User talk:555

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification

[edit]

Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(supressed bad faith message)

[edit]

[1]

Bot de-flagging notification

[edit]

Hi 555, I'm writing to you because your bot 555.bot (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a week from now (20 February 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For uploading the original Lusiads. ~ DanielTom (talk) 20:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(I have no idea where you got those scans. They are from the 2nd edition of the 1572 printing, which slightly differs from the 1st. A true treasure!) ~ DanielTom (talk) 20:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fantástico, obrigado novamente. ~ DanielTom (talk) 21:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

[edit]

Este usuário carregou três imagens hoje 9 de julho que foram verificadas pelo FlickreviewR 2. Curiosamante se clicar nas ligações para origem das imagens encontra a indicação que a conta que carregou no Flick não existe mais. Não parece meio estranho que após as imagens serem aceitas que a conta do autor tenha sido desativada? Fabiano msg 21:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

[2] Source is {{OWN}} because I made the photo of that portrait at the Museum, is it something wrong to point out at that fact?--Asqueladd (talk) 11:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the source parameter was meant to indicate the url direction or publication where you obtained the file (not qualifying there the place where you took a pic with your camera), resulting in OWN if it is was a work by yourself on, for example, a PD-work... But... Does is look fine now? [3] Have in mind the file were already categorised in Category:Museo Romántico, Madrid (the physical place)--Asqueladd (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Please remain calm and collegial

[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For this personal attack.
Maybe you should read Commons:File renaming, and especially the “Which files should not be renamed?” section. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
ciao! Alienaaliena77 (talk) 18:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fontes?

[edit]

Quem, no planeta Terra, chama Luiz Gama (ou o famigerado "Luís Gama" da pt-wiki) de Luís da Gama, além de ti, little dog? he, he... André Koehne TALK TO ME 04:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Wizard campaign editor

[edit]

Hello,

I'm dropping you a message because you are a Upload Wizard campaign editor who may not have used the tool, or at least not recently. Consensus has been determined that this user right should be removed from users who are not using it or not planning on using it (see previous discussion.) If you have a reason that your upwizcampeditor be kept, please let me know below! If you think you got this message in error, please also let me know. :) ~riley via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello 555, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barnstar rescue 01.png

[edit]
File:Barnstar rescue 01.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 11:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons bot inactivity

[edit]

Hello!

Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 5 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you wish for your bot to retain it's bot flag, please speak up on the deflag page. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can re-request the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards, ~riley (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

chronica commoniana

[edit]

Lugusto, File:Lourenço- chronica pernambucana.pdf e File:Lourenço - chronica pernambucana (1881).djvu diferem em algo além do formato e tamanho? ~★ nmaia d 00:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NMaia: por preciosismo eu acabei reprocessando o PDF da BBM-USP, primeiro tirando o DRM, como descrevi aqui (exceto passar pelo Acrobat nesse momento) e depois como expliquei aqui. O DjVu final fica consideravelmente maior do que se simplesmente convertesse o PDF, mas, o ABBYY faz alguns ajustes interessantes (como endireitar linhas de texto) e a imagem fica menos desfocada na hora do MediaWiki renderizar com zoom maior. Mas os outros dois livros desse autor dessa mesma sequencia (O Cabeleira e O Matuto) eu re-enviarei a partir da digitalização da HathiTrust, que em termos gerais tem qualidade melhor que as da BBM-USP. Mas você sabe, isso é só da minha neurose mesmo, um simples conversor de arquivo já faria o Match&Split funcionar =P Lugusto • ※ 02:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:555&oldid=512811198"