Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Images of people uploaded by Aquila Leite|year=2025|month=January|day=12}} to the description page of each file.
Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Images of people uploaded by Aquila Leite|plural}} ~~~~
Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Images of people uploaded by Aquila Leite}} at the end of today's log.
These are public images provided by the city hall of the town I live in, images free for use. If it's within your capacity, use Google Lens and you'll see that there are several reproductions of the same images on websites and social media.
But it was necessary for me, personally, to go to the municipal government headquarters to take photos, then upload them to Flickr, so I could upload them here on Commons, and even so, they are deleting them!
@Jan.Kamenicek, If your doubts are regarding the format of the photo on Commons compared to Flickr, well, the photos on Flickr are unedited photos, due to the difficulty in finding a good position to photograph.
However, they are all the same photos, with the difference that for Commons I adjusted them to standardize the list where they are used. Especially because it goes against Wikipedia's formatting standards to have "crooked" photos that misalign the page. But the photos are the same.
If necessary, I'll go back to the city hall and take selfies to see if you believe I took the photos!
What is necessary to upload a photograph of a public gallery in the city where I reside, where I went to the city hall, received clear authorization to photograph the gallery, and use it for whatever purpose I am interested in?
Porque os prefeitos vivos eu já estou apelando para que eles mesmos carreguem as fotos sem direitos autorais... E você quer que eu peça aos que já morreram para publicarem novas fotos também?
As fotografias disponibilizadas na galeria da prefeitura não tem autor, cada um vai lá e fotografa como quiser e usa como quiser. Seja para fins educacionais ou não, nada é determinado por eles. Dessa forma, fico no direito de atribuir a licença que vejo como mais adequada!
I nominated these photos because they were tagged as being your work and released under {{self|cc-by-4.0}}, which was apparently not true. I am not an expert in Brazilian law, but it is quite possible that some of them are in public domain under {{PD-Brazil-Photo}}. So, if you think that some of the nominated photos fulfill all the requirements of this licence, please note which. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 13:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jan.Kamenicek, Here in Brazil, for the first time last year (2023), we had stricter legislation regarding this issue. But it is strict for politicians in office, they were "prohibited" from using their own images during their term. But it is strict for politicians in office, they are "prohibited" from using their own images during their term. However, this legislation maintained the autonomy of municipalities to determine their own laws and use of images.However, this legislation maintained the autonomy of municipalities to determine their own laws and use of images..
Veja:Projeto de Lei (PL) nº 1.731, de 2023
In my city, the previous legislation was maintained, only adapting the use of the position for personal gain!
See the Municipal Law: Araripina - 25 de julho de 2023
_n%C2%BA_1.731,_de_2023.jpg)
