User talk:Notwist
Babel user information | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Users by language |
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 19:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
- Hello. I see i forgot a license, it's fixed now. Thank you for pointing this out Notwist 08:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Cannabis_cigarettes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Chaser 09:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:ThomasTelford.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:ThomasTelford.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 03:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Bluring iPod screens
[edit]Hi. Just wanted to say that bluring the screen was a good solution and a much better alternative than cropping out the image. Just wondering which tool you used since e.g. Image:SE W900 flickr.jpg could use something similar. /Lokal_Profil 12:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I used photoshop :) I'll fix that image right now! Sorry for the long response time, didn't see it until now Notwist 15:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Diclofenac.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Karelj 21:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:JasonStatham_right.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:JasonStatham_right.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil 22:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Waterhouse_Echo_and_Narcissus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Kameraad Pjotr 18:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Narcissus_cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Kameraad Pjotr 18:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Morgan-Tsvangirai-crop1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Cropped version of a copyright violation. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Images uploaded by Africa Festival. Cheers, --SVTCobra (talk) 19:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Calligraphy(1).jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Calligraphy(1).jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Kimsə (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 1051747b8c75bbf13643025bef1694c2
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Please link images
[edit]
Hello Notwist!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Folkfronten.svg is uncategorized since 1 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Buck65 vector.svg is uncategorized since 2 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:718smiley 608EC2.svg is uncategorized since 1 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kopimi pyra2.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Scribbled door.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Processbarhetsteorin.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Politisk kompass.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Kopimi logo usa.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Las palmas group.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Kopimi pyra1.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Graffiti at Palais de Tokyo.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
Hi, I see you've worked on this picture and uploaded a new version. Thank you for that. Yet, would you care to retract and upload it again under a new name? This is the best version we have of the original sepia photograph (and it has been promoted as the valued image for the scope "Oscar Wilde"), and your derivative version significally changes its colours. For this reason, both versions should be allowed to exist simultaneously. I thank you in advance. --Eusebius (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ofcourse. I'll upload it under a new name and revert it. Thank you for the heads up. Notwist (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! --Eusebius (talk) 16:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Westchester.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Choess (talk) 01:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Obama portrait revision
[edit]Hi, I appreciate your work with the Obama image, but for the sake of other users who want to use the picture with the original resolution, could you please upload your version of the file separately from the OTRS confirmed image? Thanks. Tktru (talk) 21:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I will try to remember this in the future, thank you. Notwist (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Change my pictures
[edit]Hey. You did some changing of my picture, Veronica Maggio.jpg I can't see what you done, so loved to know. Oderwise I remove your name Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Daniel, I'll answer your question in english as a courtesy to other readers. I presume you are talking about the file File:Veronica Maggio.jpg. If you look at the bottom of the page you can see the original version and the newest version. Just for the sake of being clear, here are the permanent links to both versions for you to compare: original vs. retouched. Regards Notwist (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hej, jag tycker inte att det var så bra att du "fixade till" denna bild. Det var originalfilen från Stockholms stadsmuseum och på kanten (som du klippte bort) kunde man se bl.a. datum och autor, dessutom hade bilden med sina färgskiftningar och småfel en viss charm. Jag avstod medvetet från att förändra bilden. Som alternativ hade jag även en beskuren variant. Jag kommer därför att ladda upp tidigare variant igen. Det är även bra att fråga innan. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Originalfilen är ju inte försvunnen, den finns ju fortfarande att hämta i historiken där nere. Om förändringarna är av sådan art att det inte finns anledning att vilja använda originalfilen tycker jag att det är bäst att skriva över, så slipper man ändra alla eventuella bildlänkar. Inte för att vara dryg, men varför ska man fråga? Det finns inget "ägande" av varken artiklar eller bilder på Wikipedia/Commons, varje bidragsgivare är fri att förbättra bilder så som den anser bäst, skulle det i värsta fall inte bli en förbättring så går det även att återställa bilderna. Notwist (talk) 18:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- På wikipedia gäller någonting som kallas "konsensus", jag tycker att bildförändringar av denna art skall absolut diskuteras, liksom större artikeländringar, då får man veta hur vederbörande hade tänkt. Det har inget med "ägande" att göra utan med respekt. Jag lyckades inte att återställa den ursprungliga filen utan var tvungen att ladda upp en ny bild. God kväll. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ubuntu-desktop-2-804-20080708.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AVRS (talk) 11:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Biggie grafitti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Seidenstud (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Google_translate.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Sevela.p 21:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Notwist_jan07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Amada44 (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Bam_Margera_and_Ryan_Dunn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GeorgHH • talk 20:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Notwist_gotland_2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Amada44 talk to me 08:43, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Notwist.biltak.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Notwist.biltak.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Notwist.biltak.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
GeorgHH • talk 12:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
grillo (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Fountain_of_Eternal_Life_crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 23:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Your speedies
[edit]Hi Notwist,
File:Berber warriors.JPG is heavily used and cannot simply be deleted without replacement. I tried to hide the upload entry with your realname, but that didn't work. Therefore you should re-upload this image under a similar filename, but without your realname in the description. Thereafter we could substitute and then delete the old one. The same with File:Max visby.jpg, File:Sunset and a skislope.JPG and all other images. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- I successfully hid the details at File:Sunset and a skislope.JPG. Will try the others now... Rehman 11:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- No, it did not work. Look at the lower part of the page at the most right field of the boxed table. --Túrelio (talk) 11:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right. Page data can be hidden, but as you said, data within the upload log cannot. But I think if Notwist reupload the same file over the same file as a new version (yes, you read right), then we could delete the old file (along with the upload log), and the necessary page history... Rehman 11:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Or as you said, a simpler way would be to upload the same file on a different name and delete the current once and for all... Rehman 11:23, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Real name? I don't see it on the file and we might be able to edit the history if you can show which edit is a problem. It is such a widely used file it would be difficult to justify speedy when other options may exist. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Billinghurst, please see #Your_speedies above. Rehman 12:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- And I looked at the bottom only (D'oh!). There is a methodology to manage this, see http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=48116819 where it talks about reloading copies of the files with a new file history, and we can hide the older versions. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The real name is in the comment at the bottom of the page (where you can see the different versions of the file, only one on this particular image though) Notwist (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Just for the record; I am absolutely not opposed to the continued use of the images, I just want the name gone. If you wish to reupload the images, that is fine by me, but I would very much want my name deleted. Thank you. Notwist (talk) 15:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- But it is to be preferred that the re-upload happens by yourself (under your username, but without reference to your realname). --Túrelio (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Since I don't have the right to delete images it would seem to me that it would be easier for an admin to do it. All you'd have to do is download the images, copy the description text, delete the image, upload it again. For me it would require me for do the same thing, except I can't delete the pictures so I then have to post links to the old images to be deleted, and all links would have to be changed to the new file name. Also, If I wish that my pictures be deleted, do I not have that right? I seem to remember there being a "right to disappear", does this not also apply for images? Notwist (talk) 15:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Pleeeease. 1) You have the right to disappear (as a user), but that does not refer to your images. 2) You can wish the deletion of your images, but after having them uploaded under a free license, formally you don't have control over them; though we sometimes grant that wish out of courtesy if the images are not in use and if there is a compelling reason. 3) Above I had explained to you, why the images cannot simply be deleted, as they are in use. 4) until now, at least 3 other users/admins have dedicated some time to fulfil your wish, as you can easily see from the discussions above. Therefore, you could be a little more cooperative, IMHO. 5) A re-upload of these images by their original author is of course to be preferred over a re-upload by somebody else. And as written already 2 times, this re-upload does not require that you disclose your realname. --Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- What's with the attitude? I was merely suggesting that it would be less work and a smoother transition for someone who is actually capable of deleting the pictures. I wasn't aware that it was preferred that the author reuploaded the images because I didn't think it mattered (they are free license anyway). I tried uploading them anew now, I got a warning that the picture already existed, I tried choosing "save anyway" but it doesn't seem to have been uploaded. Could you please delete the following files and I'll reupload them momentarily as I now have them downloaded to my computer: File:Construction in Agadir, Morocco, 2006.jpg, File:Berber warriors.JPG, File:Max visby.jpg, File:Sunset and a skislope.JPG, File:Alstern (2295732069).jpg. Or do you have a better idea? Because I can't seem to get the upload to work when there are duplicates. Notwist (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- You tried to upload them with the same filename (= new version) or with a different filename (as I had suggested in my very first posting)? Did you activate the switch "ignore warnings"? If not, try it. I have deleted the only unused file of your above list. If I delete the other ones, the links to the projects will break. Though I don't know how fast, due to the somewhat erratic behaviour of the CommonsDelinker. Therefore, I prefer (as stated above at "Your speedies") the file to be re-uploaded under a slightly different filename. Thereafter I can command the CommonsDelinker to change the usage links to the new name and the "bad" can be deleted without breaking the links. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- What's with the attitude? I was merely suggesting that it would be less work and a smoother transition for someone who is actually capable of deleting the pictures. I wasn't aware that it was preferred that the author reuploaded the images because I didn't think it mattered (they are free license anyway). I tried uploading them anew now, I got a warning that the picture already existed, I tried choosing "save anyway" but it doesn't seem to have been uploaded. Could you please delete the following files and I'll reupload them momentarily as I now have them downloaded to my computer: File:Construction in Agadir, Morocco, 2006.jpg, File:Berber warriors.JPG, File:Max visby.jpg, File:Sunset and a skislope.JPG, File:Alstern (2295732069).jpg. Or do you have a better idea? Because I can't seem to get the upload to work when there are duplicates. Notwist (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Pleeeease. 1) You have the right to disappear (as a user), but that does not refer to your images. 2) You can wish the deletion of your images, but after having them uploaded under a free license, formally you don't have control over them; though we sometimes grant that wish out of courtesy if the images are not in use and if there is a compelling reason. 3) Above I had explained to you, why the images cannot simply be deleted, as they are in use. 4) until now, at least 3 other users/admins have dedicated some time to fulfil your wish, as you can easily see from the discussions above. Therefore, you could be a little more cooperative, IMHO. 5) A re-upload of these images by their original author is of course to be preferred over a re-upload by somebody else. And as written already 2 times, this re-upload does not require that you disclose your realname. --Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Since I don't have the right to delete images it would seem to me that it would be easier for an admin to do it. All you'd have to do is download the images, copy the description text, delete the image, upload it again. For me it would require me for do the same thing, except I can't delete the pictures so I then have to post links to the old images to be deleted, and all links would have to be changed to the new file name. Also, If I wish that my pictures be deleted, do I not have that right? I seem to remember there being a "right to disappear", does this not also apply for images? Notwist (talk) 15:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- "1) You have the right to disappear (as a user), but that does not refer to your images" <- I was merely pointing out that the right to disappear should also apply to any information on the image pages, I never said anything about the pictures having to be deleted (they are freely licensed and I cannot revoke that, nor would I want to) but if the only way for Commons to remove the data that I want to remove is to delete the picture then it would make sense that that is what Commons have to do (and then reupload). Regardless, I am cooperating and I don't see what I've done to deserve the kind of attitude you're giving me, it seems highly unsuitable for a person in an administrative position to act in a non-helpful way towards users, and I should know because I'm an admin on the Swedish wikipedia myself and I consistently try to be pedagogical and nice even to people I heavily disagree with. I'd appreciate actual suggestions on what to do instead of your demeaning attitude. Notwist (talk) 18:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
New files uploaded: File:Berber warriors show.JPG - File:Max Visby Gotland.jpg - File:Sunset skislope.JPG - File:Alstern varmland.jpg Notwist (talk) 23:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- As you may have seen already, I've now deleted the 4 old files, after all their usage had been replaced, mainly by the CommonsDelinker, except of 3 manual substitutions. For forensic reasons I've added the date of the original upload of the now deleted versions to the description of the new uploads. If you prefer, you may remove that. It was meant as a safeguard in case you have to provide evidence of your first publication/release. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Age of consent map in swedish
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cc/Age_of_Consent_sv.png/220px-Age_of_Consent_sv.png)
Hello, the map in swedish looks out of date, it lists Madagascar and Mexico incorrectly. Texcarson (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- My only actual contribution to this image was translating the text at the bottom, so when thinking about it I would probably recommend using the English version (less images to update) :) Notwist (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Notwist.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Adrignola talk 22:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Notwist.wasted.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Adrignola talk 22:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-698-0038-04,_Russland-Nord,_Panzer_VI_(Tiger_I).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
195.46.58.224 09:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Notwist_politicalcompass.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Santosga (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Slicked_back.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Santosga (talk) 12:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kafka_Starke_Verwandlung_1915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
91.64.141.8 01:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Treinamento2.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Treinamento2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Treinamento2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Stefan4 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Liberated warsaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Monique Wadsted and Rasmus Fleischer.jpg is missing author information
[edit]Hello! The specified license for the work says that it "may be used freely by anyone for any purpose as long as the photographer is credited, where applicable, as required by non-waivable parts of Swedish copyright law.". The "where applicable"-part makes me a little uncertain. If this means that it is not applicable if the author is not specified (like in our case), then all is well. Otherwise use and re-use of the image is not possible. Unfortunately the image is no longer available at the given source. If you happen to know who the author is, can you perhaps update the file information? --Bensin (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Most likely the image was missing author information when it was put up on the pirate party website as well. The way I see it, it should be enough to credit The Pirate Party of Sweden as the author, in lieu of the actual photographer stepping forward. If the Pirate Party published it on their website I think it's safe to assume that it was a member of the party that took the image, and by publishing it on their website without author information they consented to the party's license, basically allowing republication without crediting the author. Notwist (talk) 19:41, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
clenched fist
[edit]As the creator of File:Gonzo.svg, you might be interested in the discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Womanpower_logo.svg. John Vandenberg (chat) 02:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 13:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Graffiti at Palais de Tokyo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 06:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Notwist.neongolden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sjodin.cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Rear front monument.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Rear front monument.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rear front monument.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Vanjagenije (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Rear front monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vanjagenije (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e5/WLM_ITA_DEF_V.svg/220px-WLM_ITA_DEF_V.svg.png)
Gentile Notwist, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.
Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.
Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!
Grazie, Nemo 16:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!
[edit]
Hi,
You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!
You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.
This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.
If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Regards, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Fretsonfire2.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fretsonfire2.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fretsonfire2.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Solomon203 (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Politisk kompass.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |