User talk:Alraunenstern

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alraunenstern!


Hallo Alraunenstern, könntest du bitte noch den Namen des Bildhauers in die Beschreibung setzen. Dies ist gemäß der gesetzl. Vorschriften für die Nutzung der Panoramafreiheit erforderlich, sofern der Künstlername am Kunstwerk angegeben ist. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oha. Ich kümmer mich sofort darum, bzw. suche danach. Danke für den Hinweis. --Alraunenstern (talk) 15:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Erledigt. --Alraunenstern (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huhu

[edit]

Gerade gefunden, einen schönen Abend wünscht

Itti (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fearless Girl (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fearless Girl at NYSE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fearless girl, Grand Hotel, Oslo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zur Info

[edit]

Moin, ich habe grad zufällig entdeckt, dass dein Foto hier mit der falschen Lizenz verwendet wird. Viele Grüße, XenonX3 (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altar Laurentiuskirche Herne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taufbecken 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambo Laurentiuskirche Herne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bildstock Laurentiuskirche Herne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heimat-Museum Wanne-Eickel Büste Friedrich Steffen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Viegener Detail 3. Etage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gesundheitshaus Dortmund Kuhn 6. Etage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Falke Seidenglatt 15 Strumpfhose 40493-4699 Transparent Shining glänzend golden new 15 den. (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 20:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Falke Pure Matt 50 Strumpfhose 40150-6179 semi-opaque matt blau (marine) 50 den. (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 20:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Martin-Gauger-Gedenktafel, Wuppertal

[edit]

Hallo Alraunenstern,
wie mir gerade auffiel, hast Du ein gutes Foto vom Standort der Martin-Gauger-Gedenktafel gemacht, auf dem man nur leider den Text nicht lesen kann. Gab es einen besonderen Grund, dass Du kein zweites Foto gemacht hast? Bevor Du es mir nun zu Recht vorwirfst, ich war schon vor Dir da und habe die Tafel nicht fotografiert. Bei mir lag es damals am störenden Schlagschatten, allerdings habe ich vergessen, es auf meine to-do-Liste zu setzen. Kommst Du dort vielleicht in nächster Zeit mal auf ein Foto vorbei? Wenn nicht, ist's kein Problem, ich komme immer mal wieder nach Barmen, da liegt's fast am Wege.
Gruß --Im Fokus (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Im Fokus, ich hatte noch ein Foto gemacht, auf dem man den Text mit etwas gutem Willen lesen kann, aber mit Schatten und Blitz, es ist also nicht gut geworden. Ich hab es jetzt trotzdem hochgeladen, für den Fall, dass der Text dich interessiert, und hoffe, dass jemand mal ein besseres macht. Ich bin sonst eigentlich nie in Wuppertal. Wenn du zwischendurch dran vorbeischwenken kannst, würde mich das freuen. Gruß, --Alraunenstern (talk) 10:16, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Danke Dir für das Foto, Alraunenstern. Ich hoffe, Du bist mir nicht böse, dass ich es noch ein wenig zurechtgeschnitten habe. Dass sich schon zwei Tage später die Gelegenheit für einen Besuch auf der Gerichtsinsel ergebe, hatte ich vor drei Tagen nicht präsent. Wie Du siehst, habe ich nun auch ein Foto hochgeladen, wobei auf Deinem der Text vor allem im unteren Drittel besser zu lesen ist. Das ist das Fatale an der Anbringung dieser Tafeln mit beschichteter Oberfläche im 45°-Winkel: die Kamera fängt, je steiler sie auf sie ausgerichtet wird und je heller es ist, desto mehr Reflektionen ein, die Du mit bloßem Auge gar nicht wahrnimmst. Leider war es gegen Mittag und deshalb mit meiner bescheidenen Ausrüstung nicht mehr drin. Gruß --Im Fokus (talk) 21:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ne, bin ich nicht, Hauptsache es ist gut zu lesen. Und unsere beiden Fotos zusammen ergeben dann ja hoffentlich einen vollständigen Eindruck, was will man mehr. Besten Gruß zum Wochenende, --Alraunenstern (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categorie der Bilder der Sammlung Prinzhorn

[edit]

Liebe @Alraunenstern ich hab eine Frage an Dich. Wie ist deine Haltung zur Einordnung der Bilder in die Kategorie der Sammlung Prinzhorn. Beispiel: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Works_in_the_Sammlung_Prinzhorn_by_artist

und die in der Oberkategorie, wo alle Mussen sind, ist das zu sehen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Works_by_artist_by_museum Dort sollte auch die Sammlung Prinzhorn rein. Ich hab versucht das Frederike Rauch das zu erklären hab es aber irgendwie nicht argumentativ belegen können. Kannst du dich mal mit Ihr in diesem Punkt zusammen tun? Viele liebe Grüße -- Armin Pangerl (talk) 18:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Armin, bei dem Thema werde ich leider passen, weil es so zeitaufwändig ist, sich ordentlich in die Kategorienbäume reinzudenken und sich nicht zu verhaspeln. Ich hab noch Sachen auf meiner To-do-Liste, die ich vorrangig erledigen möchte. Liebe Grüße, --Alraunenstern (talk) 12:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weihnachstgrüße

[edit]

Liebe Alrauenenstern, Die besten Gedanken und wünsche zu den kommenden Weihnachtstagen. Danke für alles in WP. Liebe Grüße und alles Gute Armin Pangerl (talk) 11:22, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miraitowa someity wrapping bus (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]