skip to main content
article

A negotiation-based networking methodology to enable cooperation across heterogeneous co-located networks

Published: 01 August 2012 Publication History

Abstract

In a future internet of things, an increasing number of every-day objects becomes interconnected with each other. Current network solutions are not designed to connect a large number of co-located devices with different characteristics and network requirements. To cope with increasingly large and heterogeneous networks, this paper presents an 'incentive driven' networking approach that optimizes the network performance by taking into account the network goals ('incentives') of all individual devices. Incentive driven networking consists of the following steps. First, devices dynamically search for co-located devices with similar network preferences and hardware and/or software capabilities. Next, if such devices are found, communities consisting of interconnected objects with similar network expectations are formed on an ad hoc basis. Due to the similarities between the involved devices, it is easier to optimize the network performance of each individual community. Finally, different communities can cooperate with each other by activating and sharing (software or hardware) network resources. The paper describes which (future) research is needed to realize this vision and illustrates the concepts with a number of simple algorithms. Through an experimental proof-of-concept implementation with two networks of resource-constrained embedded devices, it is shown that even these simple algorithms already result in improved network performance. Finally, the paper describes a large number of example use cases that can potentially benefit from our innovative networking methodology.

References

[1]
The internet of things, ITU Internet Reports, 2005.
[2]
S. Buljore, H. Harada, S. Filin, P. Houze, K. Tsagkaris, O. Holland, K. Nolte, T. Farnham, V. Ivanov, Architecture and enablers for optimized radio resource usage in heterogeneous wireless access networks: the IEEE 1900.4 working group, IEEE Communications Magazine, 2009.
[3]
Wheeler, A., Commercial applications of wireless sensor networks using zigbee. IEEE Communications Magazine. v45 i4. 70-77.
[4]
C.F. Garca-Hernnndez, P.H. Ibargnengoytia-Gonznlez, J. Garcna-Hernnndez, J.A. Pnrez-Dnaz, Wireless sensor networks and applications: a survey, IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 7 (3) (2007).
[5]
N. Wakamiya, S. Arakawa, M. Murata, Self-organization based network architecture for new generation networks, in: First International Conference on Emerging Network Intelligence, October 2009, pp. 61-68.
[6]
Camp, T., Boleng, J. and Davies, V., A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. v2 i5. 483-502.
[7]
Musaloiu-E, R. and Terzis, A., Minimising the effect of wifi interference in 802.15.4 wireless sensor networks. International Journal on Sensor Networks. v3. 43-54.
[8]
M. Yarvis, N. Kushalnagar, H. Singh, A. Rangarajan, Y. Liu, S. Singh, Exploiting heterogeneity in sensor networks, in: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Infocom 2005), 2005.
[9]
Nash, A., Duane, W. and Joseph, C., PKI: Implementing and Managing E-Security. 2001. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
[10]
M. Toorani, A. Shirazi, Lpki - a lightweight public key infrastructure for the mobile environments, in: 11th IEEE Singapore International Conference on Communication Systems, 2008 (ICCS 2008), 2008, pp. 162-166.
[11]
Feigenbaum, M.B.J. and Lacy, J., Decentralized trust management. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos. pp. 164-173.
[12]
OpenPGP Message Format (IETF standard), <http://www.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880>.
[13]
Device description structures, <http://www.w3.org/TR/dd-structures/>.
[14]
A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. v11. 116-130.
[15]
Non-intrusive aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks. v9 i3. 324-340.
[16]
Dasilva, L., Bogucka, H. and Mackenzie, A., Game theory in wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine. v49 i8. 110-111.
[17]
MacKenzie, A. and Wicker, S., Game theory and the design of self-configuring, adaptive wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine. v39 i11. 126-131.
[18]
Lee, M., Marconett, D., Ye, X. and Yoo, S.J.B., Cognitive network management with reinforcement learning for wireless mesh networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on IP Operations and Management, IPOM'07, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 168-179.
[19]
De Poorter, E., Troubleyn, E., Moerman, I. and Demeester, P., IDRA: a flexible system architecture for next-generation wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks (Springer). v17 i6.
[20]
D. Hughes, K. Thoelen, W. HorrT, N. Matthys, et al., Looci: a loosely-coupled component infrastructure for networked embedded systems, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia, Kualu Lumpur, Malaysia, 14-16 December 2009, pp. 195-203.
[21]
Erl, T., Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology, and Design. 2005. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
[22]
Tmotesky datasheet, <http://www.snm.ethz.ch/projects/tmotesky>.
[23]
The IBBT W-iLab.t wireless sensor testbed, <http://www.ilabt.ibbt.be/>.
[24]
L. Tytgat, B. Jooris, P. De Mil, B. Latre, I. Moerman, P. Demeester, Demo abstract: Wilab, a real-life wireless sensor testbed with environment emulation, published in European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, EWSN Adjunct Poster Proceedings (EWSN), Cork, Ireland, February 2009.
[25]
Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing. networking group request for comments (rfc): 3561, July 2003, <http://www.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3561>.
[26]
M. Wirz, Btnode application for automated link measurements, term thesis, Master's thesis, ETH Zurich, 2007.
[27]
D. Ganesan, B. Krishnamachari, A. Woo, D. Culler, D. Estrin, S. Wicker, Complex behavior at scale: an experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks, Wireless Sensor Networks, Technical Report CSD-TR 02-0013, UCLA, February 2002.
[28]
Wu, Y., Chou, P., Zhang, Q., Jain, K., Zhu, W. and Kung, S.-Y., Network planning in wireless ad hoc networks: a cross-layer approach. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. v23 i1. 136-150.
[29]
Wu, Y., Chou, P., Zhang, Q., Jain, K., Zhu, W. and Kung, S.-Y., Network planning in wireless ad hoc networks: a cross-layer approach. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. v23. 136-150.
[30]
Haykin, S., Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. v23 i2. 201-220.
[31]
Jondral, F.K., Software-defined radio - basics and evolution to cognitive radio. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. v2005 i3. 275283
[32]
Akyildiz, I., Lee, W., Vuran, M. and Mohanty, S., Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Elsevier Computer Networks. v50. 2127-2159.
[33]
Thomas, R.W., Friend, D.H., Dasilva, L.A. and Mackenzie, A.B., Cognitive networks: adaptation and learning to achieve end-to-end performance objectives. IEEE Communications Magazine. v44 i12. 51-57.
[34]
C. Fortuna, M. Mohorcic, Trends in the development of communication networks: cognitive networks, Computer Networks, 2009.
[35]
A.K. Sadek, K. Liu, A. Ephremides, Collaborative multiple-access protocols for wireless networks, ICC 2006, 2006.
[36]
J. Garcna-Vidal, M. Guerrero-Zapata, J. Morillo, D. Fust, A protocol stack for cooperative wireless networks, in: Wireless Systems and Mobility in Next Generation Internet, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 4396, 2007, pp 62-73.
[37]
Opportunistic networking: data forwarding in disconnected mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Magazine. v44 i11. 134-141.
[38]
Owl-s: semantic markup standard for web services, <http://www.w3.org/submission/owl-s/>.

Cited By

View all
  1. A negotiation-based networking methodology to enable cooperation across heterogeneous co-located networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Ad Hoc Networks
      Ad Hoc Networks  Volume 10, Issue 6
      August, 2012
      297 pages

      Publisher

      Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

      Netherlands

      Publication History

      Published: 01 August 2012

      Author Tags

      1. Network coexistence
      2. Network cooperation
      3. Network discovery
      4. Network negotiation
      5. Network optimization
      6. Self-configuration
      7. Self-organization

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media