User talk:JuTa/Archive 39

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

about Category:Visha (given name)

I see you put it in the female names cat. I was thinking of doing the same, but I`m not hip to Indian names and Wikipedia wasn't helpful (at least not yet) in helping me determine gender. There`s lots of English given names that are not definite in gender specificity—e.g. Stacy, Tracy, Abby, Terry, Jean, et al, and I figure the same might apply for Indian names. I`ll read your reply, if any, on this page. Cheers.      :-)      199.7.157.61 05:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, if we find a man having this name we add Category:Male names, then its both. --JuTa 07:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
(same guy, different IP) Good point. I just noticed that Category:Tracy (given name) is in both genders. I've learned something new. Now what about transliterated names such as what I posted in Category talk:Anna (given name)? Should I forgo it and just create a category with Cyrillic letters? Cheers.199.119.233.133 04:10, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
No, dont do it, the categories will run under the translitated names like i.e. Category:Alexander Alexandrovich (given name). regards. Visha is likely transliteated too btw. the origin is in hindi, bengali or similar with different letters. --JuTa 06:35, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

The herd

Hi,'crat. I was reading the discussions at Commons:Administrators/Requests/H-stt (desysop) and I regret to have seen that a user calls people who have a different opinion as "the herd". As far as I know, the word herd is only used for animals in English. As you are one of the people who could possibly close that discussion, I hope you also have a word or two with the person who insults others as if it were so normal. Danke schön. --E4024 (talk) 15:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

The vote is open till tonight 14. August 2017, 21:38 (UTC). I see no reason to early close it. --JuTa 16:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm happy we understand each other. :-) --E4024 (talk) 09:36, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:RAMSWROOP BIJARNIYA 1.png

File:RAMSWROOP BIJARNIYA 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

141.196.210.216 19:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Tsar family expertise Ck1.jpg

Hi, all attribution was placed. I consulted attribution with russian admins and experts User:Ctac, user:Dmitry Rozhkov, User:Shakko before upload files to Commons. As well due to language problems I appealed to russian Common's admin User:Ahonc. --Evgen2 (talk) 06:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Hmm, I removed the problem tag. Its seems realy to be published in the russian wiki under cc-by-sa-4.0. I still not realy convinced that the real photographer released the image (and only that person can do it). --JuTa 06:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Ok. There is a long story with en:Execution of the Romanov family and expert Sergei Abramov (1940-2010,File:Tsar family expertise tomography 0.jpg), his son, who work now on the workplace of his father and Investigator for especially important cases of the Main Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation V.N. Solovyov (person who made tzar's expertize 1993—1998 with Sergei Abramov). As well there is in the story first (in Russia) full-size plastic model of human skull made with laser stereolithograhy on X-ray tomography data. And I still don't know what to do with source binary tomography files and derivatives in more common stl file format (binary), seems it is not for Commons --Evgen2 (talk) 07:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
"I still not realy convinced that the real photographer released the image (and only that person can do it)".
1. "Фотография представлена Алексеем Сергеевичем Абрамовым, к.м.н., старшим экспертом отдела медико-биологических исследований УОЭКД ГУК Следственного комитета Российской Федерации" = "The photo was presented by Alexei Sergeyevich Abramov, Ph.D., senior expert of the Department of Biomedical Research of the Main Department of Criminalistics Investigation Committee of Russia"
2. Foto was made officially by an employee of state institution, and can be attributed as СС:state:ru bla bla (I don't understand well), and was physically placed in official state materials of tzar's expertize. --Evgen2 (talk) 07:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Modellflugzeug F-4 Phantom.jpg

File:Modellflugzeug F-4 Phantom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Endre_Lund_(given_name)

Category discussion warning

Category:Endre_Lund_(given_name) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Morten Haugen (talk) 16:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Thx, I fixed Category:Endre Lund Eriksen now too. --JuTa 18:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but Lund Eriksen is not one surname, it is a sequence of two. --Morten Haugen (talk) 12:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
What is more; by norwegian name law, only the latter is a surname. Whilst Garzia Marquez is one fixed surname by hispanic customs – in libraries his books are found at G, norwegian and scandinavian surnames only consist of the latest name. In a libary, you'll find Eriksen's books at E and the books by Jørn Lier Horst at H. Bw --Morten Haugen (talk) 12:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Morten Haugen, what is Lund then in this case, if its not a surname nor a given name? Should the category be renamed to Category:Endre Eriksen then? Or should it be categorized to Category:Lund (surname) seperatly? Just to ignore that part his his name and keep the cat as it is seems to me not a good solution. Cheers. --JuTa 18:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Lund is obviously a surname on its own. The merge of L and E can have several possible origins: If mr Eriksen marries ms Lund, they can agree to make a combination of their two names their mutual set or surnames. If mr Eriksen and ms Lund are married but have kept their individual surnames, their children could have both names as a set of surnames. Either way you'll find them under E in the library shelves and in the phone directories. No one in Norway would say that such combinations constitutes a new surname. Bw --Morten Haugen (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
So, I'll add Category:Lund (surname) to his cat? --JuTa 23:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Yes, that's the best solution. Bw --Morten Haugen (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
OK, done. --JuTa 09:42, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Who?

this is not INC! 14.203.99.67 07:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Might be but youre vandalizing. --JuTa 07:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Kingstone Bookstore, Downtown Store

Hello there! I am a Taiwanese, this page is no content, please delete, thanks! --219.85.169.230 02:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Because you just emptied it. I now refilled it. regards. --JuTa 07:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Electricity in France fr.svg

Dear JuTa,

since your upload there is now German and French text in the SVG. Please a take a look on the file.

Cheers, E. Primavesi (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

For what I should have a look? --JuTa 12:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
(Stalker) I think the file has German and French text at the same time; I mean not bilingual but mixed. --E4024 (talk) 12:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
True, but I dont know hwat I could or should do because of that. --JuTa 15:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
(Regarding File:John B Prescott, Australian business leader.jpg)

User Virtualovertake has uploaded a photo saying "This is one of the latest pic we got for John B Prescott taken during one of his visits to University of New South Wales". This is a lie, as shown at en:User talk:Virtualovertake#John B. Prescott where the uploader states "The picture was commissioned by John Prescott and taken by Van Der Toorren, a prominent Melbourne Photographer. Their address is 20 The Block Arcade, Melbourne." I have twice stated "This is one of the latest pic we got for John B Prescott taken during one of his visits to University of New South Wales" is a lie and corrected the license.
You have twice reverted my edit. Why? Pdfpdf (talk) 10:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Because any image on commons needs a license, if such a license does not apply, please request a deletion of such an image instead of just removing the license template, as I did it now for you. I will now restore the license template a third time, please keep it in until the request will be decided. Thx. --JuTa 16:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Your response makes no sense, is completely illogical, and ignores the facts and reality.
I have stated numerous times that the license does not apply, and have requested numerous times that it be deleted.
I have not, and did not, "just remove the license template", and am very insulted by you misrepresenting the facts of the matter.
I will now restore the license template a third time - Why?
please keep it in until the request will be decided - Why? No, I see no reason why I should, and you have most certainly made NO attempt to explain or justify your position, (or answer my questions).
Why don't you at least attempt to provide a reply that is relevant to the questions you have been asked?
And if you are in a really good mood, why don't you make an attempt to answer the questions you have been asked?
I am TOTALLY unimpressed with your behaviour. TOTALLY. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Just to clarify, you say "Because any image on commons needs a license". This image is copyright. It should NOT have been uploaded. It should NOT be on Commons. There is NO license that does, or ever will, be valid. I completely fail to understand what you think you are trying to achieve by placing ANY license other than "this is a copyright image". And again I ask, Why are you supporting copyright violation? Pdfpdf (talk) 12:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
@Pdfpdf: Don't remove licenses from files, during a open deletion request (otherwise the files will pop-up on maintenance cats). And you have to moderate your language and read COM:AGF and COM:MELLOW. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Look: this wasnt a deletion nor a quick deletion request, it was just removing (relevant) information from the file description page. Correct would have been to add {{Copyvio}} with your reasoning or the link to the external source to the top of the description page. That the reason why it was automaticly added to Category:Media without a license: needs history check where I picked it up. I didnt saw a reason to doubt the original own work claim, as you gave no reason how and why you came to the conclusion that its a copyright violation, so I just restored the old infos. here you made a little mistake to use {{Tlp}} intead of using {{Speedy}} directly. So it went back info Category:Media without a license: needs history check where I picked it up again one week late, and converted it to a correct regular deletion request - see here and here. Please now let the regular deletion request run until it will be decided by another admin after likely one week after I started it. Btw. Your last edit has been revereted by somebody else inbetween. regards. --JuTa 13:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying / explaining. I now understand what you were doing, and why, and what was happening, and why. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)


You`re very wellcome. --JuTa 15:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Ringlokschuppen.jpg

File:Ringlokschuppen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Prussinick (talk) 11:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference project

Hello JuTa,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around, but since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 19:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Thx, but I dont think I like to travel (overseas) for such a conference. Cheers. --JuTa 19:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Hu stele

Look at here:[1]. This one Category:Hu stele is still under discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Hu stele. I hope you know what you're doing!--Kai3952 (talk) 23:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I know what I'm doing. The old content (categorization) should be kept until the DR will be decided (as deleted). Otherwise, if it will be diceded as kept they are "lost". regards. --JuTa 23:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Why? Can you say more clearly what exactly you mean?--Kai3952 (talk) 08:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
You requested the deletion of that category. But that does not neccessarily mean that it will be deleted. The decision could also be keep. In this case, when the deciding admin forgets to recover the categories of it, we will end up with an kept but uncategorzed category. Which I try to prevent. regards --JuTa 09:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
I know, but I am not asking this question. I was asking: What do you mean by "why not leave it as a redirect"?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
That was not my question, but I think if its left it should be left as {{Category redirect}}. --JuTa 18:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
That was not my question? You did not say the reason why leave it as a redirect. I don't know why you want to do that, but the only thing I know is that you make me feel myself like an idiot. Because I have said my reason for deletion requests is : "There is no such name as Hu stele, at least that is not the official name of the stele." Meaning that I doubt that the file name is self-created. It's like that "Washington" was renamed to "Huashengtun" in Chinese. The truth, as we all know, is that "Huashengtun" is not the correct name of George Washington. Similarly, "Hu stele" is not the correct name of 虎字碑. I can't help but ask, why you want to keep it?--Kai3952 (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kai3952. Again, I didnt wanted that. It was User:Jeff G. who asked this question here. regards --JuTa 21:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, I do not know that I have always regarded you as him. This proves what I said earlier: "Myself like an idiot".--Kai3952 (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
@Kai3952: You wrote "Do you mean using {{Bad name}} instead of {{Category redirect}}?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)" at the DR in response to my question, but did not ping me, so I did not see it until now. {{Bad name}} is a speedy deletion request, and as such is unsuitable for guiding future users. I would like to see {{Category redirect}} at that cat page rather than it being deleted, to better guide future users. Would that situation offend you? If so, why? I now regret not !voting to keep. Also, I cannot find a page creation log entry for that cat, nor can I find evidence that you notified its creator, as you should have per COM:DP.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
You say these words are not the focus!! How did you know this discussion? You do that make me feel you are User:JuTa's puppet, because I don't see who's told you. Only he and me know this discussion.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
@Kai3952: JuTa mentioned me (via a wikilink to my userpage) in this edit. I reacted by replying, putting this page on my watchlist. Anyone who directs a statement or question to me outside my user talk page without notifying me of it (as you have done repeatedly) risks my inattention. Also, this is a public discussion on a public website, anyone can read it.   — Jeff G. ツ 18:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
So what? I just mistook User:JuTa for you(you look here, I said: "I do not know that I have always regarded you as him."). But you said "without notifying me". I think it's very funny. You just want me to apologize to you, isn't it? --Kai3952 (talk) 19:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Friedhof Cadolzburg

Dear JuTa, looks like u wanna be faster as Lucky Luke with the eraser pistol.-) Please check if someone is working(uploading) right in the moment, before u start killing...btw Cemetries im Landkreis... not makes sense=denglisch Landkreis = administrative district Regards, HaJN — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hans-Jürgen Neubert (talk • contribs) 07:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Hans-Jürgen Neubert. Sorry, but what you talking about? The cat was created in 2015 by somebody else than you and deleted in July 2016 for beeing empty by me, thats not quicker than Lucky Luke. And what is the or my connection to the Cemetries in Landkeis? --JuTa 09:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Good Morning JuTa, i can only remark, that I have had getting a info about a empty and erased cat, after ! the second uploaded pic. (This saturday 2017, after uploads I maked 2016). I filled some add files to this cat and again get info about a deleted cat.-/ After the diskussion and comments, cat is usable and now everthing is fine. :) (with added text from my side). To change describtion from "Cemetries in Landkeis" to "Cemetries at administrative district XXX" is only a additional recommended term and btw I get these info from commons, via "erased category" pls. use "Cemetries in Landkreis...." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hans-Jürgen Neubert (talk • contribs) 07:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Well, the cat was only deleted once more than a year ago -> see here. And "denglish" category names are not unusual -> see the subcats of Category:Landkreis Fürth and any other german Landkreis. regards. --JuTa 17:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

hi! you've tagged this file File:Adelino Sassi.jpg. why? I don't see any problem. tetraktys (talk) 01:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

ops! sorry, i did a mistake. this problem was solved months ago. sorry!!!! tetraktys (talk) 01:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please delete File:Neil Peng (2014-12-17).JPG

This photo is the extra content, request to delete! --Glay Liou (talk) 08:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

No, the redirect should be kept not to break potential external use of the file. regards. --JuTa 09:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Picture of Evelyne Audet

Hi, I see you have cancelled the image on the page of Evelyne Audet. I have put myself this image, and it was free of rights, permission given by the photograph himself. Could you please put it back ? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.154.184.254 (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC) https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyne_Audet — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.154.184.254 (talk) 20:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Well, the file File:Evelyne Audet.jpg was uploaded by User:Evil11. And he wrote to the description that Michel Bellemare is the author of it. In this case we would need a formal release by Michel Bellemare. He should send an email to the commons supporteam as documented on Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 21:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Jochen Wilhelm Porträt.jpg

Sagst Du mir bitte, wer als Urheber angegeben war? --Nicola (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Klar, das war Reinhard Schulze. Gruß --JuTa 20:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Und dieser Reinhard Schulze hat die Genehmigung weitergeschickt, ich hatte davon eine Kopie (leider jetzt nicht mehr). Es ist jetzt schon zum wiederholten Male, dass ich eine Kopie einer Genehmigung erhalten und die Fotos dann trotzdem gelöscht werden (eine Nachfrage wäre auch mal schön). Es macht viel Arbeit, diese Fotos zu besorgen - und dann für nix. Das vergällt einem die Lust. --Nicola (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Am besten fragst Du auf Commons:OTRS noticeboard was mit diesem Fall ist. Wenn alles OK ist, wird die Datei problemlos wiederhersgestellt. Zur Zeit steht der OTRS backlog auf 59 Tage und der 14. Juli ist doch recht weit vorher. Ich versuche nur einige Backlogs aufzuräumen. Gruß --JuTa 20:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Beiguan

Look at here: [2]. I don't see why there is any reason to delete it. You can read about that in zh-tw:北關 (宜蘭縣). As you see, "Beiguan" and "Beiguan Tidal Park" are different concepts and should not be confused with each other.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Well, it was an empty and at that time uncategorized category, which is now not any more the case. --JuTa 21:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
I do not think so. I'm worried that many Taiwanese are confused by both Beiguan and Beiguan Tidal Park. In fact, the true "Beiguan" situated at the narrowest place between the mountain and the coast; but they often mistakenly thought that it was the Beiguan Tidal Park.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
You dont think that the cat was empty ancategorized at the time I deleted it? Believe me, it was. The cat makes sense as long it it categorized and has some images sorted to it, which is now the case. Thx for that. --JuTa 17:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm not saying that this means that the cat was not empty ancategorized at the time. I certainly understand that the cat makes sense as long it categorized, but the problem is not here. Just as I said before, many Taiwanese are confused by both Beiguan and Beiguan Tidal Park. If we want to avoid that the cat is empty from happening again in the future, and this is where the problem sets in. Do you understand what I said?--Kai3952 (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Ahh, I see. The only thing I could recommend then is to make some commemts (best in english and korean) that the 2 cats should not be confused from each other and what the difference is. regards. --JuTa 08:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm at my wits' end with this problem. As far as I know, they(the users from Taiwan) will take the initiative to modify the category for these files. So that's why I think Category:Beiguan were become empty. Do you have any better way to avoid it?--Kai3952 (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
No, sorry. --JuTa 16:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

"Libro las 101 recetas más saludables para vivir y sonreír.jpg" and "Showcoking ecoreus 28 novembre 2016.jpg"

Hello JuTa, I saw that you'd deleted the images: "File:Libro las 101 recetas más saludables para vivir y sonreír.jpg" and "File:Showcoking ecoreus 28 novembre 2016.jpg", but the athor of the photos sent the authorization of them several times, and the photos have been deleted a couple of times because they say there is no authorization, I can't understand why. ¿Could you check it please? Thank you very much. --Aidalova (talk) 08:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Aidalova, Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case. Perhaps the copyright owner never sent it, perhaps the rellease was not valid, perhaps OTRS stuff missed it. regards. --JuTa 08:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Removal of users from Category:Users suspected of abusing Wikipedia Zero

Hi, could you explain why you are removing users from Category:Users suspected of abusing Wikipedia Zero? These users exist, although many have specifically avoided visiting Commons in an attempt to slip under the radar. —Dispenser (talk) 19:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

No, they don't exist on commons (see i.e. the red remark on top of User:Salva Amadri). They are/were listed on Commons:Database reports/Ownerless pages in the user space. I try to clean up this backlog from time to time and I plan to continue to do so, as I cant see a real advantage to categorize non-existing users. regards. --JuTa 15:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: Can you join centralauth_p.globaluser ON gu_name = REPLACE(page_title, "_", " ") instead of the user table? All accounts are merged in SUL, so there sound be no problems. Dispenser (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Done, Changed to gu_name. Query is running but slow, so it may take a while to update. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
@Dispenser: It is not working, but i have no time to look deeper into it right now. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Edit: Contains global acc's which are globally hidden... Thus it is no longer working as expected (those are in LEFT JOIN NULL). --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Correct license

can you check my new two images and see if its correct license? Saadkhan12345 (talk) 18:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Which images? Please name them. --JuTa 16:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

How is the problem on this file File:Población de Porto Alegre.PNG? You sent me a msg on my profile. The picture is an derivate work from this File:População de Porto Alegre.PNG that is also on the same license.

Thank you!

--Loco085 msg 12:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, its solved since this edit. regards. --JuTa 12:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Please keep it!

This is a very important photo, Please keep it, Thank You! --223.140.155.50 06:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

See [3] --223.140.155.50 07:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A request from an anonymous IP contributor claiming to be the owner of the copyright has no validity. We see far too many people here who claim to be something they are not.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

{{Delete}} location

Hi. Template:Delete says nothing about being at the top of the page, so why move {{Delete}} there in this edit?   — Jeff G. ツ 19:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Because people visiting the file description page should notice it at any time. --JuTa 05:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hello. I request deletion file. This file is File:Flag of Serbia Fixed.svg, but I think it doesn't need to change file.

If it is appropriate, please delete it. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done. --JuTa 16:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Frage

Halo JuTa, da Du immer wieder schon mal LAs von mir nachjustierst ... eine Nachfrage zu diesem Bild: File:Nina_Kolleck,_Berlin_2011-08.jpg. Hiernach, stammt es von einer Hannah Krickau. Wobei es ja eh kein Selfie sein kann, wie derzeit angegeben wird ... Was denkst Du? Danke wenn Du dir die Zeit nimmst und Beste Grüße --Benutzer:WvB (talk) 07:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Als kleiner Nachsatz, da die IP auch die Angabe "erstellt 2011" hinterfragte: unter demselben Bildnamen bestand zuvor bereits ein anderes Bild, auf das womöglich die Angabe August 2011 passte. So oder so, beides waren keine Selfies. --Benutzer:WvB (talk) 07:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, ich hab' das Bild zurückgesetzt und die "neueste" Version gelöscht. User:Zitronenkuchen war ursprünglich als User:Nkolleck angemeldet und wurde umbenannt (siehe hier). Falls Du Zweifel hast, dass das ein Selfie (z.B. mit Selbstauslöser) ist, stell bitte selbst einen Löschantrag. Gruß --JuTa 09:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Danke dir, werde mal sehen. Erste Klarheit haben wir dank Deiner ja aber wieder gewonnen. Die Umbennenung war mir wohl durchgegangen ... Merci und beste Grüße --Benutzer:WvB (talk) 09:30, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

de:Peter Nguyễn Văn Hùng

Can You create a German entry about him? Thank! --114.136.207.76 05:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

No --JuTa 06:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
See Category:Peter Nguyen Van Hung. --114.136.207.76 10:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop "fixing" the hundred images

Please stop removing the PD-Australia template; if you do wish to remove it from the description field, help us by placing it under the license section of the pages! Thanks! Donama (talk) 03:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

I do that, except for those after 1955, because I think for those the license does not apply. regards --JuTa 06:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
On a second thought, the part Commonwealth, State or Territory owned2 photographs and engravings: taken or published more than 50 years ago seems to apply. So I will keep the PD-Australia and remove the speedy deletion templates for those as well. Please feel free to add a sensefull decription if you like to. regards. --JuTa 06:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Code issues in User:JuTa/monobook.js

Hi JuTa, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:JuTa/monobook.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 36 character 1: Expected '}' to match '{' from line 30 and instead saw 'groups'. - Evidence: groups: {
  2. ISSUE: line 36 character 7: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: groups: {
  3. ISSUE: line 36 character 7: Expected '(end)' and instead saw ':'. - Evidence: groups: {

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 12:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC).


Code issues in User:JuTa/monobook.js

Hi JuTa, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:JuTa/monobook.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 36 column 1: Unexpected identifier

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 12:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC).

File:Ökumenischer Gebärdenchor Augsburg, St. Ulrich und Afra, 2015 (01B).jpg

Hallo JuTa, was soll diese Löschung? Mit einem Klick lässt sich unschwer feststellen, dass hier eine OTRS-Freigabe für das unbearbeitete Originalbild vorliegt: File:Ökumenischer Gebärdenchor Augsburg, St. Ulrich und Afra, 2015 (01).jpg. Das OTRS-Team hat offensichtlich versehentlich die Freigabe nur auf der Originalbild-Datei eingetragen, jedoch nicht bei der retuschierten Version. Hier ist nicht zu löschen, sondern das OTRS-Ticket einzutragen. Ich bitte um entsprechende Wiederherstellung der retuschierten Dateiversion nebst Regelung der Ticketeintragerei. Danke + Grüße, --Jocian (talk) 03:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Hatt ich übersehen, sorry. Bild ist wieder da. Gruß --JuTa 06:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanx + Grüße, --Jocian (talk) 06:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

File:1c Astrolabe Sedillot.jpg

Bonjour, je ne comp rends pas ce qui ne va pas ?

  • L'image de l'auteur n'a pas été modifiée ; la transcription en français est de Sédillot ;
  • L'ouvrage est daté de 1844, c'est un ouvrage personnel, je ne sais pas s'il est en ligne ;
  • L'auteur est mort depuis longtemps...

Que faut-il de plus ?

Cordialement, --Aubry Gérard (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, it looks OK now. --JuTa 20:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Ag-obj-24942-001-pub-large.jpg

Hi, the files still categorize as Category:Files with no machine-readable license. Could you either fix that or revert the removal of the problem tag? Jcb (talk) 12:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

I tried it - see here. No idea what else to do. Perhaps someone else is able to help. --JuTa 19:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I have reinstated the fix as done by User:Prosfilaes. I expect User:Jmabel to only touch it when they have a better resolution that does not throw the files back into the problem category. On a second look, this may be better. Jcb (talk) 20:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Hei sir please delete this logo.... File:Wikivoyage-Logo-v3-ps.svg Olasyar (talk) 21:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

You started a regular deletion request. Please wait until it will be decided by another admin likely on 19.11. regards --JuTa 21:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

File deletion

Hello. You deleted dome files, particularly File:Логотип Чесного театру.svg saying there is no permission, but permission were sent in the same day files were uploaded. You did not even bother to check! --TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

It was not confirmed by an OTRS member since end of August. Cuurently I try to clean up some backlogs. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case. If the release is valid, they will undelete the file. regards. --JuTa 22:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Then can you, please give a list of files you deleted. They do not show up in Uploads any more. --TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 22:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
See here. regards. --JuTa 07:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Statendam (ship, 1929)

You deleted this category, 26 okt 2016 22:54, probably with a good reason. I cannot find in your list why.

27 okt 2016 01:26 (wijz | gesch) . . (+9.272)‎ . . N Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ένωση Δημοκρατικού Κέντρου ‎ (Starting mass deletion request using VisualFileChange)
26 okt 2016 22:44 (wijz | gesch) . . (+21)‎ . . N Category:Arnholm (surname) ‎ (new) (laatste wijziging)

I uploaded images of this ship, found in the inheritance of my father. It might be the same images and bought my father this pictures. Can you tell me the reason of deletion? --Stunteltje (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Because it was empty. The 2 images now within it you uploaded today. I'll undelete it. regards. --JuTa 14:04, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:25, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

The Saturday Evening Post/Norman Rockwell

Hi JuTa, The Saturday Evening Post the copyright owner for these various Norman Rockwell pieces. I don't need them deleted, I just need the proper copyright notations posted. I've had 2 unauthorized uses come about because of the PD notice that is currently listed on all the images. This is completely inaccurate. The NARA has the correct information on their site and since Wikimedia says it gets all the information from NARA, it doesn't make sense why this is different. I have also contacted NARA to help remedy this. Both the original version and the war bond version are copyright protected. I tried editing these myself but I see that you changed all of them back. I need to be able to edit the copyright / licensing notation for all of these images.

FREEDOM FROM FEAR - NARA - 515600.tif , FREEDOM FROM FEAR - NARA - 515600.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%22Freedom_from_Fear%22_-_NARA_-_513538.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%22Freedom_from_Fear%22_-_NARA_-_513538.tif https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%22Freedom_from_Fear%22_-_NARA_-_513666.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%22Freedom_from_Fear%22_-_NARA_-_513666.tif FREEDOM OF SPEECH - NARA - 515599.jpg , FREEDOM OF SPEECH - NARA - 515599.tif Freedom of Speech" - NARA - 513536.tif , Freedom of Speech" - NARA - 513536.jpg Freedom of Speech" - NARA - 513711.jpg , Freedom of Speech" - NARA - 513711.tif FREEDOM FROM WANT - NARA - 515597.jpg, FREEDOM FROM WANT - NARA - 515597.tif "Freedom From Want" - NARA - 513710.jpg, "Freedom From Want" - NARA - 513710.tif "Freedom From Want" - NARA - 513539.jpg, "Freedom From Want" - NARA - 513539.tif FREEDOM OF WORSHIP - NARA - 515598.jpg, FREEDOM OF WORSHIP - NARA - 515598.tif Freedom of Worship" - NARA - 513537.jpg , Freedom of Worship" - NARA - 513537.tif Save Freedom of Worship" - NARA - 513712.jpg , Save Freedom of Worship" - NARA - 513712.tif — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbeer (talk • contribs) 12:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Then please nominate them for deletion. If they are not public domain, the cannot be kept on commons, except the copyright holder releases them under a free license though Commons:OTRS. How to raise a deletion request: see Commons:Deletion requests, Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually or if you active the Help:QuickDelete gadget within your preferences its a one click action per image. regards --JuTa 15:43, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Erst schauen, dann löschen.

Wohl wenig geschlafen, letzte Nacht? https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AV16-0014-4.jpg&type=revision&diff=268474913&oldid=268465077. Gute Besserung, --Edelseider (talk) 12:01, 21 November 2017 (UTC) PS: Jetzt ist alles durcheiander geraten, so noch einmal zur Klärung: Datei V16-0014/4 ist diese hier: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mediathequeprotestante/15835626923/; wohingegen Datei V16-0014/3 diese hier ist: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mediathequeprotestante/16455696745/. Zwei verschiedene Bücher, zwei unterschiedliche Dateien. Nix von doppelt. --Edelseider (talk) 12:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Die ware binär identisch - siehe Special:ListDuplicatedFiles recht weit unten. Du hast die Zieldatei erst hinterher auf File:Dionysii Afri de situ orbis.jpg verschoben, und dann den redirect auf File:Pomponii Melae Geographiae, libri tres.jpg geändert. Da hattest Du wohl beim hochladen was übersehen. Gruß --JuTa 15:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Picture deleted

Hello. On 12 November 2017‎ you removed File:Alan_Duffy_and_Neil_deGrasse_Tyson_2017_Melbourne.jpg from Commons, saying it "has been deleted from Commons by JuTa because: No OTRS permission since 2017-08-28". But I have copies of the email which the photographer sent OTRS to authorize it, so I am not clear what the problem is or how to address it. --Gronk Oz (talk) 10:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, please ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for this case. If the release is valid they will undelete the file. regards. --JuTa 10:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I have raised it at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File_deleted_-_Alan_Duffy_and_Neil_deGrasse_Tyson_2017_Melbourne.jpg. --Gronk Oz (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Screenshot xtcmodified.png

File:Screenshot xtcmodified.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mikel Urdangarin bideo.webm

Hi JuTa: You can find this file's license information at the botton of the page Euskalkiak.eus. This project which aims to record differents pronounciations in basque language has licensed all its videos under Cc-by-sa. Thank you.--Xabier Cañas (talk) 01:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Hmmm, the source is vimeo not Euskalkiak. And there is a note "all rights reserved" at the bottom. --JuTa 01:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Stora Ekholmen

Hi JuTa. I'm wondering why you deleted Category:Stora Ekholmen, which was (what seemed to me a useful) redirect to Category:Stora Ekholmen, Vaxholm Municipality. -- Chris j wood (talk) 16:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Well, there should be a {{Disambig}} page if there are multiple Stora Ekholmens. If not, it should better be moved back. --JuTa 18:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Elcor, Minnesota

The images File:Elcor Aerial 1948.jpg and File:Elcor Aerial Photo, 1961.jpg now have proper licensing. Thank you, Juta! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrGregMN (talk • contribs) 22:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Hmm, are you sure? --JuTa 11:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Pethő Sándor-Halmi Béla.jpg

Magyar: Szia! Ezek szerint kétszer kell törölni? Üdv. Tambo (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Why? --JuTa 10:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

not free license

Hallo JuTa, ich verstehe diesen edit von Dir nicht.
Meinst Du wirklich, "Der Urheberrechtsinhaber dieser Datei erlaubt es jedem, diese Datei frei zu benutzen, solange diese nicht verkauft werden." wäre eine für Commons ausreichend freie Lizenz? Gleiches gilt für die anderen Fotos, bei denen Du meinen Baustein herausgenommen hast. --Stepro (talk) 10:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Das steht da so. Du bezwifelst dies mit den no permission Baustein (zu recht). Der no license Baustein ist daher überflüssig, da ja ein Lizenz-Baustein vorhanden ist. PS: Ich check 1 mal pro Woche dies (to find files tagged with {{No license since}} template, that have a license (which might or might not be valid).) - siehe Category:Media without a license. Gruß --JuTa 10:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ich weiß ehrlich gesagt nicht so recht, was da richtig ist, deswegen hatte ich beide Bausteine gesetzt. Mein Gedankengang dabei war: Selbst wenn der Urheber eine Freigabe für "solange diese nicht verkauft werden" schicken würde, wäre diese Lizenz dann zwar vom Urheber freigegeben, aber für Commons immer noch nicht ausreichend. Andererseits hast Du recht, im Supportteam würden wir diese Freigabe sowieso nicht akzeptieren, daher wird der eine Baustein wohl reichen. --Stepro (talk) 19:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ich hätte das sofort gelöscht, denn "solange diese nicht verkauft werden" ist eindeutig nicht Commons-kompatibel und auch keine freie Lizenz gemäß unserer Auffassung. Das Bild hat also tatsächlich keine gültige Lizenz. De728631 (talk) 19:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ich finde übrigens dass dieser Baustein gelöscht gehört. --Stepro (talk) 21:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Kategorielöschung

Besten Dank für die Löschung der Kategorie People of Melle! Kind regards --Ἀστερίσκος (talk) 09:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Aber gern doch. --JuTa 13:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Request

Can you add this template to the list of other translations please?--Ma▀▄Ga 16:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done --JuTa 16:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Correct Croation to Hrvatski, please.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
OK. --JuTa 16:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Great. Thank you very much.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

About "Files provided by the Defensoría del Pueblo de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires"

Hi! The OTRS agent who confirmed the licence of this files forgot to add it to 55 files, that seems you just deleted. how can we fix this? Thanks!--Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Ask User:Ezarate on User talk:Ezarate. It seems he confirmed the other files of that "row". Otherwise please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case. regards. --JuTa 17:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hello, JuTa.

Please, see this request on which you were mentioned. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

I see, as I'm not an OTRS volounteer I cannot tell anything about the ticket. I'm only trying to reduce some backlogs currently. regards. --JuTa 17:08, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
No problem! I just thought I should inform you as you were mentioned.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Chris Sherwin

Ticket#2017091410011119 - Please restore the image you deleted of Chris Sherwin - the email I received on September 18, 2017 from permissions states the following:

Please go ahead and upload the photo of Chris Sherwin. The permission has been accepted. All that's still required is the file on Commons so that I may tag it. Yours sincerely, Quintin Williams

I uploaded the file on Commons, the photographer sent permissions an adequate email stating the image is licensed per CC-BY-SA 4.0 - I followed the same procedures I've been following for image uploads for the past 6 years. Atsme 📞 19:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, you talking about File:Chris Sherwin (veterinary biologist), 2009.jpg I guess. It seems he OTRS volounteer forgot to confirm the release with editing the file description page. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case, I am not a member of the OTRS team. I only tried to clean up some backlogs. Thanks. --JuTa 22:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

File:DBU - Colombo.jpg

I know you’ve got it wrong, this is a photo that I took when visiting the DBU - sure it is a picture of the same memorial plaques but I know what I photographed. Will find the other photos of the DBU that i took at the same time, which collaborates what I’m saying for you. Dan arndt (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Well, the image was marked for deletion by an IP because it appears on http://bombaywalla.org/the-dutch-burgher-union-of-ceylon-1908/. I converted that incomplete request into a speedy one. And if I don't miss something even on your blog https://dancarndt.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/anybody-want-a-burgher/ I dont find any notice about a free license - compare Commons:licensing. We cannot be sure that commons user Dan arndt is equal to dancarndt on worldpress. We have a lot of imposters evrery day here. All images from there would need a confirmation through Commons:OTRS that you are identical and that you are willing to publish the image(s) under a specified and on commons accepted license - compare Commons:License tags. As an alternate you could post a note onto your blog, that the photos are published under i.e. {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. If you do so, please leave me a not I will recheck your block and then undelete the image. If you decide to use OTRS you would need till the outcome of that process, which will likely could take some weeks. regard. --JuTa 09:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Understand your suspicions - so I’ve included a note on the bottom of Wordpress page. I hope that is sufficient to address your concerns that I’m one and the same person. Let me know if you need any other proof. BTW the image on http://bombaywalla.org/the-dutch-burgher-union-of-ceylon-1908/ is completely different from mine because they were taken by two different people at two different times. Dan arndt (talk) 14:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
OK, I restored the image. regards --JuTa 09:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

JuTa an IP seems hellbent on deleting this image, once again arguing that it is copyright of www.Bombaywalla.org, which it clearly isn’t given that it’s my photo. Also the two photos are completely different. I feel that I’m being victimised by an anonymous editor but can’t work out why. Can you assist? Dan arndt (talk) 02:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

I remvoved the imcomplete DR now. If this continues we might have to block the page for IPs for a while. regards --JuTa 09:56, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Moving files to Wikisource

Hi, could you please help move these files you nominated for deletion to Wikisource. They are to be deleted, but after being moved to wikisource for transcription.

Also see wikisource:Wikisource:Scriptorium/Help#Localising_two_files for details. Arthur Kerensa (talk) 13:15, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no "extra rights" on any wikisource. Please upload them yourself if they accepted there. If thats not possible, you should save them now localy to your hardisk and upload them to wikisource after they got deleted on commons. regards. --JuTa 19:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:ATM 1501

I know for a fact that this category was not empty when I created it. Do you know what happened to its contents? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, no Idea. I walked through the parent cats without finding anything with ATM 1501. If you don't remember which files you sorted into it could be any edit to any of our about 30.000.000 files. Nearly impossible to find. They might got deleted as well by what ever reason. regards --JuTa 23:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
I remember it very well. It showed ATM 1501 renumbered 1000 in service in Madrid, 1960s, black and white photo, portrait, taken from a low angle as the tram goes over a bridge. I wonder where it is. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
As I said: Maybe deleted by what ever reason. --JuTa 13:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
As I thought: Your business here is to grow your admin edit count, not help other users building a free media repository. It’s deplorable to witness your recent refusal to delete these two totally useless and mislading galleries coupled with your “enthusiatic” deletion of empty categories that however include non-trivial information in their description and/or categorization (18 cats in the last 30 days, in my watchlist only). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JuTa/Archive_39&oldid=276059418"