User talk:Wigulf~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Kategorien

[edit]

Hallo. Ich sehe dass du die Landshafts-Kategorien (landskap) auf die kommun-kategorien engeführst hast. Weil nicht falsch, überlege ich ob es nicht besser ist, nur die Stadt under den Landshafts-kategorie zu einführen? Wiel die Stadt und Landskap sind beide historische einheiten, aber der Län und Gemeinde die Administration von Heute. So z.B. soll Category:Närke nur für Seite Örebro benutzt werden und nicth für Category:Örebro. Was denkst du davon? Gruss Fred Chess 17:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, please be careful when adding copyright tags. Image:Akallavy.jpg, Image:Rinkeby skyline.jpg, Image:Rinkeby.jpg, Image:Hhgg.jpg and probably many more are not GFDL, they are licensed as public domain. Please go through your uploads and tag them correctly. Thuresson 18:17, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I corrected the copyright tags for Image:Akallavy.jpg and Image:Rinkeby skyline.jpg, but Image:Hhgg.jpg is actually GFDL in the english wikipedia where I've copied it from. Wigulf 12:10, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help, and sorry for me getting Hhgg.jpg wrong. Thuresson 13:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:420px-Ehs-Kirche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Nard 21:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Used one of your images

[edit]

Dear Sir, I just wanted to let you know that i used one of your images on my blog - it will go live tonight at 24pm Austrian time: http://tamss60.tamoggemon.com/2009/03/18/news-for-s60-developers/

Please leave a comment if you are unhappy or have any further statements or requests!

All the best from Linz Tam Hanna


File:Museum Nice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--- Zil (d) 13:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Hhgg.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hhgg.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Hhgg.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 13:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have also asked the admin who deleted the original from English Wikipedia to recover and add the missing information. LX (talk, contribs) 13:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

23:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

06:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 10:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Plymouth has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]