User talk:Hildabast
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Cheryl-Shavers.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Cheryl-Shavers.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Hildabast,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Ana Maria Rey.jpg
- File:Cheryl Hayashi in lab.jpg
- File:Cheryl Hayashi.jpg
- File:Deborah Jin - 2.jpg
- File:Deborah Jin at work.jpg
- File:Jennifer Richeson - 1.jpg
- File:Jennifer Richeson - 3.jpg
- File:Jennifer Richeson -2.jpg
- File:Katherine Gottlieb.jpg
- File:Lisa Cooper.jpg
- File:Mercedes Doretti.jpg
- File:Nergis Mavalvala - 1.jpg
- File:Nergis Mavalvala - 2.jpg
- File:Nergis Mavalvala - 3.jpg
- File:Nicole King.jpg
- File:Olufunmilayo Olopade - head shot.jpg
- File:Olufunmilayo Olopade in office.jpg
- File:Olufunmilayo Olopade.jpg
- File:Wafaa El-sadr.jpg
Yours sincerely, Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- The files, and the website, explicitly point to the current policy for photos of fellows: they are CC BY 4.0. What possible argument could there be for deletion? https://www.macfound.org/creative-commons/ Hildabast (talk) 18:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please see the previous (and contentious) discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows. Long discussion short, their release is for "use by media" only (per discussion and OTRS ticket)), something which Commons does not recognize as a proper CC-release. But I recomend you read the discussion to understand the different isues here. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Nathan Francis Mossell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Granville evelyn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—innotata 18:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Bust of Percy Julian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 21:49, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Miriam Rothschild 2003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |