Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 30 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Passer_domesticus_-_House_sparrow_-_Serçe_07.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A female House sparrow (Passer domesticus). Cambazlı, Silifke - Mersin, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, I don't think this image is QI. Not sharp enough. --Charlesjsharp 11:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharpness is OK, IMHO. --C messier 15:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • {{Comment}} Sorry, I don't like the composition: The subject is too litle. Dust spots! a little bit of noise. Perhaps not sharp enough--Lmbuga 13:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose See above--Lmbuga 13:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree to all above. --Denkmalhelfer 18:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 22:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Passer_domesticus_-_House_sparrow_-_Serçe_01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A male House sparrow (Passer domesticus). Ayaş, Mersin, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I don't think this image is QI. Not sharp enough. --Charlesjsharp 11:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose indeed, not sharp --Denkmalhelfer 15:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 22:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_Santo_Domingo,_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-11,_DD_02.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Chapel of the Rosary, Santo Domingo, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Comment It looks a bit dark to me. Do you think you could lighten up the darker part a bit? --Moroder 09:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Poco a poco 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Moroder 22:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I ask for a discussion, because the perspective correction of the tower is too strong, this looks unnatural to me.--Jebulon 23:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Perspective correction of a building seen from the bottom always looks unnatural. What is the limit? --Moroder 11:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong perspective distortion (horizontal perspective distortion): Unnatural, it seems overprocesed IMO--Lmbuga 13:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose agree to Lmbuga --Denkmalhelfer 18:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Rügensche Kleinbahn 02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rügen Island, Germany, Train "Rasender Roland" --Derzno 16:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: sharpening artifacts --MB-one 18:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Question As far as I can remember "Rasender Roland" is a steam train, isn't it? --Code 07:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good composition but the image is overexposed (and tilted). Alvesgaspar 11:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose same as Alvesgaspar --Denkmalhelfer 15:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Rohrbach 01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rohrbach, Village view, Bavaria --Derzno 16:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please reduce colour noise --Cccefalon 17:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)✓ DoneNot sure where you saw some colour noise but anyhow, reduced it now with photoshop. --Derzno 18:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
    new version uploaded by 17th-April but no further feedback received. --~~~~

     Support Nice --Moroder 21:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

  •  Support Good enough -- Alvesgaspar 11:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 15:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Ruddy_darter_dragonfly_(Sympetrum_sanguineum)_almost_adult_male_wings_forward.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ruddy darter dragonfly (Sympetrum sanguineum) almost adult male --Charlesjsharp 20:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment  Oppose Too dark and a bit noisy. --Hockei 12:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Noise is acceptable and looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 17:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The quality in the abdomen is acceptable but not in the head -- Alvesgaspar 11:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:39, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Myra_theatre.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Demre - Ruins of Myra - Theatre --Imehling 08:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment IMHO, overexposed at the orchestra and too tight crop at the bottom. --C messier 12:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done --Imehling 17:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    The surface shows no detail, just grey. I don't think this can be saved. --C messier 11:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC) I think we should discuss that. In my view the surfaces of the stones in the theatre show no structure because they are sleek. There are structures visible on other grey stones. --Imehling 12:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose left part of circle end in nothing and not sharp. --Denkmalhelfer 17:06, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor framing and lighting, not sharp enough. Alvesgaspar 11:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Lycaena thersamon - Lesser Fiery Copper 01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wing upperside of male Lesser Fiery Copper (Lycaena thersamon). Adana - Turkey. --Zcebeci 10:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wings not in focus and are the colours not over-saturated? --Charlesjsharp 13:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support fine for me --Denkmalhelfer 12:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 20:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose All wings should be focused, which is not that difficult when the insect is presented this way. Alvesgaspar 22:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)