User talk:Ka23 13
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
カテゴリ付けに関して
[edit]下位のカテゴリをつけた場合はその上位のカテゴリが付加しないようにお願いいたします。たとえばFile:Hakone Kankosen Victory2007 20061230 130202.jpgには、最下層となるCategory:Victory (ship, 2007)がついていますので、その上位となるCategory:Hakone, Kanagawaと、 Category:Hakone Kankosenは不要です。ガイドラインはこちら「Commons:カテゴリ」 --Batholith (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ka23 13, I just want to let you know that these butterflies are not Brenthis ino, but Argynnis paphia. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 21:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing it out. I am not familiar with butterfly species. I will check if the backside of the wing is green with other pictures. Ka23 13 (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I see that this picture too shows a male of Argynnis paphia. It is generally a much larger species than Brenthis ino. You may also notice the 4 black stripes on the forewing of the males of A. paphia, which are absent on B. ino. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 15:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the detailed explanation. I updated the photo's name and description. Best regards. Ka23 13 (talk) 10:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I see that this picture too shows a male of Argynnis paphia. It is generally a much larger species than Brenthis ino. You may also notice the 4 black stripes on the forewing of the males of A. paphia, which are absent on B. ino. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 15:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! V107II 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Photo Challenge Winner | |
Congratulations!
Your picture RailroadSwitch 20200801 014921.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Darkness, in January 2021. You can find the results of the challenge here. |
-- Jarekt (talk) 02:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Photo Challenge Winner | |
Congratulations!
Your picture BabyCarriage 20210713 102412.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Baby related equipment, in July 2021. You can find the results of the challenge here. |
-- Jarekt (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RailroadSwitch 20200801 014921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Chiba 20220515 113526.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Chiba 20220515 113526.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Chiba 20220515 113526.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Photo Challenge – Third Place | |
Congratulations!
Your picture Hakone 20220507 174848.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Asian gardens, in May 2022. You can find the results of the challenge here. |
-- Jarekt (talk) 01:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Photo Challenge – Second Place | |
Congratulations!
Your picture Stellisee 20190716 094443.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Lake islands, in August 2022. You can find the results of the challenge here. |
-- Jarekt (talk) 01:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Straps 20190502 203140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yokohama 20200114 080912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Switches 20201003 110916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fukushima 20201031 161354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]Nice pictures!
Unnerving duck (talk) 22:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mount Shakushi 20231008 124719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Vending Machine 20220116 150526.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yokohama 20240210 111331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|