skip to main content
research-article

Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight

Published: 01 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

This study proposes an approach for visualizing a knowledge structure, the proposed approach creates a three-dimensional “Research focused parallelship network”, a “Keyword Co-occurrence Network”, and a two-dimensional knowledge map to facilitate visualization of the knowledge structure created by journal papers from different perspectives. The networks and knowledge maps can be depicted differently by choosing different information as the network actor, e.g. author, institute or country keyword, to reflect knowledge structures in micro-, meso-, and macro-levels, respectively. Technology Foresight is selected as an example to illustrate the method proposed in this study. A total of 556 author keywords contained in 181 Technology Foresight related papers have been analyzed. European countries, China, India and Brazil are located at the core of Technology Foresight research. Quantitative ways of mapping journal papers are investigated in this study to unveil emerging elements as well as to demonstrate dynamics and visualization of knowledge. The quantitative method provided in this paper shows a possible way of visualizing and evaluating knowledge structure; thus a computerized calculation is possible for potential quantitative applications, e.g. R&D resource allocation, research performance evaluation, science map, etc.

References

[1]
Alsan A and Oner MA An integrated view of foresight: Integrated foresight management model Foresight 2003 5 33-45
[2]
Amsteus M Managerial foresight: Concept and measurement Foresight 2008 10 53-66
[3]
Baldwin C, Hughes J, Hope T, Jacoby R, and Ziebland S Ethics and dementia: Mapping the literature by bibliometric analysis International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2003 18 41-54
[4]
Bhattacharya S and Basu PK Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis Scientometrics 1998 43 359-372
[5]
Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1992). Centrality and power in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, 191, 215.
[6]
Callon M, Courtial JP, and Laville F Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry Scientometrics 1991 22 155-205
[7]
Cambrosio A, Limoges C, Courtial JP, and Laville F Historical scientometrics? Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with coword analysis Scientometrics 1993 27 119-143
[8]
Chiu WT and Ho YS Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research Scientometrics 2007 73 3-17
[9]
Chiu WT, Huang JS, and Ho YS Bibliometric analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related research in the beginning stage Scientometrics 2004 61 69-77
[10]
Clarke A, Gatineau M, Thorogood M, and Wyn-Roberts N Health promotion research literature in Europe 1995–2005 The European Journal of Public Health 2007 17 24-28
[11]
Coulter N, Monarch I, and Konda S Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998 49 1206-1223
[12]
Courtial JP A coword analysis of scientometrics Scientometrics 1994 31 251-260
[13]
Cuhls, K., Breiner, S., & Grupp, H. (1995). Delphi-Bericht 1995 zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik-Mini-Delphi. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer-Institut ISI (auch herausgegeben als BMBF-Brosch\üre, Bonn 1996).
[14]
Czaplicka-Kolarz K, Stańczyk K, and Kapusta K Technology foresight for a vision of energy sector development in Poland till 2030. Delphi survey as an element of technology foresighting Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2009 76 327-338
[15]
Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica: RAND Corp.
[16]
De Looze MA and Lemarié J Corpus relevance through co-word analysis: An application to plant proteints Scientometrics 1997 39 267-280
[17]
Ding Y, Chowdhury GG, and Foo SBibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysisInformation Processing and Management200137817-8420971.68558
[18]
Dosi G Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change Research Policy 1982 11 147-162
[19]
Freeman LC Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification Social Networks 1979 1 215-239
[20]
Gavigan JP and Scapolo F A comparison of national foresight exercises Foresight 1999 1 495-517
[21]
Granovetter MS The strength of weak ties American Journal of Sociology 1973 78 1360-1380
[22]
Grupp H and Linstone HA National technology foresight activities around the globe: An experimental study of group opinion Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1999 60 85-94
[23]
Gupta BM and Bhattacharya S A bibliometric approach towards mapping the dynamics of science and technology DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology 2004 24 3-8
[24]
Havas A Evolving foresight in a small transition economy Journal of Forecasting 2003 22 179-201
[25]
Helmer, O., & Rescher, N. (1959). On the epistemology of the inexact sciences, Management Science, 25–52.
[26]
Hinze S Bibliographical cartography of an emerging interdisciplinary discipline: The case of bioelectronics Scientometrics 1994 29 353-376
[27]
Ho YS Bibliometric Analysis of Adsorption Technology in Environmental Science Journal of Environmental Protection Science 2007 1 1-11
[28]
Irvine, J., & Martin, B. R. (1984). Foresight in science: Picking the winners. London: Pinter.
[29]
Kajikawa Y and Takeda Y Structure of research on biomass and bio-fuels: A citation-based approach Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 1349-1359
[30]
Kajikawa Y and Takeda Y Citation network analysis of organic LEDs Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2009 76 1115-1123
[31]
Kajikawa Y, Yoshikawa J, Takeda Y, and Matsushima K Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: Toward a roadmap for sustainable energy Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 771-782
[32]
Kaplan A, Skogstad AL, and Girshick MA The prediction of social and technological events Public Opinion Quarterly 1950 14 93-110
[33]
Keenan M and Popper R Comparing foresight ‘style’ in six world regions Foresight 2008 10 16-38
[34]
Kostoff RN Literature-related discovery (LRD): Introduction and background Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 165-185
[35]
Kostoff RN Literature-related discovery (LRD): Potential treatments for cataracts Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 215-225
[36]
Kostoff RN Comparison of China/USA science and technology performance Journal of Informetrics 2008 2 354-363
[37]
Kostoff RN, Antonio del Río J, Cortés HD, Smith C, Smith A, Wagner C, Leydesdorff L, Karypis G, Malpohl G, and Tshiteya R The structure and infrastructure of Mexico’s science and technology Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2005 72 798-814
[38]
Kostoff RN, Bhattacharya S, and Pecht M Assessment of China’s and India’s science and technology literature—introduction, background, and approach Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2007 74 1519-1538
[39]
Kostoff RN, Block JA, Solka JL, Briggs MB, Rushenberg RL, Stump JA, Johnson D, Lyons TJ, and Wyatt JR Literature-related discovery (LRD): Lessons learned, and future research directions Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 276-299
[40]
Kostoff RN and Briggs MB Literature-related discovery (LRD): Potential treatments for Parkinson’s disease Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 226-238
[41]
Kostoff RN, Briggs MB, and Lyons TJ Literature-related discovery (LRD): Potential treatments for multiple sclerosis Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 239-255
[42]
Kostoff RN, Briggs MB, Rushenberg RL, Bowles CA, Icenhour AS, Nikodym KF, Barth RB, and Pecht M Chinese science and technology—structure and infrastructure Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2007 74 1539-1573
[43]
Kostoff RN, Briggs MB, Rushenberg RL, Bowles CA, Pecht M, Johnson D, Bhattacharya S, Icenhour AS, Nikodym K, Barth RB, et al. Comparisons of the structure and infrastructure of Chinese and Indian Science and Technology Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2007 74 1609-1630
[44]
Kostoff RN, Briggs MB, Solka JL, and Rushenberg RL Literature-related discovery (LRD): Methodology Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 186-202
[45]
Kostoff RN, Eberhart HJ, and Toothman DR Database tomography for technical intelligence: A roadmap of the near-earth space science and technology literature Information Processing and Management 1998 34 69-85
[46]
Kostoff RN, Johnson D, Bowles CA, Bhattacharya S, Icenhour AS, Nikodym K, Barth RB, and Dodbele S Assessment of India’s research literature Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2007 74 1574-1608
[47]
Kostoff RN, Koytcheff RG, and Lau CG Global nanotechnology research literature overview Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2007 74 1733-1747
[48]
Kostoff RN, Solka JL, Rushenberg RL, and Wyatt JA Literature-related discovery (LRD): Water purification Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2008 75 256-275
[49]
Kostoff RN, Tshiteya R, Pfeil KM, and Humenik JA Electrochemical power text mining using bibliometrics and database tomography Journal of Power Sources 2002 110 163-176
[50]
Kostoff RN, Tshiteya R, Pfeil KM, Humenik JA, and Karypis G Power source roadmaps using bibliometrics and database tomography Energy 2005 30 709-730
[51]
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. USA: University of Chicago.
[52]
Landeta J Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2006 73 467-482
[53]
Lee P-C, Su H-N, and Wu F-S Quantitative mapping of patented technology—the case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2009 77 466-478
[54]
Li T, Ho YS, and Li CY Bibliometric analysis on global Parkinson’s disease research trends during 1991–2006 Neuroscience Letters 2008 441 248-252
[55]
Linstone HA and Turoff M Delphi method: Techniques and applications 1975 USA Addison-Wesley
[56]
Loveridge, D., Georghiou, L., & Nedeva, M. (1995). United Kingdom Technology Foresight Programme Delphi Survey.
[57]
Martin BR and Johnston R Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1999 60 37-54
[58]
Mu RP, Ren ZB, Yuan SD, and Yuan Q Technology foresight towards 2020 in China: The practice and its impacts Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 2008 20 287-308
[59]
NISTEP. (2005). NISTEP Report No. 94–98: The 8th Science and Technology Foresight Survey. NISTEP.
[60]
Noyons ECM and Van Raan AFJ Bibliometric cartography of scientific and technological developments of an R&D field Scientometrics 1994 30 157-173
[61]
Noyons ECM and Van Raan AFJ Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998 49 68-81
[62]
Rikken F, Kiers HAL, and Vos R Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL Scientometrics 1995 33 367-380
[63]
Rip A and Courtial JP Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics Scientometrics 1984 6 381-400
[64]
Saritas O, Taymaz E, and Tumer T Vision 2023: Turkey’s National Technology Foresight Program: A contextualist analysis and discussion Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2007 74 1374-1393
[65]
Schlossstein D and Park B Comparing recent technology foresight studies in Korea and China: Towards foresight-minded governments? Foresight 2006 8 48-70
[66]
Tian Y, Wen C, and Hong S Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006 Journal of Informetrics 2008 2 65-74
[67]
Van Eck NJ and Waltman L Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems 2007 15 625
[68]
Van Raan AFJ and Tijssen RJW The neural net of neural network research: An exercise in bibliometric mapping Scientometrics (Print) 1993 26 169-192
[69]
Wikipedia. (2009). Wikipedia.
[70]
Wild, C., & Torgersen, H. (2000). Foresight in medicine Lessons from three European Delphi studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[71]
Yang QQ, Gong ZM, Cheng JY, and Wang G Technology foresight and critical technology selection in China International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 2004 1 168-180

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Scientometrics
Scientometrics  Volume 85, Issue 1
Oct 2010
26 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2010
Received: 09 October 2009

Author Tags

  1. Keyword
  2. Network theory
  3. Knowledge structure
  4. Technology Foresight

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media