Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/07/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(480x640).jpg){kind=link}
_(480x640).jpg){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
dubbele pagina Xandra van rossem (talk) 18:31, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Done but please keep in mind that Commons is not a place for articles. Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Это не Salvia nemorosa 'Caradonna', а совсем другое растение - STACHYS lanata Jasq.= S. byzantiana 5.144.96.46 01:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, if the plant is improperly identified please tag it for renaming Denniss (talk) 02:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a photograph of a photograph (e.g. notice borders/matting in upper left and lower right). Эlcobbola talk 16:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Closed and added to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Philippe gratton to discuss images with same issue Эlcobbola talk 16:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hoffmann92 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non free images:
- File:Estadio Nacional Julio Martinez.jpg: © 2013 COLOMBIA CORRE
- File:Estadio El Teniente 2014.jpg: No sign of a free license at the source
- File:Estadio Sausalito 2014.jpg: © 2014 El Epicentro. Todos los derechos reservados.
- File:Estadio Elías Figueroa 2014.jpg: Las imágenes son © de cada fotógrafo/oficina menciona - no sign of a free license for this image
- File:Estadio La Portada.jpg: CC-BY-NC - we don't accept files with a "non commercial" restriction - see COM:Licensing
- File:Regional Calvo y Bascuñán.jpg: CC-BY-NC - we don't accept files with a "non commercial" restriction - see COM:Licensing
El Grafo (talk) 08:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violations. JuTa 20:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Category:Physomerus bicoloripes Alpsdake (talk) 11:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: DR opened by mistake, edition reverted by the same user. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure because invalid deletion request)
This file was initially tagged by Elcobbola as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dailyfreepsd.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/trophy-of-the-World-Cupfootball-match-trophy-vector.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.dailyfreepsd.com/?attachment_id=3408&h=1920&w=960&tbnid=KZuvtlPph9pTHM&zoom=1&tbnh=318&tbnw=159&usg=__55ycV84P9dWpErHxM1I1_50LmZE= also derivative of actual sculpture Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- The uploader objected to speedy deleting this file and has some arguments. I see no harm in a regular DR in this case. Natuur12 (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- First of all I'd like to make clear I just moved a CC 3.0 file from en.wiki, which seems to be fully legit.
- Now I think we have to well define what's derivative or not, because if it's a derivative of a copyrighted 3d object, then it is supposed to be deleted from en.wiki too.
- I think it's just a work representing the FIFA trophy, but not a derivative. --Gambo7 (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- The English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are two complementary projects whose objectives are not exactly identical. The English Wikipedia has chosen to allow media files copyrighted but usable under Fair Use. Wikimedia Commmons, due to its different objectives, has not. As such the deletion of a file on a project does not become grounds for deletion on another project. Regardless, you may want to raise issues on the English Wikipedia if you feel the file ought to be deleted there as well. Regards, Snowolf How can I help? 22:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Delete as unambiguous copyio. Image is a derivative of the sculpture which has been deleted ad nauseam (Commons:Deletion requests/File:FIFA World Cup Trophy, 2010.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Copa Mundial de la FIFA 2010.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:FIFA World Cup trophy.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:FIFA World Cup Trophy.jpg, etc.) A "'derivative work' is a work based upon one or more pre-existing works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted”. Rendering a trophy as a svg "cartoon" does not dissolve magically copyright. The above is OTHERSTUFF. Эlcobbola talk 17:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)- FYI: en:Special:Undelete/File:Football_World_Cup.svg has an interesting history about drawing of this image, it seems to be a true work by Jcer80 anyway. --Vituzzu (talk) 21:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I find the copyvio claims based on other website's publication of the image unconvincing, as they are more recent than the original drawing/vectoring on the English Wikipedia at en:File:Football World Cup.svg. It was first uploaded in November '07. I think this discussion should focus on the derivative issue, on which users more expert than me on the sculpture's copyright status and this SVG's similarity/inspiration/derivation from it should comment. Snowolf How can I help? 22:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed, the references to other webistes are inconsistent --Gambo7 (talk) 22:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment If the description of the image were "fantasy image representing a football award", would the copyright issues have been raised? There are many images on wikis and commons of "fantasy" images drawn to avoid copyvio problems with more realistic logos or symbols... --Gambo7 (talk) 08:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/organisation/marketing/brand-protection/intellectual-property/ - FIFA credibly claim ownership of the design of the trophy, which would be protected under US and international copyright legislation as an item of 3D sculpture not permanently installed in a public location. See also http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10272924 and practical application of FIFA's claim of ownership (July 2014) in which Nico Rosberg was banned by FIFA from using an image of the World Cup Trophy on his helmet for the German Grand Prix (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/28344335) demonstrating clearly FIFA's claim of ownership of the design and likeness of the trophy to be valid. -- Nick (talk) 11:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
porque quiero Javier28 (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy close: File:Maluma.jpg already deleted by Steinsplitter and other admins due to copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure because file already deleted).
Viola los derechos de autor. C.Jonel [contact me] 00:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata about notable Colombian singer, the uploader's only contribution. Considering what is depicted, own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement: (C) Estereo NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
incomplete Saqib (talk) 23:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I suppose than you know well the Commons deletion policy. If you have a more up ro date file, just upload as new version. If you really want to delete (as recently uploaded), please use {{Speedy}} instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 13:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed.
User will use the other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Dschwen JuTa 19:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User will use the other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:40, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:50, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has remove the image license and request wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 03:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 03:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 03:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 03:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 03:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 20:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 03:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 21:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 21:01, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 21:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 21:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
User ebay5678 who upload this image has removed the image license and requested wiki delete this image, because this image is no longer needed. Ebay5678 (talk) 05:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:McZusatz. JuTa 21:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Magog the Ogre. JuTa 21:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Magog the Ogre. JuTa 21:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement: (C) Namco NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: For clearly copyvios like this, please use {{Copyvio}} (speedy) instead. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Magog the Ogre. JuTa 21:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Magog the Ogre. JuTa 21:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of painting; OTRS ticket applies only to the photo itself, not the painting. Эlcobbola talk 16:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Email asking for clarification sent; If we can hold off with this for a few weeks, that would be appreciated. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- subject has clarified they are happy with this; can we close this please? --Mdann52talk to me! 19:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS ticket number 2014071510020331 - permission completed in the meantime from photographer and artist Jcb (talk) 22:00, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
There is no official record of Israel using chemical warfare against anyone. 66.108.187.100 03:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy keep please: Have you evidences than Israel didn't used chemical weapons against Palestine? No valid reason for delete this picture in use, and possible conflict of interest and/or vandalism. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)- Keep This photograph shows a reality. Zozs (talk) 19:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Maybe there's an issue with the filename, but that isn't for AfD. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 01:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: POV -- Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 09:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 09:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Obviously a scan from print or capture from screen, see typical pattern. Thereby a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded in batch with obvious copyvios (see File:005 010 - copia.jpg and File:005 005 - copia.jpg). Same name scheme, resolution, technical characteristics, etc.
- File:005 035 - copia.jpg
- File:005 014 - copia.jpg
- File:005 011 - copia.jpg
- File:005 004 - copia.jpg
- File:005 003 - copia.jpg
- File:004 - copia.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
_(480x640).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(480x640).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
_(480x640).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
_(480x640).jpg){kind=link}
_(480x640).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(480x640).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
_(480x640).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
_(480x640).jpg){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
_(640x425).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
_(640x425).jpg){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
_(640x480).jpg){kind=link}
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 15:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be user's own work, seems to be from a book or poster, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 16:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE; unused image of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 16:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 16:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, personal portrait. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 16:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philippe gratton (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be photographs of photographs (e.g. notice borders/matting, scratches, other visual characteristics).
- File:L'éternité depuis le début, Petit Odéon, octobre 1974.JPG
- File:L'éternité depuis le début, Petit Odéon, 1974.JPG
- File:Répétitions de "Maitre Puntila et son valet Matti, Centre Dramatique du Nord, 1971.JPG
- File:Dehors dedans, Centre Dramatique du Nord, 1972.JPG
- File:Le metteur en scène philippe madral, 1972.JPG
Эlcobbola talk 16:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
com:scope McZusatz (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work; scan of publication by en:Ernst Barthel (died 1953, thus not PD until ca. 2023)
Эlcobbola talk 17:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Seems as a very useful illustration of a weird concept otherwise hard to depict. If this would be deleted many other not so well known pictures would have to be deleted, too, Thus, I don't recommend to delete it. --Nvf33 (talk) 17:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Your uploads infringe on copyright. Usefulness is not responsive or germane to the point. OTHERSTUFF arguments are not substantive; if you know of other images that need to be deleted, please feel free to nominate them. Эlcobbola talk 17:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality self portrait. Unused. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
made a mistake, wrong title 130.88.141.34 13:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be copyvio. See 2011-crawled page and icon in lower left Risker (talk) 04:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
text only, some homepage material Motopark (talk) 04:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is not clear that the uploader is the copyright holder for the display on the video monitor. Gazebo (talk) 05:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- speedy delete derivative image. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is not clear that the uploader is the copyright holder for the display on the video monitor. Gazebo (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
File:A correlação e a contribuição da Teoria do Caos, o Efeito Borboleta e a Análise de Cenários no contexto das organizações, para a elaboração do Planejamento Estratégico.pdf
[edit]text only, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 06:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
File:PLANIFICACIÓN Y GESTIÓN DEL PIEDEMONTE MENDOCINO, UN ASUNTO PENDIENTE PLANIFICACIÓN Y GESTIÓN DEL PIEDEMONTE MENDOCINO, UN ASUNTO PENDIENTE.pdf
[edit]text only, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 06:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
copyvio from http://newshopper.sulekha.com/shahla-atta_photo_914616.htm Sjö (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
no source no author name no date Gunduu (talk) 08:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:34, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
no source no author name no date Gunduu (talk) 08:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
no source no author name no date Gunduu (talk) 08:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
no source no author name no date Gunduu (talk) 08:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
no source no author name no date Gunduu (talk) 08:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
no source no author name no date Gunduu (talk) 08:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
File from user with 10 edits in 2013, who think that wiki is for personal page. Out of SCOPE. Not in use. - Shakko (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- plus more:
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Published here in 2013. No indication that it is an old work. Copyvio likely. BrightRaven (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexander Reid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks, advertising or self-promotion
- File:Something01X.jpg
- File:Host a SNF Kiosk in your area.png
- File:Savenaturefree local kiosk concept.jpg
- File:No one doubts climate change anymore.jpg
- File:Buck004.jpg
- File:PureTruth.jpg
- File:ThingGreen800.jpg
- File:Area7.jpg
- File:Something01X0.jpg
- File:HexSocca02.jpg
- File:Unitycircle.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 09:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- I am a digital artist and webmaster at "savenaturefree" I created the image using truespace 3.2 and several; others Which can be viewed on my profile photos section at http://savetheworldfree.ning.com/profile/Savenaturefree
- In my humble opinion, these images do not belong to our project's scope, because we only host files with educational value. We are not a free media repository. BrightRaven (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Promotional photo. Humatiel (talk) 10:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, user created logotype. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 20:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
User created portrait work. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Extremely small screenshot of a web page. Does not provide value to commons. Mippzon (talk) 21:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above, and copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Selfie. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 21:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Jay Chandrasekhar image originally from- http---psychusa-wikia-com-wiki-Jay Chandrasekhar 2014-07-16 01-03.jpg
[edit]
No license given at wikia. Highly unlikely to be own work of uploader there (small file size; no meaningful EXIF data); especially looking at that uploader's other uploads there: [1]. Might be a screengrab, or a publicity photo. Lupo 21:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't need $17,000 to know that this image is out of scope. If it isn't, I'll give the uploader an extra hour in the Village Pump. ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement: (C) TheeFaction ? NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Ich dachte, es gäbe noch keine Abbildung mit dem abgerissenen 2. Schornstein, und habe daher ein minderwertiges Handy-Foto hochgeladen. Das war voreilig. Sorry. Kann weg. Froth82 (talk) 20:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 18:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Please recplace it first Natuur12 (talk) 19:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
User who upload this image plan to use other image to replace this image. Ebay5678 (talk) 01:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Please upload the replacement first Natuur12 (talk) 19:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file is stated to be taken from AlltheSky.com. Specifically, this site (look under "Eridanus", then the picture on the right). However, according to their copyright page, the image is NOT licensed under the CC license. We might want to contact him and ask him to release his work under a CC-BY-SA license before the image gets deleted, because the user who uploaded this image claims to be him. 123chess456 (talk) 01:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded many of my constellation images in a decent resolution for Wikipedia under the CC-BY-SA license. The versions at my site AlltheSky.com are bigger and released only under my full copyright. Best wishes, Till
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Not own work (probably fixable), but IMHO out of scope here. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Beyond the COM:SCOPE issue, there appears to be a copyright problem. Based on the nominator's comments on Hedwig's talk page, copyright to this guide possible belongs to the authors, possibly to the provincial government. Given that Rochdale operated as a co-op from the late 1960s to mid 1970s, this guide is still under copyright under Canadian law, and we cannot host it here on Commons unless the copyright owner(s) agree/have agreed in writing to either freely license the material or release it into the public domain in accordance with the Commons rules. Absent such a license or release, this unfortunately needs to be deleted. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Page 2 of the pdf states: "THIS BOOK IS DISTIBUTED FREE. Contents in whole or part may be reproduced provided only that credit is acknowledged to the author of the part quoted and to The Toronto Survival Manual." That looks like some sort of attribution licence is all that is required. Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- There you go. Shows you that reading something carefully does pay off. I guess my only hesitancy is that there is no reference to modifications, but the broad intent of that sentence you quoted, Secondarywaltz, suggests to me that the authors were freely licensing it subject only to an attribution requirement. On that ground I'm inclined to say keep. I'm not concerned by the SCOPE argument. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Page 2 of the pdf states: "THIS BOOK IS DISTIBUTED FREE. Contents in whole or part may be reproduced provided only that credit is acknowledged to the author of the part quoted and to The Toronto Survival Manual." That looks like some sort of attribution licence is all that is required. Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Beyond the COM:SCOPE issue, there appears to be a copyright problem. Based on the nominator's comments on Hedwig's talk page, copyright to this guide possible belongs to the authors, possibly to the provincial government. Given that Rochdale operated as a co-op from the late 1960s to mid 1970s, this guide is still under copyright under Canadian law, and we cannot host it here on Commons unless the copyright owner(s) agree/have agreed in writing to either freely license the material or release it into the public domain in accordance with the Commons rules. Absent such a license or release, this unfortunately needs to be deleted. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Then let's keep it! :-) @Stuart roche44: The license has to be changed as well as the authors should be mentioned in the information template. Then the files should be safe and sound here on Commons. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I changed the license, date, source. Should be fine now. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Looks good. Thanks, Hedwig. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Okey Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Maxxl2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no source - attribution of SVG elements missing Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Updated the summary box with the source/reference and attribution of SVG elements - John Ronn talk 05:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Fixed Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
NOFOP in Ukraine Yuriy Kvach (talk) 07:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Nothing connects uploader with copyright holders and {{PD-Art}} doesn't apply due to visible frames. heb [T C E] 08:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Can be found on various places on the web but original source seems to be Panoramio [2]. Uploader doesn't seem to be the copyright holder. El Grafo (talk) 08:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
The translated text says it is ok to use this image so long as the logo isn't removed. This means no derivative works which is required. russavia (talk) 08:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 09:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- There is an article about her in Wikipedia in Hungarian, so it is probably in scope. Nevertheless, permission is needed for this contemporary artist. BrightRaven (talk) 07:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- This smaller image has no watermark. This permission was published on the artist's website. So I do not know whether we should keep this file or not. BrightRaven (talk) 09:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: He has an article and there is permission. Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quaility image. Unsure what the picture displays. Does it provide value to Commons? Mippzon (talk) 09:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Seems to be taken from [3] here. El Grafo (talk) 11:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
From panoramio with © all rights reserved by DXT 1 (Dmitriy T). There is another copy at ru:Файл:Геническое_озеро.jpg, which should probably deleted as well. El Grafo (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Photoshopped nonsense. Appears to be vandalism, and is very likely to be a copyright violation. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 11:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Small resolution, looks like not own work. Anatoliy (talk) 11:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- This picture was taken and printed years ago. Unfortunately I did not keep a computer version so I had to scan the printed image. --Perohanych (talk) 06:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This appears to be a forged or altered diplomatic document having to do with the International Criminal Court. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 11:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
It's a replica of an existing file Kj1595 (talk) 12:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Which file? I am not going to look for stuff like this Natuur12 (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Name on the logo is wrong. Also it's an outaded replica of the existing logo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stema_e_Komun%C3%ABs_Synej.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
It's a replica of an existing file Kj1595 (talk) 12:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: If the file or title is wrong, just upload a new version and/or rename them instead of uploading the same file more than once. Please identify the most correct file and apply the correspondient corrections, and tag for {{Speedy}} the other ones. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Which file? I am not going to look for stuff like this Natuur12 (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Name on the logo is wrong. Also it's an outaded replica of the existing logo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stema_e_Komun%C3%ABs_Synej.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
It's a replica of an existing file. It's also wrongly titled. Kj1595 (talk) 12:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: If the file or title is wrong, just upload a new version and/or rename them instead of uploading the same file more than once. Please identify the most correct file and apply the correspondient corrections, and tag for {{Speedy}} the other ones. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Which file? I am not going to look for stuff like this Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Name on the logo is wrong. Also it's an outaded replica of the existing logo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stema_e_Komun%C3%ABs_Synej.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:15, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
It's a replica of an existing file Kj1595 (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: If the file or title is wrong, just upload a new version and/or rename them instead of uploading the same file more than once. Please identify the most correct file and apply the correspondient corrections, and tag for {{Speedy}} the other ones. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Which file? I am not going to look for stuff like this Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of an existing file http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stema_e_Kavaj%C3%ABs.svg 167.187.101.239 11:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- The other file is on the English Wikipedia. Basvb (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Not so simple. Copyvio? Yann (talk) 16:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept, It appears to be "not protected by copyright" according to Article 9(c) of the Albanian Copyright Law (2005) because it is a black&white version of the seal of Kavajë district (or municipality). Therefore I can only assume that the file is in the public domain, although the law does not use those exact words. Green Giant (talk) 19:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
It's a replica of an existing file. File content is incomplete. Kj1595 (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: If the file or title is wrong, just upload a new version and/or rename them instead of uploading the same file more than once. Please identify the most correct file and apply the correspondient corrections, and tag for {{Speedy}} the other ones. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Which file? I am not going to look for stuff like this Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Outdated map. Replica of this existing map https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harta_e_Rrug%C3%ABve_t%C3%AB_Kavaj%C3%ABs.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
It's a replica of an existing file. File content is incomplete. Kj1595 (talk) 12:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Which file? I am not going to look for stuff like this Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Outdated map. Replica of this existing map https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harta_e_Rrug%C3%ABve_t%C3%AB_Kavaj%C3%ABs.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Spam -- non notable business . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
violación de copyright Dodro (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: Freedom of Panorama in Spain. Regardless the status of the sources (no date and no EXIF), this specific picture of the Castromil building (Built around 1730 and collapsed in the 1970) seems to be very old. So, the picture is already in the Public domain. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious licenses, no evidence that uploader is the same person as the prominent animator. Two more authors at the portrait, that could be found in the net in a bigger size [4].
![[4]](http://culture.ru/ru/uploads/media/news/0001/17/thumb_16399_news_billboard.jpeg){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 13:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
No license Jarekt (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This is a Miniature Pinscher, on the page of German Pinscher Gwestra (talk) 13:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Picture of a sculpture by malgorzata Chodakowska within a shopping mall, copyright violation - Panoramafreiheit does not apply here, because it does not allow to take pictures of copyrighted material within a building, even if you are standing outside that building. Paulae (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
FoP France (architect died 1981) Milliped (talk) 14:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Sculpture by Katharine Emma Maltwood, who died in 1961. This is not in the public domain. However, uploader could be connected to the gallery. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Habbo
[edit]
Company doesn't give the permission to publish their logos. People who add the images are not the company. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - File:Habbo logo.png and File:Habbo-logo.png as {{PD-textlogo}} and Delete File:Habbo Fansite.png per COM:PRP as possibly above the ToO. Эlcobbola talk 14:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: one and kept two Natuur12 (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
derivative work of temporarily exposed advertising poster darkweasel94 14:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This page is absolutely senseless as it is an overview page over one single photo. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 15:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Self-promotion, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: screenshot of a software, maybe for self-promotion CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Artist's painting is clearly visible. So, his permission is needed to publish this photo., Vanjagenije (talk) 16:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused, and almost identical image to File:Matricaria recutita 4623.jpg. It looks like the background is a bit darker in one than the other, they have sequential exposure numbers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of sculpture; no FoP in the US Эlcobbola talk 17:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- I am neither the author nor creator of this image and have no particular personal interest in it one way or the other as my only connection to it is that I cropped it at the request of another editor who posted a request to do so in the Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop. That being said, however, I do not believe that this object has sufficient "originality" as a "sculpture" to be subject to FoP restriction as it was clearly created not as a "work of art" but to be a faithful reproduction (albeit a "giant" one) of a common commercial product, i.e, an automobile tire, for the purpose or promotion of that product. As such a two dimensional image of this object does not appear to me to be a violation of FoP under 17 U.S.C. §113, would appear to be allowed under Rock & Roll Hall of Fame & Museum v. Gentile Prods., 134 F.3d 749 (6th Cir. Ohio 1998), and Leicester v. Warner Bros., 232 F.3d 1212-1217 (9th Cir. 2000), and also constitutes fair use under 17 U.S.C. §107. Centpacrr (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- You may misunderstand the meaning of originality and of a utilitarian article. As you acknowledge, this is essentially a giant scale model of an industrial object; it's purpose is aesthetic, not functional, thus it does not get a useful article exemption - see User:Elcobbola/Models for the reasoning and case law. There are no 2D objects here, so I don't follow why you find that case law relevant. Эlcobbola talk 19:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- The two cited cases relate to 2D photographs of 3D, not 2D, objects. Centpacrr (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame & Museum, Inc. V. Gentile Prod. is a trademark case and does not reference copyright. Leicester v. Warner Bros. deals with towers found to have a structural function inseparable from the aesthetics. What, precisely, is the industrial function of this tire? What building is it holding up? To the extent it "constitutes fair use under 17 U.S.C. §107," remember fair use is forbidden on the Commons). Эlcobbola talk 19:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- The two cited cases relate to 2D photographs of 3D, not 2D, objects. Centpacrr (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- "Originality" is also an essential element of copyright which I believe to be at issue here and would likely not be sufficient to support a claim that this object is a copyrightable "work of art" per Puddu v. Buonamici Statuary Inc. 450 F.2d 401 (1971). Centpacrr (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- As I said, you appear to misunderstand originality. Per your cite: "originality has been considered to mean 'only that the work owes its origin to the author, i. e., is independently created and not copied from other works." A tire, as an industrial object, is not another work - just as a lion is not a work on which a sculpture of a lion could be based. Indeed, see also Rushton v. Vitale, 218 F.2d 434, 436 (2d Cir. 1955): "[t]he mere fact that ... [a stuffed toy chimp] is based on a live model does not deprive [its author] ... of the necessary amount of originality." Basing a work on a subject with no copyright (a chimp, a tire, a lion) does not deprive the author of originality. Also per your cite, originality includes an element of novelty. Creative choices such as the wheel/hub cap design, tread pattern, etc. are examples of input generally considered novel/a creative "spark". Indeed, "To be sure, the requisite level of creativity is extremely low; even a slight amount will suffice. The vast majority of works make the grade quite easily, as they possess some creative spark, 'no matter how crude, humble or obvious ' it might be." (Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991))(emphasis added). Эlcobbola talk 20:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Irrespective of any of the above, this "giant tire" was built by the U.S. Rubber Co. in 1964 not as a "sculpture" but as a ferris wheel ride for its pavilion at the 1964 New York World's Fair and was then moved by the company to Allen Park, MI, two years later. As promotional images of the "panorama" of this object were published in both brochures as well as in magazine and newspaper advertisements placed and paid for by that company, the "panorama's" right's holder, between 1964 and January 1, 1978, one or more of which were published without specific copyright notice, that would seem to cause the copyright status of the "panorama" of this object to be governed by the 1909 Copyright Act in force at the time of their publication. It would seem, therefore, that as the 1976 Act now in force provides that any previously copyrightable image or "panorama" of such an object made at any time after the first publication of any image of it had been published prior to 1978 by and under Uniroyal's (the copyright owner’s) authority without such an affirmative notice of copyright would render any and all copyright protection for the "panorama" (as opposed to a specific image) to be permanently terminated in the United States at the time of such first publication. As the particular image in question here was freely licensed through Flickr, and the "panorama" of the object (the "giant tire") also appears to be in the public domain under the provisions of the 1909 and 1976 Acts as images of it were published by U.S. Rubber (now Uniroyal) prior to January 1, 1978, without an affirmative notice of copyright, this image would therefore appear to meet all the criteria for inclusion on Commons. For that reason nomination for deletion of this image should therefore be withdrawn as moot. Centpacrr (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know what you believe "panorama" to mean, but I do not see that word appear once in the 1909 Act. The proper consideration is copy. Section 10 of the 1909 Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 10) indeed requires that a notice of copyright be affixed "to each copy (of the work) thereof published or offered for sale in the United States by the authority of the copyright proprietor...." Under the 1909 Copyright Act, however, "'(a) copy is that which comes so near to the original as to give every person seeing it the idea created by the original" (emphasis added) (White-Smith Music Co. v. Apollo Co., 209 U.S. 1, 17, 28 S.Ct. 319, 323, 52 L.Ed. 655 (1908)) Congress implicitly adopted this definition in the 1909 Copyright Act; See 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.03(B) at 2-29 (1981). For example, Kamar International Inc v. Russ Berrie and Co. found "pictures are not copies of what was copyrightable in Kamar's work (soft sculptures)" and "[p]hotographs of the soft sculptures do not give viewers the idea created by the original; nor are the pictures the tangible things, the reproduction of which it is the purpose of the statute to protect. Distributing uncopyrighted pictures of the (soft sculptures) does not, therefore, invalidate Kamar's copyright." (Kamar International Inc v. Russ Berrie and Co ., 421 F. 3d 199 (3rd. Cir. 2005)) In other words, a photograph (2D) of a sculpture (3D) is by definition not a copy, as it cannot convey the "idea created by the original." To believe this is a genuine copy of the actual sculpture is contrary to case law and common sense. Эlcobbola talk 21:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Irrespective of any of the above, this "giant tire" was built by the U.S. Rubber Co. in 1964 not as a "sculpture" but as a ferris wheel ride for its pavilion at the 1964 New York World's Fair and was then moved by the company to Allen Park, MI, two years later. As promotional images of the "panorama" of this object were published in both brochures as well as in magazine and newspaper advertisements placed and paid for by that company, the "panorama's" right's holder, between 1964 and January 1, 1978, one or more of which were published without specific copyright notice, that would seem to cause the copyright status of the "panorama" of this object to be governed by the 1909 Copyright Act in force at the time of their publication. It would seem, therefore, that as the 1976 Act now in force provides that any previously copyrightable image or "panorama" of such an object made at any time after the first publication of any image of it had been published prior to 1978 by and under Uniroyal's (the copyright owner’s) authority without such an affirmative notice of copyright would render any and all copyright protection for the "panorama" (as opposed to a specific image) to be permanently terminated in the United States at the time of such first publication. As the particular image in question here was freely licensed through Flickr, and the "panorama" of the object (the "giant tire") also appears to be in the public domain under the provisions of the 1909 and 1976 Acts as images of it were published by U.S. Rubber (now Uniroyal) prior to January 1, 1978, without an affirmative notice of copyright, this image would therefore appear to meet all the criteria for inclusion on Commons. For that reason nomination for deletion of this image should therefore be withdrawn as moot. Centpacrr (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- As I said, you appear to misunderstand originality. Per your cite: "originality has been considered to mean 'only that the work owes its origin to the author, i. e., is independently created and not copied from other works." A tire, as an industrial object, is not another work - just as a lion is not a work on which a sculpture of a lion could be based. Indeed, see also Rushton v. Vitale, 218 F.2d 434, 436 (2d Cir. 1955): "[t]he mere fact that ... [a stuffed toy chimp] is based on a live model does not deprive [its author] ... of the necessary amount of originality." Basing a work on a subject with no copyright (a chimp, a tire, a lion) does not deprive the author of originality. Also per your cite, originality includes an element of novelty. Creative choices such as the wheel/hub cap design, tread pattern, etc. are examples of input generally considered novel/a creative "spark". Indeed, "To be sure, the requisite level of creativity is extremely low; even a slight amount will suffice. The vast majority of works make the grade quite easily, as they possess some creative spark, 'no matter how crude, humble or obvious ' it might be." (Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991))(emphasis added). Эlcobbola talk 20:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- You may misunderstand the meaning of originality and of a utilitarian article. As you acknowledge, this is essentially a giant scale model of an industrial object; it's purpose is aesthetic, not functional, thus it does not get a useful article exemption - see User:Elcobbola/Models for the reasoning and case law. There are no 2D objects here, so I don't follow why you find that case law relevant. Эlcobbola talk 19:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - As Centpacrr said, this relic is not a "sculpture", it's the remnant of a ferris wheel ride from the 1964 World's Fair.[5] ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Highly agree with Centpacrr. The subject in the photo is not a sculpture, it is a ferris wheel wrapped to resemble a tire. So in theory this is amusement park ride even though not functional is should still be classified by it. --///EuroCarGT 17:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - For all the reasons I laid out above, and especially the fact that this is not a "sculpture" but a structure built as both a ferris wheel as well as to promote a commercial product, and it's owner published images of it prior to 1978 without claiming copyright protection of the images or the "panorama" of the object they depicted. Centpacrr (talk) 03:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
![[5]](http://i.usatoday.net/communitymanager/_photos/drive-on/2012/03/12/giantx-wide-community.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: I agree with Эlcobbola on this one. Natuur12 (talk) 20:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no source (No source since) ... which is correct, however the painting is by fr:Marcel Lagasse (1880-1974) , which suggests this is possibly a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
possible copyright violation Amartyabag (talk) 17:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Freedom of panorama in India for buildings. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Such kind of photos have double copyright: architect's and photographer's. While architect's copyright is not violated, because there is freedom of panorama in India, the photographer's rights violation is likely. This is small photo without metadata and the uploader is serial copyright violator. I do not believe own work. Taivo (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As above Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
DW of a non free picture. Coyau (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
fake logo -the olympic rings aren't braided Maxxl² - talk 18:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Are you serious?? Do you think it's a valid reason for a deletion request? It can simply and easily be corrected. --Gambo7 (talk) 18:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ich habe die Erfahrung gemacht, dass du auf Ansprache auf deiner Talk-Seite nicht reagierst. Also bleibt nur dieser Weg. -- Maxxl² - talk 19:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Welche Ansprache??? Du hast nie auf meiner Talk-Seite darüber geschrieben --Gambo7 (talk) 19:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for delete. If the image has issues, the right way is upload a newer version with the corrections rather than nominating for deletion. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
JPEG copy of File:Flag of Saar (1947–1956).svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Tiny copy of the Russian flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 18:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Tiny duplicate of the Russian flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedydeleted: & protected. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Probably not a picture the user owns. Higher res here: http://img.cyberfight.ru/i_c/i9i/63289/orig/img.jpg – GeMet [talk] 18:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
zu obszön, nicht weiterbringend (bring keine Erkenntnisse) Der schlaue86 (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
No Source, no author, but {{PD-old-70}}. JuTa 20:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
No source, no author, but {{PD-old-70}}. JuTa 20:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Peteforsyth as no license. Well there is a CC license. But the authors an licenses of the depicted images should be named. Might be a borderline case for COM:DM. JuTa 20:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- According to my understanding of the COM:DM page, the appropriate response for a de minimis claim is to simply remove the minimal content -- especially where the shape of the picture makes such a crop practical (i.e., a rectangle can easily remove that one element without removing anything else of importance). But the uploader has indicated a strong preference in similar cases, for keeping the uncropped version. I think that preference clearly indicates the photos are not de minimis, but are an essential part of the general photo.
Even if there is a legal case like that to be made (i.e., even if our De Minimis policy is more strict than relevant law), I think it is simply a matter of respect for the original photographer to give them credit if they have requested it (via the selection of a license that requires attribution). I am confident the photographers are known or knowable, and that these are likely released under a free license (but not public domain); so I think it's reasonable that the uploader should find their names and include them in the file. Even if you're correct that it's not absolutely required by the law, it would demonstrate respect and appreciation to the photographer. -Pete F (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not DM Natuur12 (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Peteforsyth as no license. Well there is a CC license. But the authors an licenses of the depicted image should be named. Might be a borderline case for COM:DM. JuTa 20:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- According to my understanding of the COM:DM page, the appropriate response for a de minimis claim is to simply remove the minimal content -- especially where the shape of the picture makes such a crop practical (i.e., a rectangle can easily remove that one element without removing anything else of importance). But the uploader has indicated a strong preference in similar cases, for keeping the uncropped version. I think that preference clearly indicates the photos are not de minimis, but are an essential part of the general photo.
Even if there is a legal case like that to be made (i.e., even if our De Minimis policy is more strict than relevant law), I think it is simply a matter of respect for the original photographer to give them credit if they have requested it (via the selection of a license that requires attribution). I am confident the photographers are known or knowable, and that these are likely released under a free license (but not public domain); so I think it's reasonable that the uploader should find their names and include them in the file. Even if you're correct that it's not absolutely required by the law, it would demonstrate respect and appreciation to the photographer. -Pete F (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Peteforsyth as no license. Well there is a CC license. But the authors an licenses of the depicted image should be named. Might be a borderline case for COM:DM. JuTa 20:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- According to my understanding of the COM:DM page, the appropriate response for a de minimis claim is to simply remove the minimal content -- especially where the shape of the picture makes such a crop practical (i.e., a rectangle can easily remove that one element without removing anything else of importance). But the uploader has indicated a strong preference in similar cases, for keeping the uncropped version. I think that preference clearly indicates the photos are not de minimis, but are an essential part of the general photo.
Even if there is a legal case like that to be made (i.e., even if our De Minimis policy is more strict than relevant law), I think it is simply a matter of respect for the original photographer to give them credit if they have requested it (via the selection of a license that requires attribution). I am confident the photographers are known or knowable, and that these are likely released under a free license (but not public domain); so I think it's reasonable that the uploader should find their names and include them in the file. Even if you're correct that it's not absolutely required by the law, it would demonstrate respect and appreciation to the photographer. -Pete F (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
There is a similar problem with the complete presentation file File:Wikipedia App Visual direction.pdf, which contains scores of images. Some carry a hardly legibly watermark, which however is linked to Wikimedia on Flickr. But quite a number has no credit at all, though are somewhat unlikely own work of the presentation-author MGalloway (WMF); for example: the cat image on slide #28, the animal photo on slide #21, the design-images on slides #9 to #11, #14. I've notified the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not DM and those files must be atributed Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Peteforsyth as no license. Well there is a CC license. But the authors an licenses of the depicted image should be named. Might be a borderline case for COM:DM. JuTa 20:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- According to my understanding of the COM:DM page, the appropriate response for a de minimis claim is to simply remove the minimal content -- especially where the shape of the picture makes such a crop practical (i.e., a rectangle can easily remove that one element without removing anything else of importance). But the uploader has indicated a strong preference in similar cases, for keeping the uncropped version. I think that preference clearly indicates the photos are not de minimis, but are an essential part of the general photo.
Even if there is a legal case like that to be made (i.e., even if our De Minimis policy is more strict than relevant law), I think it is simply a matter of respect for the original photographer to give them credit if they have requested it (via the selection of a license that requires attribution). I am confident the photographers are known or knowable, and that these are likely released under a free license (but not public domain); so I think it's reasonable that the uploader should find their names and include them in the file. Even if you're correct that it's not absolutely required by the law, it would demonstrate respect and appreciation to the photographer. -Pete F (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not DM and that file must be atributed Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This file has no historic source in rendition or description. If it should be historical it doesn't follow the written blasonnement "Gules a pair of keys crossed in saltire, one gold, one silver, tied gold, surmounted by an umbraculum." A territorial body with the name "Pontifical State" never existed.
Three reasons for deletion. Maxxl² - talk 20:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- COM:NPOV: files do not necessarily need to comply with the Neutral point of view and No original research requirements.Images having particular national, political or religious significance including flags, emblems and maps can arouse strong passions, but Commons is not the place to decide which of various competing versions is the correct or official version.
- If you feel strongly that a map, emblem, flag is "wrong", make use of the version you prefer instead.
- A file that is in good faith use is, by that very fact, considered useful for an educational purpose and is not liable to deletion on the grounds that it is "wrong" in some way. --Gambo7 (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Moreover, the "historical blasonnement" you provide is just your own interpretation of «Gules a pair of keys crossed in saltire, one gold, one silver, tied gold, surmounted by a tiara silver, crowned gold», taken to represent the Papacy as distinct from the Papal States, so it's totally invented by you. It is moreover commonly known that until 1929 the colours of the keys could be both gold, both silver, or silver and gold with no particular order. --Gambo7 (talk) 21:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Again you are mistaken: the blasonnement is described at en:Coats_of_arms_of_the_Holy_See_and_Vatican_City#Papal_States and has the source Donald L. Galbreath: Papal Heraldry. Cambridge, 1930; Heffer and Sons, page 25. -- Maxxl² - talk 08:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- But it's « surmounted by a tiara silver, crowned gold» (and it's referred to the emblem of the popes), not «surmounted by an umbraculum»: that's invented by you. --Gambo7 (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Just read the second paragraph carefully and try to understand: The arms of the Papal States differed in having the umbraculum (the emblem of the Pope's temporal powers) in place of the tiara .... -- Maxxl² - talk 09:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- And you read what you wrote: «the written blasonnement "Gules a pair of keys crossed in saltire, one gold, one silver, tied gold, surmounted by an umbraculum"», “written” by you because it's not written in the text you mention.
- Anyway I dont want to keep this discussion further because the image is not violating any rules and it is not necessary for an image to be perfect (COM:NPOV), so the discussion about deletion can, IMO, be ended because it's inconsistent. --Gambo7 (talk) 09:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Again you are mistaken: the blasonnement is described at en:Coats_of_arms_of_the_Holy_See_and_Vatican_City#Papal_States and has the source Donald L. Galbreath: Papal Heraldry. Cambridge, 1930; Heffer and Sons, page 25. -- Maxxl² - talk 08:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Moreover, the "historical blasonnement" you provide is just your own interpretation of «Gules a pair of keys crossed in saltire, one gold, one silver, tied gold, surmounted by a tiara silver, crowned gold», taken to represent the Papacy as distinct from the Papal States, so it's totally invented by you. It is moreover commonly known that until 1929 the colours of the keys could be both gold, both silver, or silver and gold with no particular order. --Gambo7 (talk) 21:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- My last recommondation: if you refuse to trust the sources of the article in the en:wp, go and buy the book and read GIACOMO BASCAPÈ- MARCELLO DEL PIAZZO CON LA COOPERAZIONE DI LUIGI BORGIA INSEGNE E SIMBOLI ARALDICA PUBBLICA E PRIVATA MEDIEVALE E MODERNA page 760 STEMMA DEL REGNO D'ITALIA (1805-1815) - Lo stemma del regno napoleonico riunì i simboli dei territori occupati. Interzato in palo: nel 1°: troncato in a) di rosso al gonfalone della Chiesa d'oro caricato dalle « sacre chiavi » (Parma-Farnese) , in b) di .... I have to understand that coats of drawn by you are just sourceless and fictional. I will tag them accordingly. At least read your formerly mentioned source: European heraldry - Duché de Parme.
- My intend here is not annoy you or battle for simple categorisation, but to ask for trustworthy historical sources, heraldic renditions of blasonnements that we know and file names, that indicate the content reliably. -- Maxxl² - talk 09:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep npov --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use, in scope. Natuur12 (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Old map (before 2008) Cobija (talk) 20:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Likely hoax. The uploader's only other "contribution" has been File:Bicorn-tapestry.jpg, which is photoshopped from a real painting. With that in mind, I seriously doubt that this image came this way from the printer, unless it's a vanity image created by the uploader, in which case it would be badly out of scope. Nyttend (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded this file by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- What is wrong with it? Is the licence incorrect? --Albinfo (talk) 18:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not awnsered the question and in use Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
File lacks source and is not part of any article Kj1595 (talk) 12:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept It lacks source only because User:Kj1595 removed "own work" between the two DRs. Was "own work" not true? Or did he simply vandalize the file page? Note also that, contrary to the claim above, it is in use on WP:DE and, in any event, not being in use is not a reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of another file uploaded already on Wikipedia Kj1595 (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The file is used in it.wiki. Also, the replacement file is not shown. Taivo (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- delete I assume licence isn't correct --Albinfo (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: And why is this license incorrect? Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
It's a poor replica of an existing file uploaded on Wikipedia. Kj1595 (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in use --Krd 18:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
fichier presque identique : File:CHEPY 2.JPG Geralix (talk) 12:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Je précise que le fichier proposé à la suppression (File:CHEPY.JPG) comporte les numéros d'immatriculation visibles de deux véhicules automobiles alors que ces numéros ont été masqués sur le second fichier (File:CHEPY 2.JPG). Geralix (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Français : (missing text)Maintenir - fichier 2 est pire. Il n'y a pas les questions de confidentialité ici dans les communes. Supprimer Fichier: CHEPY 2.JPG plutôt
- English: (missing text)Keep - File 2 is worse. There are not privacy issues here in Commons with such kind of files. Delete File:CHEPY 2.JPG instead.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Sculpture by Katharine Maltwood, who died in 1961. This is still copyrighted. Uploader could be connected to the gallery that has the work. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
