Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/04/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 28th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Marco eugenio artista (talk) 20:37, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request as usual by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader did not provide sufficient information (a valid and suitable tag) on this media's copyright status. SSGohan2 (talk) 04:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Reason}} Upload Error SSGohan2 (talk) 13:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request, no license. --Achim (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photograph of (purportedly) notable person. Clearly from the same set as this, which is credited to professional photographer zhoomerz (Fredy Gonzalez), who is not the uploader (Denisse Anaya). Эlcobbola talk 18:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Strike - exact one from here; speedying per F1. --Эlcobbola talk 18:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - per description and title, video clip. All other user uploads copyvios of this subject. Эlcobbola talk 18:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Strike - exact one from here; speedying per F1. --Эlcobbola talk 18:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution file without metadata, unlikely to be own work // 176.59.47.225 08:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 17:02, 28 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 21:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: http://giadinh.net.vn/giai-tri/cam-ly-con-o-dinh-cao-them-10-nam-nua-2010072512571851.htm DHN (talk) 01:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:04, 29 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: http://giadinh.net.vn/giai-tri/cam-ly-con-o-dinh-cao-them-10-nam-nua-2010072512571851.htm --Krdbot 13:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This copyrighted image has been uploaded and deleted before. 75.82.59.49 22:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk at 09:39, 30 April 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be above COM:TOO. If it is, it will need OTRS permission. Ahmadtalk 18:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:38, 30 April 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 19:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Metadata specifies photographer, user specifies "own work", but has not responded to queries whether they are the same person. Tarl N. (talk) 17:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The editor who submitted the image appears to be involved in conflict of interest, so the image might well be properly intended to be made public domain by the owner. But in the Wikimedia description, the editor claims "own work". From the evidence, this could be a mixture of conflict of interest, paid work and copyright issues. I can't figure it out, I'm nominating it for deletion since I have evidence that something is awry, even if I can't tell what. We need input from the submitting editor to clear up the issues. Tarl N. (talk) 17:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of the issue and am working to obtain the proper licensing. Also, the photo needs to be edited because I mistakenly put "own work" when it is not - I am in fact working with NBCUniversal to license. I am working with Tarl to get the updates on the page per Wikipedia terms - apologies as I am learning the platform. Also -- if you need to delete this and have it re-uploaded once we figure out the rights, that should be okay. 05:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC) @Tarl N.: EricaS97 (talk) 06:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC) 06:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, possible to get this taken down? It was indeed mistakenly updated on my end - my confusion over policy. We are adjusting and can re-upload. Thank you! @Tarl N.: EricaS97 (talk) 17:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File mistakenly uploaded by user, and is not correct on copyright. Please delete. EricaS97 (talk) 21:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Logo wird von der Finanzverwaltung Nordrhein-Westfalen sei dem 4.09.2019 nicht mehr verwendet. Es soll nicht mehr bei den google-Suchanzeigen oder bei Wikipedia erscheinen. CE2019 (talk) 15:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Commons hosts old and outdated logos to show history. And Commons does not care about Google search results. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhammika111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, paintings, drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Likely to be small resolution duplicates.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhammika111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhammika111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, painting, stamp, map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhammika111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

so called "own Works" (no sources)

Mutter Erde (talk) 07:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhammika111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free image from the web. Per description, there are claims this was taken by the uploader. @Mariana Cordeiro da Silva: please follow the instructions on OTRS to confirm that you are the photographer. Storkk (talk) 11:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: copyright verified by correspondence available to trusted volunteers as OTRS ticket #2020050110008229.  JGHowes  talk 12:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jmchehin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 06:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake - I need to use a different file name Kezmarcan (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 06:57, 4 Mai 2020 UTC: Author or uploader request deletion - Uploaded by mistake. --Krdbot 19:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, self-promotion. File:Ticona Cesar Erick.jpg isn't likely to be own work (unlikely to be a selfie).

Ahmadtalk 03:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already speedily deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sri basava tv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 06:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Famenator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 06:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moses Moreroa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host.

Achim (talk) 06:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

List of files:
- File:Uttam 100kb.jpg
- File:Uttam Raj.jpg
- File:Uttam Raj ptotos.jpg
- File:Uttam Raj Wallpepar.jpg
CfSD: F10 Personal image of a non-contributer. Commons is not facebook! This is yet another famous actor who needs a page on Wikipedia. 193.171.152.104 07:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk 05:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrick Hickey Jr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Based on a sample number of these I've looked at via Tineye these are not apparently "own work" and often seem to be stock images. If any passing admin agrees then these can be deleted speedily in the absence of other information

Herby talk thyme 11:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saurabh2y (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlexandrePicart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 14:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bluedevilsacademy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmadrezaarzani6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NDW650 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 06:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 07:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChemistryIndex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ohidurrahman2580 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on bn.wiki

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:29, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ohidurrahman2580 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More COM:NOTHOST/self-promotion

Эlcobbola talk 19:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vusi vilanculos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused user-created artwork - out of scope.

-mattbuck (Talk) 19:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vusi vilanculos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader purports to be subject of non-selfies. As copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject, COM:EVID of permission from the actual author would be needed

Эlcobbola talk 15:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ringo.sam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

files from Picasa, with "FBMD" in the EXIF. Probably taken from the Net, not own work.

Ruthven (msg) 20:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by E.J Esther (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal and family photos. Out of scope.

~Cybularny Speak? 22:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of trophy Эlcobbola talk 18:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 08:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 08:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional logo, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 09:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims that evidence for permission can be found online at http://imgur.com/Yrm4pTB, but I think that this would need to go through OTRS.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

佾珜 pointed out that these are likely screenshots of MLB broadcasts/video streams and not the uploader's work. I don't know the details, but the image quality and file format do indicate they are video screenshots. Though 佾珜 can feel free to provide additional evidence.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found that Alvarado's pic might cropped from [1]佾珜 (talk) 08:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, Thanks Cowart-Mubo sama too. :) 佾珜 (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE + screenshot from a photo with unclear copyright status. Ahmadtalk 19:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like copyright violation to me; title and metadata don't even agree on creator Linseneintopf (talk) 19:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"NC" non-commercial Tibet Nation (talk) 19:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License review passed in 2014. Although he has since changed the license, CC is irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"All rights reserved" Tibet Nation (talk) 20:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License review passed in 2014. Although he has since changed the license, CC is irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says Instagram, previously published photos require OTRS tickets Ytoyoda (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.facebook.com/lynxfcgib/posts/1987795054774592, the subject does not own the copyright Ytoyoda (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and according to the details, not taken by the uploader (probably sent to him). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS was sent and it's not a PR image. Li-reg (talk) 08:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. We'll wait for the OTRS team processing of the mail you sent. Ldorfman (talk) 08:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you actually.. it was sent when I uploaded it, should I resend? Li-reg (talk) 09:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; can be undeleted when we get OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. law text. eien20 (talk) 02:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only in now-deleted spam draft on enwiki. Out of scope, no encyclopedic use. Kinu (talk) 08:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 08:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-wikipedian - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 14:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just a test Spokatov (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by courtesy, unused, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krzysztof Pałucha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in MediaWiki graph, SVG or tabular data if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr.Danyel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value + advertisment Perumalism (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, we have much better photographs of clouds Buidhe (talk) 18:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, out of project scope. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional logo, out of project scope. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality logo. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, likely promotional and out of project scope. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 23:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author not credited. Many people who were born before 1950 have not been dead for 70 years. Thuresson (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibilities of Flickr washing ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no valid license. --ƏXPLICIT 03:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the license states that the work is "Self-published work", the description says that it was made in 1956 by Dinorah Azevedo de Simas Enéas. The indicated license is therefore false.

Embora a licença afirme que a obra é "própria", a descrição diz que foi feita em 1956 por Dinorah Azevedo de Simas Enéas. A licença indicada é, portanto, falsa.

Porantim (talk) 10:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely above the threshold of originality in India AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:02, 8 Mai 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 19:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by محقق۲۰۲۰ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, likely to be copyright violations. The screenshots of newspaper articles need permission. All files are small, of poor quality and the EXIF data is missing.

Ahmadtalk 04:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was uploaded twice. أحمد بن عبدالله (talk) 03:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 21:22, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: Broken redirect --Krdbot 01:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copiright (http://www.linux2p.com/mappeditalia/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1233&Itemid=178) 79.43.63.215 13:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 19:15, 10 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Un mail a été envoyé à l'ASF pour le droit d'utilisation. En attente du retour SFCCF (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 17:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Un mail a été envoyé à l'ASF pour le droit d'utilisation. En attente du retour SFCCF (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: You're opening a DR on your own files because you want to keep them? Nonsense!. Ruthven (msg) 17:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce logo appartient au Servette Football Club Chênois. J'en suis actuellement le président et j'autorise l'utilisation SFCCF (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 17:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce logo appartient au Servette Football Club Chênois. J'en suis actuellement le président et j'autorise l'utilisation SFCCF (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 17:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce image appartient au Servette Football Club Chênois. Toute les joueuses ont signé un droit d'utilisateur de leur photo de sportive.J'en suis actuellement le président du Servette Football Club Chênois féminin et j'autorise l'utilisation SFCCF (talk) 15:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cette image est issue de cette page, dont le site est vraisemblablement sous copyright (à en croire l'indication "© Servette Football Club 1890 SA" en pied de la page)


Kept: Permission OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 17:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unremarkable person, out of scope Buidhe (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Photo of other media, probably copyrighted. Buidhe (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Only used on userpage, no other contributions. --P 1 9 9   18:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, unclear copyright status Buidhe (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이 파일이 삭제되어야된다고 주장하는 사람은 김지희 본인이며, 이 게시물은 초상권 등으로 무단으로 배포될 수 없습니다. 비스니스 이외의 목적이라도 수정 후 제 배포도 불가능 합니다. 218.145.166.200 17:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이 파일이 삭제되어야된다고 주장하는 사람은 김지희 본인이며, 이 게시물은 초상권 등으로 무단으로 배포될 수 없습니다. 비스니스 이외의 목적이라도 수정 후 제 배포도 불가능 합니다. 218.145.166.200 17:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이 파일이 삭제되어야된다고 주장하는 사람은 김지희 본인이며, 이 게시물은 초상권 등으로 무단으로 배포될 수 없습니다. 비스니스 이외의 목적이라도 수정 후 제 배포도 불가능 합니다. 218.145.166.200 17:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이 파일이 삭제되어야된다고 주장하는 사람은 김지희 본인이며, 이 게시물은 초상권 등으로 무단으로 배포될 수 없습니다. 비스니스 이외의 목적이라도 수정 후 제 배포도 불가능 합니다. 218.145.166.200 17:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이 파일이 삭제되어야된다고 주장하는 사람은 김지희 본인이며, 이 게시물은 초상권 등으로 무단으로 배포될 수 없습니다. 비스니스 이외의 목적이라도 수정 후 제 배포도 불가능 합니다. 218.145.166.200 17:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gshguru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Books covers looks modern.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, The files are claimed to be in public domain, because author is 70 years dead. Sometimes that's impossible, sometimes simply author is not given. In addition, USA demands 95 years from publication, which has not passed. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lisensi tidak sesuai 182.1.108.28 11:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 14:50, 18 Mai 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Taan Prof --Krdbot 19:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taan Prof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All files with a very small resolution, and no EXIF data. Some EXIF data report just "Screenshot" (e.g. File:Syailendra_Oktosa.jpg), other nothing at all. Very probably COM:NETCOPYRIGHT: files found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work.

Ruthven (msg) 16:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - some also recreations, this is LTA sock. --Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taan Prof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More of same from above. Mix of COM:NOTHOST/self-promotion, bogus PD claims (e.g., File:Telkom Indonesia kantor cabang Prabumulih.jpg is blatant, File:Deddy Yevri Hanteru Sitorus.jpg is all rights reserved at source, purported PD-IDGov is not applicable and note same red background photoshopping as other of the sock's copyvios), and COM:NETCOPYVIOs by LTA sock.

Эlcobbola talk 14:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mug shots are not among the documents carefully enumerated at {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Unless any of these predate 1925, they are all subject to the URAA and may also still be under copyright in Russia unless they were published in Russia before 1950.

List
* File:1937-SofianoTA.jpg

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in copyright law that requires a work to be artistic -- all created works have copyrights .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that we have a category for a number of copyvios proves nothing. We have many bad categories on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the images are not artworks they are not subject to copyright. There is nobody who holds the copyright. It would be absurd to claim that it is held by the policeman who took the pictures. Deletion of the pictures for copyright issues is totally unwarranted. 108.18.3.70 19:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that they may or may not be "important historical documents" is irrelevant because they are copyright violations. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is well established on Commons that mug shots have a copyright. Whether the copyright belongs to the actual photographer or to the police department varies from place to place, but they are certainly copyrighted. As far as I know, the only mug shots that are PD when created are those taken by departments of the US Federal government -- all works by US Federal government employees are PD.

In contrast to US law, the law in Russia and almost all other countries exempts only a very specific list of works from copyright. {{PD-RU-exempt}} applies only to :

  • official documents of state government agencies and local government agencies of municipal formations, including laws, other legal texts, judicial decisions, other materials of legislative, administrative and judicial character, official documents of international organizations, as well as their official translations;
  • state symbols and signs (flags, emblems, orders, any forms of money, and the like), as well as symbols and signs of municipal formations;
  • works of folk art (folklore), which don't have specific authors;
  • news reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character (daily news reports, television programs, transportation schedules, and the like).

None of these apply to mug shots. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ok. Then this is part of the official document, since the image is glued to the arrest protocol. Kolchak1923 (talk) 15:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. They are as part of a file official documents. They were not taken for fun, but in an official context.--Kresspahl (talk) 10:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Official photos made by NKVD ("official state agency") officers for the purpose of personal files of arrested and investigated people are official documents - photos made officially for state purposes by anonymous state officials of official state agency. There is no elements of copyright anyway. Andros64 (talk) 14:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: see {{PD-Russia}} or {{PD-Russia-1996}}: This work was originally published anonymously or under a pseudonym before January 1, 1943 etc. Just change license to PD-Russia and keep it. Files like File:MGB Semen Krasnov.jpg which are dated after 1943, can be apparently deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anna Timiriova 1954.jpg: «In the absence of a clearer wording of the applicable law, or any case law to the contrary being cited, it seems acceptable to treat a police photo in a police file as literally "material of an administrative nature" and therefore in the public domain». 2A02:2168:A01:35FB:0:0:0:1 21:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Julo (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

その根拠 自撮り 尾井優太 (talk) 07:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

不使用になったため Kocgs (talk) 08:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope. the file of scribbling on notebook. eien20 (talk) 09:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree--セロン (talk) 07:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • これは、京都府福知山市が都になるために必要な礼儀で、その方と円滑にコミュニケーションをする為の礼儀です、都になるだろうなら必ず守って下さい。--尾井優太 (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, stock photo not available under free license, only "royalty free" https://www.gettyimages.in/detail/photo/cleaning-set-for-different-surfaces-in-kitchen-royalty-free-image/1144761713 94.234.38.200 21:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have an account at Getty images. Maybe I have attatched the free version by mistake. I will attached a new picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BraMiljöval (talk • contribs) 06:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BraMiljöval: Having a Getty Images account is irrelevant to the copyright status. When you purchase a photo at Getty, you're just getting a license to use it. The image does not become free. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of non-notable organization, out of project scope. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. LAPD retains copyright on most of its works, or possibly the author of the letter has copyright. Buidhe (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't Template:PD-CAGov-LAPD apply here?--BevinKacon (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Probably, according to [2]. I just checked the website and it said "Copyright © 2020 Los Angeles Police Foundation and the LAPD. All Rights Reserved." So I assumed that they copyrighted their work... Buidhe (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Likely that notice is for the website code and to cover any works that are re-published. This letter is a private correspondence, so license is still questionable.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright map Mindmatrix 00:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not "own work", but a collection of copyrighted photos. One of those, for example, is taken from here. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copyrighted artwork. Description claims that documentation had been emailed to OTRS, but this is over a year ago and there is no OTRS confirmation of permission. Seraphimblade (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from awards. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE DannyS712 (talk) 03:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work - "official logo" per description, also available at, eg, https://www.5foot5.fr/Mouty-Ousseni-Sign-2-Play-Donner-envie-aux-joueurs-de-revenir_a2293.html DannyS712 (talk) 03:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits H.W.KIM, not the Flickr user Ytoyoda (talk) 03:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image cannot be described as any item in {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. It is a non-free logo exceeding COM:TOO Taiwan. Wcam (talk) 03:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 03:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 03:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as no permission (No permission since) Wcam (talk) 04:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

However, non-free portion of the photo is blurred out so it is de minimis. --Wcam (talk) 04:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 04:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is not representative for my oevre anymore, Christine Streuli 2A01:C23:5C23:5200:1D18:E0E8:F2C7:5EEF 07:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on de:Christine Streuli. Under COM:NPOV, if it's representative enough for German Wikipedia, it's representative enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Galerierupertpfab as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: nicht verfügbar --Galerierupertpfab (talk) 09:34, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Converted to regular DR, as no valid rationale for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:50, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of a free licence on the source page. jdx Re: 07:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

jdx I agree. I can't find either. It is a pity that it is used in so many wikipedia articles. Botaki (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the data the photograph taken in 1975. Even if 1975 is correct It's cannot be qualify as {{PD-IsraelGov}}. Cannot find the file on the net (not including that mentioning Commons as source - 1, 2, [3]). -- Geagea (talk) 07:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope fictitious flag. Telluride (talk) 09:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The picture is used on several Wikipedias, from az:Cənubi Azərbaycan bayrağı to uk:Прапори народів. If it's useful to those Wikipedias, then under COM:INUSE it's useful enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 13:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: The file is also published at CAMAH's official website (http://www.guneyazerbaycan.com/en/).

At the bottom of the page says: The use of images and content on this website is completely free. Aztap


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reason: source page does not exist. very unlikely that the image really is available under by-sa 193.171.152.103 07:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted film poster. Ruthven (msg) 16:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too old and don't represent the brand anymore Jevrot (talk) 17:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion & in use. --Achim (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: --Hydrel (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 30+ Tineye hits This Flickr user (who has a paid pro-account) is on the questionable author's list. However, they link and attribute to their official photography website where they have similar images licensed under CC-licenses. I want to give the benefit of the doubt here. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Josve05a: According to past discussions, Marco Verch is an apparent copyright troll who is suspected of posting images on Flickr under a Creative Commons licenses, and then shaking down reusers for not attributing him correctly. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:51, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete not because of licensing but per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch. --Achim (talk) 10:25, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Achim. --Herby talk thyme 10:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt that this image is the uploaders own work. Same for File:Kamala Lopez 2019.jpg 193.171.152.103 07:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope—unused hypothetical seat projection without a reliable source Buidhe (talk) 18:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 23:42, 11 Juli 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zach Vega --Krdbot 06:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patafisik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Touristic panels in Italy, where there is no FoP for such works.

Ruthven (msg) 19:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FOP in US. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - screenshot of news program. Indeed, per description, "Picture of media appearance on BBC Channel 5" Эlcobbola talk 18:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Regasterios at 15:52, 5 September 2020 UTC: No permission since 28 August 2020 --Krdbot 18:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old photo Chvu73 (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|1=privacy}} 185.91.165.26 12:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:40, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution file without metadata, unlikely to be own work // 176.59.47.225 08:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person, unused image, out of scope Buidhe (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unremarkable people who work for a non-notable organization, out of scope Buidhe (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused file. Commons is not the private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low resolution, not very useful and doubtful copyright status (no exif) Buidhe (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film poster. Unlikely to be own work. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with watermark, no permission, no metadata. Cjp24 (talk) 18:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Perumalism (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use Perumalism (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously printed photograph, not own work, unclear copyright status Buidhe (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK threshold of originality is known to be very low and the PD-signature usage instructions even note this specifically for the UK: Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag#United_Kingdom. This signature in particular is quite creative having been intentionally designed to appear phallic. SilentSpike (talk) 18:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious non-free promo shot, not taken by the uploaded Lugnuts (talk) 18:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duck copyvio - professionally staged, (purportedly) notable person, all other user uploads copyvios of this subject take from social media. Quack/PRP Эlcobbola talk 18:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Sahapedia 2018 at source given Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art by living artist, without permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andershus

[edit]

All these files were uploaded by User:Andershus. They appear to be photographs of works that are shown in his gallery, but these works were made by artists that are either living, either dead too recently for the works to be public domain in any jurisdiction. All files are tagged as "own work" which is clearly incorrect. I contacted the user on his talk page on the french Wikipedia and asked him to clarify the copyright status of these works but got no answer, even though he kept editing. IMO, these 31 files should be deleted as copyright violations, and the user doesn't appear to care much about the matter.

File:Anju-Chaudhuri.jpg uploaded by the same user, was already nominated for deletion two days ago.

--El pitareio (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andershus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images of Art in India. If the photos (some of them only) were own work, they would still be COM:COPYVIOs because they are images of artwork without the permission of the creator, or any indication who created them. Some images such as File:Harsh-raman(1).jpg clearly show they were taken by someone else, One of the images is large enough to be considered "big" and most are smaller than facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andershus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Maps without sources, user with bad history, unlikely to be free.

Yann (talk) 19:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andershus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artists and artworks require permission of the artist for the artwork as well as from the photographer. At these file sizes, very unlikely original photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maatgraven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works on artworks & drawings

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a derivative work, check out the pixels, halftone dots, whatever they are all over hte image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copyrighted by whoever's chop is in the lower right corner. Closing administrator please review uploader's gallery. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photo, no exif, questionable copyright status Buidhe (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper clipping. TherasTaneel (talk) 19:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bookcover, artist died in 2001, so haven't expired for free rights. TherasTaneel (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bookcover, artist died in 2001, so haven't expired for free rights. TherasTaneel (talk) 19:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from the book ""Hellas", sourced as own work, possible, usually not the case. 87.49.147.159 19:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims that evidence for permission can be found online at http://imgur.com/Yrm4pTB, but I think that this would need to go through OTRS.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims that evidence for permission can be found online at http://imgur.com/Yrm4pTB, but I think that this would need to go through OTRS.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims that evidence for permission can be found online at http://imgur.com/Yrm4pTB, but I think that this would need to go through OTRS.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Faulty SVG image. Romain Rousseau (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook - "FBMD" string in the metadata Ytoyoda (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unknown author can not license a photograph under the claimed CC license Thuresson (talk) 20:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fona2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res, no camera EXIF, all other user uploads unambiguous copyvios. Duck/COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 20:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no authorization from the author - exemple of use before the upload [4] Tyseria (d) 21:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no authorization from the author - exemple of use before the upload [5] Tyseria (d) 21:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author or source, neither in current version or in edit history. Thuresson (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's sad but dura lex sed lex. I'm pretty sure though that it belongs to the private Bonaparte collection. Pretty hard to contact them, unfortunately, to get the authorization. --Basileús (LeContributeurParisien) (talk) 00:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the author is unknown it is not clear why uploader believes that he or she has been dead for 70 years. Thuresson (talk) 21:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This site has some pictures of Louis Bonaparte as a young lad. Someone could try contacting the webmaster to inquire about where she found them from and what rights she has to them. With some luck, this could be swapped for one of them. --85.76.101.85 17:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MichielDMN as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: official logo of a supermarket brand, given license is not sufficient

Rather a DR so the uploader has a fair change to explain why the license is correct. Natuur12 (talk) 22:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Especially the lion doesn't seem a combination of simple geometric forms to me. MichielDMN (talk) 20:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of copyright material Mindmatrix 23:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation Veverve (talk) 23:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COA files by LeoDavid

CoA files from speedy-deletion. Reason was: Not 70 years PMA, see below

RE rillke questions? 21:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 03:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 1

Changing from {{copyvio|Tous droits réservés - Arnaud BUNEL - 1997-2011}} because I don't agree. They all seem to be from before 1500 so the copyright would have expired. Arnaud Bunel's contribution is probably below the threshold of originality.

 Disagree :
Français : (missing text)
Les blasonnements échappent aux règles des droits d'auteur, mais leurs représentations est soumises aux mêmes règles que les autres œuvres.--Jimmy44 (talk) 14:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Expliquez-moi, comment peux-t'on trouver des fichiers .gif datant d'avant 1500 ? Voir fr:Projet:Blasons/Droit d'auteur--Jimmy44 (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Stefan2/4. Je ne suis pas d'accord avec vous concernant les fichiers provenant du site http://www.heraldique-europeenne.org, lequel sont assujettis au droit d'auteur.
Pour faire court : les fr:blasonnements échappent aux règles des droits d'auteur, mais leurs représentations est soumises aux mêmes règles que les autres œuvres, c'est le cas de ces blasons dessinés aux XX-XXIe siècles (en détail, voir : fr:Projet:Blasons/Droit d'auteur). Voilà pourquoi, amha, les fichiers suivant doivent être supprimés (on notera qu'ils ont tous une version svg libre d'utilisation)--Jimmy44 (talk) 15:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Je ne savais pas ce règle des blasonnements. Je pensais que les images doivent être libre parce-que File:New Orleans Saints.svg est libre. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Euh...C'est très facile pour une bonne volonté de refaire un gif ou un bmp avec les couleurs adéquates puis d'importer ce fichier.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete : they are not a scan of a book from year 1500, they were drawn by someone who owns a copyright on them, according to the French law. Peter17 (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete--Jimmy44 (talk) 11:09, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. FASTILY (TALK) 20:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 2

I do not agree that these files are copyright violations. They are logos of the United States and look sufficiently simple, cf. examples at COM:TOO#United States. However, some can probably be deleted as duplicates.

Stefan4 (talk) 23:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well obviously the Texas Democratic Party's logo is way too simple. But yeah, we don't need four of it. Pick the best one, delete the other three. Fry1989 eh? 04:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dupes deleted by User:Sreejithk2000. FASTILY (TALK) 20:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 3

These were originally speedy-nommed because the Flickr license is NC. These are by a NASA employee, so the question is whether or not this negates or trumps the NC on Flickr.

INeverCry 19:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can we assume that taking such images is part of the author's work as a NASA employee? Do astronauts have free time on board to take their own amateur photographs? If they have, probably similar issues about US military taking their private images while on board of US Navy ships have previously arisen. Do we have precedents?--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A uniform series of images like these look more like official work than private images to me. INeverCry 21:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If the photos were taken by an employee in the scope of their duties, then yes that trumps the Flickr NC license. It looks like the Flickr account does that for all their images, including blatantly PD-USGov images, so that's not much of an indication of anything. But if an astronaut did those photos on his own time, then yes there could be an issue. Private photos taken on US Navy ships (and that sort of thing) are copyrighted by the photographer as normal. This article describes photos he took on previous missions, which do sound like they were on his own time -- and this article basically confirms that. On the other hand, it does say they were shared with the general public, and if these photos got official ISS/JSC photo numbers... that may mean they were released under the same general idea as PD-USGov images. This one is a tough case. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I uploaded these files on the basis that work by NASA is normally in the public domain and allowed here on Wikimedia. There is nothing to suggest that astronaut Don Pettit shot these pictures for private reasons using his own personal camera. If he intended them to be private holiday snaps he could have created a personal website and posted them there with copyright restrictions. In fact, I doubt his terms of employment at NASA would allow him to make pictures private that were taken from a NASA space station using NASA camera equipment.

The pictures were posted at a NASA controlled website, not at Pettit's own website. They have all been assigned official NASA photo identifications (e.g. JSC2012-E-051505, JSC2012-E-051506, and JSC2012-E-051507) and some have been posted at NASA's main website – NASA.gov – where the usual freedom of use applies (picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA's main website. Second picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA. Third picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA).

I assume the employee at NASA who created the NASA Flickr account may not have known that he was setting a licence parameter that restricted image usage more than at NASA's main website. If the same pictures at NASA.gov cannot be used from NASA's Flickr account, that is inconsistent and makes no sense. O'Dea (talk) 03:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a fresh copy of File:International Space Station star trails - JSC2012E051505.jpg sourced from NASA and removed it from the list above. Pixel for pixel, it is identical to the file I found originally at NASA's Flickr account. I changed the source information at the file page and removed the {{delete}} tag. This should demonstrate the absurdity of the NASA Flickr restriction. O'Dea (talk) 04:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per consensus to kept. Érico Wouters msg 02:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 4

Speedy nommed as copyvios by User:Smial, but may be covered by FoP. Discussion seems like a better idea than speedy deletion.

INeverCry 19:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think the outdoor images are OK and I have put a strike through on them. I recognize that there a small possibility that not all of them were taken from a publicly accessible place, but that seems unlikely.
I'm from there. Most if not all are very likely taken from places open to public. So I think it's FOP--TUBS 21:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete All of the interior images are not covered by the German FOP and must be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
wait. It's most certainly not FOP but photos don't put an emphasis on the art (which would complicate this discussion), so it may be OK, if the museum allows exlpictly taking and publishing pictures. I can't tell if this applies here but the absence of FOP doesn't mean that this a case of copyfraud.--TUBS 21:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ich hatte eine Fotogenehmigung auch innen, allerdings nur mündlich bzw. nur im Museumslogbuch (Name, Organisation, Unterschrift) dokumentiert. Man bekommt dort dann so ein Kärtchen umgehängt, damit man nicht von den Aufsichtspersonen erschossen wird. Hochgeladen habe ich nur Bilder, auf denen die Ausstellungsstücke Beiwerk, also nicht wirklich erkennbar bzw. großenteils verdeckt sind. Ich muß zugeben, daß mein LA aus dem Ärger resultierte, daß mal wieder einer ein Bild, das in DE unter die Panoramafreiheit fällt, als Urheberrechtsverletzung angeschwärzt hat, weil die Werke des Architekten in US halt noch geschützt sind. -- Smial (talk) 23:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted the interior kept exterior as FOP. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files in Category:Copyright violations 5

Original speedy rationale: Unfortunately, this artwork by Miquel Barceló is under copyright--User:LPLT (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several of these look like Commons:De minimis would apply. INeverCry 17:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

INeverCry 17:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I have just sent an e-mail to Miquel Barcelo himself. He may be a very busy man.... am awaiting his green light.

My pictures are the 4 first ones listed above.

I would however demand that the same deletion rules apply to the following files, which don't even mention the artist's name. The US Mission should not be above rules that apply to others.

Thank you for your patience and your understanding

--BiiJii (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about File:Keramiken-La-Seu BMK.jpg then? Moumou82 (talk) 20:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The rights are owned by FUNDACIONONUART . I wrote to them, they don't quite understand the problem, nor why the pictures should be deleted. Am awaiting a more detailed answer - and possibly authorization - from them. I als suggested they upload their own pictures. I'll let you know as soon as I hear something

--BiiJii (talk) 12:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 02:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 6

Tagged for speedy deletion as copyvio logos by User:Ostiamare. Most of these look too simple to be copyrighted, but I'd like more opinions.

INeverCry 01:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 02:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 7

Previously tagged as Copyvio by Ellin Beltz: © 2008–2015 Astronomical Institute of the Charles University, Josef Ďurech, Vojtěch Sidorin

Alan (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: under the copyright notice at the source it says, “Except where otherwise stated, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.” The files are erroneously templated CC-BY-SA 4.0, but that’s easily fixed.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree with Odysseus1479, I've updated the files to use the CC-BY-4.0 license, as mentioned in the footer of the source site. —RP88 (talk) 23:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC BY 4.0. Alan (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 8

These files was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Cropping out artistic parts of postal covers and stamps is strictly prohibited by PD-RU-exempt (read the footnotes about cropping). These artistic renderings by themselves are protected by copyright until expiration, and none are old enough to have expired copyright yet. Until such time, the artists of these works, like Pyotr Bendel and Anatoly Kalashnikov, retain the rights to these works.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 9

These three stamps were sent to copyvio, but I think they need to be discussed, because the argument presented is a little bit above the quick decision needed for CopyVio.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Initially nominated for speedy deletion by Hogwarts Portal with the rationale "The Philippine government doesn't hold the copyright of the photograph nor the stamp."
  • Delete. Not free in the United States. Works published in the 2010s. And not free in the source country. Photos by photographer Bong Tan. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete although the Philippine stamps by themselves are not copyrighted (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Stamps), the underlying image of Megan Young may not be. Under 176.3. "Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest or otherwise; nor shall publication or republication by the government in a public document of any work in which copyright is subsisting be taken to cause any abridgment or annulment of the copyright or to authorize any use or appropriation of such work without the consent of the copyright owner." Thereshould be proof that the photographer of the underlying image is a government employee. Also, the Q&A test (through Google forms) of the October 15, 2020 IPOPHL webinar joined by one of our fellow Filipino Wikipedians Higad Rail Fan has a question about whether the government works, having no copyright, can be used even for commercial purposes with no permission from the owner (the Government), and the answer is false (prior permission from the Government is obliged). IMO, this should not be an issue if the uploader sent a permission letter to the Philippine Postal Corporation for the uploading of these files to Wikimedia Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 10

These files were initially tagged by Matthias Winkelmann as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F5}}{{SD|reason=No information is given regarding consent, and the tone of the description and the inclusion of "ex-girlfriend" in the filename raise the possibility of this being intentional harassment. Plus, it's pornographic and low-quality. User has about 80+ similar photos.

The uploader (@Ulflarsen: ) asserts the following: "I put this picture up for deletion, to stop a speedy deletion. The picture is posted with the full consent of my ex-girlfriend, she know of it and is still doing amateur pornograpy with me now and then. If this picture (and my 90+ similar pictures) shall be deleted, then there are some tens of thousands of others that also should be removed, and Wikimedians would have to ask what other content that may be problematic, perhaps pictures of war?“

FredWalsh (talk) 00:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The uploader has contributed a significant number of photos exploring human sexuality, nudity, relationships. None of his files have been low quality pornography. FredWalsh (talk) 00:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This is obviously the wrong category, because the copyright status is not in question. But anyway: The guidelines ask for consent of people appearing in photos, and I would assume that a requirement of consent should be required for most pornographic photos, at least of living and non-notable people. The comments on some of these photos still seemed vaguely hostile to me, raising this question. While I would not consider it sufficient for keeping the photos at this point, adding this template should be required if this is resolved in favor of keeping them. Matthias Winkelmann (talk) 01:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Matthias Winkelmann: These files ended up in Category:Copyright violations because of the speedy deletion tag you used. See Special:Diff/433571117 for example - it is one of the hidden categories. The correct procedure would have been to start a deletion request. FredWalsh (talk) 01:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Category:Copyright violations" should really not be a category for the Speedydelete tag. The Copyvio tag used for copyright reasons is distinct from the Speedydelete tag used for other reasons. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sure the "teen" in one of the above files and those other "teens" in files of this person including "teens" (and also are in some other DR) are all over 18 or 19 or 21 regarding whatever is the maturity age in their countries. And vanity pictures, I mean in the area of amateur porn, are very much in scope. (Only out of scope in Lucknow, Delhi, etc.) I begin to understand, although slowly, why people avoid discussions about porn... The best anti-deletion arguments are being produced in these areas. Congratulations to those for the brain storming. If you ask my opinion, you already know it. That is all I have got to say. Bye. E4024 (talk) 02:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am not going to argue for keep or delete, as I leave it up to the community here on Wikimedia Commons to decide if they shall be kept or not. Regarding consent, the various models I have paid to be with me in amateur porn has all agreed to have the pics and videos uploaded by me on the Internet. Regarding my former girlfriend, I have just a few days ago specifically asked her if she agreed to have the category "Prostitutes and customers", and she was fine with that. Regarding amateur porn in general, I do of course respect it if a decision is made to remove such media from Wikimedia Commons, but I believe then that one would have to discuss professional pornography. And if both of them are unfit for presentation here, what about other media that may be disturbing for some viewer (nude people, dead people, pictures of war). I have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2004, and I will continue to contribute, regardless if some or all of my amateur pornographic pictures are removed. As an exhibitionist, amateur porn model I do however believe that this also is a part of what should be of interest for a project that: "is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content (images, sound and video clips) to everyone, in their own language." - a direct quote from Commons:Welcome. Ulflarsen (talk) 09:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • "I have just a few days ago specifically asked her if she agreed to have the category "Prostitutes and customers", and she was fine with that" — could someone please independently (from the uploader) verify that she has indeed consented to it, and that her consent referred to all images in question? GlossyMannequin (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per the first section of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 19.jpg, Fred Walsh, Jeromi Mikhael, and COM:CENSOR. This is a fatuous nomination.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, but on the Village Pump I have advised User:Ulflarsen that his ex (with whom he is apparently on good terms) should use the OTRS process to indicate that she's fine with these, and with the description of herself as a "prostitute". Judging by what he's written, I'd be surprised if that is not the case, but it would still help to hear from her and remove all doubt. - Jmabel ! talk 03:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As said by Jeff G. in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen 09.jpg, this file are as much in scope as others kept per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 07.jpg, 08, 09, 10, 11, the first section of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 19.jpg. Also, per previous deletion nominations as those were closed as kept proves the scope of this files. Also per other users and COM:CENSOR. Tm (talk) 00:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • My ex-girlfriend have now sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org stating that she support the uploading and keeping of these and other files of her and me in amateur porn. It seems to me that as for the deletion regarding that she is not aware of, or support the upload, now has been settled, and can not be used as a reason for deletion. This applies to all the pictures listed above, except the last one. For that I also got the girl's consent, but I do not have contact with her, and so am not in a position to have her send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org - so if that is decided to be needed, the file Ulf Larsen and teen 03.jpg should be deleted. Ulflarsen (talk) 14:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ulflarsen: That email message is in Ticket:2020102510004811 and backs up your claims.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete There is no evidence that the person who sent the email message is really the person shown in the images. We must beware of any risk of personal harrassment. --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
     Keep I just accepted the portrayed person's permission via Ticket#2020102510004811 --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • As my ex-girlfriend in the email to OTRS also clearly stated that she accept that the term prostitute is used about pics of her. Thus I again added the category Prostitutes and customers to the pictures with her and me. Alas, the contributer Vysotsky have now removed that category from these pictures. If I have done something wrong in using that category, I do of course accept that. But the picture of her and me both show a couple in amateur porn AND a prostitute and her customer. As there so far seems to be very pictures of such behaviour on Wikipedia, it seems proper that there would be room for more. As the statement from my ex-girlfriend has been accepted by OTRS I would ask for the use of the category Prostitutes and customers to be reviewed again, and possibly added anew. Ulflarsen (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I deleted or specified several categories, because they were ill-chosen. Many times they were way too generic (Category:Human sexual activity -duh). As to the example you give (prostitute and her client): categories are not chosen by the people in the photo. If I upload a photo of a cat and add Category:Panthera tigris, other people need to correct that mistake. Vysotsky (talk) 20:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that categories are not chosen by the people in the pictures, as I have written several places my main effort is also on Wikipedia in Norwegian Bokmål, so I thus fully accept any changes of categories. Regarding adding categories, I have only tried to add those I thought the project may find useful. But when it comes to the category Prostitutes and customers, is that category only for paintings? Or only paintings and black and white pictures? Or is it only for very low-grade pictures? It does not seem obvious what criteria is used for including the pictures that are allready there, and for excluding the pictures I have added. Ulflarsen (talk) 16:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is now some four months since these files were marked for deletion. As a volunteer to Wikipedia I do of course understand that various issues takes time, but it would be good if this matter could be solved, one way or the other. Ulflarsen (talk) 09:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The primary issue of this DR seems to be consent of the other partners, rather than scope or other topical reasons. I have kept those files for which OTRS consent has been received, and deleted one for which it cannot be obtained. If there has legitmate scope or other topical concerns, they can be addressed in a separate DR. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 11

These files was initially tagged by Yinweiaiqing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: videos of performances captured by audience. missing permission from performers. They've sat in CAT:COPYVIO for a few days; converting to DR.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Polarlys. --Minoraxtalk 04:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations 12

Appear to be from 1910s/1020s-era, likely a PD original (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ghidul Constantei si Tekirghiol.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:CityStudyCasinoArchive.jpg for evience of this timeframe and porential original being PD).

DMacks (talk) 11:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's no indication that any of these were published before 1996 to qualify for PD-Romania. File:InteriorStaircaseCasinoConstanta.jpg and File:Lista detinuti politici.jpg are definitely recent (2000s). The vignetting, sepia tone and "antique" editing present on all of the files is an original contribution of the copyrighted website, some sort of "house rules" for the publication. If proof of publication is provided indicating they qualify for PD-ROmania, non-edited versions should be uploaded for these to qualify for PD.Anonimu (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. While the text of the name list is not eligible for copyright, the photograph of the list probably is (barely). --Rosenzweig τ 07:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converting these to DR since they've sat in the copyvio queue for a while. Gleb Leo tagged these as copyvio as apparently containing work by author not covered under the existing license template.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no objection nor counterargument presented. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:Myrrine

[edit]

Source site: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License." According to the uploader, he/she has the permission to upload the files under the provided license. User_talk:Myrrine#Non-commercial_use_is_not_allowed_on_Commons. --Polarlys (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Polarlys (talk) 18:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Some are also derivative works of copyrighted Google Earth screenshots, such as File:Calimanesti 3.jpg ("suprapunere pe Imagine satelitară Google Earth 2021" = "overlay on Google Earth 2021 Satellite Image"). Belbury (talk) 16:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy tagged by IP user. Wait: "Such booking photographs may be broadcast, published, and/or posted to a website in the normal course of business." is arguably a free license (although it does not expressly permit derivative works), and I will reach out to the named contact for clarification and to see if consent can be sent to COM:VRT.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that File:Donald Trump booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png should be restored if VRT permission is granted. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These should be deleted, it doesn't seem like I'm making progress with the contact person, unfortunately. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump Mug Shot.webp. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YasuSupa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Found on Flickr, claiming cc-by-sa, but it looks like flickr washing by a fan who doesn't understand copyright. The Flickr account is named "Emilio Insolera" but you would think that a notable actor's actual account would have at least one follower.

Guanaco (talk) 09:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. P 1 9 9   13:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YasuSupa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4715060/mediaindex?ref_=tt_pv_mi_sm

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel Done for that part as well --YasuSupa (talk) 15:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YasuSupa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted, Photos: Johnny Dalla Libera - Stefano Guindani Photography, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7353361/mediaindex?ref_=nm_phs_md_sm

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YasuSupa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Metadata credits H.W. Kim, needs evidence of permission.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YasuSupa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

derivative work of a likely copyrighted poster

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YasuSupa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Credited to Laura Kasmauskaite, no evidence of permission givven

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Ytoyoda (talk) 05:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission accepted. --Ahmadtalk 05:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YasuSupa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely belongs to Golden Globe Awards, needs OTRS ticket


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 05:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is questionable that uploader on Flickr is author of this image, since this set of pictures is available as stock photo here. Smooth O (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's stupid Miio1 (talk) 13:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely cropped from CD jacket. eien20 (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete See the original CD jacket on this YouTube video. --Titlutin (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goneas2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

 Delete Post-1970 Greek stamps are certainly copyright for 70 years pma of the artists per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Greece#Stamps so these 2011 stamps cannot be freely licensed by the uploader

Ww2censor (talk) 09:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken before 1937, so it can't be own work. Larryasou (talk) 10:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 193.171.152.104 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|Yet another famous person on youtube, which isn't as far as I can tell, a copyright violation rationale. However, the photographer should confirm license via OTRS and it should be clarified why the image fits within our COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 11:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I meant F10. I missed the 0 --193.171.152.103 19:13, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Commons is not your personal free web host, see Special:DeletedContributions/Santhoplus. --Achim (talk) 19:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bin der Urheber dieses Fotos. Es entstand im Rahmen eines Fotoshootings am 9. September 2009. Für dieses Foto habe ich niemals eine CC-Lizenz erteilt. Um Schaden von möglichen Nutzern des Fotos abzuwenden, bitte ich um dessen unverzügliche Löschung. Vielen Dank, Stefan Theßenvitz

- - -

I am the author of this photo. It was created as part of a photo shoot on September 9, 2009. I have never granted a CC license for this photo. In order to avert damage from possible users of the photo, I ask that it be deleted immediately. Thank you very much, Stefan Theßenvitz 2003:CB:8734:C872:B55B:E82E:CEF3:857C 11:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Krd 14:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING. Wcam (talk) 12:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Personality rights Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information.

Keine Zustimmung der abgebildeten Personen zur Veröffentlichung ersichtlich. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Mef.ellingen (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no evidence of missing consent. --Krd 14:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alylizotte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Truthseeker123abc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edda Gísladóttir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 양념파닭 (talk) 07:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 17:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 사용되기를 원치 않음 Geumbagi (talk) 09:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FOP in US.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FOP in US.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FOP in US.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je souhaite delete cette image que j ai uploader par erreur Scubapeopchris (talk) 11:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Greensky70 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appear to be screen captures (i.e., COM:DW) from a video (see visual characteristics - motion blur, pixelation, etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 17:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, all other user uploads related to Coca-cola (and there have been many) have been unambiguous copyvios. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt that this image is the uploaders own work. File:Farah-5B (2).jpg is the same. cfsd: F1 193.171.152.103 07:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone uploaded it by mistake, I don't want my image on public portal Preethi chinnathambi (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Uploaded in 2019; uploader request. No valid reason for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 15:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Uploader removed information template and licence. I have restored them. Brianjd (talk) 15:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone uploaded it by mistake, I don't want my image on public portal Preethi chinnathambi (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Uploaded in 2019; uploader is not the subject of the image; uploader request. No valid reason for deletion. (If the uploader actually means that the subjects object to this image being public, perhaps delete as a courtesy.) Brianjd (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. No FOP in US. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well that sucks. I don't have anything to justify it. It is a "model" (which I guess is a "sculpture" in a broad sense) of a fictional character. U+1F360 (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:20, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Same object as in deleted file File:Celebration - Rey on her Speeder (17187464117).jpg.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture's copyright seems to be owned by e-hulhulia.com, not "freelyricsclub.com". MrClog (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image may be copyrighted by Letv corp. Larryasou (talk) 12:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size without EXIF, unlikely to be own work. Regasterios (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF: © Gary Tardiff Smooth O (talk) 12:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for this cropped version File:Seared Duck with haricot verts and blood orange couscous.jpg. --Smooth O (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marty01997 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mitch SN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:22, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 16:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in hong Kong for drawing and paintings. The photo represents a recent 2D graphical artwork, which is not free. Ruthven (msg) 16:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 09:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Необходимо актуализировать изображение Katygr (talk) 16:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Появление нового портрета - не повод удалять старый. "Актуализация" в википедиях - это туда, в википедии, а здесь сколько угодно фотографий могут храниться. // Upload of a different portrait is not a valid reason for deletion Retired electrician (talk) 23:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Эlcobbola talk 19:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by XenonX3 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This is not Gertraud Gruber (who is 99 and pictured here) but someone from the Gertraud Gruber company's management (see here). The person is not notable and thus shouldn't be on Commons. XenonX3 (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Converted by me to regular DR just for formal reasons, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. However, the nominator's rationale is valid and image should be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with: File:Gertraud Gruber (cropped).JPG


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:14, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Rots61 (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:14, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing, unlikely to be own work. Regasterios (talk) 13:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing original author, date, permission. --P 1 9 9   03:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is the same as the one on this album cover. An OTRS ticket is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by IDÉ agency (see watermark bottom right, i.e. not own work) Gyrostat (talk) 13:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imae credit indicates this is not a free photo Ytoyoda (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your response.
The image is my own and uploaded by myself personally, I am the sister of the subject.
I'm not sure what how to tag it correctly but this is case.
Anything I need to do please let me know — Preceding unsigned comment added by Global247 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You can follow the steps described at COM:OTRS and submit a copyright statement and some way to show that you and "Leslie OA Photography" are the same person, and it may be helpful to upload the original high-res photo with the EXIF data, instead of the current low-res version. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if OTRS ticket is ever received. --P 1 9 9   03:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beatnbass (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without adequate EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found online published before upload date here. --P 1 9 9   03:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and taken from FB. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user blocked, is it true this lady agrees to this picture ? Sammyday (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is my and my friends school project, where we translate old document about Lahošť village and make analyse about its development. I think it will be useful for future research of other people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmantisCZ (talk • contribs) 12:18, 30 April 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GeoffGlem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are logos of a UK company, and are likely to be above TOO for UK, hence copyvio here.

~~ Alex Noble - talk 15:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 16:19, 14 October 2020, by Túrelio. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GeoffGlem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work - several have no metadata, ones left have metadata of several different cameras.

~~ Alex Noble - talk 15:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - The ones with "Google" in the metadata would appear to be theres however the camaeras listed are: Sony DSLR-A100, Panasonic DMC-ZS3 and NIKON D3000 ..... I personally don't believe they own 3 cameras (why would you?), The Google metadata ones appears to be theres but that's a guess, Delete the lot. –Davey2010Talk 16:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Nightfury. --P 1 9 9   02:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works by Mogilewski

[edit]

Modern artist Mogilewski was died at 2020. No permissions. --Lesless (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:57, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://mapio.net/pic/p-18734206/ Py4nf (talk) 16:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this image thinking it would fall under the same criteria for public domain as File:Vacation Days by Edward Mason Eggleston.jpg. However, I now believe it is the original painting for that print, modified to create a new image. I can’t find any evidence the new image was registered for copyright or published. If I understand rightly, it would be considered a newly created, work, created (by the painted modification) after 1930. Jacqke (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://correiodeminas.com.br/congonhas-recebe-r25-milhoes-para-restauracao-da-romaria-e-construcao-de-teatro/ Py4nf (talk) 17:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:54, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of two images Yinweiaiqing (talk) 02:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably unfree source — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: promotional photo or DW. --P 1 9 9   03:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, missing EXIF — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found online. --P 1 9 9   03:49, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Atylotus (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution file without metadata, unlikely to be own work // 176.59.47.225 08:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-notable person, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution file without metadata, unlikely to be own work // 176.59.47.225 08:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, found online. --P 1 9 9   03:39, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution file without metadata, unlikely to be own work // 176.59.47.225 08:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found online published prior to upload here. --P 1 9 9   03:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone uploaded it by mistake, I don't want my image on public portal Preethi chinnathambi (talk) 08:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Uploaded in 2019; uploader request. No valid reason for deletion was given, but the image might be out of scope anyway. Uploader removed information template, licence notice and the rest of the file’s description; I have restored them as they were. If this file is kept, the description should be edited. Brianjd (talk) 15:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   03:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission to upload the photos from tadviser.ru — all images are copyrighted (Все права защищены и охраняются законом. © 2005-2020). ru: А, кстати, раз это фотография офиса в Москве - в чём проблема сделать собственную фотографию (даже, м.б., снятую на смартфон) и выложить сюда, без нарушенияя авторских прав?.. Brateevsky {talk} 09:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mentatus (talk · contribs)

[edit]
  • The files are images of Romanian law enforcement from websites of Romanian police and Gendarmerie, and the uploader claimed that they are free because

    See also en:Image:Image_DEFILARE_CAI.jpg: "Taken from the website of the Romanian Gendarmerie; on the website there is no specific information on the copyright. I assume that it is the same as in the case of all the pictures obtained from the web-sites of the Romanian institutions: may be used if the source is cited.

廣九直通車 (talk) 09:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nur die Verknüpfung (!) - Ist ein falsches Kürzel Gunnar (💬) 16:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JamesOnGod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from vehicles art.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web (e.g. [6]) and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 18:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from billboard. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The billboard was put up by the city of Pula, as can be seen in the upper right corner. Derivative works does not apply because there is no copyright. --Tuvixer (talk) 17:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Correct me if I am wrong but: Freedom of panorama, it is a photo of some billboard in Pula, Croatia and not a scan of it. This is also used in many articles, why should this be deleted?! --Koreanovsky (talk) 19:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Billboard is not permanent display as required by freedom of panorama in Croatia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken by Arecibo Observatory. It cannot be an own work of User:JosOntiveros1. The License is wrong and does not attest correctly the copyright holder. Harlock81 (talk) 16:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Appears to be {{PD-USGov-NASA}} per NASA. --Эlcobbola talk 18:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Este logo es una imagen que ya no se utiliza en el Programa Con Vos en la Web, perteneciente al Sistema Argentino de Información Jurídica. Tiopappo~commonswiki (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Tiopappo~commonswiki: :
Español: Nominación incorrecta. En realidad, quien procedió erróneamente fuiste vos, al sobreescribir un logo con otro totalmente diferente. (de acuerdo a Commons:Overwriting existing files). Lo que debiste haber hecho, fue subir el logo nuevo separadamente, como un nuevo archivo.
English: Wrong nomination. Indeed, it was you who acted wrongly, when overwriting the logo with a completely different one. What you should have done was to upload it separately, as a new file.
Fma12 (talk) 13:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image is COM:INUSE and thus cannot be deleted merely because it "is no longer used in the Con Vos en la Web Program". Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. --Эlcobbola talk 18:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor in Switzerland Bigbossfarin (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Whatever the FoP circumstance, this appeared here without a free license prior to Commons upload and thus requires COM:OTRS evidence of permission. --Эlcobbola talk 18:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor in Switzerland Bigbossfarin (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Whatever the FoP circumstance, this appeared here without a free license prior to Commons upload and thus requires COM:OTRS evidence of permission. --Эlcobbola talk 18:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, may be above the threshold of originality in India. COM:TOO India is not especially helpful. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Eatcha. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fdavidtolla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Eight photos from one user with four types of machines. Unlikely to be own works.

Regasterios (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: At least several are from here. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mug shots do not qualify for {{PD-RU-exempt}} as they do not fit into any the carefully enumerated classes of documents listed there. While the image may be PD in Russia, it is certainly under copyright in the USA due to the URAA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no proof of that. The file description shows the source as
"газета "Завтра", январь 2001 г."
(The newspaper "Tomorrow", January 2001) (Google translation)

Since that is the first publication for which we have knowledge, we know only that the image will be PD in Russia on 1/1/2072. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (mug shots) .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There the decision is made, the file is keep. Kolchak1923 (talk) 11:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Jim. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Este no es el verdadero escudo de Benimantell. Para comprobarlo les dirijo a la página web oficial del municipio https://www.benimantell.es/es/historia. Muchas gracias. 81.42.248.6 11:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Seems to be heraldically correct according to the provided link. Kathisma (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement RSVartanian (talk) 12:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maximumspatium (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those files are actually previews of their much bigger SVG/KiCAD counterpart, see https://project5474.org/index.php?title=7400_NS_443

Using those files, users can immediately see the annotated die as well as the schematic without the need to install huge (7GB!) KiCAD package.

I'd like to link the corresponding Project5474 site but I couldn't find how to do that.

I therefore want to ask you to reconsider this deletion request.

I'm prepared to improve the metadata if needed.

Thank you in advance! Max Poliakovski (Maximumspatium), the creator of the linked pictures — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximumspatium (talk • contribs) 14:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Useful diagrams. I have provided proper categorization. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei bereits bearbeitet Nina Eger (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DoktorJaner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads are claimed as own work, yet this is unlikely.

  1. Already caught once Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alte Universitaet 01.jpg
  2. File:Башни на старом мосту Гейдельберга.jpg uploaded June 2016, yet Tineye first found this in January 2014.
  3. File:229832 original (1).jpg uncropped version found elsewhere found via Google search, also filename
  4. File:Гейдельберг в 1906.jpg so they took a photo in 1906? Sure… likely public domain copied from elsewhere.
  5. More suspicious unique file names, File:S9PL79pTYa4 (1).jpg, File:3799965 orig.jpg, File:Colourbox3125466.jpg
  6. Very few uploads have any meta data, the few that do, even less show match each other

Of their uploads, only three with matching meta data are likely true own works, so these are not nominated. The 1906 work is likely in public domain, so this is also excluded.

BevinKacon (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]