User talk:Fleets

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fleets!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Archives 1

Please do not overwrite files

---

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Josh Reynolds playing for City in the City v Country in Wagga Wagga.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Significant/radical cropping isn't a minor, please see COM:OVERWRITE.Bidgee (talk) 02:56, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

I did not see an issue, as it was not used elsewhere, and was not cropping any other information but green grass away. I see the issue that it was not re-cropped to create a new image as it now looks pretty crapppy in the infobox, but I'll do that now.Fleets (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Please consider adding iw links here on Commons

Dear Fleets,

Thanks for creating quite some new categories here on Commons as you did recently for Category:Addin Fonua-Blake. It would be great if you could as well add the interwiki-link to the corresponding page on en-wikipedia by clicking here on commons in the sidebar menu under 'In Wikipedia' on 'Add links' and then putting in the appearing pop-up box the link to the corresponding article on en-wikipedia. This will add a link to commons to all language versions of the corresponding article on en-wikipedia. Moreover this will avoid the corresponding article to be included in the maintenance category en:Category:Commons category template with no category set.

Many thanks if you could consider to do so, indeed this would reduce my efforts on adding these iw links later through patrolling the pages listed on the pre-mentioned category on en-wikipedia. I would like to thank you for all the great work you are realizing on en-wikipedia and here on commons.

If you have any further questions on this do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards and already now my very best wishes for you for the New Year. Robby (talk) 08:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Corey Paterson.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Corey Paterson.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 22:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Daniel Crowley

Hi. I saw you reverted my edit on Daniel Crowley image. I think the category should be deleted because it's redundant -- Daniel Crowley category is already in Players of Arsenal FC category so no need for that photo to be sitting in Arsenal FC. Check out: COM:OVERCAT. Thanks — Dudek1337 (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Darren Nicholls St George Illawarra.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:04, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

You are free:

• to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
• to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

• attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0CC BY-SA 2.0 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 truetrue

per link on the page.Fleets (talk) 06:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Cropping

Hey, I don't know you, I have nothing personal against you, I'm not a rugby league expert but I have to ask, why do you crop every picture so narrowly, so closely to one's skull? You leave, what, three, four pixels around people's head/hand/leg. I thought it is a well-known fact that a properly cropped picture should leave some space between pictured person and the edge of a photo (unless you're trying to make some kind of an artistic photo, what's not the case here). Take a look how are made official photos of politicians for example. And - judging by the case of this revert of yours - I'll add one more thing: limbs are not always important in profile pictures. Aʀvєδuι ⁺ 23:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

No worries, thought it best to avoid having other subjects in the background, and I would say that whilst limbs may not be pertinent for a politicians infobox, they would be infinitely more important to a rugby league footballer.Fleets (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Well, yes and no in the same time, to be honest. I agree that if you get a picture of a player in action, in some kind of a characteristic pose then of course it is good to have it all. But when a player is standing still, then cropping into some kind of a profile pic, infobox suited may be a better idea. If you cropp it closely to the silhouette, it quite often creates pictures relativly narrow and high (considering their ratio) that don't look good in articles. And especially in infoboxes, when fixed width result in being counterproductive (infoboxes' aim is to instantly give the readers the most importantant information, and if a photo is as narrow in ratio as in said McGillvary's case, they may have to scroll down to get them). Therefore in my opininon leaving a wee bit more of a background may be recomended or in some cases even required. And getting back to the argument about leaving virtually no space between pictured person and an edge of a photo - for me this exemplary picture looks much better uncropped [1] than cropped to the skull [2]. And frankly speaking I would probably say the same thing about a major part of rugby league pictures here at Commons, as most of them passed through your hands. (Should you reply, please let me know anywhere on 'my talk page, as last time I didn't know untill I checked your page myself.) Aʀvєδuι ⁺ 22:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Billy Slater Maroons.jpg

Copyright status: File:Billy Slater Maroons.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Slater Maroons.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 16:18, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Matt_King

Category:Matt_King has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Robby (talk) 22:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Dana Wilson.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Dana Wilson.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Anthony Seibold.jpg

Copyright status: File:Anthony Seibold.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anthony Seibold.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ethan Lowe.jpg

Copyright status: File:Ethan Lowe.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ethan Lowe.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tonie Carroll Queensland.jpg

Copyright status: File:Tonie Carroll Queensland.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tonie Carroll Queensland.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dane Gagai.jpg

Copyright status: File:Dane Gagai.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dane Gagai.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mick Hancock.jpg

Copyright status: File:Mick Hancock.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mick Hancock.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 04:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Corey Oates.jpg

Copyright status: File:Corey Oates.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Corey Oates.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 04:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Allan Langer.jpg

Copyright status: File:Allan Langer.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Allan Langer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 04:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Justin Hodges Broncos.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Justin Hodges Broncos.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ryanpapenhuyzen.jpg

Copyright status: File:Ryanpapenhuyzen.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ryanpapenhuyzen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:26, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Not uploaded by me.Fleets (talk) 15:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jason Ryles Coach.jpg

Copyright status: File:Jason Ryles Coach.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jason Ryles Coach.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Not uploaded by me.Fleets (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Daniel Hindmarsh.jpg

Copyright status: File:Daniel Hindmarsh.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Hindmarsh.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 13:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:57, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Human error, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 states "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format ... Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material". I have not attempted to deceive, but was not in tune with the current interpretation here for that licensing. I recognise the error and will care take take not to utilise anything under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 again.Fleets (talk - ) 17:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)" Decline reason: "No consensus to unblock. Taivo (talk) 07:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

• @Magog the Ogre: What do you think? I see no clear warning before the block, do I miss something? I am inclined to AGF and give them another chance. Jcb (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

  @Jcb: three separate warnings above about uploading non-commercial images from Flickr. This was the fourth offense. If anything I should have blocked for longer. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

I had hoped for a reduction, but I will take the above sentence into consideration. That can obviously be addressed by myself so not to bring a fifth offence to the list. Would it be prudent to work something stronger into the quick upload tool, as the wording would indicate it is free to use, but there is a not a robust enough routing to protect the user from themselves, were they to not be entirely o fay with the terms, and how they are interpreted here. Happy to take it on the chin, and also to learn from it too.Fleets (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Thomas Johnstone.jpg

File:Thomas Johnstone.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: hardly own work: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/7528963/tom-johnstone-spoke-to-sporting-chance-during-injury-hell-before-england-glory/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Lee Kershaw Wakefield.jpg

File:Lee Kershaw Wakefield.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: hardly own work: https://www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/sport/rugby/lee-kershaw-signs-one-year-deal-at-wakefield-trinity-1-9803185 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

File:AshurstMatty-AWIDMW-MM-2-e1510748142422.jpg

File:AshurstMatty-AWIDMW-MM-2-e1510748142422.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: hardly own work: https://www.totalrl.com/potential-england-knights-team-look-years-six-nations/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Not added by me.Fleets (talk) 09:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Sure; but the original image, as the other by the same uploading account, are copyvios. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ben+Jones+Bishop+Hull+FC+v+Wakefield+Trinity+cfc62kj59hAl.jpg

File:Ben+Jones+Bishop+Hull+FC+v+Wakefield+Trinity+cfc62kj59hAl.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Getty! https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/ben-jones-bishop-of-wakefield-during-the-betfred-super-nachrichtenfoto/847266958?adppopup=true Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ryan-Hampshire.png

File:Ryan-Hampshire.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.rlnews.co.uk/i-just-feel-i-am-worth-a-little-bit-more-than-what-the-offer-is-hampshire-discusses-wakefield-future/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Rugby-League-Friendly-Wakefield-Trinity-vs-Castleford-Tigers-Sunday-15th-January-2017.jpg

File:Rugby-League-Friendly-Wakefield-Trinity-vs-Castleford-Tigers-Sunday-15th-January-2017.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/meet-james-batchelor-wakefields-england-10383486 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mikewardscore.jpg

File:Mikewardscore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Rob Butler Broncos.jpg

And also:

• File:Josh Eaves.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first"). A1Cafel (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Sisa Waqa, Aku Uate & Marika Koroibete.jpg

File:Sisa Waqa, Aku Uate & Marika Koroibete.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Marika Koroibete 2013.jpg

File:Marika Koroibete 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Ezra Mam.jpg

File:Ezra Mam.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.odds.com.au/nrl/news/nrl-round-3-2023-saturday-betting-tips/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Whpq (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

I did not add the file.Fleets (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Rhys Houston Lovegrove.jpg

File:Rhys Houston Lovegrove.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sam Sailor 22:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)