Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/05/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 29th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur dans le copyright de ma part. Misterclem (talk) 10:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal image of a user with no further edits on any Wikimedia project. El Grafo (talk) 09:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rpha914 (talk) 11:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, out of scope Nolispanmo 13:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Krd 13:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the same as File:YaakovMetzer1.jpg Hanay (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, next time :) Hanay (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per num. -- Geagea (talk) 12:01, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not wikipedia. Voluminous user page as gallery. Achim (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is a speedy. Articles belong in WP, not Commons, and this article has already been removed from WP:ES. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, very small picture MMFE (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 03:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work; user's other uploads were copied from websites. NSFW Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User.Didym. JuTa 03:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid educational use. Created only for vandalism on English Wikipedia. Howicus (talk) 22:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo 淺藍雪 02:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-free shizhao (talk) 01:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Omid.koli as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: بخشی از نقشه متلق به www.gulf2000.columbia.edu/maps.shtml. But when I tried to open www.gulf2000.columbia.edu/maps.shtml the page does not seem to exist. So I am inclined to  Keep unless there is some stronger evidence that this was not created by the uploader. (see below) Jarekt (talk) 17:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete You are right this image is a cropped version of this image which has a prominent (c) on it. --Jarekt (talk) 19:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation. Jarekt (talk) 11:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlton Pries (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images from website with no licensing information. Image of female not found at source; image of food at source, but no license.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unambiguous copyvios by sock Эlcobbola talk 17:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope anyway Denniss (talk) 07:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, other files are copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 19:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, no EXIF data, other files are copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shovan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal images. Some nice pictures, but insufficient context to establish educational value – sorry. Wdchk (discussion) 01:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Some are out of scope personal pics some scenerys may keep.--Fanghong (talk) 02:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, unused shizhao (talk) 02:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 03:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional image INeverCry 03:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SHIKER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image & artwork

INeverCry 03:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TeamFlybox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image & logos of non-notable group

INeverCry 03:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luanda Taciana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotion

INeverCry 03:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, old BMW press picture (size, München license plates, etcetera) mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flagged for speedy as obvious copyvio, widely available at much higher resolution. Revent (talk) 17:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Wdwd (talk) 18:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je voudrais la suprimee Frank Bamba (talk) 00:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

a supprimee Frank Bamba (talk) 00:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 02:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flagged for speedy, image located at http://editoriaecomunicazione.uniroma2.it/chi-siamo/docenti/marco-frittella/ (which dates to 2012) and other places at higher resolution. Revent (talk) 17:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Didym; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, mysteriously watermarked, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing. The original (copyright) image is widely circulating on the web (e.g. http://mantan-web.jp/gallery/2014/04/13/20140413dog00m200004000c/006.html), but was uploaded to Flickr only yesterday apparently as an attempt to avoid deletion. The same image has been repeatedly uploaded and deleted (under various file names) by User:Chiikochan and then by User:Riiko11 despite warnings, so temporary blocks to prevent further uploading of copyvio material is probably in order. DAJF (talk) 01:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I took the picture from the start it was widely spread after I uploaded on tumblr and some sites took the copyrights after that. And now wikipedia keeps claiming it's not mine. What do you want me to do delete the picture from all over the internet or something?!?! FYI I'm not even that chiikochan - User:Riiko11

And yet, when you uploaded this image to Commons, you stated that the author was Chiiko Chan, the source was Flickr, and the photo was taken on 29 May 2015? Wdchk (discussion) 02:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is spam 太刻薄 (talk) 03:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and copyright holderː Roberto Duran 37.5.5.33 07:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and copyright holderː Troy Constable, MystifyMe Photography 37.5.5.33 08:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957).[1] Eleassar (t/p) 08:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is NOT my own work; I uploaded it without the correct copyright info. The same file with the correct information exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Interieur,_eerste_en_tweede_kapiteel_koor,_vrijstannde_kolommen,_noordzijde_-_Maastricht_-_20146505_-_RCE.jpg Kleon3 (talk) 08:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The other version is very similar but of better quality. I can't find an use best fitted by this one, even if we fix its copyright info.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: Can't think of any potential educational use because of extremely low quality/resolution. El Grafo (talk) 09:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks very much like a screensot from Google Maps, which is ©Google. El Grafo (talk) 09:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me with incorrect copyright information. The same file with correct information exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Interieur,_kapiteel_in_het_koor,_eerste_van_het_midden_-_Maastricht_-_20146493_-_RCE.jpg Kleon3 (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader requested, duplicate of File:Eich von Niederbrechen 2015-5.webm Pristurus (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. In addition, this is small photo without metadata, own work is suspicious. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clfwkd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A bunch of tables containing text/raw data. Out of scope, should be Wikitext, not image files.

El Grafo (talk) 10:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused; Not educationally useful. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 10:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture of a not noticeable group, loaded for promotional purposes - not useful for educational purposes L736E (talk) 10:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong person, due to bad info during shooting Haraldbischoff (talk) 10:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong person, due to bad info during shooting Haraldbischoff (talk) 10:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused; Not educationally useful. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Buxtehude (talk) 11:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew Reiver (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos.

Buxtehude (talk) 11:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mushfiqasad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

this user has uploaded several copyvios. so i suspect these all are copyvio as well. none of the image have meta data. some are of low size , some are of big.

Saqib (talk) 12:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyrighted. uploaded by a copyvio guy . Saqib (talk) 12:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is blurry, unidentifiable Thiotrix (talk) 18:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is made in circa 1940. The photographer is unknown. No proof, that the photographer is 70 years dead, no proof, that the photo is anonymous. The photo has watermark in external source in left bottom corner. Maybe this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably a hoax; file was uploaded to illustrate a hoax article at de.wp [2]. Sitacuisses (talk) 20:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the uploader's own work [3], may or may not be something like PD-USGov. El Grafo (talk) 20:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was working on the Matt Bevin Wikipedia article and found it fitting that as Bevin might become the next Governor of Kentucky, that he should receive a picture for his page. I found the picture after typing in Matt Bevin in the search engine. I realize that the picture was the work of the Associated Press and have given them credit for their work. The only work I did on it was cropping the picture. Please do not delete the picture from the page. Count Awesome (talk) 21:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Count Awesome: Sorry, but if you can't prove that a) the copyright holder has published it under a Free License or b) it is in the en:Public domain for some reason, it must be deleted. --El Grafo (talk) 21:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like self-advertising to me (see also: en:Antonio Cachia)) El Grafo (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF (eventually grabbed from Flickr), per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Turkamel and previously published (smaller res) via (example) http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/catholics_to_make_57mile_pilgrimage_to_shrine_of_our_lady_of_czestochowa/ (Copyright © CNA All rights reserved) = http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/images/cristoreymt.jpg (last modified: 2008). Gunnex (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, wrong author, wrong date (possible FBI photo, but unsure) Wdwd (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is too big, I want to upload a smaller file Сергій Корнєв 21:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


Kept: no reason for deletion Didym (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is too big, I want to upload a smaller file Сергій Корнєв 21:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

This file is too big, I want to upload a smaller file Сергій Корнєв 13:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


Kept: no reason for deletion Didym (talk) 00:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't understand why you want to delete this image. The image I have uploaded (and for which I am the owner and creator) is not copyrighted).
In that case you can follow this instructions com:OTRS--Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
anyway the source of the logo is copyrighted. I suggest to upload it on fr.wikipedia --Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 10:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion (again) Bazj (talk) 12:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfpromotion by sockpuppet (again!) Bazj (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyrighted. uploaded by a copyvio guy . Saqib (talk) 12:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question The only reason to delete is that another image from the same new user has been deleted as copyvio? Is there any other reason to think that uploader is a "copyvio guy"? Is there any other reason to think that this image is copyvio?--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your question is confusing. Can you please repeat. --Saqib (talk) 09:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why do you think the uploader is a "copyvio guy"? I just see that one of his images was deleted due to copyvio, but that doesn't seem to be bad faith nor a ground to delete all his images without further evidence. It just seems a new user that mismanaged copyright issues in one of his first uploads.
  • Why do you think this particular image is a copyvio. Please provide evidence, or at least a reason.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:45, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The user has today uploaded new 3 copyvios. All deleted now. Still do you think this is not copyvio? --Saqib (talk) 18:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 00:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyrighted. uploaded by a copyvio guy . Saqib (talk) 12:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal unsed image. out of scoop Saqib (talk) 12:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. This image was already used to vandalize in the English wiki. Ies (talk) 12:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bass kessler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Previously published elsewhere ([4], [5]), we need a written permission from the copyright holder. See COM:OTRS for details/instructions.

El Grafo (talk) 12:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no real use, and was only used for promotion on Wikipedia. Kelapstick (talk) 12:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnage sur la photo Guillaume de clermont 60 (talk) 13:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep No reason to delete. Pas de raison pour destroyer. This image is the only one in Commons showing this whole facade and it's in use in fr-wiki. Therefore, it's obviously in commons:scope, even if someone prefers that the cyclist wasn't there.--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je ne veux pas que cette photo soit téléchargée LECHIAT (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je ne veux pas que cette photo soit téléchargée LECHIAT (talk) 13:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je ne veux pas que cette photo soit téléchargée LECHIAT (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to I don't wanna expose my personal information , Please delete the old versions of this user page which contain my e-mail address. Thanks you--Grampus (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to EXIFː copyright holderː © LACATRINA - http://www.redbubble.com/people/lacatrina 37.5.5.33 14:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe license "I, the copyright holder ..." Depicted person was born in 1866. Deciding on how he looks like on the photo, it is made probably circa 1900–1910. No source. I am not convinced, that the photo is in the public domain. Who is the photographer and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and copyright holderː (C) 2008 Robert Edwards 37.5.5.33 14:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BitBay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of web site of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cacophonia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xabines (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unusedpresentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goliax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and videos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Please delete Gilliark (User talk:Gilliark) 13:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabian castro barros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused promo photos of music group of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Freddygtv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for sculpture in Russia, see also: Category:Russian FOP cases/The Motherland Calls. A.Savin 15:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for sculpture in Russia, see also: Category:Russian FOP cases/The Motherland Calls. A.Savin 15:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for sculpture in Russia, see also: Category:Russian FOP cases/The Motherland Calls. A.Savin 15:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of non-free material, no info on permission. A.Savin 15:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. fake license. http://mns.romny.info/index.php?option=com_phocagallery&view=category&id=5%3Azaluchennya&Itemid=32&limitstart Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture of Yevgeny Vuchetich who died in 1974. Unfortunately, no FoP in Russia and also copyrighted in the U.S. Excluded some pics which are de minimis, stamps, coins etc.

A.Savin 15:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, no se si es aqui donde se vota para la permanencia de la imagen, pero considero que puede quedarse porque solo es un recorte de una imagen que ya esta en Commons y la recorté para hacer enfasis en la estatua solamente. Me he leido lo que dicen sobre la Libertad de Panorama y ciertamente la veo muy ambigua en algunos conceptos, pero si estamos luchando por un internet mas libre (sin SOPA ni nada de esas leyes) deberían ser mas tolerantes con una fotografía que ha sido tomada en publico como las de esta estatua. Acabo de ver la plantilla "FOP", que honestamente no se para que funsione o si puede ayudar a que los archivos se mantengan.--AnelGTR (talk) 02:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This would mean that either RIAN has become a CC-BY-SA release from Vuchetich's heirs, or RIAN has bought the whole copyright on the monument. Both cases seem rather unlikely to me, apart from that, there are not only RIAN photographs in this category. A.Savin 16:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, but the opposite cannot be verified as well. We should ask RIAN directly if there was a special permission provided by the heirs or somebody else who was/is authorized to to so. --High Contrast (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I am deleting all of the images with the exception of the RIA Novosti images, as it is possible that RIAN has obtained the necessary permissions. The issues related to those 2 RIAN photos need to be taken up with those collaborating with RIAN, and they will need to report back to us as to the outcome. The other photos are plainly covered by COM:FOP#Russia and have to be deleted. russavia (talk) 01:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Russia: sculpture of Yevgeny Vuchetich who died in 1974.

Eleassar (t/p) 09:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per File:The Motherland Calls - Mamayev Kurgan in Volgograd, Russia - July 2012.jpg and File:Концерт «На Главной Высоте России»-1.jpg, De minimis in my opinion. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Per RIA Novosti images I agree with Russavia as the previous deletion request. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"The monument is in the center and the point of line convergence" same for this copyrighted work that is hosted on Commons: File:Louvre at night centered.jpg (also File:Vue de la pyramide, Louvre.jpg)! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the same at all, because in the latter case, the intent was to reproduce the courtyard, whereas the pyramid is of secondary importance. Here, the intent is to reproduce the promenade and the statue that it leads towards. Not withstanding this, what can a case from France tell us about the Russian copyright law in any case? --Eleassar (t/p) 10:26, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
About law: no FoP in France and no FoP in Russia, so it's the same. About de minimis IMHO it's. The statue is really huge, the figure itself measures 52 metres (170 feet) and the sword 33 metres (108 feet), 87 metres (279 feet) from the tip of its sword to the top of the plinth (from en.Wiki). So compared to its real size the image of the statue in the photo is small. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment about File:The Motherland Calls - Dmitry Medvedev.jpg: that's an image in silhouette of the statue. I can see a very similar image in File:Height comparison of notable statues (vector).svg that, as statement by the author, is a derivative work of File:Flag of Volgograd Oblast.svg and Commons also hosted File:Coat of Arms of Volgograd oblast.svg. The question is: Volgograd Oblast and or the Russian Federation, have the right to reproduce the monument (and or the silhouette), and also they have the right to transfer the copyright on its reproductions to third parties? Another question: is a silhouette of a copyright work, covered by copyright? Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:50, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See e.g. [6] --Eleassar (t/p) 23:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment What about File:Mamayev Kurgan.jpg? Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The monument is an important part of the composition of the photograph. --Eleassar (t/p) 23:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, you are right, but also in File:Dmitry Medvedev in Volgograd Oblast, March 2010-2.JPG the monument is an important part of the composition of the photograph. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 01:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's why both have been proposed for deletion. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure? File:Mamayev Kurgan.jpg has not been proposed for deletion! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're correct. I've added it to the list now. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no FOP in Russia -FASTILY 23:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for sculpture in Russia, see also: Category:Russian FOP cases/The Motherland Calls.

A.Savin 15:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deletion for the file I uploaded File:Journey of Discovery - Welcome to Volgograd (6877277406).jpg. Nick (talk) 19:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for artwork including sculptures. Copyright expires in 2045.

Off-shell (talk) 07:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures in Russia. Author died in 1974.

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support in general. Perhaps some pictures might be kept as de minimis:
--Off-shell (talk) 21:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as previously: No FOP for sculptures in Russia. Author (E.Vuchetich) died in 1974.

A.Savin 22:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: my turn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another batch of derivatives (please note that OTRS permissions, if any, are from photographers, not from sculptors).

VLu (talk) 06:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:The Motherland Calls (2019).jpg. This is a photograph of an object under restoration(author=duma.gov.ru). --Semenov.m7 (talk) 09:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- note that the fact that the work is surrounded by scaffolding does not somehow make it not copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP Russia — the last-living sculptor died in 1974 (see the enwiki article), and still within the posthumous copyrigh term. Russian FOP is limited to architecture and garden designs only. Unless another copyright law change/reform will occur soon.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See previous nominations. A copyrighted public work that was unveiled in 1967. Its authors: Yevgeny Vuchetich (1908–1974) and Nikolay Nikitin (1907–1973). Russian freedom of panorama for works of art (sculptures, monuments, murals etc.) is noncommercial, thus unacceptable. COM:VRT authorization from the heirs of the sculptors is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violating FoP rules of Russia (Category:Russian FOP cases/The Motherland Calls); de minimis not applicable

— Draceane talkcontrib. 11:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Missvain. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation: no proof that uploader is creator of this design (see https://twitter.com/truebluedezigns). P 1 9 9   15:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Дидар93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work, on these illustrations, probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

person not quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 18:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

persons not quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 18:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues in the picture are not the own work of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the picture itself is probably also not the own work of the uploader Didym (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, likely not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

persons not quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 18:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 沈伟 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable band INeverCry 04:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal drawing INeverCry 04:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published photograph (e.g. here); i'd tend to doubt the claim of "own work" made by the uploader. El Grafo (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The photos are from our corporate archives. --Tim99~commonswiki (talk) 08:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tim99~commonswiki: That's great! Please use the process explained at COM:OTRS to file a permission (it would probably be a good idea to include the product shots of the wheelchair you uploaded in that permission e-mail as well). Please feel free to contact me here or at my talk page if you have further questions. Thanks, --El Grafo (talk) 10:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suppression par précaution après emploi abusif du fichier par une tierce personne Dmmtvg (talk) 12:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is no reason to delete.  Question Quel est il cette "emploi abusif"? Ou est il passé? En Wikipedia? En Commons? Hors les projets Wikimedia? Touts les logiciels de Commons - e de tout autre place - se posent employer abusivement, par exemple par faire une falsification, mais nous ne pouvons les destroyer toutes par empêcher les emplois abusifs de tierces personnes.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Didym (talk) 00:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal unsed image. out of scoop Saqib (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to look for if we have got image of this place during WLE but if we're going to keep every personal photos because it show some landscape, then I think we're going to have many such photos on Commons because most of the photos show some landscape. After all, such photos taken on earth with some background of scenery, rather than in the air with no background. --Saqib (talk) 09:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This image could be kept because it depict the local people with no intention to create their personal photo gallery on Commons whereas the image that I nominated for deletion clearly shows that people want to maintain their personal phots on Commons. --Saqib (talk) 09:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader and photographer's intentions don't matter. What matter is if the images have potential educative use. Some of my images have been used to illustrate subjects absolutely unrelated to my intentions or to what I intended to illustrate. And the only image of any thing is the best and most usable image of such thing, even if it's bad quality or shows disturbing people, at least until a better image shows up.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent pictures from "Réunion des musées nationaux" are not free. This is not 2D, so this license doesn't apply. Yann (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images from Réunion des musées nationaux. Yann (talk) 16:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of non-notable people, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tacky dupe of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Taj_Mahal_in_March_2004.jpg Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 16:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent pictures from "Réunion des musées nationaux" are not free. These are not 2D, so this license doesn't apply. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fragment de Sarcophage, travaux d'Hercule - le lion de Némée à gauche, l'hydre de Lerne à droite.jpg.

Yann (talk) 16:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to take a copyright-free picture of Le Prince Imperial? I am creating . It would be good to add as many of his sculptures as possible to the gallery.Zigzig20s (talk) 07:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Either take your own, or get the permission from the photographer. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: uploader doesn't seem to be the same as the watermark credit. OTRS ticket needed, see COM:OTRS. P 1 9 9   16:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've arrived here cleaning the cat of uncategorized media. I've tried to look for more information googling some sources in Italian: I don't think he is a "relevant" person. No big loss.


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Navaghar Kiran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's only contribution Didym (talk) 00:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal/promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality (too small, unreadable legend) to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personality rights + uploaded for advertisement only, see de:Spezial:Beiträge/MichelB88. XenonX3 (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused text document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishekraysingh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, Commons is not a private photo album or a place for self-promotion.

Martin H. (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishekraysingh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons isn't a personal photographic album, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew2145 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

NSFW: Commons is not a personal photo album.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The museum doesn't hold the copyright to this work of art. Only Kees Meinders can publish this painting under a free license. Multichill (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monne de Miranda.jpg and File:Emanuel Boekman.jpg are both by Elie Neuburger (1891-1972). The museum doesn't hold the copyright to these works of art. Multichill (talk) 20:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ad uses a still from British film, so image is not in public domain in UK and most other countries; also license is incorrect Deanlaw (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ad uses a still from British film, so image is not in public domain in UK and most other countries; also license is incorrect Deanlaw (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates, the person is out of project scope. Ras67 (talk) 21:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates, the person is out of project scope. Ras67 (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Ras67 (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image didn't have a copyright; such promotional stills, if they had a copyright notice, tended to have them on the rear of the image. However, the reverse hasn't been included here, and thus it's not verifiable; no copyright search has been done in the US records, either. Precedent has been to delete images with unclear status, such as decided at Commons:Deletion requests/File:O'Hara, Maureen.jpg, under the precautionary principle.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image didn't have a copyright; such promotional stills, if they had a copyright notice, tended to have them on the rear of the image. However, the reverse hasn't been included here, and thus it's not verifiable; no copyright search has been done in the US records, either. Precedent has been to delete images with unclear status, such as decided at Commons:Deletion requests/File:O'Hara, Maureen.jpg, under the precautionary principle.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image didn't have a copyright; such promotional stills, if they had a copyright notice, tended to have them on the rear of the image. However, the reverse hasn't been included here, and thus it's not verifiable; no copyright search has been done in the US records, either. Precedent has been to delete images with unclear status, such as decided at Commons:Deletion requests/File:O'Hara, Maureen.jpg, under the precautionary principle.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The trailer has a copyright notice at 2:28.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Published 5 Aug 1940, renewed 8 Aug 1967 (Copyright entries 1967), so becomes public domain on 5 Aug 2035. Hroðulf (talk) 09:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The trailer has a copyright notice at 0:49.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akcorp365 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotion

INeverCry 03:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - self-promotion INeverCry 03:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parisa mallikharjuna rao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Q24222283 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saqism (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unusable Didym (talk) 00:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

France FoP The Photographer (talk) 22:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy  Keep. Gustave Eiffel died in 1923. The exploitation rights of his works expired in 2003. --Discasto talk 10:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Gustave Eiffel died in 1923 and the architect Stephen Sauvestre died in 1919. -- Geagea (talk) 04:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

France FoP The Photographer (talk) 22:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for the same reason: File:Arc de Triomphe from the avenue des Champs-Élysées, June 2014.jpg by the same user. --JuTa 19:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The building is public domain. PierreSelim (talk) 06:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very little difference with File:Raining clouds 3 (15023547022).jpg. No reasons to keep two images of the same thing. Pierre cb (talk) 03:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In some aspects better, thus kept. Basvb (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raymundo Martínez Carbajal

— Racconish 📥 18:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Raymundo Martínez Carbajal

Self promotion. Out of scope.

— Racconish 📥 21:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Raymundo Martínez Carbajal

Self promotion. Not in project scope.

— Racconish 📥 05:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Political campaign of an apparently notable [7] candidate. Obviously, political campaigns are promotion, but if events or people are notable, they are in scope. Furthermore, photographs of politic events is a notable subject in itself, and generic photographs have a potential educative use.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:50, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment He doesn't have an article on the Spanish Wikipedia, so I don't think it's up to us to decide if he's notable or not. Even if he wins, he will be just one of 300 representatives (see en:Federal electoral districts of Mexico), but at this point he is probably one of over a thousand candidates. Self-promotion is a reason for deletion, as you know. He has uploaded dozens of campaign pictures. If they are kept, probably over a thousand candidates in Mexico would have the same right. We would have a similar problem with candidates in many countries. What if they all decide to upload the same amount of pictures, or what if each candidate decides to upload thousands of pictures? Where do we draw the line? That could be millions of campaign pictures. Things would get out of control, I believe. Now, if an article on the Spanish Wikipedia is created with the political campaign of the subject, then I think his pictures could be kept, but only if we find out with reasonable proof who took the pictures because he claims that he owns the pictures, which is obviously false. Dontreader (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think there are 2 reasons to keep:
  • Notability of subject: With very little effort I found the linked news, which is related to his previous office. This is at least at the edge of notability in most Wikipedias. I think we could start right now an article on some of them.
  • Generic interest: Do we have enough images of similar campaigns in Mexico? If we have, they are hard to find.
Anyway, promotional intention is not a reason to delete: the reason to delete is being out of scope. A lot of promotional images fall out of scope, but some images uploaded with promotional intention are in scope and useful. For example, bots routinely upload to Commons free images taken from Flickr accounts of political parties; they are useful and in scope, but the reason to release them under a free license was political promotion.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, his official website [8] says that he was the Secretary of Education of the State of Mexico, not of the country of Mexico. There are 31 states in Mexico. Maybe there's enough material for an article about him, maybe not. If he wins the election, that would help, of course, but at this point there is no article. Perhaps I'm a deletionist. I think the amount of campaign pictures he uploaded is outrageous, even immoral. Commons is not his personal website. Typical corrupt politician, in my opinion (let him sue me if that offends him). Anyway, don't forget that without proof of ownership we have to delete those pictures because he didn't take them, obviously. If he doesn't go through OTRS, which is painful the first time, his pictures are doomed. {{Wicked Laughter}} Clin Dontreader (talk) 22:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • About ownership: if he or his team has grabbed the images from anywhere else, we haven't find until now. The assessment of ownership made in uploading should be enough, then.
  • I'm not expert in political information in Mexico, but I'm sure that the equivalent of a "minister" or "secretary" of a first level administrative division in Spain is covered enough in the news to be clearly notable.
  • Being corrupt or being honest doesn't add nor subtract notability. In fact, a politician is more likely to attract extra notability for being outstandingly corrupt than for being outstandingly honest.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was just joking when I said he's a corrupt politician. Of course corrupt politicians can be notable, but I still think these images should disappear from Commons. I've spent time here to express my reasons because I just cannot stand the shameless level of abuse shown by the uploader. Even if his team succeeds at creating an article about this guy, I would not change my opinion (although he can keep the picture he put on his Commons user page per COM:INUSE). Also, even though we can't find those pictures elsewhere, he claimed that he took them, which is not true. The people who took the pictures own them, not him. Declarations of consent by the owners are necessary. But I hope the pictures will be deleted based on the self-promotion rationale. Even if he creates an article about himself, I don't see how all of these pictures can be kept. Let him fight later, if he wants to, to get a couple of them undeleted. What he did is selfish and stupid, at best. Even with a hypothetical article about him, how many of these pictures could be used in the article? Two, at the most (including the one on his user page). Or have you ever seen a Wikipedia article about a politician with two campaign pictures from the same campaign? Of course not. Dontreader (talk) 17:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will give you an example. category:Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya contents 1881 files (227 of them used in Wikimedia projects). A big amount of these files were uploaded by the party to its Flickr account under a free license - of course, the reason to upload them was to help press and anybody to inform about the party and this way promote it. It's a 100% promotional reason to contribute to free knowledge. Commons users - as far as I know unrelated to the party - managed to upload those images and now 53 or them are used in Wikimedia projects and they would have been a lot more if they had been uploaded some years earlier. Some of them are even used to illustrate subjects quite unrelated to the party.
This promotional images from Convergència i Unió have been useful for educative purposes. I don't see those mexican images different.
On the ownership issue, in the most doubtful cases, we usually content ourselves with a statement of organizations via OTRS or a free license on Flickr stated by organizations or enterprises. This case is very similar.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I took a look at that gallery. It's another abomination, in my opinion, although not as bad as this one. Do you honestly think, for example, that this image is educationally useful? It's unused (not surprisingly). I think it's garbage. Poor quality (blurry), and what am I supposed to learn from it? Commons says here that:
  • The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".
  • An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons.
Please tell me, if I nominate that file for deletion, do you think it will be kept? Thanks in advance. Dontreader (talk) 20:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've shown you that tens of those images are in use in Wikimedia projects - and Wikimedia projects are just a tiny fraction of all conceivable educative usages. Then obviously, those images - and that kind of images - are in scope.
About that particular blurred image, it needs better information, but I think that at least the person in center is notable by himself - about others and the event I would need to check. It could be deleted if we had equivalent non blurred image, as it happened in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Concurs de Castells 2008 P1220783.JPG.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Files uploaded by Raymundo Martínez Carbajal

Self promotion. Not in project scope.

— Racconish 📥 22:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom & doubts regarding authorship. INeverCry 23:44, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneous content Сарапулов (talk) 07:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's a photo of a cat in a roof. There is no need to delete it. The "natural heritage site" template can be removed without deleting the file, and the file could be renamed.--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 23:51, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneous content Сарапулов (talk) 09:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion given. INeverCry 23:51, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal unsed image. out of scoop Saqib (talk) 12:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to look for if we have got image of this bridge during WLE but if we're going to keep every personal photos because it show some landscape, then I think we're going to have many such photos on Commons because most of the photos show some landscape. After all, such photos taken on earth with some background of scenery, rather than in the air with no background. --Saqib (talk) 09:25, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Some years ago, when I arrived to Wikipedia, a lot of places were illustrated with an image with people in the foreground, because there was no better image available. Now, we usually have better images - without disturbing people - for a lot of places. If for this place we had better images we could debate getting rid of this one.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, I can't find other equivalent images of a girl in a bridge, although it might just be that they are uncategorized.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:32, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 23:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work, but might be old enough to be in the Public Domain (Warszawa 1913). {{PD-Polish}} doesn't really fit, however, because it's only about photographs. {{PD-old}} requires the author to be known. Ideas, anyone? El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 23:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 10:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please do not delete this file. it is a homework of one of our students and is now in the correct category Category:Wikiversity-class-DSA-Torgelow-2015-6.3-Internet-und-Militär. Our students are all new to wikimedia and have bad naming and categorizing habbits but we are working on this. as soon as the deletion request is removed I will ask to rename the file. --Renepick (talk) 19:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 23:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested deletion. See ticket:2015052810009376. Currently not used. Yann (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see no valid reason for deletion. If name / descrition is misleading (because the logo is outdated) I suggest rename / description fix. IMO, still in scope; useful for historical purposes. Ankry (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Ankry. Also, this seems to be the only logo we have for this company, and is the only live upload of the user. INeverCry 23:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibirapuera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

]

(talk The artist used filters to emphasize the pleasure,for the audience to have access at the information - image The subject "Night Exercise" is a positive message and good habit. message is clear I believe Wikipédia have a clever audience... My suggestion is that you review your point (talk


Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 23:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MoiraMoira as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non free logo from https://www.hupper.nl/ no permission given Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 23:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've mistakenly uploaded the same picture twice with slightly different file name. I'll be very grateful for the help in deletion of this doubling photo Nataliya Shestakova (talk) 17:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Topographic maps are rarely own work of user. Probable copyvio unless souce is provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rainbow Zebra 13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of false-colored satellite images all claimed as own work of uploader without source. Very few uploaders have private satellites; to be retained, the original sources of these images need to be provided by uploader, please see COM:EVID.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Uploader left a message at my talk page[11]. I have gone to [http://www.viewfinderpanoramas.org/dem3.html the site the uploader added as source. I'd appreciate the closing administrator take a look for the licensing or original source information, the US material appears to be from the "2000 Shuttle Radar Topography Mission". If that's correct, the appropriate PD license needs to be added to all pages. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment In case you are not aware, most of my uploaded files, the first 90 percent of them, come from a different source at http://www.mrlc.gov/viewerjs. For these files, I have changed the license to PD-USGov. The last few uploads which come from http://www.viewfinderpanoramas.org/dem3.html, I have changed the license to PD-USGov-NASA. --Rainbow Zebra 13 (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Rainbow Zebra 13, licensing issues addressed. INeverCry 00:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free college logo, not just trivial letters. Retired electrician (talk) 06:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a license to publish the file in Wikipedia -
Lizense Migup
--Kislicyn (talk) 08:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Commons is a collection of media that's free to use anywhere, i.e. on other websites, on books, on advertisement, etc. If the licence was given for use on Wikipedia only, then the file must be removed here and uploaded to Wikipedia. --Pitke (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 20:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from a site with © 2013. No free license. Retired electrician (talk) 06:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC) I have a license to publish the file in Wikipedia - Lizense Migup[reply]

Permission look OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Eugene. INeverCry 19:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source page given as "source" does not exist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source is now here: http://web.archive.org/web/20150612085000/http://data.abuledu.org/wp/?LOM=8506 but the license is only cc-by-sa. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Hedwig. INeverCry 19:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not "own work", may be old enough to be kept, but requires proper source information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not "own work", may be old enough to be kept, but requires proper source information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not "own work", may be old enough to be kept, but requires proper source information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has no relation to the balalaika. File downloaded for no purpose. ПростоУчастник (talk) 19:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. INeverCry 20:56, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not "own work", may be old enough to be kept, but requires proper source information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously not own work. But Rackam who died in 1939 is now PD. — Racconish 📥 22:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The original is at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/11339/11339-h/11339-h.htm, and we have w:Arthur Rackham (1867-1939) for the art, but this pdf includes a French translation of the fables. Is that done by the uploader? Is a modern translation done by a seemingly unpublished anonymous person within scope? INeverCry 19:47, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Page 4 of the PDF says the translation from English is by Annie Lesca and is CC BY SA. The immediate source of the file, Abulédu, is CC BY SA [12]. — Racconish 📥 08:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: cant fin the file on the source. JuTa 20:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC) [reply]

kept: source is http://raconte-moi.abuledu.org/w/7176-si_esope_m_etait_conte?fullscreen=2 --JuTa 21:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the second photo on the page at this website. Changes include the colorizing, extra rays from sun, etc., but still obviously same picture. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Nominator show evidence that the image has NOT been grabbed from the that web page. To cast a doubt we need some evidence that the image has been copied from anywhere else. At the moment, there is no reason to think that anybody different that the author has had access to the original image or the image uploaded here.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:05, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The source page is marked "©2015 Mulheres na Montanha - Todos os Direitos Reservados.", so a derivative work of that image would not be free of copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • As you previously pointed, our image is not a derived work of that "source". Therefore, it's not the source. Furhtermore, author (and uploader) names are the same in both places, so there is no reason to doubt - e.g. there is no reason to doubt beyond any other "own work" uploaded to Commons.
This DR and a bunch of similar ones seem to be a campaign against allowing Commons collaborators to publish derived works of the same originals anywhere else, but free licenses don't restrict the right to publish as many copies and derived works of their works wherever they want, in the way they chose and with any license.--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DW of a copyrighted work. Would need confirmation through COM:OTRS. Anybody can log onto commons using a name found in the web. JuTa 20:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Personality right issues as well. P 1 9 9   18:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Your point is that a fair good image of a non notable child eating a non notable slice of bread has no potential educative use and it's therefore out of Commons scope. Anyway, category:children eating has 145 images, and 48 of them are in use in Wikimedia projects - most of them of non notable children. Therefore, it's obvious that images of generic children eating have plenty of potential educative uses in our projects. Outside Wikimedia, they can be reused in the large amount of books and other publications about children and food which are released every year.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is where we need a balanced approach: yes, some of these images of eating children can be useful and educational, but on the other hand, we don't want Commons to become a host for everyone's family photos. --P 1 9 9   13:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • If people's family album is full of photographs with potential educative uses, we should be happy to host such photos. Why are you afraid of hosting too many potentially educative images? Since good images of children eating have potential educative uses, it's better to have 146 than 145 of them.--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, added {{PR}}. JuTa 19:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]