skip to main content
article

Do quantum strategies always win?

Published: 01 November 2015 Publication History

Abstract

In a seminal paper, Meyer (Phys Rev Lett 82:1052, 1999) described the advantages of quantum game theory by looking at the classical penny flip game. A player using a quantum strategy can win against a classical player almost 100 % of the time. Here we make a slight modification to the quantum game, with the two players sharing an entangled state to begin with. We then analyze two different scenarios: First in which quantum player makes unitary transformations to his qubit, while the classical player uses a pure strategy of either flipping or not flipping the state of his qubit. In this case, the quantum player always wins against the classical player. In the second scenario, we have the quantum player making similar unitary transformations, while the classical player makes use of a mixed strategy wherein he either flips or not with some probability "p." We show that in the second scenario, 100 % win record of a quantum player is drastically reduced and for a particular probability "p" the classical player can even win against the quantum player. This is of possible relevance to the field of quantum computation as we show that in this quantum game of preserving versus destroying entanglement a particular classical algorithm can beat the quantum algorithm.

References

[1]
Eisert, J., et al.: Quantum games and quantum strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3077 (1999)
[2]
Du, J., et al.: Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 137902 (2002)
[3]
Iqbal, A.: Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games. arXiv:quant-ph/0503176
[4]
Guo, H., Zhang, J., Koehler, G.J.: A survey of quantum games. Decis. Support Syst. 46, 318 (2008)
[5]
Levine, D.K.: Quantum games have no news for economists. dklevine.com/papers/quantumnonews
[6]
van Enk, S.J., Pike, R.: Classical rules in quantum games. Phys. Rev. A 66, 024306 (2002)
[7]
Meyer, D.: Quantum strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1052 (1999)
[8]
Khan, F.S., Phoenix, S.J.: Gaming the quantum. Quantum Inf. Comput. 13(3&4), 0231 (2013)
[9]
Balakrishnan, S., Sankaranarayanan, R.: Classical rules and quantum strategies in penny flip game. Quantum Inf. Process 12, 1261 (2013)
[10]
Iqbal, A., Abbott, D.: Quantum matching pennies game (cross-disciplinary physics and related areas of science and technology). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78/1, 014803 (2009)
[11]
Zhang, L.-H., et al.: Direct measurement of the concurrence of two-photon polarization-entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 88, 062342 (2013)
[12]
Huang, Y.-F., et al.: Experimental measurement of lower and upper bounds of concurrence for mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 79, 052338 (2009)
[13]
Schmid, C., et al.: Experimental direct observation of mixed state entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 260505 (2008)

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Quantum Information Processing
Quantum Information Processing  Volume 14, Issue 11
November 2015
353 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2015

Author Tags

  1. Algorithms
  2. Games
  3. Quantum strategy

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media