User:A.Savin/Archive/2016/2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 14 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 01 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 04 Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 06 Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 11 beach in Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 12 Dabolim Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Photo usage

Greetings, I am writing to make sure I comply with usage of photos taken by you. I have used a number of photos in a music video involving a song about Tula Russia. I have included attribution, but since it is for a client, I wanted to double check it was okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.179.3.87 (talk • contribs)

If you provide a link to your video, I can maybe help you. --A.Savin 19:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Here is a link to the page https://www.youtube.com/----- Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributingauthor (talk • contribs)

Feel free to use the tram photo; all others in this video are not by me. --A.Savin 18:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!

Sensordreck

Wie bemerkst du solche unauffälligen Sensorflecken? Ich habe schon einen recht guten Monitor, bemerke aber trotzdem nicht alles. Wenn ich die Tonwerte total runterdrehe, sehe ich dann auch die Flecken, die du bemängelst. Ist aber recht mühsam. Hast du einen Trick? --Ralf Roleček 20:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img03 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img35 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img28 view from Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img23 Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img13 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:36, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img04 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img32 flying gull.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:14, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img18 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img22 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img15 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Possible FP

Hi, Alexander. This looks to me like a likely FP if nominated. I'd certainly vote for it.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Ikan Kekek: Thank you a lot for the interest, feel free to nominate :) --A.Savin 11:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

I'll certainly consider doing that when I can. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 08 view to Mormugao Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 10 beach in Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Invalid block

You have blocked me (Laberkiste) for 3 days for alleged Intimidation/Harassment, just because I discussed the application of the AGF policy with a user on his talk page, after he got edgy on AN/U. What is harassment about this? Sure, I was not too polite, but this was totally OK given what he wrote to me before. Or is this just another case of Commons admins wanting copyright infringement to occur? --91.1.55.201 13:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Use {{Unblock}} on your talk page. --A.Savin 13:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img01 Mumbai Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 10:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img02 Mumbai Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 10:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img07 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 10:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img14 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img26 view from Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 16 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 31 Gateway of India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Above tight cut, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 53 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 57 Sewri station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img08 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 14:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img09 docks at Jawahar Dweep.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:32, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 88 Omkareshwar Temple in Borivali East.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:32, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 101 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:32, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Imperial Academy of Arts Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Imperial Academy of Arts Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img05a Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 114 Airport international terminal interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality but sharpness could be better. --XRay 05:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img29 Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img30 abandoned ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 29 Kamla Nehru Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments four dustspots left of the column, elsewhere good --Cccefalon 10:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)  Done However these spots are rather hard to notice --A.Savin 20:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC) Perfect now. Yes, that is the advantage and the pain with a very good monitor - you easily see things, you can't see with other monitors .... --Cccefalon 10:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 25 Hanging Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img36 ferry near Gateway of India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 87 Borivali station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 91 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 105 Bandra station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img05 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 12:34, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img31 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. Please add the name of the ship at the file description. --C messier 13:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 99 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 109 Western Express Highway near Bandra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Special:ListFiles/Cherus

Добрый день, коллега. Хотел бы узнать Ваше мнение - может ли этот сонм ogg-файлов соответствовать COM:PS. В любом случае - на доступных мне компьютерах не хватает оперативной памяти даже чтобы открыть в VFC этот объём, не то что вынести их на обсуждение удаления. Sealle (talk) 03:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

@Sealle: Почему бы и нет, для викисловаря например. Другое дело, что реально файлы не используются да и категоризация оставляет желать лучшего. --A.Savin 11:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img06 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img21 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img24 Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 89 scene in Sanjay Gandhi National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:52, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 92 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 96 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 102 Teenmurti Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 103 Teenmurti Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:53, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Музей МГУ

Добрый день, а ваши фото из "Геологического музея в МГУ" - это тоже, что и "", верно? Если так, то подкорректирую.// Stolbovsky (talk) 09:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Судя по всему, имеется в виду именно этот музей, но название "Музей землеведения МГУ" мне не знакомо. --A.Savin 11:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img11 Port in Navi Mumbai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img25 view from Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img10 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 93 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Spurzem 21:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 104 Bandra station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 107 Bandra station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 111 Masjid station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img20 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purana Qila in Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Peulle 15:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sabz Burj in Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajpath in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a great sunset! --Halavar 16:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Temple in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 94 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would crop out the unsharp area at the top. --C messier 10:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Thanks.  Done --A.Savin 14:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)  Support QI. --C messier 13:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 39 University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img33 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 110 Masjid station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 100 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purana Qila in Delhi 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qutub Minar in Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It looks like leaning in at the right (fence), but the tower says no. --XRay 04:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! India Gate in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img12 Elephanta Island ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img27 view from Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img16 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The best of the three pictures IMO. Nice and good--Lmbuga 15:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img17 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perhaps a bit tight, but good quality and composition IMO--Lmbuga 14:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img19 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 15:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 81 Dadar Beach view of the SeaLink.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I believe that this would get better if you cropped out the boat parts on the left edge, could you try? Some inevitable athmospherical unsharpness, but IMO OK as a QI. --Basotxerri 08:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Yes, I could crop or even clone-out that boat. But I don't understand, why I should... Sorry --A.Savin 14:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Take it as a suggestion, I believe the composition would be more harmonical. Anyway, QI approved. --Basotxerri 15:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img32 flying gull.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img32 flying gull.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 108 Bandra station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 97 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Not a work by a wikimedian

• В данном случае, действительно, композиция полного кадра и нажатие на кнопку сделано не мною. Зато кадрирование и вся обработка сделана мною. Всё равно это not a work by a wikimedian? -- PereslavlFoto (User talk:PereslavlFoto) 14:24, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Два вопроса

Коллега, я к Вам с двумя разными вопросами.

1

Вокруг этого файла в избранной статье рувики развязалась война правок, приведшая к запросу на ЗКА и блокировкам. Поясните, пожалуйста, с точки зрения фотографа - имеются ли у данного изображения неустранимые недостатки, позволяющие настаивать на его невключении в карточку профильной статьи. Sealle (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

2

См. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Плавучий завод СПГ Прелюд.JPG и User talk:Roo mate#You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week. Меня вовлёк в эту историю администратор рувики, с которым у нас единое мнение по данному вопросу, и, будь он целиком в рамках русского раздела, разрешился бы иначе. А именно: удаление контента, не нарушающего правил проекта, находящегося в его рамках и активно используемого (а так и было), по запросу автора / загрузившего не допускается. Есть ли на Commons какие-то правила, которые позволяют толковать данную ситуацию иначе? Sealle (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Мне в данный момент там слишком много текста и некогда разбираться, но я правильно ли понимаю, что речь об этой номинации? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Плавучий завод СПГ Прелюд.JPG Если вкратце, то мы не обязаны удалять контент только потому, что автору "расхотелось", тем паче если контент активно используется. Про дискуссию о кривой панораме я в курсе, постараюсь прокомментировать... --A.Savin 18:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Да, именно эту ссылку я указал в начале вопроса. Courtesy deletion мне попадалось, но построить на нём аргументацию я не счёл возможным, поскольку оно не является действующим правилом. Sealle (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Сорри, проглядел вашу ссылку. В общем, если фотка в самом деле использовалась в статьях, то удалять не надо было. Советую результат обжаловать. --A.Savin 03:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 02:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 02:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice composition. --XRay 04:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 41 Bombay High Court.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 95 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 01 Jaigarh Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 05 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 113 Chinchpokli station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the platform, but you might reduce shadow under the roof (it's too dark) --Michielverbeek 08:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC))

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 10 textile printing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 24 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Could be sharper at the left. --XRay 05:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 30 Jaipur railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 02 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great colors. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 08 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great colors. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 16 Jaleb Chowk at City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 22 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 36 Jaipur Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 90 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 98 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img34 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 106 Bandra station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 112 Masjid station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 09 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 15 Jaleb Chowk at City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 25 Hawa Mahal Road at the City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 32 Jaipur railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 33 surroundings of Jaipur railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Sankt Petersburg-Aufnahmen

Hallo, ich habe noch einige Aufnahmen aus St.Petersburg (gefertigt im September 2010), die ich nur schwer verorten kann. Kennst Du Dich dort einigermaßen aus? Kannst Du beispielsweise dieses Gebäude zuordnen und entsprechend kategorisieren? Falls nicht - kennst Du jemanden, der das womöglich tun würde? Eine russischsprachige Beschriftung wäre auch hilfreich. Besten Dank & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 08:43, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Das ist Newski-Prospekt Ecke Fontanka, Category:Nevskiy 68. --A.Savin 12:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Prima; Danke! Gruß --Sir James (talk) 13:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jaipur 03-2016 05 Amber Fort.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jaipur 03-2016 05 Amber Fort.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 34 Jaipur Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent perspective, photo gives me the feeling that the metro will hit me (and all what I can do is "jump") - well done --Michielverbeek 14:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 39 Jal Mahal - Water Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 03 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 19 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 23 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 12 textile printing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lights above and right object somewhat disturbing. But still enough quality for me.--Famberhorst 17:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 27 Hawa Mahal - Palace of the Winds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 38 Garh Ganesh Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Kräne in Mitte

Siehe hier: File:Berliner Dom, Ostseite, 160402, ako (retouched).jpg. Ein wenig tricky wegen der Bäume, aber ich denke, das ist ok so. Was meinst Du? Gruß, --Code (talk) 12:48, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

@Code: Dort ist am Himmel neben dem Dom ein Fleck übrig geblieben, den ich entfernen würde (z.B. mit Pinsel), ansonsten sieht gut aus für mich. Ich würde die alte Version überschreiben --A.Savin 13:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Ok, danke, habs nochmal ganz neu gemacht. Habe die ursprüngliche Datei damit überschrieben. Könntest Du bitte File:Berliner Dom, Ostseite, 160402, ako (retouched).jpg unbürokratisch schnelllöschen oder muss ich da jetzt nen aufwändigen Antrag schreiben? --Code (talk) 16:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Ja. Erledigt --A.Savin 16:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Kann für FPC nominiert werden, denke ich, kann auch in einigen Artikeln das Foto vom Berliner Dom ersetzen. --A.Savin 16:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Danke! --Code (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 09 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 12 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 13 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 15 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 29 auto-rikshaw meter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perfect DOF and composition. --Ralf Roletschek 16:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment I'm not agree, but perhaps QI, not for me--Lmbuga 17:20, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajasthan Bharatpur District brick kiln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 07 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 06 Taj Mahal complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:42, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 08 Taj Mahal complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 04 Taj Mahal from Mehtab Bagh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 14 Kale Hanuman Ji Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 35 Jaipur Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 01 Itmad-Ud-Daulah riverside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 02 view from Mehtab Bagh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 28 Albert Hall Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 13 Jorawar Singh Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 10 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Famberhorst 05:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 11 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 05:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 14 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 16 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred Heart Cathedral in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 04 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 17 Jaleb Chowk at City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 20 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 31 Jaipur railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delhi aerial photo 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jaipur 03-2016 39 Jal Mahal - Water Palace.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jaipur 03-2016 39 Jal Mahal - Water Palace.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 11 textile printing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo --ArildV 05:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 03 view from Mehtab Bagh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 05 Taj Mahal complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor halos. --XRay 15:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 07 Taj Mahal complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 17 Itmad-Ud-Daulah east gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 18 Jaleb Chowk at City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 21 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 37 Jaipur Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laxminarayan Temple in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delhi aerial photo 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

QIC

Hallo, Could you please tell me what exactly is wrong in your opinion in this picture. Regards --Wolfgang Moroder

Some vertical lines are not quite vertical, for example on windows. --A.Savin 02:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Северное окончание Нижнего Шавлинского озера (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Северное окончание Нижнего Шавлинского озера (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 06 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 26 Hawa Mahal Road at the City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img38 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img02 view from Kuznechnaya Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img05 trolley at Abdrahmanova Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img22 Botanical garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img31 Ala-Archinskoe Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img23 Botanical garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img27 Ala-Archinskoe Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img07 trolley at Abdrahmanova Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img40 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img45 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img16 CHP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img41 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img46 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img32 Victory Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img34 trolley near South Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img35 bus near South Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img01 Victory Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img15 Bishkek-1 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img39 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:33, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img04 bus at Abdrahmanova Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img18 Alamedin railway platform.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img08 Aitmatov Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img11 Chuy Prospekt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img26 alley at the National University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img42 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo, but why not crop the bottom (rule of thirds) --Michielverbeek 16:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kant near Bishkek 03-2016 img03 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ata-Beyit Memorial near Bishkek 03-2016 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ata-Beyit Memorial near Bishkek 03-2016 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img14 Moscow Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img09 Chuy Prospekt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img21 Akhunbaev Street petrol station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img51 Manas Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jaipur 03-2016 02 Amber Fort.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jaipur 03-2016 02 Amber Fort.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img06 trolley at Abdrahmanova Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img12 Chuy Prospekt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img03 view from Kuznechnaya Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img28 Ala-Archinskoe Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulugnor District Galaba aerial photo 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Considering the distance and the circumstances its a good image. --Dirtsc 06:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img29 Ala-Archinskoe Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img43 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img47 minibus at Chuy Prospekt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img50 Eternal flame at Victory Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition. Stunning colors and saturation. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img13 Freedom Boulevard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img10 Chuy Prospekt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img49 trolley at Chuy Prospekt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img24 Botanical garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img19 Bishkek-2 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img30 Ala-Archinskoe Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img33 Victory Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steschke 14:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img36 trolley near South Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perfekt --Ralf Roletschek 16:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img37 post box.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img25 Botanical garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Olympian Columns

I am writing a book on Simulation Based Engineering in Solid Mechanics with Springer. I would like to use your picture File:Attica 06-13 Athens 25 Olympian Zeus Temple.jpg - Wikimedia in my text. Please give me permission for this,

JS

Hi, you may use it with remark «© A.Savin, Wikimedia Commons» at the picture. --A.Savin 15:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img44 Kuznechnaya fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img48 trolley at Chuy Prospekt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img20 Alamudun River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishkek 03-2016 img17 CHP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kant near Bishkek 03-2016 img01 surroundings of the railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kant near Bishkek 03-2016 img02 surroundings of the railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:39, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kant near Bishkek 03-2016 img04 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kant near Bishkek 03-2016 img05 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kant near Bishkek 03-2016 img06 market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I`m going hungry. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ata-Beyit Memorial near Bishkek 03-2016 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ata-Beyit Memorial near Bishkek 03-2016 img05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sphinx at Universitetskaya Embankment (img1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sphinx at Universitetskaya Embankment (img1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ata-Beyit Memorial near Bishkek 03-2016 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Wahner Heide

Hallo, du hast mehrere schöne Fotos von der Wahner Heide gemacht. Auch wenns schon ein paar Jahre her ist, vielleicht kannst du ja in Category:Nature of Wahner Heide gucken und sehen, ob du noch was weiter zu den einzelnen Naturschutzgebieten einordnen kannst? Mir ist das nur hierfür gelungen, weil "Telegraphenberg" eindeutig in der Beschreibung stand. Kartenlinks zur Gebietsabgrenzung stehen jeweils im grauen Kasten in den Kategorien wie zB bei Category:Naturschutzgebiet_Wahner_Heide_(K). Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 20:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Bei File:Wahnerheide-fruehjahr-10.jpg hattest du "2008 in Cologne" ergänzt, aber in der Galerie mit Beschriftung "Geisterbusch" eingefügt. Auf Karten liegt der Geisterbusch im Stadtgebiet Rösrath (das wär dann Category:Naturschutzgebiet Wahner Heide (GL)), aber vielleicht reicht der Bereich auch bis nach Köln rein… Deswegen sortier ich dort lieber nichts voreilig. Holger1959 (talk) 21:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

@Holger1959: Hallo, das ist zu lange her und ich kann leider die genauen Standorte nicht mehr zuordnen. Sorry. --A.Savin 20:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

schade! Aber ein paar Bilder werden bestimmt auch so irgendwann zugeordnet werden, muss man nur Geduld haben bis einer mit Ortskenntnis kommt, der was wiedererkennt. Holger1959 (talk) 21:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ata-Beyit Memorial near Bishkek 03-2016 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ata-Beyit Memorial near Bishkek 03-2016 img07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img23 view from Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For a pano it´s hazy, but it´s a city scape. Good quality. --Hubertl 16:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img28 view from Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img13 trolley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img17 Ak-Buura River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img37 Cemetery at the Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img34 Sulayman Mountain at the viewpoint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img38 Cemetery at the Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img26 view from Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img16 trolley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img01 airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img03 Lenin Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img29 view from Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img32 Sulayman Mountain viewpoint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems sharpened too much, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img02 Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img20 minibus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img14 trolley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img24 view from Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img04 Ak-Buura River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img11 market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img08 Lenin Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Old Believers Church at Serpukhovsky Val 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportMaybe oversaturated, but a good one ! (a pity, all these wires...)--Jebulon 16:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Lefortovo Prison 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Salarievo Metro station 04-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 14:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Paveletsky Railway terminal platforms 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. Please see the note.--Jebulon 16:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Rumyantsevo Metro station 04-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 14:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC) Indeed an excellent composition, also the other one --Michielverbeek 20:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img22 tomb of Asif ibn Barkhiya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img33 Sulayman Mountain at the viewpoint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 04:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img25 view from Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img31 view from Sulayman Mountain pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img35 Sulayman Mountain at the viewpoint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img19 Kurmanjan Datka Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img21 Yaxing bus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img27 view from Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img40 Cemetery at the Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img10 market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img05 Ak-Buura River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:52, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img15 trolley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img07 Gapar Aitiev Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img06 Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img36 Sulayman Mountain at the viewpoint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img09 Lenin Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img12 Alishir Navoi Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img18 StMichael Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img30 view from Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osh 03-2016 img39 Cemetery at the Sulayman Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Moscow Rumyantsevo Metro station 04-2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow Rumyantsevo Metro station 04-2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For your outstanding Indian images! Thank you and I hope you do more! Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 15:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo05 Am Markt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo10 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo22 Uebersee-Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Agra 03-2016 14 Agra Fort.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agra 03-2016 14 Agra Fort.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo03 Bremer Roland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo13 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo25 Egyptian goose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality -- Spurzem 19:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo27 TV Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo17 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO tilted CW. No joke. Please have a look to the windows at the top. --XRay 17:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC) -- Assuming the two stories are congruent the tilt is 0,2° – too little for me to see. -- Renardo la vulpo 18:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC) @XRay: My reference point are the windows of the tower at the very right, and they are straight. --A.Savin 19:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)  Comment GIMP tells me there's a tilt of 0,2° on the left as well on the right window edges; since I correct my own pictures only starting from 0.33° I propose the picture for promotion. Sharpness is fine, background not bad, except for the weather. -- Renardo la vulpo 20:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo01 Wall windmill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well balanced composition on all points. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo15 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo24 Park-Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo31 Gewerbehaus detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)  Comment Right side of the image is leaning to the left (see the note). --Halavar 14:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC) Done --A.Savin 17:55, 28 July 2016 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 21:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outer Weser near Bremerhaven 07-2016 photo1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bf Norddeich Mole 07-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo02 Schuetting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo39 Bremerhaven sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo08 Stephani-Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo29 Am Markt Bremer Loch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo23 OVBArena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 15:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo09 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo16 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo34 Bremerhaven sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo37 Bremerhaven sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo38 Bremerhaven sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo19 Martini-Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo20 Haus Atlantis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo12 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo28 tram at Domsheide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo30 Bremer Stadtmusikanten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bishkek 03-2016 img11 Chuy Prospekt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bishkek 03-2016 img11 Chuy Prospekt.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Землячев

Я правильно понимаю, что весь вклад этого товарища натырен с миру по нитке под статью ru:Типы_старинной_архитектуры, опубликован здесь с шаблоном own, и, судя по гуглопоиску, уже расползся по всем весям? --Figure19 (talk) 14:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Russia FPCs

The Russian language is tough to learn! It makes English grammar seem so simple. At that FPC, I think I said "more photos from Russia!". In English, it would be implied that I meant "more photos from Russia instead!". I don't know how to say "instead" or "instead of" in Russian yet. I want to see more Russian landscapes, more photos of Moscow architecture (bridges, buildings, the metro) now that there's FoP, and more interior photos of Orthodox churches (like Diliff's English stuff). Our government and media are always negative about Russia, which makes it hard on someone like me who's interested in Russian places, people, literature, art, etc. We do have a broad selection of English translations of Russian literature (I've got 100+ volumes), but I'd have nobody to discuss it with if I didn't have my long-time friend and pen-pal Vlad in Zheleznodorozhny.

We have PBS, which is an educational TV network. They do shows about art and painting, and yet there's nothing about Ivan Kramskoy, Ilya Repin, Ivan Shishkin, Isaac Levitan, or Valentin Serov, some of the world's greatest painters! We get knocked over the head with Manet and Van Gogh over and over, or maybe John Singer-Sargent and Winslow Homer. Nothing about great photographers like Sergey Levitsky, Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky, and many others either, just Ansel Adams, Margret Bourke White, and Man Ray.

I've uploaded a few thousand photos from Russia I've found searching Flickr, but they don't have the high artistic quality you and Georgy Chernilevsky are capable of. They're good quality because I won't transfer junk, but they're mostly good tourist shots taken with high-priced cameras but not a lot of concern about artistic merit. But I'm sure we'll see more Russian FPCs from you sooner or later... INeverCry 23:08, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Almost all Russian churches disallow taking photos inside, so there will never be a Russian Diliff or so. I'm very sorry about that :((

Thank you so much for the nice feedback. As for my part, I'm going to take part on WLM-2016, so there surely will be some interesting photos (Nizhny Novgorod, Tatarstan, and some more). --A.Savin 08:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

It's too bad about the churches. Even some of the small ones have wonderful iconostases. But sometimes the outside is just as good as the inside: File:Новгород - Витославлицы - Церковь Успения.jpg. I'll be looking forward to WLM and to some FPCs from you. It's good that the FoP change will allow some more freedom for photographers this year. I remember when I was younger Nizhny Novgorod was still named after Maxim Gorky, who I was reading in the early 1980s when I was in highschool (mostly his autobiography, short stories, and his memoirs of Chekhov and Tolstoy). INeverCry 19:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo14 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo18 Ueberseestadt und Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo35 Bremerhaven sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outer Weser near Bremerhaven 07-2016 photo3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outer Weser near Bremerhaven 07-2016 photo4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo06 Am Markt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The colors some exaggerated, but good for me.--Famberhorst 15:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo21 Am Markt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo33 Bremerhaven sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HB 2016-0607 photo36 Bremerhaven sea port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:30, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outer Weser near Bremerhaven 07-2016 photo2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and clean. --ElBute 12:25, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Context of infinite block of user:Szegedi László

Hello A.Savin! I was requested to investigate the circumstances of the infinite blocking of said user as well as the deletion of his images. Please help me with the following:

• what were the reasons of the immediate delete of the uploaded images? (I would appreciate the reference to the specific part of the deletion policy.)
• you have provided the boilerplate "out of scope"; have you anywhere explained as how the images are out of the scope and if possible, how to remedy that?
• were you using "speedy" template? have you put the files on "deletion requests" page? if not, on what basis?
• why do you find appropriate to indefinitely block any user, 2 hours after the last communication, in contrast to the blocking policy suggestion which says "As blocks are preventative rather than punitive, use a block duration that is proportional to the time likely needed for the user to familiarize themselves with relevant policies and adjust their behaviour."? Especially when the "violation" wasn't explained, was not voted on, wasn't even discussed, so the user had little chance to either explain or remedy, and without any suggested warning period between the OTRS permission email request?

I would like to kindly ask you to:

• in simple language and terms politely request the user not to reupload the images (I will do that, in fact)
• if he agrees not to do it while waiting for your specific explanations about the deletion reasons you would remove the unnecessary blocking (and reblock, or ask me to, when he reuploads them contrary to the agreement).
• explain the specific "out of scope" reason, if valid, or undelete the images if it wasn't.
• there shouldn't any deletion based on copyright grounds since the uploader owns all the copyright: the proper way is to request email to OTRS which he could comply in a given timeframe.

(I could obviosuly do the unblocking and the undeletion but the policies advise to let the original admin to do the corrective actions if necessary, or the explanation if it would be.) Thank you for your help! --grin ✎ 19:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

@Grin: The block was based on Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Privacy_problem request. It concerned two images uploaded by Szegedi László, which were Gmail screenshots with possible privacy issues. When handling this request, I had a look at all recent uploads by this user. There were these two images with privacy issues, as well as some diagrams with unknown copyright status, and a photo of an unknown person. None of that images were used anywhere at the time I checked them, nor were they sorted into any meaningful category; so I decided to delete them all as out of scope, given that obvious out of scope / promotional files may be speedily deleted. Then Revent reported on AN that the deleted files were reuploaded by Szegedi László, so I decided to block them for repeated uploading of out of scope / promotional stuff after warnings. Szegedi László may at any time appeal for {{Unblock}} at their talk page. Maybe an other sysop is willing to shorten the block, that's OK with me. (However, from what I have read on their talk page, their "unblock requests" are not very kind so far, which makes a positive decision rather unlikely at the moment.) Also, the deleted images may be restored at COM:UDR if Szegedi László (or anyone else) provides a reason why they should, despite the fact that they are unused, uncategorized, low quality and with privacy problems. --A.Savin 19:48, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the details! I will communicate it to the user. (I would like to make two sidenotes: one is that please provide a bit more detail apart from the out-of-scope boilerplate because neither the user nor anyone who was asked for help can figure out the reason easily (and please notify the user on his talk page); two is that maybe a much shorter block would be beneficial (for a user with long-standing registration and activity); I would say details and a few weeks would suffice unless repeated. But I don't request this, just sharing as an option based on the case. Thanks!) You may see my note on Admin Noticeboard as well. --grin ✎ 10:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Стыдно

• Очень жаль, что вы отказались поделиться своим опытом. Очень жаль, что вы не желаете помочь другим участникам Викиновостей и Викисклада улучшить свои фотографические навыки. Очень жаль, что вы отказываетесь помочь своим товарищам.
• Надеюсь, что вы перемените своё мнение и всё-таки найдёте время, чтобы поучить нас, ваших коллег, правильной фотосъёмке. Спасибо. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

После того, как какая-то глупая мразь констатировала, что оказывается все мои фотографии являются помойкой, мне теперь кого-то чему-то учить? А чему, собственно? Наверное, как нужно плохо фотографировать а-ля А.Савин. Желаете стать единственным зрителем? Вроде бы, раньше вы хоть и троллили всех и вся, но неплохо фоткали в своём Переславле, разучились, что ль? Иначе не совсем понимаю, что вам с меня взять. --A.Savin 15:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Вижу, у вас что-то разладилось в жизни, оттого вы ругаете меня без оснований. Мне очень стыдно за вас! С такой эмоцией ваша жизнь не будет лучше!

Вы спрашиваете, чему я могу поучиться у вас? Тому, что мне непонятно в ваших работах. Например, я не понимаю, отчего на портретах вы предпочитаете не исправлять баланс. Не понимаю, отчего вы недодерживаете, делаете тёмные портреты. И много вообще есть вопросов. Однако намного удобнее не разбирать частные вопросы (их всегда очень много), а понять принципы, которые заложены в методику вашей съёмки. (Напомню, что я нередко обращаюсь к вам с вопросами на этой странице, да только вам всё некогда отвечать.)

Мне хотелось подчеркнуть, что полезнее будет не приватное общение между двумя людьми, а открытое общение между множеством людей, которые смогут обменяться опытом и рассказать друг другу, зачем надо быть лучше и зачем надо снимать лучше.

Наконец, слова Красоткина вы не поняли. Это нормально! Он так написал, что я тоже не сразу понял его мысли . Красоткин говорит, что недостаточно делать превосходные видовые снимки. Необходимо, кроме того, делать репортажные снимки, которые позволяют передать самую жизнь. А делая портреты, недостаточно дать один превосходный портрет (увы, так это заведено у меня). Необходимо давать множество разных эмоциональных портретов, которые позволяют показать людей с разных сторон, и которые позволят не повторяться в разных статьях с участием этих людей. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Ну, вообще-то я не припомню, где вас ругал, тем паче что вы - самое милое создание. Но если вам отчего-то стыдно за меня, то это ваше дело. У нас свобода совести, так что стыдитесь на здоровье. Другое дело, что тогда и всякий вопрос относительно знакомства и обмена опытом для меня отпадает начисто, как вам, надеюсь, несложно понять. --A.Savin 16:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Это я имею в виду ваши слова «троллили всех и вся», чего, конечно, не было. В остальном очень жаль, что вы ставите личный комфорт выше res publica. Ведь ваши знания, опыт и умения могут здорово помочь широкой публике. Так что вы, пожалуйста, со временем передумайте. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

AN/U

I've opened a discussion at AN/U about your long block of Livio. You and I have had problems in the past, so I didn't think my trying to discuss this with you one-on-one would be a good idea. The discussion is here: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Unfair_block_by_A.Savin. INeverCry 20:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)