User talk:Kruusamägi/archive 2006-2014

Tere! Oleks hea, kui kaardil http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Many_Karelias_est.png saaks õigesti mõned nimed. "Valge Karjala" on eesti keeles "Valge mere Karjala" [1], "Olonetsi Karjala" "Aunuse Karjala" [2], Oneega järv "Äänisjärv". - Urmas 19:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC) (et:Kasutaja:Urmas)[reply]

Parandasin vead. Vaata ka [3] Iffcool 18:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vaatasin. Karjala piirkondadest on eesti keeles kirjutanud prof. Ott Kurs. Ajakirjadest nii "Eesti Looduses" ja vist ka "Akadeemias". Tasuks pilk heita ka soomlaste rahvusentsüklopeediale, soomlased on karjalaste ja Karjala osas üheselt asjatundjad ja kui vaja (pole ise viimaste aastate jooksul sinna kiiganud :) ) kaarti muuta (Piirkondade nimed loomulikult KNAB-ist). Karjala kannas asub Soome lahe ja Laadoga ning Aunuse kannas Laadoga ja Äänisjärve vahel (Onega on kahjuks selge russitsism :( ). - Urmas 11:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jõgede nimed Karjala kaardil

Ka jõgede nimed Kem ja Svir on Karjala artikli kaardil selged russitsismid! Parem oleks kirjutada: Kemi jõgi ja Süväri jõgi. Lugupidamisega. Urmas.

Väikesed saared

Tere! Väiksetele saartele oleks kaardil hea tõmmata ümber ring (meenutab vaatajale luupi ;) ), mis tõmbaks tähelepanu ja aitaks pisikest objekti kaardilt üles leida (umbes nii nagu http://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilt:Buru.gif ; saare nime märkimine (ja alusjoon selle juures) pole oluline ega otseselt vajalik ning sõltub kaardi tegija suvast). Nii oleks kaardi lugeja tähelepanu püütud kahel moel - erineva värvi kasutamisega saare märkimiseks ja "luubiga". Need kumbki eraldi aitavad samuti saart leida, kuid kaks on parem kui üks. Ka on dubleerimine abiks värvipimedaile ja "mittetähelepanelikele" :). Jõudu! - Urmas 01:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Hi, someone has uploaded an image from nagi.ee, namely this one. The license text (here) is in Eesti. Could you try to translate it into English, so that we can understand what it says? You can answer here or at the deletion request. Thank you very much, --rimshot^talk 14:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kalevipoeg.JPG

Hi Iffcool, are you sure this picture is public domain? Do you know who is the artist of the cover image? And his he/she really for more than 70 years dead? Since the edition you photographed dates from 1975 this isn't necessarily self-evident. It would be nic if you could check the authorship. Kind regards --Zinnmann 16:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Kalevipoeg" was illustrated by Estonian artist Kristjan Raud who died 65 years ago. So now I am anymore not very sure about the authorship. Is is important that the artist has been dead at least for 70 years or is it measured with the artist who created the book cover or with the time that has passed from publishing the book or ...

I don't think that I have any more copies of this book (published before or after) at home and so I can't make a photo with those books in a stack (picture made about stack of books can't be under that kind of copyright?) that can be used to replace this photo.

Should there be used some kind of templates? Iffcool 10:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid "public domain" isn't applicable here. This license would only apply if the creator of the artwork is dead for 70 years or more. The text of the Kalevipoeg itself is of course public domain by age. But that doesn't mean that any art attached to it becomes itself "free". Otherwise anyone could take any text of sufficient age, illustrate it with some recent art and thereby renders it (the art) "public domain". --Zinnmann 23:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake that I didn't checked about that before. Previously I thought both would be in public domain now.

So, what should I do with the picture now? Chance the licence to Template:PD-old-50? Iffcool 07:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kategooriad ja geokodeerimine

Hei, kategoriseerisin mitu su pilti. Panin tähele, et fotodel ei ole geokodeerimist tehtud. Mulle endale tehti siin ükskord märkus, et fotod on geokodeerimata. Sul on ka palju kaarte jms, ehk ei hakka silma, et ei ole geokodeeritud. Olen geokodeerinud ka teiste pilte nii palju kui olen osanud. Sinu fotosid vast ei oskagi geokodeerida. Avjoska (talk) 18:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Defineeri geokodeerimine. Milles see täpsemalt seisnema peaks? Iffcool (talk) 22:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ad Tour de Ski images @etwiki

Thanks for letting me know, I'm glad to see them used. --che 21:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Tiit_Made_1988.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tiit_Made_1988.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Wknight94 ^talk 12:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know the people that took those pictures agreed to let anyone use them for any purpose - even commercially - completely free of charge? Did they send an e-mail to you saying so? If they did, then just forward the e-mail to the people at COM:OTRS. Wknight94 ^talk 19:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they send me an e-mail but usually thous are longer conversations + with some cases there were also some conversation through other mediums (face to face, mobil, MSN etc). So it is difficult to "find the right spot" and I don't understand how you make sure that thous will be the authentic e-mails (i.e. that I haven't written them by myself)?

For example with this image: picture was taken by the wife of Tiit Made with his photo camera and send to me by Tiit so he would not need to figure out how to upload images to Commons (that last part is not a thing even I like to do). Iffcool (talk) 20:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just send whatever you have to COM:OTRS and let them sort it out. As long as you get an OTRS tag on the picture, you are okay. Wknight94 ^talk 20:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For how long time it usually takes them to read e-mails? Iffcool (talk) 13:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It can take a while - several days even. You can ask COM:OTRS/N. You can also change the no-permission tags to {{OTRS-pending}}. Wknight94 ^talk 14:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As this OTRS takes so long (it just can't be normal) then I am not planning to deal with that thing any more. If I get pictures form autors for uploading, then I'll upload them. And if You don't like it, delete them, and I'll upload them to Estonian Wikipedia. But this OTRS thing does not work!Iffcool (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Load

Tere! Ükskõik, kas siia või eesi vikisse laetuna, kui pilt on kelleltki teiselt saadud, tuleks luba ikkagi OTRSis talletada ja iga pildi juurest linkida. Näiteks arhitektide ja piirivalve piltide staatust pole piisavalt selge. Sellest pole midagi, kui isegi paar kuud läheb enne kui luba üle vaadata jõutakse. Või võid ju paluda näiteks Wootelel luba kohe kinnitada. 88.196.241.249 13:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Riigikogu fotoalbum

Tere! Märgis {{PD-old}} ei ole nende piltide juures vettpidav, kui samas on kirjutatud, et autor on teadmata. Kui on alust arvata, et autor on tõesti teadmata, tuleks üle 70 aasta tagasi avaldatud piltide juures kasutada märgist {{Anonymous-EU}}. 193.40.10.180 14:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Riigikogu Kantselei / Chancellery of the Riigikogu CC-BY

Do you have an OTRS ticket that you can add to this files? --Martin H. (talk) 09:57, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have and I already sent it to permissions-et for approval. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added that information to the file description. The otrs ticket, if confirmed, should be written on all file descriptions, otherwise sooner or later someone will ask to provide permission. --Martin H. (talk) 10:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

e-post

Palun võimalda konto eelistustest Special:Preferences teistel kasutajatel sulle e-posti saata. --WikedKentaur (talk) 06:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh jah, ma arvasin, et see on juba lubatud (eestikeelses Vikipeedias on). Kruusamägi (talk) 13:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

riigikogujad

ma arvan, et nii kaua, kuni pole isikust üle ühe pildi, ei ole vajalik tema nimelise kategooria ettenägemine. alustasin riigikogujate piltide juures kategooria parandamist. loodan, et jätkad. Avjoska (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ma olen täpselt samal arvamusel. Ma ei kujuta ette ka, et mis hea pärast Quibik need kategooriad lisas. Mõtlesin juba mõni aeg tagasi (kui selle avastasin), et peaksin need ära kaotama. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Juhtisin tema tähelepanu ka sellele arutelule siin tema enda arutelus. Loodan, et ta tuleb appi. Avjoska (talk) 19:08, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kommenteerin siis peasüüdlasena. Nõustun, et kui isikust eksisteerib Commonsis vaid üks pilt, pole mõtet eraldi kategooriat luua. Siiski, siin puhul pole tegu eksisteerivate kategooriate vaid üksnes "redlinkidega". Lisan neid aega-ajalt piltidele inimestest mõttega, et tulevikus, kui tekibki rohkem pilte, on kategooria loomine lihtsam. Kuna see ei tohiks kellegi elu raskemaks teha, ei näe ma antud tegevuses probleemi. Aga kui see teid tõesti häirib, võib need kategooriad minu poolest vabalt ka eemaldada. Quibik (talk) 19:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Kruusamägi,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

teadusfoto

Kõigil teadusfoto konkursi piltidel pole preagu malli {{Teadusfoto 2011}} juures. Kas lisan malli ka ülejäänud piltidele boti abil? --WikedKentaur (talk) 12:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suur tänu, kui saaksid seda teha! :) Kruusamägi (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valgejõgi3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely. --Mattbuck 14:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konstantin Päts.jpg

File:Konstantin Päts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

howcheng {chat} 06:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fotod Presidendi kantseleist

Tere! Kui Jelena Rudi luba on edastatud, lisa piltide juurde mall {{subst:OP}}. Samuti võiks olla allikas võimalusel lingitud. 90.190.114.172 13:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sai edastatud küll. Kord juhtus aga, et foto(d) kustutati Commonisist seetõttu, et toosama mall oli pildi juurde liiga pikaks ajaks jäänud (ehk saadetud kirjale ei reageeritud piisavalt kärmelt). Seega ma selle lisamisega ei kiirustaks.

Võin ka president.ee lehele lingid lisada, aga fotod ise on spetsiaalselt e-kirja teel küsitud ja ei ole otseselt kuskilt kopeeritud.

Kruusamägi (talk) 14:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Kruusamägi,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:53, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Fibroblast (BPAE).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fibroblast (BPAE).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Geneetik Riin Tamm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geneetik Riin Tamm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WLM Barnstar

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tarvasjõgi.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarvasjõgi.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piusa koopad 2011 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rõuge Kaussjärv 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Two dead pixels imo (see notes) but they're easy to fix : QI. --JLPC 18:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Fixed --Iifar 19:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tabasalu pank .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really nice, FP level --Poco a poco 15:47, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laelatu puisniit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loojang Jõemõisa järvel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 15:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rein Taagepera 2009.jpg

File:Rein Taagepera 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 15:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

QI spam

Hi. I noticed you nominated 25 images at COM:QIC today. Please don't, anything more than 5 or 6 is just spamming, even if they are worthy images. Try and spread your nominations out a bit. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually 23. But ok, I'll try spread out the nominations a bit. Just haven't done that for years so there is a long list of images worth of having the QI tag. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is my list, so believe me, I understand your pain. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice :) It will definitely take you more time to nominate thous.

I should make similar list. So I wouldn't need to worry that I'll forget some of the images I wanted to nominate.

Could you review some of the images I nominated there? Kruusamägi (talk) 21:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamula järv 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 22:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vooremaa, Vaadee Raigastvere järvele..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 15:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vesisulg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väimela Alajärv 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment ~~Strange red spot (natural or not?), note added.~~ --Iifar 15:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Support --Iifar 11:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaan Kalda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 16:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geneetik Riin Tamm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Of cause QI --Ximeg 15:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Very good ~~but please add an English description.~~ --Tuxyso 18:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kosmoloog Arved Sapar..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astragalus glycyphyllos Eestis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krista Aru.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 16:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riinu Rannap.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 16:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kvaliteetsete piltide alamkategooriad

Kui ühe alamkategooria alla annab panna ca 20 ja rohkem pilti, siis võib neid rohkemgi teha. Muidugi korrektne oleks nad siis peakategooriast maha võtta. --Ivar (talk) 15:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Quality images of the Tallinn Botanic Garden" peaks imo sobima küll, kuid päris keelespets ma pole. --Ivar (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu raudteejaama veetorn, 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Nice but ccw tilted and under 2 Mb required. Sorry. --Moonik 07:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC) Comment Required is 2 megapixels not megabytes, tilt needs to corrected of course. --Iifar 09:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC) Done --Iifar 11:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my error on resolution. After a tilt correction, OK for me now. --Moonik 12:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kollane ängelhein.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 07:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commonsi päeva pildid

Pole selle teemaga kunagi tegelenud ja mul pole aimugi, kuidas neid pilte valitakse. --Ivar (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Piusa koopad 2011 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Piusa koopad 2011 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu Catholic Church 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, although dark. --Mattbuck 03:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puitelamu Tartus Näituse 5, 1886.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please brighten. Mattbuck 03:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Done Kruusamägi 17:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Still a bit dark, bit better. Mattbuck 20:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tolmujäljed eemaldatud. --Ivar (talk) 06:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:James Webb Space Telescope Mirror37.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:James Webb Space Telescope Mirror37.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kaselaug - Rabivere maastikukaitseala.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kaselaug - Rabivere maastikukaitseala.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kandidaatide ülesseadmises annan sulle vabad käed. Saadjärve viltune katus tuleneb pildistamiskohast, mis oli hoonele lähedal ja mitte keskel, samuti on taevas on natsa liiga tume, polariseeriva filtri tõttu (isiklikult ei pea eriti tugevaks FP kandidaadiks). --Ivar (talk) 07:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tallinna Raekoda.jpg parandatud. --Ivar (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohni tuletorn 2011. aastal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:05, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipiku piiripunkt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it.--ArildV 13:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kose, Pirita jõgi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jänese raudteesild.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but needs sharpening. Mattbuck 06:43, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Done Kruusamägi 15:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 15:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corinthian order. Helsinki Lutheran Cathedral.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mattbuck 06:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kadrioru_lastepargi_paviljon.jpg parandatud. Soovitan sul proovida vabavara Gimp. Parimat, --Ivar (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laur Järv 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Sangaste mõisa peahoone1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sangaste mõisa peahoone1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leppneeme sadam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK despite overexposure. --Mattbuck 08:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rõngu kirikul ei näe erilist potentsiaali. Edu! --Ivar (talk) 17:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hea küsimus, mõlemal on omad head ja vead. --Ivar (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Aleksander I ja Napoleoni sõdade mälestusmärk1 (Mõdriku).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aleksander I ja Napoleoni sõdade mälestusmärk1 (Mõdriku).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Axis axis (Nagarhole, 2010).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Axis axis (Nagarhole, 2010).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tartu Toomkiriku varemed 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu Toomkiriku varemed 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Väimela Alajärv 2012 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Väimela Alajärv 2012 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Rakvere linnuse varemed vallikraaviga1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rakvere linnuse varemed vallikraaviga1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 01:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tartu Kaubamaja 2011.JPG

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kiviloo mõisa peahoone.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiviloo mõisa peahoone.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tunnustus/Award

Hea töö eest eeskujulike piltide kandidaatide esitamisel. For good work nominating FP candidates --Ivar (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Malla mõisa peahoone 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Malla mõisa peahoone 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Holdre mõisa peahoone.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holdre mõisa peahoone.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Luhasoo.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luhasoo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category for uploads photoes from Chernobyl

Category:Wikiexpedition to Chernobyl Exclusion Zone 2013 --Jbuket (talk) 20:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arhitektuuri kohta ei oska midagi tarka öelda, aga looduse kohta võiks küll eraldi kategooria olla (vajadusel taimed, loomad, putukad, seened eraldi alamkategooriatesse). Persooniloo kohta ei oska samuti midagi tarka öelda, ma pole veel suurem asi fotograaf. Parimat, --Ivar (talk) 05:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dactylorhiza incarnata - kahkjaspunane sõrmkäpp.jpg

Seda pilti pole veel mõtet päevapildiks panna. Liigi ID on kahtluse alla seatud. Proovin asjatundjate käest järele uurida. See võib mõnda aega võtta, sest kahjuks ei tunne isiklikult ühtegi orhideelisi tundvat proffi. --Ivar (talk) 11:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ühele mailile sealt nimekirjast juba päeval kirjutasin, aga vastuse saamise osas pole üldse kindel. --Ivar (talk) 17:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tegemist on arvatavalt kahkjaspunase sõrmkäpa hübriidiga. --Ivar (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

(Just for the record:) Hello, I have removed the "autopatrolled" flag from you Account. "OTRS Member" right includes autopatrol, so this right is redundant , Regards--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Vabadussõja võidusammas 2010.JPG

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 12:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maa-ameti kaardid

Nende kaartide kasutamisest oli juttu siin ja siin. Kas oled hiljem maa-ametiga suhelnud ja saanud midagi teada nende kaartide kasutatavusest vaba litsentsi all (CC BY-SA 3.0 all siis)?

Näen, et sul on nüüd OTRS-ligipääs. Aga kas enda üles laaditud piltide puhul pole loa kinnitamise mõte siiski selles, et keegi teine kinnitab loa? Pikne 14:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Olen suhelnud ja küsinud, kas pilte tohib CC SA-BY 3.0 litsentsi all levitada. Vastus sama: kui Maa-amet on välja toodud, siis tohib. Neile sobis see, kuidas ma olin pildid üles pannud -- küsisin pärast ka seda.

Keegi teine ei soovi seda OTRS kohta täita. Kruusamägi (talk) 07:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Selle kohta võiks siis olla OTRS-pilet ja ilmselt ka eraldi märgis, mis sisaldab täpsustust selle kohta, kas CC BY-SA 3.0 all lubatakse kasutada kõikvõimalikke maa-ameti kaarte, kaardirakenduse kuvatõmmiseid või mõnd konkreetset kuvatõmmist, et oleks selge, kas sinu üles laaditud piltide eeskujul võib teisigi üles laadida.

Võiksin ka OTRS-vabatahtlik olla, kui just kaht eestlast juba piisavaks ei peeta. Pikne 08:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Esialgu pärisin küll kaitsealade kohta, sest nende piire peaks kaardi peal näitama ning neid artikleid endid on meil juba üsna suur hulk, kus selliseid kaarte lisada võiks. Kuigi tundub küll, et lubataks täpselt sama ka teiste kaartide juures.

Eraldi märgise järgi ei näe ma mingit vajadust: vähemalt sellisel kujul.

Hetkel olen OTRSi juures ainult mina, aga ega miskeid kirju tegelikult peaaegu ei laekugi kunagi ja see mis laekub on kah minu enda kirjavahetus. Kruusamägi (talk) 09:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Siiski, praegu jääb mulje, et kui sinu üles laaditud failid sobivad, võib nende eeskujul ka teisi maa-ameti kaarte üles laadida. Aga tegelikult pole teada, kas see on nii. Tuleks ikkagi välja selgitada, mille kohta vaba litsentsi all avaldamise luba täpselt käib, kas tohib kasutada kõiki maa-ameti kaardirakenduse kaarte igasuguses mahus, ka paberkaarte? Praeguse seisuga tuleks failide juures ära märkida, et maa-amet on nõus konkreetsete kuvatõmmiste avaldamisega vaba litsentsi all. Viide OTRS-piletile on endiselt puudus. Pikne 09:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Mul ei ole aega, et tegeleda kõigi võimalike objektide tarvis kuvatõmmiste tegemisega. Kui sa oled valmis sellega tegelema, siis küsi ise detailne info kõigi lubatud kasutusviiside kohta. Loa hankimisel puudub mõte, kui ei ole plaani seda kasutama hakata. Kruusamägi (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peaksid vähemalt enda üles laaditud piltide juures üheselt ära märkima, milles luba seisneb ehk luba on küsitud konkreetsete kuvatõmmiste kasuatmiseks, mitte maa-ameti materjalide kasutamiseks üldiselt. Pikne 10:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Kui tohib küsida, siis mille põhjal sa loed välja luba kõikvõimalike Maa-ameti materjalide kasutamiseks?

Analoogia: kui on lisatud mõned fotograafi pildid, siis nende paiknemine vaba litsentsi all ei tähenda automaatselt, et kõiki selle fotograafi materjale tohiks vaba litsentsi all üles riputada. Kuigi võib eeldada, et on lootust ka teisi pilte sama litsentsi alla saada.

Kruusamägi (talk) 11:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tegelikult seda ei saa välja lugeda jah, aga kui laadid neid kaarte massiliselt üles ja kasutad sellist üldist loainfot nagu selles malliski, siis tekitad tahes tahtmata segadust ning võib jääda mulje, et ka siinpuhul ei tule luba küsida ja sinu üles laaditud failide eeskujul hakatakse tõenäolisel teisigi üles laadima. Miks mitte luba konkreetselt ja üheselt sõnastada? Pikne 11:52, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Veebikaardi paljude staatiliste tõmmiste üleslaadimine tundub tegelikult olevat pisut ajast ja arust. Eriti arvestades, et viitame niigi paljudele kaardirakenduste seas ka maa-ameti looduskaitse kaardile ja et meil jookseb artiklite päistes OpenStreetMapi WMS, millele põhimõtteliselt on võimalik samasuguseid piire lisada (vt näiteks kaarti artikli et:Tartu päises). Ma küll ei tea praegu, kuidas see viimane täpselt käib. Iseasi muidugi, kui anda veebikaardile lisaväärtust ja teha selle põhjal oma kaart, kust näiteks on üleliigne kribu ära jäetud, siis oleks staatilise kaardi üles laadimine enam põhjendatud. Pikne 07:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Selles osas jääb üle vaid igati nõustuda, et see ei ole ideaalne lahendus. Samas oleks teatud objektide puhul vaja määratleda nende piire. Kuigi ma olen viidatud võimalusest teadlik, ei oska ma seda esile kutsuda ning lihtsam on pilt üles seda, kui ise mingeid piire määratleda. Neid mõningaid Maa-ameti kaartide tõmmiseid tehes püüdsin samuti üleliigset välja võtta, kuigi kohati jäi mingit pudi sinna peale veel alles. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

focus stacking

Ei ole veel proovinud. Momendil puudub mul selleks vajalik varustus (ja oskused). Parimat, --Ivar (talk) 06:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Siiski pole see nii lihtne. Selleks peab pildistatav objekt täiesti paigal püsima. Siseruumis probleemi pole, aga väljas õhk liigub pidevalt ja taimed kiiguvad. Kogu suve jooksul oli mul 1-2 täiesti tuulevaikset õhtut. Parimat, --Ivar (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images from University of Tartu

Hi there, I see in Category:Images from University of Tartu that you have uploaded these images. I think these might need COM:OTRS permission. Are you able to arrange this permission, so that the images will be kept on Commons. This is required because you aren't the copyright holder. Cheers, russavia (talk) 02:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As the permission is acquired with lot of e-mails and meetings, then it is a bit difficult, but I can take a look into it. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Telleri kabel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Telleri kabel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

QI kandidaadid

Näen, et oled oma fotokat uuendanud. (Kui eelarve lubab, siis järgmine etapp oleks kit-toru asemel parema objektiivi soetamine, mis võib olla ka kasutatud. Igatahes kvaliteedihüpe saab olema silmaga nähtav).

Mõned mõtted viimaste piltide kohta. Paljudel piltidel on müratase märkimisväärne. Rusikareegel DX kaamerate puhul on see, kui valgust on vähe, siis on suureks abiks kolmjalg. Võimaldab vähendada valgustundlikkust (ISO) ja suurendada teravussügavust. Soovitan kindlasti pildistada raw formaadis, see annab hilisemaks töötluseks suurema vabaduse.

Koguva, Andruse talu tuulik.JPG - tundub ok
Kuressaare linnus (2010).JPG - väga hea pilt, vajab vaid veidi teravuse tõstmist ja pööramist.
Kuressaare linnus, põhjabastioni suurtükitorn.JPG - samad sõnad
Kuressaare linnus õhtuhämaruses.JPG - vajab veidi perspektiiviparandust (nt proge shifN) ja osalist teravustamist (gimpiga)
Mihkli talumuuseum, sari.JPG - tundub ok

Edu, --Ivar (talk) 19:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iga endast lugupidav fotograaf tulistab raw formaadis. Kui arvuti kõvakettal on ruumi vähe, siis alternatiiviks oleks väline kõvaketas. Samuti võib pärast töötlust raw maha kustutada ja jpg alles jätta. RAW suurim eelis minu jaoks on võimalus muuta särikompensatsiooni ja valge tasakaalu. Kui sa oled jpg-s pildi natukenegi üle säritanud, siis taastada seda pole enam võimalik. RAW-s on võimalik väiksemad ülevalgustused taastada või alavalgustatud pildile säri juurde keerata. Parimat, --Ivar (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võru Suurkannataja Ekaterina kirik 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hargla kõrtsihoone 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 06:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koguva, Andruse talu tuulik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 09:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! J. Tõnissoni ja A. Haava tänava nurk Tartus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice mood and colours but a problem easy to fix : see note, please. --JLPC 13:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Done I hope it is better now. Kruusamägi 22:15, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK. --JLPC 17:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paide kaubahoovi ärihoone.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuressaare linnus õhtuhämaruses.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice mood. --Iifar 17:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mihkli talumuuseum, sari.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 17:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuressaare linnus (2010).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice light and contrast with the sky. --Iifar 17:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinni talu ait (2013).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:17, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paide ordulinnuse varemed 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 11:00, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Artiklis on vead eestikeelsete tähtedega

Palun kontrollige artiklis https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicobacter_pylori seal estikeelsen tähed nagu ü,õ.ä,ü on ebakorrektselt välja näevad.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Aalupi järv 2013 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aalupi järv 2013 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Kruusamägi,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Vastus

Kiirel läbivaatamisel hakkavad rohkem silma mikroskoobi abil tehtud pildid. Esitamisel lisa ka ingliskeelne kirjeldus.
Võid esitada seeriana või paar parimat üksikuna, kategooria võib olla.
Kahele viimasele vastamiseks kulub tõenäoliselt rohkem kui paar nädalat (pildid peab ükshaaval üle vaatama). Praegu nii palju vaba aega pole.

Parimat, --Ivar (talk) 09:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Hommik laukaserval, Endla LK.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hommik laukaserval, Endla LK.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/ But where is the permission from Tauriparna recorded here? The license is invalid without creator's permission, I afraid. J Kadavoor J e e 09:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tradescantia tolmukakarvad ja õietolm.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tradescantia tolmukakarvad ja õietolm.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Kruusamägi,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Merry Christmas

File:Endla looduskaitseala õhtupoolikul.jpg

Head uut sullegi! CA-d saab eemaldada mitmete progede abil. Minu jaoks pole see kõige lihtsam protseduur (palju käsitööd). Laadisin parandatud versiooni üles. --Ivar (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Müürlooga (Arabidopsis thaliana) lehekarv (trihhoom) 311 0804.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Müürlooga (Arabidopsis thaliana) lehekarv (trihhoom) 311 0804.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kaberneeme campfire site.jpg

Mul ei ole midagi arutelu kriitika vastu ning kindlasti ei ole ma kommentaaride peale ärritunud. Ma lihtsalt olen väga otsekohene. Kui kommentaar ikka väga mööda läheb või pole asjakohane, siis ma ka seda ütlen. Kui pilt ei sobi, siis loomulikult tuleb selle vastu hääletada. Mina olen selle projektiga nii vähe tegelenud, ja mul ehk pole veel nii selget ettekujutust, mida siin hinnatakse ja mida mitte. Olen mõningaid pilte lisanud. Tegelikult on mul tekkinud huvi mõned artiklid inglise keelde tõlkida, näiteks see sama Kiipsaare tuletorn või Oandu-Ikla matkatee. Kuidas ma täpselt toimima peaksin?

Selle fotograafide lehe jaoks on vist veel natukene liiga vara. Minu panus võrreldes teistega on ikka suhteliselt tagasihoidlik. Võibolla kunagi tulevikus. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jah, mulle sobib. Aitäh. Ma pole ise viitsinud sellega tegeleda. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minu jaoks ei oma teemade järjestus peaaegu mingit tähtsust. --Ivar (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FrozenTallinn.jpg

Ega mul suur midagi pole kommenteerida. Selline see lihtsalt on. Midagi oluliselt moonutanud ei ole. Lihtsalt kontrasti on juurde keeratud. Algselt oli ta selline:

. See on Merivälja muulilt tehtud. Linn on lihtsalt nii kaugel, et mingeid värve ei loe sealt välja ka palja silmaga. Jää on värvitu. Kui esitasin QI kandidaadiks , siis keegi kommenteeris, et pole ju siluett, kuna on detaile näha. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Hellamaa panoraam.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hellamaa panoraam.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hellamaa panoraam.jpg

Minu vabavara proge seda maha ei võta. Üks võimalus oleks käsitsi üle kloonida, aga see võtab omajagu aega. --Ivar (talk) 19:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/archive 2006-2014⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laanemaa järv Orkjärve looduskaitsealal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Laanemaa järv Orkjärve looduskaitsealal.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laanemaa järv Orkjärve looduskaitsealal.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Thanks. But is it a work of a Wikimedian? I saw a QI badge there. / J e e 02:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how it got a QI-tag :P I didn't paid attention to it before as I was waiting for FP-tag anyway.

If needed, then I could try to get him to add some images by himself to Commons. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not in QI anymore. Just asked as I know there are a lot of QI purists who demands QIC must only for Wikimedians. BTW, I found it was nominated by Blurred Lines as "Orkjärve Nature Reserve, Estonia by Kruusamägi" there. :) J e e 12:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Kruusamägi,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Someone nominated a vector image of yours for deletion. [4] cheers, (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 18:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have to admit, that I agree with deleting the image. It is not used in Estonian Wikipedia and there is some confusion about the legend, that renders it useless. Slight deference in meanings makes it very hard to translate (this in translated for eng image) and it would require a lot of work to sort this out. But thanks for letting me know! Kruusamägi (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia

Hi, I am interested in Estonia And many articles in Persian Wikipedia about the country you've created, I hope one day I can travel to your country. --Kasir (talk) 19:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

:) Kruusamägi (talk) 23:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sinu failid on kaks viimast. Taivo (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ma kartsin jah, et selleni võidakse kunagi jõuda.

No tõesti. Küll ma selle panoraamivabaduse ka seadusesse saan. See on juba üsna käeulatuses.

Alati saab arhitektidelt luba küsida, kuigi antud objekti puhul on seda suht tülikas ja keeruline teha (püüa sa neid kontakte leida ja minu vene keel pole kah just suurem asi). Kuigi autoritel on 99,999% tõenäosusega täiesti ükskõik, et kes, kus, millal ja miks mingeid fotosid teevad. Kruusamägi (talk) 09:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mukri raba 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mukri raba 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re-edition of the Photowikimeetup in Wikimania 2014

Hello Kruusamägi! in the case that you are also visiting this year's Wikimania in London, you may be interested in attending the new edition of the photowikimeetup that took place in Hong Kong last year, and where you listed up. As the preparation is not yet settled, you are more than welcomed to take part in the discussion here. All the best, Poc o² 17:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! I do plan to participate in this year's Wikimania and hopefully also in the photowikimeetup. :) Kruusamägi (talk) 00:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu railway station, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 01:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Supreme Court of Estonia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivo Volt, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rahvaste mälestussammas Tartus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TÜRKA Vanemuise suures majas -- tants Kodukotus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you try brightening shadows a bit? --Kadellar 13:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
* Acceptable considering difficult circumstances. --Smial 08:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vanemuine 2009.JPG

File:Vanemuine 2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pildirüüstaja (talk) 22:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tartu raudteejaama veetorn, 2010.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu raudteejaama veetorn, 2010.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kaitseväe Ühendatud Õppeasutused.JPG

Yours sincerely, Pildirüüstaja (talk) 09:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tartu Keskpark 2011.JPG

And also:

File:Tartu Turuhoone ja Tartu Kaubamaja.JPG

Yours sincerely, Pildirüüstaja (talk) 10:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Catedral de Gniezno, Gniezno, Polonia, 2017-09-20, DD 37-39 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Gniezno, Gniezno, Polonia, 2017-09-20, DD 37-39 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Administratiivhoone Jõhvis, 2014-09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurtna mõisa tuuleveski.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iisaku kirik 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome in Vienna...

--Hubertl (talk) 12:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Roti vesiveski hooned ja pais 2010.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roti vesiveski hooned ja pais 2010.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:21, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Päiksetõus rabas.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Päiksetõus rabas.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Altja jõgi Lahemaal.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altja jõgi Lahemaal.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prangli rahvamaja 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prangli kirik 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kukruse mõisa hobusetall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurtna mõisa valitsejamaja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kelnase sadam 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wrangö, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 12:04, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Postipaat Helge (2014).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste mõisa peahoone 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality. --Ram-Man 01:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich Reinhold Kreutzwaldi koduhooned 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality --Ram-Man 01:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mäetaguse manor park 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The lighting is not the most attractive, but the subject is accurate, so QI for me. --Ram-Man 03:42, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mäetaguse mõisa aednikumaja 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's quite borderline for me with the sky exposure, but I think enough? --Ram-Man 03:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mäetaguse mõisa kasvuhoone 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Illuka manor park 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Borderline. It's hard to make out the details, but good enough I think. --Ram-Man 03:42, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raadi mõisa väravahoone 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It need perspectuve corrections --Christian Ferrer 05:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion it's OK. --Pudelek 11:04, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste mõisa aedniku tööriistakuur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 01:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Matsimäe Pühajärv.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Matsimäe Pühajärv.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vabadussõja Paju lahingu mälestussammas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:46, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vabadussõja mälestussammas Otepääl 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:46, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koivaliina Uus loss 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI Poco a poco 22:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koivaliina mõisa kõrvalhoone 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. QI for me --Hubertl 00:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niguliste kirik Harjumäelt 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soe Inn 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti in Tartu 02.JPG

File:Graffiti in Tartu 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jebulon (talk) 11:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! XIX üldtantsupidu 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kambja church 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The overhanging branches are a bit distracting. It should be easy to crop them out. Jakec 01:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC) I prefer to keep it that way. Kruusamägi 19:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Jakec 23:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koivaliina mõisa kõrvalhoone 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 10:46, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! XIX üldtantsupidu 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 21:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soe Inn 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Overall good quality, but it needs a perspective correction. The verticals should be rectilinear. --Code 12:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC) Done Kruusamägi 19:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Code 08:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

File:Graffiti in Tartu 02.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti in Tartu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallink Star in 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. even when its a bit oversaturated. --Hubertl 17:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesvaine loss 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:24, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freedom Square (Tallinn 2014).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teises maailmasõjas hukkunute ühishaud Võrus 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The white balance need to be adjusted, yet too much magenta in the white letters. --Cccefalon 13:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Done Kruusamägi 20:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Good quality now, despite cccefalon is not available, I give the pro Vote --Hubertl 03:00, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti in Tartu 03.JPG

File:Graffiti in Tartu 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Üldlaulupidu 2014 - 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Better proportions, Straight --Hubertl 20:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! XIX üldtantsupidu 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentThe image is leaning out. Please have a look to the building in the background.--XRay 10:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Done I uploaded a new version. Kruusamägi 20:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality now. --XRay 08:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Väikjärv 2011 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Väikjärv 2011 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesvaine loss 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ettevalmistused XXVI üldlaulupeo rongkäiguks.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Color noise in the brighter areas. Can you remove? --NorbertNagel 14:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support The color noise is small. I think it's a good photo for QI. --Steindy 01:13, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]