Spaeth, G. von Krogh, F. He, Research note—Perceived firm attributes and intrinsic motivation in sponsored open source software projects, Information Systems Research 26 (1) (2014) 224–237.
[102]
U. Staber, Social capital processes in cross cultural management, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 6 (2) (2006) 189–203.
[103]
W. Stam, T. Elfring, Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extra industry social capital, Academy of Management Journal 51 (1) (2008) 97–111.
[104]
T.E. Stuart, H. Hoang, R.C. Hybels, Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures, Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1999) 315–349.
[105]
C. Teddlie, A. Tashakkori, Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches to the social and behavioral sciences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009.
[106]
R. Teigland, P.M. Di Gangi, B.-T. Flåten, E. Giovacchini, N. Pastorino, Balancing on a tightrope: Managing the boundaries of a firm-sponsored Oss community and its impact on innovation and absorptive capacity, Information and Organization 24 (1) (2014) 25–47.
[107]
M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, A. Kappas, Sentiment strength detection in short informal text, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 62 (12) (2010) 2544–2558.
[108]
A.M. Thistoll, A grounded theory of preneurial agency in information technology creation, (PhD thesis) Victoria University of Wellington, 2011.
[109]
N.M. Tichy, M.L. Tushman, C. Fombrun, Social network analysis for organizations, Academy of Management Review 4 (4) (1979) 507–519.
[110]
B. Uzzi, Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing, American Sociological Review 64 (4) (1999) 481–505.
[111]
B. Uzzi, J.J. Gillespie, Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: Embeddedness and the firms debt performance, Strategic Management Journal 23 (2002) 595–618.
[112]
J.M. Vardaman, S.G. Taylor, D.G. Allen, M.B. Gondo, J.M. Amis, Translating intentions to behavior: The interaction of network structure and behavioral intentions in understanding employee turnover, Organization Science 26 (4) (2015) 1177–1191.
[113]
V. Venkatesh, S.A. Brown, H. Bala, Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems, MIS Quarterly 37 (1) (2013) 21–54.
[114]
E. von Hippel, G. von Krogh, Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science, Organization Science 14 (2003) 209–225.
[115]
D. Wackerly, W. Mendenhall, R.L. Scheaffer, Mathematical statistics with applications, 7th ed., Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA, 2008.
[116]
D.M. Waguespack, L. Fleming, Scanning the commons? Evidence on the benefits to startups participating in open standards Development, Management Science 55 (2) (2009) 210–223.
[117]
M.M. Wasko, S. Faraj, Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice, MIS Quarterly 29 (1) (2005) 36–67.
[118]
M.M. Wasko, R. Teigland, S. Faraj, The provision of online public goods: Examining social structure in an electronic network of practice, Decision Support Systems 47 (3) (2009) 254–265.
[119]
S. Wasserman, K. Faust, Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1994.
[120]
W. Wen, M. Ceccagnoli, C. Forman, Opening up intellectual property strategy: Implications for open source software entry by start-up firms, Management Science 62 (9) (2015) 2668–2691.
[121]
S. Wenneker, R. Thurik, Linking entrepreneurship with economic growth, Small Business Economics 13 (1) (1999) 27–56.
[122]
J. West, M. Bogers, Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (4) (2014) 814–831.
[123]
J. West, S. Gallagher, Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software, R&D Management 36 (3) (2006) 319–331.
[124]
J. West, K.R. Lakhani, Getting clear about communities in open innovation, Industry & Innovation 15 (2) (2008) 223–231.
[125]
P. Witt, Entrepreneurs' networks and the success of start-ups, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 16 (5) (2004) 391–412.
[126]
Z. Yetis-Larsson, R. Teigland, O. Dovbysh, Networked entrepreneurs: How entrepreneurs leverage open source software communities, American Behavioral Scientist (2015) 1–17.
[127]
C. Zhang, N.C. Anzalone, R.P. Faria, J.M. Pearce, Open-source 3D-printable optics equipment, PLoS One 8 (3) (2013).
[128]
W. Zhang, S. Watts, Online communities as communities of practice: A case study, Journal of Knowledge Management 12 (2008) 55–71.
[129]
H. Zheng, D. Li, J. Wu, Y. Xu, The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US, Information & Management 51 (4) (2014) 488–496.
Index Terms
- Sharing my way to success: A case study on developing entrepreneurial ventures using social capital in an OSS community
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups
<P>The question of how initial resource endowments-the stocks of resources that entrepreneurs contribute to their new ventures at the time of founding-affect organizational life chances is one of significant interest in organizational ecology, ...
Does Social Proximity Enhance Business Partnerships? Theory and Evidence from Ethnicity's Role in U.S. Venture Capital
We develop a formal model to understand the selection and influence effects of social proximity homophily between business partners. Consistent with the model's predictions, we find that U.S. venture capitalists VCs are more likely to select start-ups ...
The effect of entrepreneurial social capital on dynamic capability: the moderating role of the entrepreneurial spirit
Entrepreneurs' social capital is one of the key factors for success of enterprise innovation. The resources mobilised by entrepreneurs through networks provide guarantees for enterprise innovation. However, the theory of entrepreneurs' social capital is ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2018.
Publisher
Pergamon Press, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 March 2019
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025