User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 18

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Schaft eines Wegekreuzes 1841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Maria Mustor-Bantusstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The upper part is slightly unsharp but the main object is OK. --LexKurochkin 12:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Kollesleuken Kapelle mit Bildstock 1751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Kollesleuken Kirche Sankt Ottilie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Junkerskreuz 1638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity church in Freudenburg, Germany, south view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town gate (1872) in Freudenburg, west view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine at electoral building (1730) in Freudenburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 19:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Pfarrhaus 1730 Türsturz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Bildstock 1819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Wegekreuz 1724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine, so-called "Junkerskreuz" (1638) near Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1724) in Trassem, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (c. 1800) near Kirf-Meurich, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruin of Freudenburg Castle, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, northeast view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment

• There are no geo-coordinates
• I suggest that you crop the image so as to remove the notice board and electrical connection box at the bottom of the image. Also I suggest adjusting the lighting so that the image is not so dark. Martinvl (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Comment Geocode added. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church Saint Ottilia in Freudenburg-Kollesleuken, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of a Crucifixion group (1751) at a chapel in Freudenburg-Kollesleuken.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The only in scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tithe barn (around 1700) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lintel with Saint Joseph figure at the Catholic rectory (1730) in Freudenburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 21:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Kollesleuken Bildstock 1751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Junkerskreuz 1638 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel with wayside shrine (1751) in Freudenburg-Kollesleuken, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Are you sure this shrine was built in 1751. Looks modern, with a piece set into it from 1751. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Dear Charlesjsharp, that chapel is much younger, of course. I suppose 2nd half of the 19th century. However, that younger chapel is listed as cultural heritage monument. The relief of the Crucifixion of Christ (= wayside shrine) of 1751 is additionally mentioned in that entry. To complete that ensemble, I've also mentioned that relief in the scope, as it can also be seen in the photo. The year 1751 refers to that wayside shrine, not to the chapel, which is undated. Kind regards --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment The chapel would not seem to deserve a scope. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I tried to explain above: The chapel has been listed by the Generaldirektion Kulturelles Erbe Rheinland-Pfalz as a cultural heritage monument. What else do we need to justify a scope? --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The Palauenc05's explanation would cause this to be a valid scope based on the discussions we're having on the talk page, and certainly now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Question The link is made to a Wikipedia page; there is no link to an independent authority. The links are broken. As to why a State authority would list/protect a simple 20th Century 'chapel' I have no idea. Can you explain the status of these listings. It would be helpful for the VI criteria debate. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment State protection is based on a generic normative name. If we read the cards it is easy to see that the buildings are not protected in full but in pieces. Sometimes the roof, sometimes a tower or a window etc. Here it is the statue in the wall which is protected. This pattern is quite usual and no one had thought to dispute it. In fact the problem will be solved by the result of the vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks for the information. The 'stature in the wall' is therefore deserving of a scope, not the chapel. 10:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bettingen Wegekreuz 1587 Pieta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Stadttor 1872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port Vendres Star Leader.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Pfarrhaus 1730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 19:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Befestigungsanlage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 09:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Burg Ansicht nordost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lellig Weekräiz Op de Wéngert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Junkerskreuz 1638 Umgebung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catholic rectory (1730) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucate Centre Ostréicole Austernschalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (pupa)-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narbonne Palais des archevêques fontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narbonne building inscription-1708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thuir Spolium Marmorbogen mit Grabinschrift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucate Centre Ostréicole east view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Massane Saint-Martin de Lavall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bizanet Weinbergsturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romanesque Église Saint-Martin de Lavall, Sorède, France (west view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. The only in scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 18:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Massane river near Saint-Martin de Lavall, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Beautiful, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain at the Archbishops' Palace in Narbonne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 11:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inscription (1708) commemorating the laying of the foundation stone of the chapel "Saint-Eutrope", Cour Saint-Eutrope, Narbonne Cathedral..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oyster shells behind the shops of Centre Ostréicole in Leucate..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Village center of Brouilla, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, useful and often used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thuir Notre-Dame de la Victoire NW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Commonists 18:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brouilla Kapitell und Sonnenuhr (1684).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and a nice sundial. --Aristeas 09:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narbonne Kathedrale Seitenportal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de la Victoire de Thuir (northwest view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butzweiler weißes Kreuz 1632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Side portal of Cathedral Saint-Just-et-Saint-Pasteur in Narbonne..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehrang Unfallkreuz 1669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 10:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehrang Unfallkreuz 1669 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brouilla Place de la République.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boutenac wayside cross D61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1632) near Newel-Butzweiler, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1669) in Trier-Ehrang.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo Palauenc05,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narbonne Kathedrale Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, Tournasol7 09:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross at the D61 near Boutenac (Aude), France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, very good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main portal of Cathedral Saint-Just-et-Saint-Pasteur in Narbonne..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:14, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)