Commons:Kandidat për imazh cilësor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 13% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.
Shortcut
↓ Kalo tek kandidimi ↓
Other languages:

Këto janë kandidatë për t'u bërë fotografi cilësore. Ju lutem vini re se kjo nuk është e njëjta gjë si fotografi e përkryer. Përveç kësaj, në qoftë se ju vetëm dëshironi disa komente në fotot tuaja ju mund të merrni atë në Commons:Photography critiques.

Qëllimi

Qëllimi i imazhe me cilësi është për të inkurajuar njerëzit që janë themeli i Commons, përdoruesit individual që ofrojnë pamjet unike që të zgjeruar këtë koleksion. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.


Udhëzimet

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

Për nominuesit

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements
  1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
  4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Krijuesi
Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.


Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Cilësia e imazhit

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Vlera

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section: 

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below: 

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

How to update the status

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

  • If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }} to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

  • If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }} to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

  1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
  2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
  3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives shtator 2024.
  4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

  1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives shtator 2024.
  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 19 2024 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with: 

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 00:59, 19 shtator 2024 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).


September 19, 2024

September 18, 2024

September 17, 2024

September 16, 2024

September 15, 2024

September 14, 2024

September 13, 2024

September 12, 2024

September 11, 2024

September 10, 2024

September 9, 2024

September 8, 2024

September 7, 2024

September 6, 2024

September 5, 2024

September 4, 2024

September 3, 2024

September 2, 2024

September 1, 2024

August 31, 2024

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Fisherman's bike on Manisman beach

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Mile (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-4-71-117-12_Ortskreuz_Bischberg,_1876.jpg

The image is still very yellow. Compare here; these are probably the real colors. -- Spurzem 21:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arc_de_Diane_in_Cahors_02.jpg

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Trougnouf 19:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acueducto,_Segovia,_España,_2024-06-14,_DD_15.jpg

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seattle,_September_7,_2024_-_316.jpg

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Trougnouf 19:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Новгород,_музей_«Витославлицы»_03.jpg

  • Kandidimi Vitoslavlitsy Museum of Wooden Architecture, Novgorod --Vsatinet 18:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Diskutimi
  •  Oppose I think the tree here is rather disturbing, sorry (Мне кажется дерево портит всю композицию кадра – непонятно на что смотреть, на заслонённую церковь или на частично обрезанное дерево). --Красный 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 07:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:National_Bullriding_Championship_Finals_2024-104A3770.jpg

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Radomianin 14:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:National_Bullriding_Championship_Finals_2024-104A3912.jpg

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Radomianin 14:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Euromouse at Eispalast in 2003.jpg

That was the full resolution of the camera (1.3MPix), I think 2MPix is a guideline, or can no photos from this camera be QI? Can we discuss? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Can no photos from this camera be QI [in the year 2024]" - Yes, that's how I see it. But let's hear other opinions. --Plozessor 06:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, "Old photos" is not an adequate filename for a QI too. --Plozessor 06:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File renamed. Let's see what others think. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Below minimum size requirement, I don't think it falls within the exceptions to the rule. --C messier 18:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info OK, I have a bit of info for those who may be interested: 1) Yes, this is below the minimum size requirement, which may be grounds for decline in itself. It's not absolutely set in stone, as the Guideline says that the image "should" have more than 2MP, but it's still generally regarded as a lower limit. 2) One thing that might count in its favour is that we are not judging all images according to current technical standards. If you look in the guidelines, it states that: "The purpose of quality image status is to recognize that at the moment of creation, a Commons user skillfully achieved a desirable level of quality". In other words, we can judge whether we think this image was good for 2003.--Peulle 06:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 06:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مصب_واد_بوزنيقة_على_المحيط_الأطلسي.jpg

Maybe the nominator objected without adding a comment. --Plozessor 06:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 06:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lancia_Fulvia_Coupé_HF_-_Vernasca_Silver_Flag_2024_(1).jpg

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Plozessor 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nai_Lert_Park_Heritage_Home_(2023_December)_-_img_02.jpg

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tangail_DC_Lake,_Bangladesh_11.jpg

It is not optimal, in the enlarged view it is barely --Georgfotoart 17:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 10:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tangail_DC_Lake,_Bangladesh_08.jpg

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 10:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Langenlois_Kirche_Flügelaltar_Barbara_02.jpg

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Our_Lady_of_Loreto_chapel_in_Poirino_(4).jpg

@Smial: Ich wundere mich täglich mehr, was hier alles als Qualitätsbild ausgezeichnet wird. Vielleicht sollte ich wirklich doch noch das schon oft erwähnte Bild von der schwarzen Katze im dunklen Keller ohne Beleuchtung präsentieren. Es müsste als exzellentes Kunstwerk durchgehen. Aber ich habe mir vorgenommen, mich nicht mehr mit einem Beitrag zu bewerben. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 10:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spurzem: Gegen welche der Commons:Image guidelines wird hier denn konkret verstoßen? Die Perspektive ist deutlich besser als bei vielen anderen Bildern und aus meiner Sicht einwandfrei. Den Schatten mögen manche als störend empfinden, aber das ist wohl Geschmackssache - auf mich wirkt das Bild gerade durch den Schatten ansprechend, ich bekomme das Gefühl, als wäre ich dort. Und dort steht nun mal ein Baum und die Kirche sieht an einem sonnigen Tag halt so aus, und als Besucher würde ich sie genau so sehen. Deine schwarze Katze im Keller würde ich nicht sehen, weil ich nicht auf die Idee käme, deine schwarze Katze in deinem dunklen Keller zu besuchen oder einen Wikipedia-Artikel über schwarze Katzen in lichtlosen Kellern zu schreiben. --Plozessor 04:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ein solcher Artikel wäre aber möglicherweise noch viel interessanter als einer über „Kirche im extremen Schatten eines Baumes“. ;-) Ich hätte die Kirche bei diffusem Licht fotografiert. Aber die Geschmäcker sind wirklich sehr verschieden. Ich habe am liebsten Fotos, auf denen das Hauptmotiv ungestört zu erkennen ist. -- Spurzem 12:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spurzem: Entschuldige bitte ;) de:Benutzer:Plozessor/Schwarze Finsterkatze --Plozessor 15:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Plozessor, ich sage nur: Großartig! Diese Fotos sollten gleich unter FP vorgestellt werden. Sie übertreffen meinen entsprechenden Versuch bei Weitem. Und Dein Artikel zu den Aufnahmen ist fast noch besser. Er ist lesenswert und sollte schon bald als Artikel des Tages auf der Hauptseite von Wikipedia präsentiert werden, spätestens aber am nächsten 1. April. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 16:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 05:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

  • Mër 11 sht → Enj 19 sht
  • Enj 12 sht → Pre 20 sht
  • Pre 13 sht → Sht 21 sht
  • Sht 14 sht → Die 22 sht
  • Die 15 sht → Hën 23 sht
  • Hën 16 sht → Mar 24 sht
  • Mar 17 sht → Mër 25 sht
  • Mër 18 sht → Enj 26 sht
  • Enj 19 sht → Pre 27 sht
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/sq&oldid=908384841"