Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
![5 File:Jessica "REMO" Saul full body shot.jpg](#File:Jessica_"REMO"_Saul_full_body_shot.jpg){kind=link}
![6 File:Jessica "REMO" Saul.jpg](#File:Jessica_"REMO"_Saul.jpg){kind=link}
,_Karl_A._Romstorfer,_Suceava_2018.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Athletic_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
._(13580550694).jpg){kind=link}
._(13911136631).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Manga cover and two versions of anime poster - not a free content.
- File:«Домашний питомец, иногда сидящий на моей голове».jpg
- File:"Домашний питомец, иногда сидящий на моей голове".jpg
- File:Домашний питомец, иногда сидящий на моей голове.jpg
Tatewaki (talk) 00:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 05:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Watermarked image, likely copyvio Cohaf (talk) 04:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom and because it contained a spam link to a webpage. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Spam links to webpages, probable copyvios.
- File:40BFi.jpg
- File:Aileen Dish Drainer - Green.jpg
- File:Aileen Dish Drainer - Green01.jpg
- File:GarotalINDIA12.jpg
- File:Us fx trading.jpg
- File:R149 Freedom.jpg
- File:TheWheelsOfTime.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- DeletePer nom.--Cohaf (talk) 04:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete Only about half have the irrelevant links, but the bizarre categorization would be hard to describe as anything but spammy; certainly enough to cast doubt on the provenance IMO.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 05:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
With a watermark, likely copyvio Cohaf (talk) 04:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and because it contained a spam link to a webpage. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)Hector Caminero HTCSTUDIOS INC., missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
![10:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/03/25#c-Patrick_Rogel-2019-03-25T10:22:00.000Z-File:Jessica_"REMO"_Saul_full_body_shot.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
![12:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/03/25#c-Gbawden-2019-03-25T12:03:00.000Z-File:Jessica_"REMO"_Saul_full_body_shot.jpg){kind=link}
(c)Hector Caminero HTCSTUDIOS INC., missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
![10:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/03/25#c-Patrick_Rogel-2019-03-25T10:22:00.000Z-File:Jessica_"REMO"_Saul.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
![12:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/03/25#c-Gbawden-2019-03-25T12:03:00.000Z-File:Jessica_"REMO"_Saul.jpg){kind=link}
Non free music album cover Supertoff (talk) 05:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:08, 25 März 2019 UTC: Non free music album cover --Krdbot 14:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danielfaixapreta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Please delete this image. I have uploaded the wrong image. Ovruni (talk) 02:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 16:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright image - Not free use X201 (talk) 12:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Image - Not free use X201 (talk) 12:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images with missing EXIF informations on Flickr. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, copied from: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2024290274254212&set=pb.100000197780960.-2207520000.1553348388.&type=3& გიო ოქრო (talk) 07:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 20:19, 25 März 2019 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 01:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
,_Karl_A._Romstorfer,_Suceava_2018.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Karl_A._Romstorfer,_Suceava_2018.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong account, delete pls 2804 (talk) 17:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 18:47, 25 März 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Not "Own work". Book cover art is owned by the publisher and not freely licensed. --Krdbot 01:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized picture of the subject XxLouisxX (talk) 18:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:37, 26 März 2019 UTC: I need to delete this file that I posted 3 weeks ago very quickly because the subject of the picture considere it as a violation of his rights (he didn't give his agreement for the publication) --Krdbot 13:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized picture of the subject XxLouisxX (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:38, 26 März 2019 UTC: I need to delete this file that I posted 3 weeks ago very quickly because the subject of the picture considere it as a violation of his rights (he didn't give his agreement for the publication) --Krdbot 13:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
I dont want it on wikimedia commons Faridaewida (talk) 12:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:25, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
copyvio from https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/826635708685094912/iCzOQYAf_400x400.jpg WWGB (talk) 23:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:09, 26 März 2019 UTC: Previously deleted file File:ICzOQYAf 400x400.jpg --Krdbot 02:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Template created by LTA, no indication that it is reliable. As far as I can see no trusted member of our community with knowledge of RU has ever confirmed the validity of this template. Jcb (talk) 21:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. The mil.ru website clearly states at the bottom of every single page "© Все материалы интернет-портала Минобороны России доступны по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0". Which means, if you don't understand Russian "© All materials on the Internet portal of the Ministry of Defense of Russia are under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license", which is Template:Cc-by-4.0. We have lots of templates for individual websites that release their stuff under the same licence, see Category:Custom CC license tags. Just because an editor with a bad record created the english version of the template does not magically revoke the license chosen by the Russian government.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- And I'm willing to bet that admins @JuTa: , @Yann: , and @JuTa: will also see no valid reason to delete the template.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In the meantime, several trusted users who are RU native have confirmed that this template is fine, see here. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Tagged as no source wrongfully by Jcb. BevinKacon Source is present, and creative commons license is on the bottom of the page and applicable to images. Abzeronow (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: File was not tagged by me as you can see in the history. Whether or not it was 'wrongful', I doubt it. The license template it relies on was created by a LTA who has done a huge amount of damage to Commons over a period of several years. I don't trust anything from this person. Jcb (talk) 22:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- OK, corrected my mistake, Jcb. Perhaps a discussion about the validity of the licensing template should be in order instead of speedy deleting a file that was uploaded by a good faith user relying on a Creative Commons license on a Russian page. Abzeronow (talk) 22:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: The Mil.ru and creative commons templates are completely legit as their website clearly states "© Все материалы интернет-портала Минобороны России доступны по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0". The fact that a bed editor made the mil.ru template does not magically revoke the license chosen by the Russian government. The only mistake here is an agressive admin rushing to delete a photo released under a compatible license simply because they don't want to acknowledge a previous mistake.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- OK, corrected my mistake, Jcb. Perhaps a discussion about the validity of the licensing template should be in order instead of speedy deleting a file that was uploaded by a good faith user relying on a Creative Commons license on a Russian page. Abzeronow (talk) 22:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. The Russian Ministry of Defense releases photos that belong to them under such license, and there is no reason to think that this photo of soldiers taken during WWII is not their property that they are legally releasing as stated on their website. The website mil.ru clearly states "© Все материалы интернет-портала Минобороны России доступны по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0". Even if the user who made the template is not a good editor, it does not magically revoke the fact that the Russian government literally says that everything on that website is under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license unless otherwise noted. The mil.ru template should be kept because it simplifies the process of adding photos from a source that provides photos under a free license.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License is OK: [1]. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=344151155#File:Bershanskaya,_Gelman,_and_Smirnova.png){kind=link}
Tagged as no source. That's wrong as source is there and there's no evidence that the Russian Ministry of Defence is license laundering. Abzeronow (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. The Russian ministry of Defense releases photos that belong to them under such license, and there is no reason to think that this photo of soldiers taken during WWII is not their property.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License is OK: [2]. --Yann (talk) 09:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Tagged as no source wrongfully. Russian Ministry of Defence source is there and there's no evidence of license laundering. Abzeronow (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep. The Russian Ministry of Defense releases photos that belong to them under a free license, and there is no reason to think that this photo of soldiers taken during WWII is not their property that they are legally releasing as stated on their website.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License is OK: [3]. --Yann (talk) 09:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Himanshusingh9641 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Himanshusingh9641 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Source: https://vbzonline.ch/content/uploads/2018/04/Flexity_Seitenansicht.jpg – obviously not in Public Domain or with CC license Albinfo (talk) 16:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
à la demande de son probable up-loadeur sur la page de discussion de fr.wiki qui explique qu'il n'en détiendrait pas vraiment les droits... Pªɖaw@ne 08:56, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
wrong file Bertassin (talk) 10:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 19:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:2019-01-29 18 08 10 Peanut M&M's in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 01:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Poorly focused duplicate of File:2019-01-29 14 06 22 A Boston cream doughnut in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 01:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:2019-01-31 21 27 39 A cup of Chobani Greek Yogurt with Blueberry on the Bottom after being mixed in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 02:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Blurry duplicate of File:2019-01-31 21 30 38 A cup of Chobani Greek Yogurt with Strawberry on the Bottom before being mixed in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 02:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:2019-01-31 21 30 38 A cup of Chobani Greek Yogurt with Strawberry on the Bottom before being mixed in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 02:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:2019-01-31 21 31 06 A cup of Chobani Greek Yogurt with Strawberry on the Bottom after being mixed in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 02:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ℯxplicit 07:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ℯxplicit 07:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
out of com:scope Wvdp (talk) 08:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, unlikely to be own work. The photo was taken at http://www.mstar.com.my/foto/2017/01/24/sekitar-di-malam-ajl31 Fandi89 (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete There was a watermark on the picture, indicates it is copyrighted and not under a free license.-Fandi89 (talk) 15:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Eric Devillet, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Touchmytownecom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete ads.--Roy17 (talk) 05:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Hector Caminero HTCSTUDIOS INC., missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Hector Caminero HTCSTUDIOS INC., missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c) Stephanie Berger, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c) Fischuk Yevgen Fischuk.com, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Corrupted upload Spacedout apollo (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)MPI-BGC Jena, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
© 2016 BELIN STUDIO Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Did not find any statement that the file was released under the cc-zero license. And source website isn't government website. So can't use GWOIA. Catherine Laurence 14:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catherine Laurence (talk • contribs) 14:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
|
File:Google Keep icon.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/25 → File:Google Keep icon.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG. |
.svg){kind=icon} |
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NapelaxCuore (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Lindsey Berg owns the volleyball court.jpg
- File:Lindsey Berg wearing shirt Truth..jpg
- File:Lindsey Berg walking across volleyball court.jpg
- File:Volleybal Olympian Medalist Lindsey Berg.png
- File:USA Olympian Lindsey Berg.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 16:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
This is a "pre-upload", please delete so it can be re-added to commons when copyright expires. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Pre-upload, ready for undeletion in 2058 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
this map is taken from Google. I don't think this is allowed. ProfessorX (talk) 20:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
© 2018 Ed Ritger. All Rights Reserved, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
© 2018 Ed Ritger. All Rights Reserved, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c) Adrien-Liss/Fabrizio-Francone, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
© 2019 | Deputado Estadual Gustavo Gouveia, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Pasha Erlykov, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c) GEPA pictures/ Mathias Mandl, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Cheryl George Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Cheryl George Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
copyvio from https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/10485360-1x1-340x340.jpg WWGB (talk) 23:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Seraina Cavigelli, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be your own work; likely stolen from websites like http://mydigitaldefense.com/wedding-border-clipart/wedding-border-clipart-fabulous-8-best-of-spring-bridal-shower-clip-art-bridal/ or other ones where this is hosted? Malyacko (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
“FBMD” in EXIF means Facebook download, needs evidence of permissions Ytoyoda (talk) 03:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where I've speedily deleted the subject's sandbox as a misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 07:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Seems out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
en:Filmiplex was speedily deleted due to advertizing. Its logo is out of project scope. In addition, complex logos need OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rushaan khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal images
- File:Творческий.jpg
- File:Прогулка по окрестностям.jpg
- File:Dj krilf officials BrhpLXUFr9w.jpg
- File:Dj krilf officials BotppljBd0g.jpg
- File:Dj krilf officials Br71PnlFjJv.jpg
- File:Dj krilf officials Bnx0a fh 8I.jpg
- File:DJ KRILF Ukraine.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NEYAJ SAMI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mrunalgoswami (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal images
- File:Mrunalg.jpg
- File:Mrunalatpalitana.jpg
- File:Mrunal.jpg
- File:Mrunal@Salanpur Temple.jpg
- File:At airport.jpg
- File:Mrunal with President of Seychelles.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Uncertain copyright, very poor quality, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
This looks like TV screenshot. Yann (talk) 11:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reke Miller
[edit]Out of COM:PS. Also COM:HOST & COM:ADVERT.
- File:Reke miller mx.jpg
- File:Francisco Obregon Mota (Reke Miller).jpg
- File:Charles Ans & Reke miller.jpg
- File:Gordo Fu y Reke Miller .jpg
- File:ARIANA PUELLO Y REKE MILLER .jpg
- File:SANTA RM & REKE MILLER .jpg
- File:Reke Miller & Baker.jpg
- File:LA ex Crew de reke miller.jpg
- File:Reke Miller Y Mozart Agraz.jpg
- File:Reke dando show .jpg
- File:Reke Miller Dando show .jpg
- File:Niña dioz & Reke Miller.jpg
- File:Niña Dioz con Reke Miller.jpg
- File:Reke miller nuevo mixtape One millon .jpg
- File:Reke miller Ecatepec .jpg
- File:Niña Dioz Y Reke miller .jpg
- File:Reke miller.jpg
- File:Rekee.jpg
- File:Delymx.jpg
- File:Reke .jpg
- File:Reke Miller .jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—MarcoAurelio 12:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felipe castell (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 00:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
NBA Nike uniforms
[edit]- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ATL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ATL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ATL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ATL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ATL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ATL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ATL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ATL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ATL_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ATL_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_BOS_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_BOS_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_BOS_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_BOS_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_BOS_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_BOS_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_BOS_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_BOS_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_BRK_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_BRK_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_BRK_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_BRK_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_BRK_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_BRK_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_BRK_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_BRK_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHO_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHO_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHO_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHO_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHO_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHO_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHO_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHO_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHO_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHO_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHI_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHI_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHI_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHI_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHI_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHI_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CHI_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CHI_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CLE_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CLE_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CLE_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CLE_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CLE_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CLE_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_CLE_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_CLE_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DAL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DAL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DAL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DAL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DAL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DAL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DAL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DAL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DEN_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DEN_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DEN_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DEN_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DEN_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DEN_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DEN_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DEN_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DET_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DET_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DET_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DET_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DET_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DET_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_DET_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_DET_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_GSW_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_GSW_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_GSW_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_GSW_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_GSW_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_GSW_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_GSW_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_GSW_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_GSW_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_GSW_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_HOU_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_HOU_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_HOU_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_HOU_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_HOU_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_HOU_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_HOU_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_HOU_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_IND_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_IND_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_IND_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_IND_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_IND_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_IND_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_IND_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_IND_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_IND_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_IND_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAC_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAC_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAC_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAC_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAC_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAC_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAC_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAC_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_LAL_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_LAL_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MEM_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MEM_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MEM_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MEM_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MEM_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MEM_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MEM_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MEM_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIA_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIA_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIA_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIA_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIA_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIA_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIA_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIA_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIA_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIA_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIL_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIL_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIN_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIN_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIN_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIN_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIN_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIN_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_MIN_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_MIN_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_NOP_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_NOP_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_NOP_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_NOP_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_NOP_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_NOP_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_NOP_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_NOP_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_NYK_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_NYK_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_NYK_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_NYK_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_NYK_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_NYK_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_NYK_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_NYK_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_OKC_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_OKC_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_OKC_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_OKC_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_OKC_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_OKC_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_OKC_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_OKC_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ORL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ORL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ORL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ORL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ORL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ORL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_ORL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_ORL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHI_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHI_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHI_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHI_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHI_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHI_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHI_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHI_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHO_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHO_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHO_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHO_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHO_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHO_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHO_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHO_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_PHO_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_PHO_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_POR_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_POR_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_POR_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_POR_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_POR_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_POR_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_POR_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_POR_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_SAC_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_SAC_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_SAC_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_SAC_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_SAC_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_SAC_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_SAC_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_SAC_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_SAS_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_SAS_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_SAS_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_SAS_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_SAS_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_SAS_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_SAS_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_SAS_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_TOR_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_TOR_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_TOR_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_TOR_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_TOR_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_TOR_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_TOR_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_TOR_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_UTA_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_UTA_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_UTA_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_UTA_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_UTA_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_UTA_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_UTA_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_UTA_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_WAS_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_WAS_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_WAS_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_WAS_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_WAS_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_WAS_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2017-18_WAS_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2017-18_WAS_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ATL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ATL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ATL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ATL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ATL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ATL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ATL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ATL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ATL_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ATL_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BOS_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BOS_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BOS_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BOS_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BOS_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BOS_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BOS_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BOS_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BOS_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BOS_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BRK_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BRK_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BRK_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BRK_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BRK_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BRK_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_BRK_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_BRK_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHO_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHO_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHO_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHO_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHO_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHO_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHO_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHO_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHO_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHO_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHI_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHI_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHI_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHI_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHI_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHI_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CHI_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CHI_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CLE_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CLE_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CLE_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CLE_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CLE_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CLE_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CLE_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CLE_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_CLE_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_CLE_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DAL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DAL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DAL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DAL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DAL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DAL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DAL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DAL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DEN_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DEN_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DEN_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DEN_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DEN_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DEN_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DEN_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DEN_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DET_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DET_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DET_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DET_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DET_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DET_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_DET_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_DET_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_GSW_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_GSW_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_GSW_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_GSW_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_GSW_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_GSW_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_GSW_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_GSW_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_GSW_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_GSW_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_GSW_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_GSW_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_HOU_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_HOU_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_HOU_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_HOU_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_HOU_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_HOU_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_HOU_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_HOU_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_HOU_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_HOU_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_IND_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_IND_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_IND_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_IND_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_IND_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_IND_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_IND_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_IND_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_IND_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_IND_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_IND_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_IND_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_LAC_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_LAC_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_LAC_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_LAC_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_LAC_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_LAC_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_LAC_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_LAC_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_LAL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_LAL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_LAL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_LAL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_LAL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_LAL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_LAL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_LAL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MEM_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MEM_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MEM_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MEM_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MEM_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MEM_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MEM_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MEM_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIA_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIA_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIA_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIA_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIA_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIA_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIA_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIA_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIA_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIA_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIL_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIL_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIN_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIN_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIN_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIN_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIN_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIN_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIN_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIN_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIN_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIN_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_MIN_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_MIN_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NOP_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NOP_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NOP_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NOP_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NOP_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NOP_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NOP_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NOP_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NOP_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NOP_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NYK_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NYK_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NYK_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NYK_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NYK_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NYK_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_NYK_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_NYK_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_OKC_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_OKC_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_OKC_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_OKC_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_OKC_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_OKC_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_OKC_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_OKC_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_OKC_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_OKC_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ORL_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ORL_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ORL_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ORL_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ORL_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ORL_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ORL_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ORL_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_ORL_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_ORL_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHI_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHI_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHI_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHI_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHI_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHI_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHI_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHI_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHI_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHI_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHO_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHO_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHO_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHO_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHO_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHO_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_PHO_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_PHO_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_POR_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_POR_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_POR_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_POR_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_POR_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_POR_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_POR_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_POR_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_POR_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_POR_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAC_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAC_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAC_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAC_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAC_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAC_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAC_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAC_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAS_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAS_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAS_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAS_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAS_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAS_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAS_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAS_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_SAS_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_SAS_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_TOR_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_TOR_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_TOR_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_TOR_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_TOR_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_TOR_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_TOR_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_TOR_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_TOR_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_TOR_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_UTA_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_UTA_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_UTA_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_UTA_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_UTA_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_UTA_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_UTA_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_UTA_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_UTA_classic.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_UTA_classic.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_UTA_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_UTA_earned.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_WAS_association.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_WAS_association.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_WAS_icon.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_WAS_icon.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_WAS_statement.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_WAS_statement.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_WAS_city.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_WAS_city.png
- File:Kit_body_2018-19_WAS_earned.png
- File:Kit_shorts_2018-19_WAS_earned.png
As the author of all of these files, I believe they should be deleted because they are scaled-down images of every NBA jersey made in 2017 and 2018. All of these files are above the threshold of originality, so they are copyright violations. Furthermore, most of the files aren't used in any page besides 2017–18 NBA Nike uniforms and 2018–19 NBA Nike uniforms, and it would be better to upload them on the English Wikipedia instead, like the MLB and NHL uniforms. A similar file was deleted for the same reason. (See File:Kit body raptors1995.png) I won't put {{Delete}} on all 542 of the files I uploaded because that's going to take too long. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I checked several dozens of them randomly and none of them was eligible for copyright. Also all of the files I checked are currently in use in Wikipedia articles. I see no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nitish Raj 7519 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Nitish Jee.jpg
- File:Nitish jee.jpg
- File:Nitish love Sita jee.jpg
- File:Deepak Dildar.jpg
- File:Nitish love Sita.jpg
- File:Nitish Raj love sita.jpg
- File:Nitish Raj 75190.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nitish Raj 7519 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos, commons is not a photo album
- File:Nitish.jpg
- File:Salman khan.jpg
- File:Nitish Raj 7519jpg.jpg
- File:Nitish Jee.jpg
- File:Nitish jee.jpg
- File:Nitish love Sita jee.jpg
- File:Deepak Dildar.jpg
- File:Nitish love Sita.jpg
- File:Nitish Raj love sita.jpg
- File:Nitish Raj 7519 .jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Магда Григорьевна Ростомян (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs and promo/historical photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:В-метро.ogg
- File:Зачем.ogg
- File:7.-Ханра-хонь.ogg
- File:Только-свет.ogg
- File:Portret.ogg
- File:Zvezdy.ogg
- File:Магда. Концерт в "Альма-Матер".jpg
- File:Магда. Концерт в Москве.jpg
- File:Магда. Концерт в Brooklin Hall.jpg
- File:Магда. Презентация альбома.jpg
- File:Магда. Фотосессия.jpg
- File:Магда - съемка клипа.jpg
- File:Магда Ростомян.jpg
- File:Магда Ростомян - Детство.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Low quality NMW03 (talk) 12:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Falls Du Anonymer nur unwiederbringliche historisch wichtige Bilder zerstören willst, bist Du nicht gern gesehen in der weltweiten Wikipedia. Das fragliche Bild wird in sehr viel Sprachversionen genutzt und darf nicht gelöscht werden! Kannst Du ein besseres besorgen? --GFHund (talk) 13:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- This is the only picture of her that exists on Commons. So who cares about low quality? A strong
Keep! --Gereon K. (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- This is the only picture of her that exists on Commons. So who cares about low quality? A strong
- Keep: The file is in use on multiple Wikipedias, from ca:lisa Galliamova to zh:阿莉莎·加里亚莫娃. As COM:INUSE says: Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough. --bjh21 (talk) 16:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Low quality but widely used. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:59, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tbhotch as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The Agency logo is the property of the EEA and is registered with WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organisation). It may be reproduced by media for journalistic purposes, but all other usages needs the Agency’s prior consent. The logo may not be cropped or amended in any other way than what is detailed in the EEA’s corporate identity manual. Downloadable logos in various formats and languages are found on this page.[4]
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- Isn't {{PD-textlogo}} enough like for Category:Logos of agencies of the European Union and Category:PD_ineligible in general? The RedBurn (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- @The RedBurn: , as a Danish organization I doubt the American TOO can be applied, mainly because COM:TOO Denmark is strange. Tbhotch™ 00:17, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - it is not at all obvious that this is simple enough to be exempted from protection. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Is this covered by FoP? E4024 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyvio; user's other upload was probable copyvio Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Exterior_of_Adare_Manor.jpg of a shot by Jack Hardy (professional hotel photog) and since Hardy took some aerial photos of the Manor, it seems likely this is one of them rather than "sarahkeary", a shill for the hotel, going up in a second helicopter and taking a photo of her own... Pinkbeast (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyvio - as with user's other uploads, appears to have been ripped off from a professional photoshoot of the hotel (photog may have licensed the images to the hotel, even given permission for CC upload - but it's not the hotel shill's "own work") Pinkbeast (talk) 01:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Non-free logo, no permision from copywrite holder ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
“FBMD” in EXIF indicates this was taken from Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 03:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot of a copyrighted webpage. Sreejith K (talk) 04:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
This is a copyright violation. The artwork (Skulpture of the smal house) is by a living artist (Erwin Wurm) in a Museum. The original Flickr-Photograph had no rights to publish it Rosecliff (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
copyvio until 2039, artist (Wittenstein) died in 1968 Magnus (talk) 07:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining uploaded photo. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
I accidentally selected a blurry shot instead of the clearer one I intended to upload (this was my first upload); I'd like to upload a new file and give it the same name. Thorndonite (talk) 10:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Screencap from this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5dN59k78sw at 0:41 as well as appear on other websites, likely copyrighted Vauxford (talk) 11:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
McDonald clown is under a copyright. Unused personal image, except in a self-promo page, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Article from a 1954 magazine from Havana , Cuba about Angel D'Meza former Baseball Player of the Cuban League- 2013-10-16 11-12.jpg
[edit]
Not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 11:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works.
- File:Elena Sever .jpg
- File:Елена Север в пиджаке 2.jpg
- File:Елена Север в пиджаке.jpg
- File:Елена Север в Дубаи.jpg
- File:Елена Север и Алексей Воробьев.jpg
- File:Елена Север и Стас Михайлов.jpg
- File:Елена Север в рубашке.jpg
- File:Елена Север, Стас Михайлов.jpg
- File:Елена Север в Зарядье.jpg
- File:Елена Север в Кремле.jpg
- File:Елена Север на сцене.jpg
- File:Елена Север (певица).jpg
- File:Елена Север на кинофестивале "Золотой Орел".jpg
- File:Елена Север на премии Bravo 2018.jpg
- File:Елена Север на премии BraVo.jpg
- File:Елена Север.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: EXIFs do not match. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OldShowPhoto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad quality screenshots of copyrighted TV broadcats, as shown by random resolutions and perfect camera positions.
- File:Britney Spears - Don't Let Me Be The Last To Know (México City).jpg
- File:Britney Spears - Born (Mexico, City) 2002.png
- File:Britney Spears - Oops (Mexico, City) 2002.jpg
- File:Britney Spears - I Love Rock N' Roll (Mexico City) 2002.jpg
- File:Britney Spears - Anticipating (Mexico City).jpg
- File:Britney Spears - Overprotected (Mexico City) 2002.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2002.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BevinKacon (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low resolution selfie \ PR type photo, unlikely users own work. BevinKacon (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Scanned from a book or a journal, own work is improbable, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 21:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pierre marquès fernandez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not an art gallery, nor a self promoting place for artists
Pippobuono (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Scanned from a book or a journal, own work is improbable, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
_Athletic_Logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Athletic_Logo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio to listed website John from Idegon (talk) 21:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
_Athletic_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
_Athletic_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
Similar to https://www.vinnitsa.info/news/mis-vinnitsya-2017-vidgulyala-vesillya-foto.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AchimBuehl (talk · contribs)
[edit]Stills from an unfree video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rSh1w4P5gU
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
this file should stay. I'm using it for a page I just made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aloftus2 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
© 2019 GitHub, Inc. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
not own work -- НоуФрост (talk) 19:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
not own work -- НоуФрост (talk) 19:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
not own work -- НоуФрост (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
not own work -- НоуФрост (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
This is a Screenshot of a copyrighter video game, and as such we need additional permission from the copyright holder for it to be published under a free license. Jean-Fred (talk) 19:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Itsbilalmasri (talk · contribs)
[edit]All uploads claimed as own work, but File:Maguy Bou Ghosn performing on Celebrity Duets.jpg and File:Maguy Bou Ghosn in SEB Launching.jpg are watermarked. No uploads have any meta data they are low & different resolutios.
- File:Maguy Bou Ghosn in SEB Launching.jpg
- File:Maguy Bou Ghosn in Dubai Film Festival 2011.jpg
- File:Britney Spears performing Up n' Down in Abu Dhabi.jpg
- File:Britney Spears Performing TTWE.jpg
- File:Maguy Bou Ghosn on Auberge set.jpg
- File:Maguy Bou Ghosn performing on Celebrity Duets.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Hong Kong
[edit]Wax figures are copyrighted per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#3D_art_(sculptures_etc.).
- File:Aaron Kwok in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Adolf Hitler in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Albert Einstein in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Andy Lau at Madame Tussaud's Hong Kong - Flickr - skinnylawyer.jpg
- File:Andy Lau in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Audrey Hepburn in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Bae Yong Joon in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Beatles in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Bruce Lee (Madame Tussauds).JPG
- File:Bruce Lee in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:BruceLeeThePeakHongkong.jpg
- File:Cristiano Ronaldo in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:David Beckham in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Deng Xiaoping at Madame Tussaud's Hong Kong - Flickr - skinnylawyer.jpg
- File:Deng Xiaoping in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Diana in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Gem Tang in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:HK Victoria Peak Tower 香港杜莎夫人蠟像館 Madame Tussauds Hong Kong May-2014 - Obama office (5).JPG
- File:HRH The Duke of Edinburgh in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Hu Jintao at Madame Tussaud's Hong Kong - Flickr - skinnylawyer.jpg
- File:Hu Jintao in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Janice Vidal in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:JaniceVidal image.jpg
- File:Jay Chou in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong01.jpg
- File:Joe Chen in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Jung Yun Ho and Shim Changmin in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Kelly Chen in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Kelly Chen photo in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Kim Soo Hyun in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Lady Gaga in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Lee Kuan Yew in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Lee Lai Shan in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Leo Ku in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Leo Ku.JPG
- File:Leon Lai in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Leslie Cheung at Madame Tussaud's Hong Kong - Flickr - skinnylawyer.jpg
- File:Leslie Cheung in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Liu Xiang in Madame Tussauds Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Madame Tussauds HK andylau.JPG
- File:Michelle Yang.JPG
- File:Michelle Yeoh at Madame Tussaud's Hong Kong - Flickr - skinnylawyer.jpg
- File:Yao Ming at Madame Tussaud's Hong Kong - Flickr - skinnylawyer.jpg
- File:Zhou Enlai at Madame Tussaud's Hong Kong - Flickr - skinnylawyer.jpg
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Wcam (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot from copyrighted image, likely not own work Vauxford (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
According to EXIF data, the copyright holder of the file is "Rein Skullerud". Missing permission and low resolution Jianhui67 T★C 18:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:50, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- also crop file:MaracayporCarlosx (cropped).jpg
- also crop file:MaracayporCarlosx2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No metadata, the uploader's only contribution, watermark "Liborio" bottom left corner. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per above and the uploader's history of other false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:02, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
sirin hamsho.jpg HanadiAslan (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Info: Seems to refer to already deleted File:Sirin Hamsho.jpg. --Achim (talk) 08:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion of a talk page. --Achim (talk) 08:13, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Biggdogguws (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal photos
- File:Ganggang.jpg
- File:17309838 10210556297321353 3812934235393208292 nbc.jpg
- File:17458298 689844407886857 3440245286682708603 nbc.jpg
- File:Biggdogguwsnyc.jpg
- File:18222087 1587480551270209 7218027119302386991 nbc.jpg
- File:17457893 1536739123011019 697615388743326265 nbc.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Picture of a copyrighted picture. FunkMonk (talk) 09:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I took the photo. What's wrong with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DinoDragon (talk • contribs) 12:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 11:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Shmagl 2014-06-23 01-23.jpg
- File:شميغل 2013-10-17 01-41.jpg
- File:الهلال 2013-10-17 01-40.jpg
- File:Shmagl 2013-10-17 01-39.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nphaoxiongdi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: what is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
._(13580550694).jpg){kind=link}
._(13580550694).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SELFIE Zenwort (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
._(13580550694).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
._(13580550694).jpg){kind=link}
._(13911136631).jpg){kind=link}
._(13911136631).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SELFIE Zenwort (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
._(13911136631).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:19, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
._(13911136631).jpg){kind=link}
No permission, Taken from a newspaper. Shxahxh (talk) 14:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Question Depicted person Shah Mahmud Khan died in 1959. If this photo was taken from an Afghan newspaper, isn't it likely that it is {{PD-Afghanistan}} as "a photograph, painting, or other audiovisual work originally published more than 50 years ago"? Then only the licensing template would need fixing. But the description doesn't mention the date of publication. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unless some proof is available to answer the question, COM:PRP for image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF -- all five other uploads by this new user are clear copyright violations . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Appreciate the concern, yes I am new here. Questions regarding your deletion request: What is meant with EXIF? What is small? Too small? And about the other 5, these business profile logos are uploaded on their behalf with explicit approval. I thought Id follow the right steps. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuukH87 (talk • contribs) 10:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
See my talk page, where the same questions were asked and answered. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not used image of an unknown person: Delete per COM:Scope. --E4024 (talk) 02:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)--E4024 (talk) 02:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
This wording is incompatible with a free license. If it cannot be changed, the images have to be deleted. See also the discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/03#Template:Summer Youth Olympic Games Buenos Aires 2018. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Keep Facing the fact, that this is currently controversly discussed on Commons:Village pump/Copyright, I think this DR is disruptive and an affront from Yann against me. Also this is my personal userspace, and that's why there is in my opinion no right for such a DR. --Stepro (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- The wording is incompatible. The restrictions are part of a contract between the UEFA and the accredited photographer though, not Commons or anyone else. If the photographer is putting them up here with a free license, they could be violating that agreement -- that is up to them to know, and them to risk. The only issue is if they are trying to use their copyright to enforce the "editorial only" clause on the original contract -- that would make it non-free, and be at odds with the license as given. If anyone else uses the photo in a way which violates the UEFA agreement with the photographer, I believe that is the photographer's problem -- but if they are relying on this license template to keep everyone else in line with the UEFA contract though, I think that is indeed a problem as it would make them non-free. I suppose the photographer could request that any usage be in line with the contract, but if they require it, then I thin it is indeed non-free. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Info I repeated it so many times, that I translated the first passage of User:Stepro/Missverständnisse into English language. Understand it or not. --Stepro (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- If it is just personality rights or trademark rights, there is no problem. The only issue would be if you are using your copyright to enforce the terms of the UEFA photographer contract. The template says "accreditation rules contain the obligation to point out that works from officially accredited photographers may only be used for editorial online publications". If someone else uses it in a commercial, non-editorial, non-online way, would you consider them as violating the license as given? That third user has not signed a contract with UEFA, so if truly given under a CC-BY-SA license, they would not have broken any law or contract. If the UEFA feels their contract was violated, I believe their only recourse would be to go after the photographer who signed the contract. So to me, if truly under a free license, the photographer is the one taking that legal risk by uploading them here. If they are trying to use their copyright to enforce the "online editorial only" clause in the contract, that is an additional copyright license term, no longer a CC-BY-SA license, and would make it non-free. I'm honestly not sure which one is intended here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- How often do I have to repeat it? This limitation has nothing in common with copyright. I don't limit the free CC license. The UEFA don't limit the copyright or the CC license. Nobody is limiting any copyright. The pics are on the part of copyright licensed with a plain vanilla CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. No restrictions or limitations on the part of copyright/license.
- The personality rights restrictions are existing, if there is a template or not, if there is an UEFA or not, and if there is any agreement between an organisation and photographer or not. They existing by law.
- The UEFA request me only to point out existing law. Nothing more. It would be the same, as it would be mandatory to put {{Personality rights}} on every file page which is showing a pic with a living person. It gives no new limitation, but point out existing ones. Like the template declares: "Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses."
- I really don't know, how I can explain it further more. --Stepro (talk) 22:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- If it is just personality rights or trademark rights, there is no problem. The only issue would be if you are using your copyright to enforce the terms of the UEFA photographer contract. The template says "accreditation rules contain the obligation to point out that works from officially accredited photographers may only be used for editorial online publications". If someone else uses it in a commercial, non-editorial, non-online way, would you consider them as violating the license as given? That third user has not signed a contract with UEFA, so if truly given under a CC-BY-SA license, they would not have broken any law or contract. If the UEFA feels their contract was violated, I believe their only recourse would be to go after the photographer who signed the contract. So to me, if truly under a free license, the photographer is the one taking that legal risk by uploading them here. If they are trying to use their copyright to enforce the "online editorial only" clause in the contract, that is an additional copyright license term, no longer a CC-BY-SA license, and would make it non-free. I'm honestly not sure which one is intended here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
* Striked this vote, per my statements below. Still neutral about this DR. Tm (talk) 04:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep The wording is clear. Disruptive nomination, when there is a discussion in COM:VPC#Template:Summer Youth Olympic Games Buenos Aires 2018. The wording is preety clear, as Stepro as "the photographer is providing the work under the terms of a Creative Commons license which allows commercial reuse". If the end user wants to use the images it is responsibility to decide, if he wants to " reuse for any different purpose the user himself is responsible for obtaining the necessary permission at UEFA.". In this case the end user must decide if he wants to obtain the permission of UEFA, and as such this is merely an advice, not an restriction. The photographer Stepro is not making any restriction, of any kind, only making a warning of the way he obtained this images. Tm (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- The problem is, the end user does not have to decide anything -- if they use it according to the CC-BY-SA terms, and ignore the UEFA terms, they should not be causing themselves any further legal liability. It is the photographer assuming the risk that nobody will ever use it to break the UEFA terms. The only way legal responsibility can be transferred to the end user is via the photographer's copyright, in which case that term is part of the license, and prevents commercial use without getting further permission, and makes the license here non-free. So... does the photographer assume all such risk, or is the license non-free ? Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- No. Just no. Re-users cannot ignore UEFA terms, because there are no terms between UEFA and re-users. It's just existing law, what re-users can ignore or not. And the photographer have no risk, when he is not using the pics by his self for advertising or something, and when he point to potential re-users, that they have to respect personality rights.
- Re-users are responsible to have all rights (not only the hereby given copyright license, but also possible trademark law or personality rights) for the intended usage. So it is sayed in the DEED: "The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material." (deed)
- All this I repeat again and again and again. I'm really tired of it. You can read it on my subpage, I translated it, and linked it above. --Stepro (talk) 22:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- I think we are talking past each other. The above is fine, as I have said. If there are any non-copyright restrictions such as those, inherent in normal law, indeed it is always the responsibility of the end user to obtain those rights, of course. I'm however talking about the text "the accreditation rules contain the obligation to point out that works from officially accredited photographers may only be used for editorial online publications. In case of reuse for any different purpose the user himself is responsible for obtaining the necessary permission at UEFA." The end user has signed no agreement with UEFA and is in no way bound by that. I'm not aware of any trademark or publicity right which would give UEFA that much control over reuse. Publicity rights are owned by the athletes themselves and you would have to get permission from them, not UEFA. Trademark is limited to doing something which the public could confuse as being from the trademark owner, which is considerably less restrictive than "editorial online publications only". So I'm not sure what permission anyone else would need from UEFA, provided they don't violate the UEFA trademark. I imagine that is why it is part of the photographer's contract -- they get control that way, by restricting the normal copyrights of the photographer (or at least it sounds that way to me). The only way the photographer can in turn control what an end user can do is to make that clause part of the copyright license explicitly. If that is not part of the copyright license then fine, but there is no further responsibility of any end user to the UEFA, and you may as well take that clause out because it is meaningless. You could add mention that you can't violate any publicity rights or UEFA trademarks, but not much more than that.
- If the UEFA has any problem with how anyone else uses these, even if not in editorial online publications, I'm pretty sure their only recourse would be to sue the photographer (not the CC-BY-SA end user) for breach of contract, who was the one who made them available with a license which exceeds the contract terms. In other words, there can be no limitation to "editorial online publications only" in a free copyright license, and I'm not aware of any non-copyright restriction with the power to limit to that type of thing -- that is usually squarely in the realm of copyright itself, so that is not a normal non-copyright restriction of the type mentioned by the CC-BY-SA licenses and cannot be lumped in as a similar thing. I'm not trying to ignore what you are saying, but my reading of the above sounds like it goes way above any kind of publicity, privacy, trademark, or moral rights -- it sounds like an explicit copyright restriction to me, or at least a right created by contract, in which case it is limited to only the parties to the contract, which would be UEFA and the photographer. If the photographer intends to limit re-use per UEFA's terms, they can only do that via a copyright restriction, meaning the license is no longer pure CC-BY-SA but has additions and is no longer free. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I guess you have no glue about this business. In short:
- The photographer has only the obligation to point out existing law, just that we are doing with the template. I wrote it already.
- The players have contracts with their clubs, arranging the use of their personal rights. The clubs have contracts with DFB/DFL/UEFA/FIFA. So the UEFA has the right to take some control over personal rights of the players. That's a matter of such organisations and the players and doesn't concern to us. It's just a fact, that UEFA is to ask. Entirely independent from any photographers.
- "If the photographer intends to limit re-use per UEFA's terms, they can only do that via a copyright restriction, meaning the license is no longer pure CC-BY-SA but has additions and is no longer free." - you don't understand it. Your permament repetition of such fake news are not making it true. Nobody is limiting copyright restrictions. No terms are limiting everything. It's just law. I wrote it. Some times. Above and elsewhere. Again and again. The terms are an request for me to point out existing law. Nothing more. I wrote it above.
- You don't understand it, or don't want to understand it. I'm giving up. --Stepro (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Stepro: Carl Lindberg is one of the most knowledgeable contributor here on law and copyright, just for your information. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I guess you have no glue about this business. In short:
- OK, if this is just about personality/publicity rights, we can just put the template {{Personality rights}} in there. However, those rights typically just restrict advertising use, and stuff like that, i.e. trading off the player's name or image. You can use photos in some non-editorial situations without violating them, and most particularly can use them in offline stuff without violating them -- there is nothing about personality/publicity rights that distinguishes between online and offline works. It's that part of the wording which troubles me most -- there is no way to restrict to "online" uses only via publicity rights. The wording "any different purposes" also does not jive with publicity rights normally -- for those, there are certain uses which are not OK, and everything else is. There is also no difference in that area between photos taken by people in the stands, and photos taken by accredited photographers -- they have the same restrictions. So if an end user wants to use this in an offline work, not necessarily editorial, but which does not violate publicity rights they should be able to. Additionally, while I'm sure UEFA has the rights to use the players' image in relation to advertising the team or the sport, there would still be uses that you would need to get permission from the player themselves (or perhaps a players association like FIFPro), which is not mentioned at all. Photographs not involving players (say a photo of the stadium or field or stands) would not have any such restrictions, but the wording sounds like they still do just because they were taken by accredited photographers, which makes little sense if this is just publicity rights. So this is why a lot of the wording troubles some folks here -- it sounds very much like the wording you would see in a copyright license. If it is just about publicity rights it's fine, but we should also in that case be able to delete the wording (particularly "online") and substitute the template. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- I find the “editorial only” part the most troublesome, but the whole passage seems to limit the licence rather than to explain the implications of personality rights. I haven’t looked at any of the content that appears under this rubric, but I can certainly imagine many non-editorial uses for athletic images in general—commercial or non—that wouldn’t necessarily be exploitative or require any subject’s permission.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, if that is part of the copyright license terms, it would be a problem. However, it is often used as simply a reference to publicity rights -- for example www.thinkphoto.co.uk, which says ThinkPhoto Image Media Ltd considers “Editorial Use Only” photos to be ones that simply do not have all the applicable model and property releases and thus should not be used for “commercial” applications. In that sense, it is fine, but agreed that such other restrictions are usually best defined in terms of what uses cannot be used, rather than a phrase which seems to restrict. It gets worse when they talk about "commercial use", which for publicity rights is typically the uses which get those involved, but for copyright (i.e. a non-commercial copyright license) the term is far more restrictive. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- I find the “editorial only” part the most troublesome, but the whole passage seems to limit the licence rather than to explain the implications of personality rights. I haven’t looked at any of the content that appears under this rubric, but I can certainly imagine many non-editorial uses for athletic images in general—commercial or non—that wouldn’t necessarily be exploitative or require any subject’s permission.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- OK, if this is just about personality/publicity rights, we can just put the template {{Personality rights}} in there. However, those rights typically just restrict advertising use, and stuff like that, i.e. trading off the player's name or image. You can use photos in some non-editorial situations without violating them, and most particularly can use them in offline stuff without violating them -- there is nothing about personality/publicity rights that distinguishes between online and offline works. It's that part of the wording which troubles me most -- there is no way to restrict to "online" uses only via publicity rights. The wording "any different purposes" also does not jive with publicity rights normally -- for those, there are certain uses which are not OK, and everything else is. There is also no difference in that area between photos taken by people in the stands, and photos taken by accredited photographers -- they have the same restrictions. So if an end user wants to use this in an offline work, not necessarily editorial, but which does not violate publicity rights they should be able to. Additionally, while I'm sure UEFA has the rights to use the players' image in relation to advertising the team or the sport, there would still be uses that you would need to get permission from the player themselves (or perhaps a players association like FIFPro), which is not mentioned at all. Photographs not involving players (say a photo of the stadium or field or stands) would not have any such restrictions, but the wording sounds like they still do just because they were taken by accredited photographers, which makes little sense if this is just publicity rights. So this is why a lot of the wording troubles some folks here -- it sounds very much like the wording you would see in a copyright license. If it is just about publicity rights it's fine, but we should also in that case be able to delete the wording (particularly "online") and substitute the template. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Comment The recent behavior of the uploader of trying to delete derivative works under this template and then the originals when they were told they couldn't delete derivative works makes me lean towards argeeing with Yann that this template is not compatible with Commons licensing as it appears to be a de facto "no derivative works" provision. So I'm a Weak delete at this point. Abzeronow (talk) 04:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Just for the records: The mentioned case has nothing in common with this template. To have it there is pure coincidence. --Stepro (talk) 04:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment You really want the community to believe that there isn't a de facto "no derivative works" clause with DRs like this? Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1004 LR10 by Stepro (cropped).jpg Abzeronow (talk) 16:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- My answer stands just above your question and elswhere below. This has no link to each other. There are some reasonable crops with good quality of my pics from this game I have absolutely no problem with. --Stepro (talk) 16:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Please see a case mentioned above, were Stepro is trying to speedy delete derivative works of files with this template. For context see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Tm_is_deleting_my_DRs_again, User_talk:Tm#my_DRs and User_talk:TheSoccerBoy#bad_crops.
- He nominated to speedy deletion File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0789 LR10 by Stepro (cropped).jpg, File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0826 LR10 by Stepro (cropped).jpg, File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0059 LR10 by Stepro (cropped).jpg and File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1004 LR10 by Stepro (cropped).jpg, all with the claim "DR by uploader, unacceptable crop, quality is much too low, personal rights of depicted person are affected; copyvio due not declaring the edit; I will try to find a portrait and upload it next week". He was not the uploader of the files, second and third arguments are irrelevant, personality rights are as afected in this files as in the originals, and the claim of "copyvio due not declaring the edit" is false as he was stated has the author had a link to the source file of the derivative, and had the correct license template. Tm (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- When he was rejected and them tries to delete the original photos, in Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1004 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0789 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0826 LR10 by Stepro.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0059 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, per the arguments of the files having less than 7 days. Tm (talk) 04:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- And this all has absolute nothing to do with this template and this DR. It's only a question of quality, and that I don't want to be named as the author of this low quality crops. This is my right due the CC license section 3(a)(3): »If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.« User:Tm is denying this right for me.
- To bring this case to this DR is rude and factual wrong. --Stepro (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Where i´am tring to "is denying this right for me" to not be named "want to be named as the author of this low quality crops". Did you read Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Tm_is_deleting_my_DRs_again, in particular when i asked Majora if "however, as claimed per Stepro, he says that the info about the original authorship can be deleted by him or if requested by him. Is it right in his assessment?". I asked an uninvolved administrator. Me, that started to vote to keep this images, merely because of your words, but that now are contradicted by your actions. Tm (talk) 04:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
| This picture was taken holding an accreditation by UEFA. Regarding trademark and personality rights, UEFA allows works from officially accredited photographers to be used for editorial online publications. In case of reuse for any different purpose the user is responsible themselves for ensuring trademark and personality rights are respected. Refer to the laws of the country where you are publishing for details. |
- - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Alexis, I choosed to be as near as possible to the UEFA wording there, but yes, I have no problem with your suggestion. For me it's just the same in other words. I translated your suggestion into German. If the desicion will be *keep*, I will update the text in the template to this. --Stepro (talk) 20:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Clindberg, Yann? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- That's fine by me. Didn't have much problem with the way the existing one ended up, though the final "at UEFA" may not be quite correct because for some uses you may have to go to FIFPro or the player themselves -- one way or another though, the re-user would have to get those permissions from whoever holds the rights. The above makes that clear as well. If Stepro is fine with that (i.e. it satisfies his contractual obligations), then switch to that. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Clindberg, Yann? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Alexis, I choosed to be as near as possible to the UEFA wording there, but yes, I have no problem with your suggestion. For me it's just the same in other words. I translated your suggestion into German. If the desicion will be *keep*, I will update the text in the template to this. --Stepro (talk) 20:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as is per Yann, Carl, and COM:USER#Not acceptable; or Keep with Alexis's rewording. Imposition (by anyone, including IOC, UEFA, WMDE, DerHexer, or Stepro) of restrictions on commercial and derivative works is anathema to COM:L and the WikiMedia Foundation Licensing Policy Resolution of 23 March 2007, as well as to the Free Culture Movement; see the classification of "Non Commercial" and "Non Derivatives" as among the "Restrictions which are not permissible" at https://freedomdefined.org/Permissible_restrictions. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- While there is no fair use on Commons, “the user himself is responsible for obtaining the necessary permission at UEFA” implies that the user must do it before uploading to Commons. Delete in line with the speedy deletion criterion F2. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep either the way it is now, or Alexis' slightly improved wording. The "with UEFA" is not grounds for deletion because it's still just in regards to publicity rights, and the UEFA does hold some publicity rights so that is probably a good first place to go anyways if you need that sort of thing. The way it was originally was more problematic. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:21, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: how may Commons leave a de facto licensing template in possession of a user who actively tried to subvert the “no fair use” policy of Commons? If such template is warranted, then it must have no reliance on Stepro. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- I may be unaware of Stepro's actions elsewhere, but when it comes to a licensing template, either wording makes it clear that any restrictions are purely due to trademark or publicity rights, and not copyright. That is true of any work regardless if it is mentioned or not, of course. He is a professional photographer, and if he needs such a clause to satisfy his contract so that he can upload them here, that is fine. It's only a problem if there is an attempt to use his copyright to restrict usage beyond what the free licenses do, which would really the only reason for deletion. The original wording appeared that he was using his copyright to enforce UEFA's desired limitations, which was the reason for this DR, but to my mind that wording has been fixed, thus my vote. Any future changes should of course be scrutinized. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- It seems that the template was changed to satisfy the requirement of a free license. I will follow Carl Lindberg's opinion above. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- I may be unaware of Stepro's actions elsewhere, but when it comes to a licensing template, either wording makes it clear that any restrictions are purely due to trademark or publicity rights, and not copyright. That is true of any work regardless if it is mentioned or not, of course. He is a professional photographer, and if he needs such a clause to satisfy his contract so that he can upload them here, that is fine. It's only a problem if there is an attempt to use his copyright to restrict usage beyond what the free licenses do, which would really the only reason for deletion. The original wording appeared that he was using his copyright to enforce UEFA's desired limitations, which was the reason for this DR, but to my mind that wording has been fixed, thus my vote. Any future changes should of course be scrutinized. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: how may Commons leave a de facto licensing template in possession of a user who actively tried to subvert the “no fair use” policy of Commons? If such template is warranted, then it must have no reliance on Stepro. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as per Carl, keep it with the new wording. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Stepro: I suggest you replace the wording now with the suggestion. That's usually the order in which this is done: fix any perceived issues, keep-close the DR. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:04, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- No problem, done that. --Stepro (talk) 20:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 07:38, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ℯxplicit 07:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not "Own work". Book cover art is owned by the publisher and not freely licensed.
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, after the user has uploaded a different image version showing just the book spine (if that's the right word), which might go per de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- keep I am the one who uploaded this file. I understand the problems with the first version. In my oppinion this one does not show enough of the cover art to be protected by copyright. --˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberolm (talk • contribs) 12:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
out of com:scope Wvdp (talk) 08:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- It's INUSE so not out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete 9 KB "own work"; not very convincing. --E4024 (talk) 01:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Needs permission from artist Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 01:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. User has admitted that he/she does not have relevant rights to the picture, see https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brugerdiskussion:Savfisk&diff=prev&oldid=9879406&diffmode=source (at Danish Wikipedia) Pugilist (talk) 14:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. User has admitted that he/she does not have relevant rights to the picture, see https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brugerdiskussion:Savfisk&diff=prev&oldid=9879406&diffmode=source (at Danish Wikipedia) Pugilist (talk) 14:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Historical paintings and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gaminelement (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Academies of Loudoun.jpg
- File:Trailside Middle School.jpg
- File:Mercer Middle School.jpg
- File:Willard Middle School.jpg
- File:Goshen Post Elementary School.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
License review failed. The source is a fan site on Russian Vkontakte, vk.com. No license information, FWIW. Thuresson (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Pictures is featured on several websites, likely copyrighted Vauxford (talk) 18:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not illustrative; better images exist. It's just a snapshot of two blokes in front of a steam engine. Better on facebook or flickr. Tony May (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not illustrative; better images exist. It's just a snapshot of a bloke in front of a steam engine. Better on facebook or flickr. Tony May (talk) 16:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not illustrative; better images exist. It's just a snapshot of the back of some bloke's head in front of a steam engine. Better on facebook or flickr. Tony May (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Quality isn't generally a reason to delete images, neither is the presence of people in the picture. In fact several others in this category have also been nominated. There may be better images available, but I'm not sure we host them. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; this is a better picture without anyone in the frame. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Youtube video is not with a free license. Ruthven (msg) 12:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:2019-01-28 19 59 03 A Kit Kat bar with its wrapper removed in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 00:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
I have sent a permission to OTRS. Here is the copy of my letter:
Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif de l'œuvre < https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bibliographie_d'André_Fossion_de_1980_à_2019_.pdf > Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0. Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia. Le 24 mars 2019, André FOSSION
4/1, rue Grafé
5000 Namur Belgique''
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
You can delete this file. Thanks André Fossion --Fossion (talk) 15:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Bibliographie_d'André_Fossion_de_1980_à_2019_.pdf” but not processed yet, ticket:2019032410003858. --Zetud (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary and poor duplicate of File:2019-01-28 19 55 14 A Snickers bar with the wrapper still intact in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 00:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Poorly focused duplicate of File:2019-01-28 19 55 31 A Snickers bar with the wrapper removed in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 00:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:2019-01-28 19 55 51 A Snickers bar broken in the middle in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 00:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:2019-01-28 19 55 51 A Snickers bar broken in the middle in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg Famartin (talk) 00:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
made another better Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
colors are messed up, already re-uploaded after svg conversion, please delete this. Muellersmattes (talk) 21:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Chongqing
[edit]Wax figures are copyrighted per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#3D_art_(sculptures_etc.).
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-乔布斯.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-刘晓庆.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-布鲁斯·威利斯.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-张国荣.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-成龙.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-普京.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-李小龙.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-杜莎夫人.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-杨利伟.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-林丹.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-爱因斯坦.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-爱迪生.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-甘地.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-田亮.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-莎拉波娃.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-蒙娜丽莎.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-贝克汉姆.jpg
- File:重庆杜莎夫人蜡像馆-邓丽君.jpg
Wcam (talk) 18:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Image appears to be a press photo/headshot. Licensing information claims cc-by-sa-4.0 but no link that identifies a license. William Graham (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, author is claimed to be another user. Do we take it as grandfathered old file or do we demand OTRS-permission from Xxxxx? Taivo (talk) 12:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- And who is Jaime Pérez BTW? --E4024 (talk) 02:17, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ghana has no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures or buildings. Leoboudv (talk) 19:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ghana has no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures or buildings. Leoboudv (talk) 19:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oh well - that's a bit silly. Victuallers (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
File is a political party logo and fails both public domain criteria given: File fails to meet any of criteria 1 to 5 of section 7 of the Copyright Act, BE 2537 (1994) and does not consist only of simple geometric shapes or text. Copyright is held by the Thai Liberal Party. CentreLeftRight ✉ 16:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: There's been a practice of interpreting whatever appears in the Royal Thai Government Gazette as being part of legislation or official documents and thus in the Public Domain. This is indeed rather questionable, seeing as copyright status over a work cannot be lost as a result of it being quoted in PD documents. This is a much wider issue and the entirety of {{PD-TH-exempt}} files may need to be checked. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Even if the logo would lose copyright protection in Thailand because of it being in a government document (huge and highly questionable if) it wouldn't lose protection in the US. --Majora (talk) 01:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Leslie Cheung
[edit]Copyrighted 2D artwork
- File:HKCL CWB Red Mission 張國榮歌影迷國際聯盟 Art of Leslie Cheung's Movie Images exhibit photos Apr-2013 book covers.JPG
- File:HKCL CWB Red Mission 張國榮歌影迷國際聯盟 Art of Leslie Cheung's Movie Images exhibit photos Apr-2013 books.JPG
- File:HKCL CWB Red Mission 張國榮歌影迷國際聯盟 Art of Leslie Cheung's Movie Images exhibit photos Apr-2013 DVD CD products.JPG
- File:HKCL CWB Red Mission 張國榮歌影迷國際聯盟 Art of Leslie Cheung's Movie Images exhibit photos Apr-2013 TV Times Le Cinema magazines.JPG
Wcam (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
فیلم قبلا منتشر شده و خبرگزاری تسنیم به اشتباه فیلم اختصاصی زده است. Hosseinronaghi (talk) 12:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- From an autotranslate service:
- The film has already been released and Tensen News has mistakenly made the film
- -Mardus /talk 09:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Youtube Account may be copyright laundering (reuploading content not its own SecretName101 (talk) 14:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Youtube Account may be copyright laundering (reuploading content not its own SecretName101 (talk) 14:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Youtube Account may be copyright laundering (reuploading content not its own) SecretName101 (talk) 14:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
SVG version available (File:TV25 Logo.svg) Malo95 (talk) 16:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, orphan dupe. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation of the text shown, no evidence of permission Verbcatcher (talk) 16:25, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Only a brainless machine (or a wicked human pretending to be one) would falsely accuse this church sign or the common public photograph of a "copyright violation," so stop this antichristian censorship immediately. --Olorin3k (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:52, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Background image is from https://www.cruzados.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/wallpaper-1280x960-v5.jpg and trophy images are derivative works of 3D art. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment 1) The background image is not the main subject of the photo. 2) The wallpaper was uploaded after the image in commons and the wallpapers are uploaded for the free use of the users. 3) The Chilean legislation does not prohibit uploading photographs of trophies, therefore in case of being deleted the image I will be forced to take legal action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Columna de Razta (talk • contribs) 11:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment We are not talking about a logo placed in a photograph, we are not talking about a derivative work that deceptively modifies the wallpaper. If the percentage of the image that appears in the background is sufficient or not a subjective fact. The objective fact is that the image is original, there is no record of intellectual property violated, because the wallpaper does not include the trophies in the position in which they are exposed. Columna de Razta
- You're right that the background image is not the main subject of the photo, but it does take up the vast majority of the photo real estate. I think the crops from this photo are fine, because it breaks up the photo, but this one ends up keeping much of the original photo intact.
- Just because an image is available for the free use of a website's users (i.e. most photographs/wallpapers you find on the web) does not mean that they're freely licensed for anyone to republish.
- Per COM:FOP Chile, you'd be right, as long it's a permanent exhibition and not a temporary one. I honestly can't tell if it's in a museum or the trophy is displayed for a special event. Could you clarify?
- Please don't make legal threats on Wikipedia projects. Not sure what grounds you'd have for taking legal action, but I strongly advise you to retract the threat. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- * Comment There is a museum, inside the stadium (Obviously the video that I will leave next shows only a part), whose exhibitions are updated, as in all parts of the world. I leave a link as proof. https://www.cdf.cl/cdf/universidad-catolica-presento-el-museo-cruzado/2017-07-07/201328.html
- Columna de Razta
- *
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative works. --Majora (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Ananda Chandra Agarwala.jpg and File:Chadra Kumar Agarwala.jpg
[edit]
These two photos are claimed to be of two different but similarly named people. However, it is quite obvious that they are the same photo with different quality, cropping and colour. The first is sourced from a personal blog. The second is sourced from a site that has a legal disclaimer admitting that their information is not necessarily reliable or accurate. So there's no way to know which, if either, is correct. --Geniac (talk) 04:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep both: Both files are in use across multiple Wikipedias and Wikidata. By COM:INUSE, that means they should be kept even if there's doubt as to who they depict. I suppose one exception might be if there's reasonable doubt about whether they're pre-1969, in which case they could be deleted as copyright violations. --bjh21 (talk) 11:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Year of death: 1938 or 1940? Birth years are also different. There is something complex here. --E4024 (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- No experienced users/admins from India that could solve the mystery, before closing the DR? --E4024 (talk) 20:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete File:Chadra Kumar Agarwala.jpg, It is due to mistake and lake of actual image of Chadra Kumar Agarwala. When I get it, I will upload the real one. Bishnu_Saikia (Talk) 10:10, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21. Copyright is what we look for here and the images appear to be old enough to have fallen out of copyright in India. --Majora (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Photo made in atelier of Józef Antoni Kuczyński (who died in 1952) in Kraków. License template provided definitely wrong, I see no reason why it can be PD, As marked by the photographer, {{PD-Poland}} does not apply. Ankry (talk) 19:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Atelier Kuczyński (company) is not the same as Józef Antoni Kuczyński (person). For example, the picture could have been made by his employee. There is no explicit copyright notice, nor name and surname, only a watermark with company name. Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowede (NAC, where source file was uploaded) declares: Photographs available at www.audiovis.nac.gov.pl are public domain or the owner of the copy rights is the State Treasury, represented by the National Digital Archive and which grant free of charge licence for free use of the materials on all known exploitation fields. You are requested to put the National Digital Archive logo and you should remember to disclose the author of the photographs and the source: “resources of the National Digital Archive"(https://audiovis.nac.gov.pl/files/o_zbiorach.pdf)
Its easier to fix licence template than nominate for deletion.
Matlin (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Matlin: unfortunately, I cannot find the declaration about PD / free license status at the NAC website. Note: PD and free license are not the same; if not PD we must know who the copyright owner is and the exact license terms. Neither the photo page, nor the pdf linked above declare PD status or free license for the photo.
- Also, I doubt that "Kuczyński, Zakład Artystyczno Fotograficzny" is a company, a separate legal entity other than Mr. Kuczyński himself. We cannot assume that without evidence. I doubt that this was a photographic agency who employed multiple photographers.
- Note, that it is still possible, that NAC owns copyright to the photo for various reasons (eg. via copyright transfer or as the heir if there was no human heir). They can also sell licenses on behalf of another copyright owner. But in the case the photo is copyrighted, we need to know exact license terms (and the license must allow free commercial reuse by anybody). Ankry (talk) 20:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
