User talk:Eunostos

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Eunostos!

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Eunostos,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm the date was not clearly displayed in the captation, so I may have made a mistake. I moved the file removing the date --Sailko (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Painted reproduction of Augustus of Prima Porta

[edit]

Salve Eunostos,

My name is Isaiah Mitchell, and I'm writing on behalf of Trinity University Press in San Antonio, TX. We're in the middle of publishing a book about art in the Western world right now, and we'd like to use this photo. Do you have an original RAW or TIFF version of this photograph? Unfortunately, we cannot print with JPEG.

Many thanks, --Isaiah Mitchell (talk) 21:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archibald, couverture de Jean Ache pour le magazine "Pilote", n°327, janvier 1966.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kokonino (talk) 10:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, vous avez écrit "Os fossiles", ai-je raison de dire que ce n'est pas une réplique mais les os d'origine? Gerbil (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir. J'ai repris les informations fournies par la légende du fossile dans l'exposition, donc, à ma connaissance, il s'agit bien des os d'origine. Bonne soirée ! --Eunostos (talk) 18:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mervi. --Gerbil (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Emmanuel Roudier, Face au bison, illustration pour le jeu de rôle Würm, 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sadads (talk) 23:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have contributed heavily to the Turkish pictures in the Wikimedia Commons, having a site myself with over 80.000 pictures on that subject, some of which I contribute to the commons. Today, editing pictures from a recent visit to the Anatolian Civilizations museum in Ankara I noticed a category had been added to a work I published. The problem is, the work, a large pythos, is given te category "Hittite metalwork". It's nice if people add to my work, but ony if they do not make mistakes. The work is in terracotta, nothing metal about it. I do not know if you made more changes to my work, please be careful and correct errors if you find them. I will now delete the category. Dosseman (talk)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Le stégosaure du Muséum

[edit]

Salut Eunostos. Sur cette page de discussion tu as écrit I just wrote to the Museum to ask about the date and author of the sculpture. If it is in the public domain, there won't be any problem. J'ai bien vu que les images ont été effacées (dommage) mais si je t'écris c'est parce que je suis curieux de savoir quelle réponse t'a donnée le Muséum. Qui est donc l'auteur du stégosaure du Jardin des plantes ? Kintaro (talk) 06:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Kintaro ! Je te copie ci-dessous la réponse que m'a adressée Mme Colin du Muséum fin mai :
«Bonjour Monsieur,
voici quelques renseignements, trouvés il y a plus d'une dizaine d'années maintenant, concernant les sculptures qui ornent la cour d'honneur des Galeries d'Anatomie comparée et de Paléontologie du Muséum. En plus du Mammouth et du Stégosaure, il y a de l'autre côté de la cours, entre ces 2 spécimens et beaucoup plus petite, une sculpture de Moeritherium. Peut-être est il bien d'en faire part.
Je pense que depuis, d'autres renseignements ont été retrouvés, notamment sur le Stégosaure dont nous n'avons pas l'auteur. Je me renseigne auprès de collègues et je reviendrai vers vous le cas échéant.
- Le Stégosaure est un don du Parc de Thoiry. Philippe Taquet l'a fait installer à son emplacement actuel probablement lorsqu'il était directeur du Muséum (entre 1985 et 1990).
- Le Mammouth et le Moeritherium ont été faits pour l'exposition "Eléphantillages" qui s'est tenue au Musée en Herbe (co-produite avec le Muséum). Elles ont été réalisées par le peintre animalier et sculpteur Pierre Dandelot (signature sur la patte arrière gauche du Mammouth) sous la direction de Herbert Thomas et Pascal Tassy. Les agrandissements ont été produits par la Société Haligon. En 1989, quand l'exposition a été démontée, elles ont été installées à leur emplacement actuel. La reconstitution du Mammouth est celle du mammouth de Lhiakov (présenté en galerie de Paléontologie) avec toutefois une réduction de la tête. L'artiste ayant voulu donner un effet de perspective.
Sincères salutations»
Comme tu le vois, l'artiste est inconnu, mais la sculpture est bien trop récente pour se trouver dans le domaine public. J'espérais que la liberté de panorama justifiait de maintenir la photo en ligne, mais elle était certainement trop centrée sur la statue pour que je puisse faire valoir la liberté de panorama. Bonne journée et à bientôt par ici, --Eunostos (talk) 08:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Salut Eunostos. Merci pour ton aimable réponse. Madame Colin (peut-être est-ce Cécile Colin-Fromont) nous apporte des renseignements précieux concernant le mammouth et le moeritherium (je les connais bien mais ne savais rien, ni sur leur origine, ni la date, ni l'auteur ! Maintenant oui, merci !). Par contre j'avais déjà quelques renseignements sur le stégosaure et madame Colin se trompe sur un point : il ne s'agit pas du parc de Thoiry mais du parc de Saint-Vrain. Ce parc animalier, le parc de Saint-Vrain, avait été lancé dans les années 1970. Au sein du parc, le "parcours préhistorique" fut lancé en 1981. C'était un parcours à bord de petits bateaux et plein de sculptures représentant dinosaures, ichthyosaures, smilodons, mammouths et hommes préhistoriques étaient placées sur la terre ferme, en bord du parcours aquatique. C'était l'un des espaces de visite de Saint-Vrain, mais uniquement à partir de 1981 : les visiteurs montaient en petits groupes sur les bateaux et les bateaux suivaient ce "parcours préhistorique". Et c'est le Muséum et ses savants (dont Philippe Taquet) qui avaient fourni les sculptures et le côté "scientifique" de la chose. Concernant le stégosaure, le Muséum, apparemment, fabriqua deux stégosaures et en garda un pour lui, le stégosaure encore actuellement exposé dans le Jardin des plantes. Il y a plein de photos de ce "parcours préhistorique" sur internet, dont le stégosaure, bien sûr. Mais c'est dommage, on ne connaît toujours pas l'auteur ou les auteurs des sculptures. Kintaro (talk) 01:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Dermoplastie de la Femme de Florès par Elisabeth Daynès, 2007.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FOP in France
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Reconstitution d'une tête de Néandertalien à partir du crâne de l'homme de La Chapelle-aux-Saints.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FOP in France
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Reconstitution du visage de l'homme de Néandertal, Norberto Montecucco, vers 1908.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The artist, Norberto Montecucco, died in 1978, so it has not entered PD, and there is no FOP in France
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reconstitution d'une tête de Néandertalien à partir du crâne de l'homme de La Chapelle-aux-Saints.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reconstitution du visage de l'homme de Néandertal, Norberto Montecucco, vers 1908.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dermoplastie de la Femme de Florès par Elisabeth Daynès, 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phantom Boy.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Expo "Peintres femmes" au musée du Luxembourg

[edit]

Bonjour Eunostos,

Un gros merci pour le téléversement de fichiers concernant l'exposition des femmes peintres au Luxembourg qui se termine demain. Deux points :

  • le titre de l'exposition est « Peintres femmes », et non « Femmes peintres ». J'ai renommé la catégorie en conséquence et je l'ai reliée à l'élément Wikidata et à l'ébauche sur WP.
  • aurais-tu pris par hasard des photos plus générales de l'exposition (scénographie, visiteurs, etc.) ? Ce serait génial pour illustrer l'article sur WP (qui n'est pas mon oeuvre mais que j'ai l'intention d'étoffer).

Bien cordialement, --BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir @BeatrixBelibaste:  ! Rha, je m'en veux de m'être trompé sur ce titre alors que j'avais bien remarqué que "peintres" était placé avant "femmes" (contrairement au livre sorti par Larousse à l'occasion de l'expo, et qui s'intitule Femmes peintres...). Désolé et merci pour la correction ! Pour ce qui est des photos, je n'ai pas de vue générale des salles, malheureusement. Mais j'ai pris plusieurs panneaux explicatifs, si ça peut être utile. Bonne soirée !--Eunostos (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir, Aucun souci pour l'inversion des termes, c'est une erreur très courante dans la couverture de l'événement (je l'ai fait moi-même). Pour le visuel, ça pourrait aussi être des oeuvres accompagnées de panneaux explicatifs, ou encore le titre à l'entrée de l'exposition comme ici avec la gravure de Jenny Desoras Ni l'un ni l'autre (si tu as). Sinon, les photos des oeuvres avec leurs cadres que tu as prises conviendront très bien. Côté documentation, j'ai le catalogue de l'expo et le numéro spécial de Dossier de l'art, sans compter la documentation officielle (dossier de presse, etc.) J'ignore si les panneaux explicatifs seraient utiles : peut-être s'ils sont développés au-delà de l'identification du tableau ? Je te laisse téléverser le reste de tes images en paix. À bientôt, --BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dernière précision rapide : si tu as photographié l'autoportrait de Marie-Adélaïde Durieux, elle se nomme en fait Marie-Adélaïde Duvieux - (catégorie Commons). Cette fois c'est vrai, je te laisse tranquille ! Bonne soirée, --BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@BeatrixBelibaste: Merci pour tes précisions ! J'ai mis en ligne mes dernières photographies de tableaux qui n'étaient pas floues ou trop de travers. L'autoportrait de Marie-Adélaïde Duvieux était déjà sur Commons, mais j'ai quand même ajouté ma prise de vue (où l'on voit le cadre en entier). Pour le reste, malheureusement, je n'ai pas de vue générale, et je n'ai pas non plus de photo où l'on verrait à la fois un tableau et un panneau explicatif. Il y avait du monde dans l'expo et j'ai donc pris les photos avec une vue assez resserrée, pour ne pas photographier mes voisins et voisines au passage. En revanche, j'ai le texte introductif de l'exposition, mais je me demandais sous quelle licence je pouvais le placer : je ne sais pas si ça passe en termes de droit d'auteur. Enfin, j'ai deux citations dont les photos sont trop de travers mais dont le texte est lisible, je peux donc te retaper le texte si ça t'intéresse (mais j'imagine qu'il doit être dans le catalogue). Merci pour ton travail sur l'article, ça fait plaisir de voir que l'exposition a son article sur Wikipédia ! Bon dimanche,--Eunostos (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Exhibition panel in the hangar of the "Minoa" ship - archaeological sources 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

h-stt !? 11:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oeuvre d'art sur Thalès de Milet

[edit]

Bonjour Eunostos

J'ai trouvé votre photo d'une œuvre d'art sur Thalès de Milet exposée dans un musée et j'aimerais l'utiliser pour un travail académique (je suis chercheur en philosophie au Brésil). Cependant, je n'ai pas trouvé l'auteur de l'œuvre (seulement son nom en tant qu'auteur de la photo). J'aimerais savoir si l'ouvrage est votre paternité, ou si par hasard vous seriez en mesure de me dire qui est l'auteur de l'ouvrage, car je compte sur cette information pour la citer dans mes recherches. Jpluzneto (talk) 22:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Jpluznerto. Je suis heureux de voir que cette photo vous est utile pour vos recherches. J'ai photographié cette maquette parce qu'elle me paraissait particulièrement claire et bien faite pour expliquer la conception du monde selon Thalès. Je m'aperçois grâce à votre question que je n'avais pas indiqué dans la description du fichier l'ensemble des informations dont je disposais au sujet de cette maquette. J'ai retrouvé la légende, que j'avais photographiée à part. Je vous en recopie le texte complet : "Le monde selon Thalès de Milet. 640?-547? av. J.-C. Thalès de Milet pense que l'eau est à l'origine du Monde. Au milieu de cet univers aquatique flotte une énorme bulle d'air. À l'intérieur et au fond, repose la Terre, plate comme une énorme galette. Les étoiles sont suspendues dans le ciel en haut, où circulent le Soleil et la Lune. Maquette Conseil départemental du Puy-de-Dôme. Pascal Miall..". J'ai un problème car la fin du nom de famille de ce monsieur n'est pas lisible (soit ma photo est floue à cet endroit, soit le texte de la légende a été corrigé à la main, en tout cas ce n'est pas clair) : je n'arrive pas à voir à coup sûr si ce monsieur s'appelle "Pascal Mialliar" ou "Pascal Miallion". Désolé pour cette imprécision ! Vous pouvez, soit indiquer simplement "Conseil départemental du Puy-de-Dôme", soit, si vous tenez à connaître le nom exact de ce monsieur, contacter le Musée Henri Lecoq, où cette maquette a été exposée dans le cadre de l'exposition Perds pas le Nord du 19 décembre 2020 jusqu'au 18 septembre 2022. Le musée n'a pas d'adresse de contact propre, mais vous pouvez écrire à musees@clermontmetropole.eu en précisant que votre question s'adresse au musée Henri Lecoq, pour demander le nom exact de ce monsieur.
Pour ce qui est des droits d'utilisation de l'image, dans la mesure où il s'agit d'un travail de recherche, cela ne devrait pas poser de problème. Le musée pourra vous donner plus de détails au besoin. J'espère que je n'ai pas enfreint la loi en postant sur Commons cette photo d'une maquette qui est une œuvre récente (au besoin, je la retirerai).
Also thank you for writing to me in French. I am sorry I can not answer in Portuguese, for I don't know this language well enough. If needed, though, we can also discuss in English y en español. N'hésitez pas à me poser d'autres questions si besoin. Je vous souhaite de bonnes recherches et une bonne journée. Bien cordialement,--Eunostos (talk) 07:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]