article

Authority and convergence in collaborative learning

Authors:

Teresa Hübscher-Younger,

N. Hari NarayananAuthors Info & Claims

Computers & Education, Volume 41, Issue 4

Pages 313 - 334

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.06.003

Published: 01 December 2003 Publication History

Abstract

Teachers and students have established social roles, norms and conventions when they encounter Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) systems in the classroom. Authority, a major force in the classroom, gives certain people, objects, representations or ideas the power to affect thought and behavior and influences communication and interaction. Effective computer-supported collaborative learning requires students and teachers to change how they understand and assign authority. This paper describes two studies in which students' ideas about authority led them to converge on what they viewed as authoritative representations and styles of representation too early, and the early convergence then hindered their learning. It also describes a third study that illustrates how changes to the CSCL system CAROUSEL (Collaborative Algorithm Representations Of Undergraduates for Self-Enhanced Learning) improved this situation, encouraging students to create representations that were unique, had different styles and emphasized different aspects of algorithms. Based on this research, methods to help students avoid premature convergence during collaborative learning are suggested.

References

[1]

Burroughs, N. F., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Communication Education, 38, 214-229.

[2]

Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.

[3]

Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1992). Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.

[4]

Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., & Feltovich, J. (1996). Collaboration within and among minds: Mastering complexity, individually and in groups. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 2544). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[5]

Gifford, B. R., & Enyedy, N. D. (1999). Activity centered design: towards a theoretical framework for CSCL. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

[6]

Guzdial, M., & Kehoe, C. (1998). Apprenticeship-based learning environments: A principled approach to providing software-realized scaffolding through hypermedia. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(3/4), 289-336.

Digital Library

[7]

Guzdial, M., Realff, M., Ludovice, P., Morley, T., Kerce, C., Lyons, E., & Sukel, K. (1999). Using a CSCL-driven shift in agency to undertake educational reform. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

[8]

Hmelo, C. E., Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (1998). Computer-support for collaborative learning: Learning to Support Student Engagement. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9 (2), 107-130.

Digital Library

[9]

Hoadley, C. M., & Enyedy, N. (1999). Between information and communication: middle spaces in computer media for learning. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

[10]

Jackson, P. (1976). Life in classrooms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[11]

Janis, I. (1967). Victims of groupthink: a psychological study of foreign decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

[12]

Jones, A. (1989). The culture production of classroom practice. British Journal of Sociology, 10, 19-31.

[13]

Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[14]

McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1983). Power in the classroom I: teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32, 175-184.

[15]

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.

[16]

Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57-76.

[17]

Newstetter, W. C., & Hmelo, C. E. (1996). Distributing cognition or how they don't: An investigation of student collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 462-467). AACE, Charlottesville, VA.

[18]

Richmond, V. P., & Roach, K. D. (1992). Power in the classroom: seminal studies. In V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: communication, control and concern (pp. 47-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[19]

Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235-276.

[20]

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.

[21]

Simon, Y. R. (1980). A general theory of authority. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

[22]

Sizer, T. (1984). Horace's compromise: the Dilemma of the American High School. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

[23]

Staton, A. Q. (1992). Teacher and student concern and classroom power and control. In V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: communication, control, and concern (pp. 159-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[24]

Stubbs, M. (1983). Language, schools and classrooms (2nd ed.). London: Methuen.

Cited By

Luque Ruiz IGómez-Nieto M(2012)RollingEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-010-9144-617:1(49-77)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-010-9144-6
Geng G(2011)Investigation of factors that influence collaboration within an online learning contextInternational Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning10.1504/IJTEL.2011.0394013:2(176-189)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1504/IJTEL.2011.039401
Disney LGeng G(2010)Overview of interaction framework within an online learning contextInternational Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning10.1504/IJTEL.2010.0357332:4(298-308)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1504/IJTEL.2010.035733
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Authority and convergence in collaborative learning
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. Collaborative learning

Recommendations

Using Jigsaw and Case Study for supporting online collaborative learning
Abstract
In CSCL contexts (Computer Supported Collaborative Learning) collaborative activities with different levels of structuredeness are often used to foster discussion and exchange among students and enhance collaboration. In this field the ...
Do students need teacher's initiation in online collaborative learning?

As more and more people use computers to complete their work and solve problems in the workplace, computing education is emphasized for students of all levels and disciplines in Taiwan. However, the computing education in Taiwan can hardly be recognized ...
Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools
Abstract
Research has already outlined the enormous potential of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) to facilitate effective learning processes in higher education. There is still need, though, to build up a validated model able to ...
Highlights
- Analysis of the key elements in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
- ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers & Education

Computers & Education Volume 41, Issue 4

Documenting collaborative interactions: Issues and approaches

December 2003

110 pages

ISSN:0360-1315

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Elsevier Science Ltd.

United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2003

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Luque Ruiz IGómez-Nieto M(2012)RollingEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-010-9144-617:1(49-77)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-010-9144-6
Geng G(2011)Investigation of factors that influence collaboration within an online learning contextInternational Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning10.1504/IJTEL.2011.0394013:2(176-189)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1504/IJTEL.2011.039401
Disney LGeng G(2010)Overview of interaction framework within an online learning contextInternational Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning10.1504/IJTEL.2010.0357332:4(298-308)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1504/IJTEL.2010.035733
Cross JHendrix TUmphress DBarowski LJain JMontgomery L(2009)Robust Generation of Dynamic Data Structure Visualizations with Multiple Interaction ApproachesACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/1538234.15382409:2(1-32)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1538234.1538240
Hundhausen CNarayanan NCrosby M(2008)Exploring studio-based instructional models for computing educationACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/1352322.135227140:1(392-396)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1352322.1352271
Hundhausen CNarayanan NCrosby MDougherty JRodger SFitzgerald SGuzdial M(2008)Exploring studio-based instructional models for computing educationProceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education10.1145/1352135.1352271(392-396)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1352135.1352271

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents