Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/06/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Sans usage ; il s'agit d'un REDIRECT - François GOGLINS (talk) 05:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused redirect. INeverCry 05:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Also a duplicate of File:Duque Max Sanchez III.jpg, therefore a speedy delete . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Broken redirect. YiFeiBot (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Broken redirect. YiFeiBot (talk) 11:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Broken redirect. YiFeiBot (talk) 11:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Broken redirect. YiFeiBot (talk) 11:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Broken redirect. YiFeiBot (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Broken redirect. YiFeiBot (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
unlikely to be own photo, see http://tineye.com/search/2c804b1b1425ec8893fd35fd9e2d21c680dfc14c/?pluginver= Sealle (talk) 11:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deletion. Copyvio. Alan (talk) 11:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
not own photo, see watermark Sealle (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deletion. Copyright violation. (Search results). Alan (talk) 11:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, probable copyvio Sealle (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Alan (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete: Original uploader did not add a licnece but stated that: To be used only for the Vignale Gamine section of Wiki. No other use allowed!!!, so it should be deleted as non-free. Ww2censor (talk) 11:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I found this same image here: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/jazz/56259550-87/assistant-hornacek-jazz-charlotte.html.csp Zagalejo (talk) 05:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Steinsplitter Alan (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
yt6py96i75hi8uyj76u76yu57ug68yh678hy6h666y64ty46y6tyght65yt56t56y655t5n665t67t57t65t 177.42.28.235 15:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense Alan (talk) 19:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Watermarked image with suspect copyright notice. Dismas (talk) 18:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deletion. Copyvio. Search result Alan (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete. Whilst it would be in scope because of en:Laura Perico, it is a copyright violation and should thus be speedily deleted. Savhñ 23:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deletion. Copyright violation Alan (talk) 23:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cultura Hippie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation
- File:Woodstock-multidão.jpg
- Copyvio. Google images search. --Alan (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- File:Woodstrock Nova yorque.jpg
- Copyvio. Search --Alan (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- File:Festival Psicodália hippie.jpg
- Copyvio. search. --Alan (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- File:Nudismo Hippie eua.jpg
- Copyvio. Search --Alan (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- File:Hippies.......jpg
- Copyvio. Search --Alan (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- File:Comunidade Hippie nos Eua.jpg
- Copyvio. search --Alan (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- File:Hippies.jpg
- And Copyvio. Search --Alan (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Ray Garraty (talk) 19:43, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deletion, all images are Copyright violation. Alan (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
This user has a history of uploading copyvios. I've already deleted several clear copyvios. These also look very much like copyvios and should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:FeriaTecnologica2012.jpg
- File:ISI-logo.png
- File:LogoCompuISI.png
- File:ISI LaCeiba.jpg
- File:Estadio LaCeiba.jpg
- File:Vida-Logo.png
Rosenzweig τ 08:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Logos and clearly copyvios. --Taichi (talk) 08:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deletion per COM:DP. Copyright violations. Alan (talk) 19:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Some kind of logo connected to 7 Mile Advisors, a non-notable consulting firm, without evidence of permission. Too complex for PD. This image had apparently been uploaded as part of an unsuccessful Article for Creation (see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/7 Mile Advisors, where it was declined). Other 7 Mile logos deleted on same grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/File:7ma tombstone.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tombstone for 7MA.jpg. GrapedApe (talk) 01:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Now it has failed request for creating an article twice. Hopeless case. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Some kind of logo connected to 7 Mile Advisors, a non-notable consulting firm, without evidence of permission. Too complex for PD. This image had apparently been uploaded as part of an unsuccessful Article for Creation (see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/7 Mile Advisors, where it was declined). Other 7 Mile logos deleted on same grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/File:7ma tombstone.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tombstone for 7MA.jpg. GrapedApe (talk) 01:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Now it has failed request for creating an article twice. Hopeless case. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Logo of AMTM. Probably not "own work" nor simple enough to be in the public domain. Also, Spain does not seem to have a rule that states that things like this are in the public domain (or at least we have no template for that). El Grafo (talk) 15:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete but for a different reason. The quality of the image is so poor it's useless. Fry1989 eh? 03:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused small personal photo Taivo (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PS --Alan (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Possible/probable copyright violation. Uploader claims "own work" but this image appears to have been scanned from some secondary source (such as a book or newspaper). Upload date was May 13, but the same image (with color tinting) appears on Facebook (March 19); http://allhiiraan.net (Nov. 2012); jubbalandnews.com (May 2011); and cakaaranews.com (undated). Gyrofrog (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Born July 8th, 1996- Khiana is a person everyone wants to know- While in high she is in many clubs and- Many Americans would consider her a nice person (if you don't well get over it), NewBeginningsClothing is a clothin 2013-06-10 20-31.jpg
[edit]unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Self-promotional photo for her clothing brand. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused private image. El Grafo (talk) 16:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Je suis l'auteur de l'upload. Il s'avère que j'ai fait une mauvaise manipulation. Ce fichier n'est pas une photographie, mais un logo. Je souhaiterais que ce fichier soit supprimé, je le pourrais ainsi le ré-uploader de la bonne manière (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload/Uploadtext/en-nonfree-logo) Pierre Morlanne (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Image is copied from Facebook where there is no evidence that its been released into the PD. I previously tagged this image as having no evidence of permission. The uploader undid my tag without providing any evidence of permission I can see. Nick (talk) 04:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Uploader is not the original author. According to the article it is being used in, the photograph was taken in 1928. The picture is credited to a El Comercio here – that should be the newspaper it was scanned from, probably en:El Comercio (Peru). Now we would need someone with access to the old volumes of that newspaper: We need to know if there was the name of the photographer mentioned below the image. If yes → find out when s/he died (if not still alive of course). El Grafo (talk) 16:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 03:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Considering the previously circulating Russian vk hits unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed somewhere from vk. Gunnex (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PS --Alan (talk) 19:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This seems an attack photo towards the person, whose name is in description. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, photo of minors without consent. Leyo 12:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PS --Alan (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of a temporarily shown poster with protectable content. Definitely needs permission from UEFA. A.Savin 20:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
The given license {{PD-US}} does not apply here because its a flag of the philippes. No Idea if any other license could fit here. JuTa 14:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- The "Republic of Negros" existed between 1898–1901. The Philippine islands were a US territory during this time, so actually yes PD-US does apply.
Keep Fry1989 eh? 18:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC) - Keep The licence is correct. One good aspect of working in Commons is that you get to know more about geography and history. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personnal image, out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 03:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PS --Alan (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I just uploaded and now noted that the responsible for the creation had uploaded the correct version @ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OER_in_Indonesian_Sumber_Pembelajaran_Terbuka_Logo.svg Jonathas Mello (talk) 23:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused copy of mentioned file. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
It seems to be a scanned picture, so the author is probably not the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 09:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Images are of no value on Commons, plus malicious and disruptive writing. Aftab1995 (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Text-only contribution, unused file, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
copyright : http://www.psg.fr/fr/Equipe-Pro/300002/Fiche-Joueur/1903/Bahebeck-Jean-Christophe Fawkesfr (talk) 21:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this picture has been taken by the user. Looks like a screenshot to me. 83.163.5.82 22:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Note: the other files uploaded by this user are also low-resolution press-type images with no EXIF information, claimed as their own work. Modest Genius (talk) 23:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Obviously this is not an "own work" by the uploader. I know images are essential here, I know everyone want to make an illustrated encyclopedia, but this is not the right way to do that.MachoCarioca (talk) 12:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
use as personal attack [1] 太刻薄 (talk) 07:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
use as personal attack [2] 太刻薄 (talk) 07:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
out of ratio unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Inferior copy of File:Luis Jiménez Martos 2.tif. Taivo (talk) 12:50, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personnal image SamuelFreli (talk) 03:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, low quality. Rosenzweig τ 08:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PS --Alan (talk) 19:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PS --Alan (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope, low resolution. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image of non-notable person. Rosenzweig τ 08:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, no clear source given. Savhñ 20:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PS --Alan (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Very small unused photo, worthless due to size Taivo (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Blatant copyright infringement of Associated Press photo. The flickr source page shows this photo is from a screenshot of a copyrighted website yet the photo is licensed under a free use license improperly. Arbor to SJ (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Please no advertising Taivo (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PS --Alan (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Some kind of logo connected to 7 Mile Advisors, a non-notable consulting firm, without evidence of permission. Too complex for PD. This image had apparently been uploaded as part of an unsuccessful Article for Creation (see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/7 Mile Advisors, where it was declined). Other 7 Mile logos deleted on same grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/File:7ma tombstone.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tombstone for 7MA.jpg. GrapedApe (talk) 01:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Now it has failed request for creating an article twice. Hopeless case. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Some kind of logo connected to 7 Mile Advisors, a non-notable consulting firm, without evidence of permission. Too complex for PD. This image had apparently been uploaded as part of an unsuccessful Article for Creation (see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/7 Mile Advisors, where it was declined). Other 7 Mile logos deleted on same grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/File:7ma tombstone.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tombstone for 7MA.jpg. GrapedApe (talk) 01:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Now it has failed request for creating an article twice. Hopeless case. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Copivio (the library has been built by a famous architect who is stille alive). No Freedom of panorama in France Remi Mathis (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused Coa, Very low quality, Wrong name and description. Substitute by File:Coat of arms of Hesse small.svg Perhelion (talk) 08:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete: Uploader attempted to add several different CC tag but none were valid and the flickr file is under a non-commercial CC licence when checked by me. Ww2censor (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused logo of an Android app. Does not look useful for educational purposes. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
A photo which most likely is not a own work. Mys 721tx (talk) 11:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sure is my Own work 5Never9 (talk) 13:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Metadata are present, so it is likely to be own work. BrightRaven (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Taking picture of a magazine with a cell phone will still give the metadata. -Mys 721tx (talk) 21:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Metadata are present, so it is likely to be own work. BrightRaven (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Photos of such bad quality are worthless. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP, and COM:SCOPE. INeverCry 00:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
School logo 太刻薄 (talk) 02:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Arsalan.Azarmi
[edit]User Arsalan.Azarmi has uploaded these images:
- File:ReflectionCastleInTheAir12395935.jpg (unidentified structure, says uploader. Are we supposed to believe own work?)
- File:BestPlacesForFly123953.jpg (no meaningful description, so we do not know location again)
- File:CIA123953.jpg (too small for any value)
- File:America12539123.gif (no meaningful description, therefore it is not clear, what is depicted)
All files are unused. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Estudioz
[edit]User Estudioz has uploaded these photos:
- File:464232 4552702016344 1905787295 o.jpg
- File:(1) uno.jpg
- File:(9) nueve.jpg
- File:(28) veinti ocho.jpg
- File:(34) treinta y cuatro.jpg
- File:(72) setenta y dos.jpg
- File:(82) ochenta y dos.jpg
- File:Fh2.jpg
- File:Haffner VIVO I.jpg
- File:Haffner VIVO II.jpg
- File:Haffner VIVO III.jpg
- File:Haffner VIVO IV.JPG
- File:IHaffner VIVO V.JPG
- File:Haffner VIVO VI.JPG
- File:Haffner VIVO VII.jpg
- File:LMN.jpg (violation of newspaper copyright)
- File:RNII.jpg (violation of newspaper copyright)
- File:La teoria de la musica.jpg (so small photo is worthless)
- File:La teoria de la musica III.jpg (so small photo is worthless)
- File:Tapa DISCO Y DIGY scalado.jpg (What is it? Album cover, that means copyrighted?)
- File:Tapa DISCO Z Negro.jpg (What is it? Album cover, that means copyrighted?)
Most of them a bad quality photos about a non-notable musician Federico Haffner (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 10:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Nead87
[edit]User Nead87 has uploaded these photos:
- File:Lottehoteljeju.jpg
- File:Lottehotelseoul.jpg
- File:Lottehoteljeju2.jpg
- File:Lottehotelworld.jpg
- File:Lottehotelmos.jpg
- File:Lottehotel world.jpg
- File:Lottehotel busan.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hiroyuki0904 (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyvio uploaded by a retired user
- File:伊丹廃寺跡伽藍.jpg retouched photo of a explanation board taken at the site;same image seen at [3]; probably same image deleted once in the past Commons:Deletion requests/Image:伊丹廃寺跡伽藍.png
- File:Former Kohama Shuku.jpg as descripted in ja:小浜宿 photo of miniature model or a paining of the restored village was taken at a museum. The object of the image is too modern to be in PD.
Nightingale (talk) 07:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Postcards made from images with unclear origins. Also out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:KOLI.jpg
- File:Hsu.jpg
- File:Niceevening.jpg
- File:Cmo.jpg
- File:Onlyforu.JPG
- File:Napho.JPG
- File:Dae.JPG
- File:Dak.jpg
- File:Afp.jpg
- File:Cmss.jpg
- File:Cud.jpg
- File:Desa.jpg
- File:Do9.jpg
- File:Goodnigts.jpg
- File:Do6.jpg
- File:Do8.jpg
- File:Do3.JPG
- File:Teluguwords.jpg
- File:Nicenit.jpg
- File:Yy.jpg
- File:Weke.jpg
- File:VARS.jpg
- File:VALEN.jpg
- File:Terr.jpg
- File:Taraa.jpg
- File:Surya.jpg
- File:SURYO.jpg
- File:Sundda.jpg
- File:Sodra.jpg
- File:Sitaara.jpg
- File:SCHOO.jpg
- File:Rjt.jpg
- File:Rdp.jpg
- File:PRIME.jpg
- File:PREMA.jpg
- File:Newya.jpg
- File:Mano.jpg
- File:Mrr.jpg
- File:LOVEP.jpg
- File:Leafy night.jpg
- File:LOVEG.jpg
- File:Krus.jpg
- File:Kmll.jpg
- File:Duo.jpg
- File:JII.jpg
- File:CHANDRA.jpg
- File:GMG.jpg
- File:AMMA.jpg
- File:Backto.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pietrocugini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche - Policlinico Umberto I, Roma.png
- File:Casa natale di Pietro Cugini.png
- File:Pietro cugini.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
No panorama freedom in France 81.244.109.14 13:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
No panorama freedom in France 81.244.109.14 13:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Le fichier ne s'affiche pas ==> à éliminer Le grand Albert (talk) 14:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
No panorama freedom in Belgium 81.244.109.14 15:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP Alan (talk) 16:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
No panorama freedom in Belgium 81.244.109.14 15:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP Alan (talk) 16:44, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks like an unused private image of an unidentified person. El Grafo (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 16:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Странно, человек умер 31 мая 2013, а дата создания фото 11 июня 2013 года. Сомнения в авторстве фото и свободности лицензии. Dogad75 (talk) 16:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution picture without metadata, apparently taken from the playground level. It seems stolen from a website. 87.3.225.209 16:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Search Alan (talk) 16:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Photo from 1931 cannot be own work. No information about photographer or publishing Taivo (talk) 16:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I give up, it's certainly not nice and easy to make a good article on Wiki. This is the permission I got and I don't understand any other way. Can't get better than this:
- Quate: "Beste Meneer, U hebt een link ontvangen met bestanden van het Rijksmuseum. Ik begrijp dat u ze wilt gebruiken voor een website, dus ik heb jpg-bestanden gestuurd, die voor dit doel geschikt zijn. Met vriendelijke groet, Cecile van der Harten
- I give up, it's certainly not nice and easy to make a good article on Wiki. This is the permission I got and I don't understand any other way. Can't get better than this:
Hoofd subafdeling beeld / Beeld [email protected] +31 (0) 20 6747 153 +31610690470 Museumstraat 1 Postbus 74888 1070 DN Amsterdam Rijksmuseum.nl"
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo about self-claimed millionaire Taivo (talk) 16:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
SVG availibale (Apple iOS 7 Logo.svg) TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 20:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This "image" is pure harassment against User:Starscream. Parts of User:Starscream's statements from this deletion request have obviously been used in order to debase this user. 178.7.237.173 18:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Whilst the file may use words from a deletion request, the work itself does not harass or debase the user at all; but it is rather a satirical look at Commons. russavia (talk) 18:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment I have informed User:Starscream about how you have used his phrases fpr your "satirical look at Commons". --High Contrast (talk) 14:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This image is not shockingly chauvinistic. But it worthless for statutory purposes of Wikimedia Commons. No scientific or historical value. I see the flag of Monaco or Indonesia. No my Homeland. --Starscream (talk) 22:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- And what's the value of File:Colonel Ryszard Kukliński rescued also YOUR life.jpg? Just say it hurts you and I'll understand. Don't lie that the reason for you is lack of such values, because you've uploaded a lot of worthless (at least for me) images as well. And could you expand your argument about chauvinistic? It could be in Polish. Krzysiu (talk) 22:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 22:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Krzysiu, I think Starscream is saying that he's not offended by the comic, and understands that it's satirical in nature. I further think that he doesn't understand the concept of Polandball (e.g. Poland is always shown upside down). Whilst it may not be of scientific or historical value, it is simply another example of Category:Wikipedia humor. Thanks Starscream for not taking offence at it as none was intended. Cheers, russavia (talk) 09:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- And what's the value of File:Colonel Ryszard Kukliński rescued also YOUR life.jpg? Just say it hurts you and I'll understand. Don't lie that the reason for you is lack of such values, because you've uploaded a lot of worthless (at least for me) images as well. And could you expand your argument about chauvinistic? It could be in Polish. Krzysiu (talk) 22:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 22:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The Polandball comics is, in my opinion, very funny. I do not see any offending or insulting. For example, when I, an Estonian, saw strip about Estonia, then I laughed and I had whole day good feeling. I have similar sense of humor with Russavia. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Publish your comics on your own website, not this one. Mangoe (talk) 13:47, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This garbage is abuse of Commons. — Scott • talk 15:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Please note that we will likely see a couple of votes (like the above two) as a result of the off-site canvassing we come to expect here on Commons; I am sure that admins will know who they are. It also needs to be noted, that this comic, which Starscream has stated above is not offensive to him, is in use on my userpage. russavia (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oh lordy lordy, nobody's allowed to talk about Commons outside of Commons! That just ain't fair! The same old bullshit from Commons' biggest embarrassment. — Scott • talk 15:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- In truth, I was under the misapprehension that there wasn't much of a point in arguing commons deletions because I erroneously believed that the standards there were higher than in Wikipedia; however, having found out that this isn't so I have decided that I need to become more involved. If the website you so despise is responsible for informing me, that is really none of your business. Mangoe (talk) 23:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete file created to harass another Commons user. Delete and block the uploader. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep In scope of category:Polandball and humour about Wikimedia Commons or Category:Wikipedia humor. File is also used in a userpage. Tm (talk) 20:00, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Our deletion policy says that "humor" is not enough to justify an attack picture. Your comment is not a policy based justification. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I could give out a line of pseudo-plausible bullshit based off COM:SCOPE about how this is a satirical work illustrating differing attitudes on depictions of prepubescent nudity and emphasizing the difficulty of communicating effectively on such topics to a puerile audience in a diverse community when there are serious language gaps, but the truth is that it made me lol. Starscream has indicated above that he doesn't feel the image is that bad, so there is no real harm in keeping a little inside baseball humor on Commons akin to the comedic essays one finds on Wikipedia.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 08:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: There is no clear consensus (5k vs 4d). At the moment is kept. Alan (talk) 16:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
It has been almost a decade since this was discussed but this is no longer in use and COM:HOST applies. In the prior discussion, the fact that it was humor about Wikipedia (and now in Category:Parodies of Wikipedia) doesn't change the fact that humor about Wikipedia is itself sufficient to make things used here. Anyone can make this fun on their own website and I still think it's harassment. If we had a user today make fun of a current discussion, this would be highly inappropriate on wiki let alone if this was done off wiki. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - nothing's changed and its still in scope per Tm above.. you seem to be targeting a few other polandball images, your bias is showing..:Stemoc 10:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Speaking as a Polish-American, I'm fine with keeping this file. Also per Stemoc, nothing has really changed since the last DR. It's in scope. Abzeronow (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: still consensus for keeping it (although I don't see its value either...). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Nièvre does not have a flag Cycn (talk) 19:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep definitely. Invalid request. This is a cultural flag. The policy of Commons is definitely not to accept only official flags. In addition these images do not violate any copyright policy, and there open licence is valid here. May be it's a creative image, but all photos shared on Commons are creative as well. The image is still useful for illustration purpose, or just as symbolic icons. Why would you delete these flags ? verdy_p (talk) 10:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC).
- Note: intially the category was not empty, some images have been there (but deleted). If any image reappears here about the department or one of its cities, the category will be recreated exactly with the same code. This will be unnnecessary edits and won't help uploaders finding the appropriate categories. Look at the categories for other departments, we've got flags there for the department or their cities, or other cultural flags for cultural subregions. Defintely, there exists many flags in Nièvre, or the city of Nevers, or the Nivernais. In fact there should be a category for all departments of France (look at the parent category:Flags of departments of France : almost all departments are populated, some of them more than others, but this is just a current lack of data, in fact there could be many more images in them too, wanted for illustration purpose, e.g. for creating project banners in Wikipedia, or for illustrating cities, or articles about events). verdy_p (talk) 10:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- If you don't see a problem with an empty category than I don't have a problem with a removel of this deletion request. Feel free to do so if you believe that the category is still valid and useful. Cycn (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Note: intially the category was not empty, some images have been there (but deleted). If any image reappears here about the department or one of its cities, the category will be recreated exactly with the same code. This will be unnnecessary edits and won't help uploaders finding the appropriate categories. Look at the categories for other departments, we've got flags there for the department or their cities, or other cultural flags for cultural subregions. Defintely, there exists many flags in Nièvre, or the city of Nevers, or the Nivernais. In fact there should be a category for all departments of France (look at the parent category:Flags of departments of France : almost all departments are populated, some of them more than others, but this is just a current lack of data, in fact there could be many more images in them too, wanted for illustration purpose, e.g. for creating project banners in Wikipedia, or for illustrating cities, or articles about events). verdy_p (talk) 10:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily Alan (talk) 16:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
rasterized and adapted version of File:JESC 2013 Map.svg, while original one should and will/would be updated MichielDMN (talk) 16:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Extra information: the user uploaded this file because he wanted to update the map with new information. I've checked the source, but it's wrong information. So the file is wrong as well. See also the history of this user: this kind of files has been uploaded several times by this user and they were deleted as many times. Same reason as above. (And additionally: the user has been blocked on the Dutch Wikipedia several times because of spreading wrong information.) --MichielDMN (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Deleted. odder (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Кяманча Азербайджанский национальный музыкальный инструмент. 37.110.50.67 09:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This anonymous request seems part of Armenia-Azerbaidzhan feud. Armenia has issued a post stamp about its national musical instruments, but the nominator said, that the image must be deleted, because this is not Armenian, but Azerbaidzhan national musical instrument. In that case, I tend to believe organization, which issues postal stamps. And also, it is totally possible, that two neighbouring nations share some common musical instruments. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep No explanation of DR. Speedykeep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Copied from a copyright-protected work: http://envfor.nic.in/downloads/public-information/critically_endangered_booklet.pdf (page 21) -- Cymothoa exigua (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Copied from a copyright-protected work: http://envfor.nic.in/downloads/public-information/critically_endangered_booklet.pdf (page 21) -- Cymothoa exigua (talk) 20:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
File uploaded by sockpuppet of blocked user see [4]. No permission given for photographs of minors by uploader. -- Cirt (talk) 07:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, nonsense Cirt. My brother uploaded this pic, and gave permission. I also hereby give my permission. Mind your own business. The "minors" are us two, and both your reasons to delete this picture are obviously invalid. ~ DanielTom (talk) 12:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, okay, sounds good, we can AGF about this statement of assertion, above. I've therefore stricken the relevant portion of my comments, above. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 17:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The photo is bad quality and therefore, I would say, no realistically educational use is possible. The photo is used on indefinitely blocked user's talk page as part of this user's try to avoid deleting of this photo. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. As per the statement of DanielTom we know that the uploader did not take this photograph. Hence, the claim that this is the {{Own}} work of the uploader is obviously false. This was probably taken by a family member. But in this case we need the permission of the copyright holder through OTRS. I share also the concerns how this photo falls into COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
screenshot, copyvio? Mjrmtg (talk) 01:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- The interface elements look like Android, which is under Apache 2.0, and the image seems to be from a Wikimedia project (upload.wikimedia.org). The browser's interface elements seem ineligible; what's certain is that cc-by-sa is not the right license. darkweasel94 06:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As there are better versions to illustrate this detail of the Sistine Chapel at Category:Sistine Chapel ceiling - Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Planets without the more limited usability of this close crop and the doubtful icons. --Fæ (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- This can be useful to illustrate the OS and browser shown, not so much the photo displayed by it. So no, I don't think "out of scope" applies - but it may be a copyvio. darkweasel94 13:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. As noted by Fæ this is an excerpt of Michelangelo's Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Planets and thereby no copyright violation as this is in the public domain. However, I do not see how this falls into COM:SCOPE. The file has no decent description that would open the potential to make the upload useful. So which OS and browser is it? At the end it appears to be a random upload, probably to test the upload feature from a mobile. This test worked. But as nobody had an interest in turning this into a useful file even at the threat of deletion, it is unlikely that this will ever happen. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
All these images are duplicates. They are old, now is available the possibility of using the parameter "border". --Metrónomo (talk) 18:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- I added the following files derived by myself. -- Juetho (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Georgia with border
- Monaco with border
- Malta with border
- Poland with border (derived by Dirk Hünniger)
- Well, I thought they were obsolete six years ago. FWIW, please see a deletion nomination at en where my request to delete one of the bordered images was objected to because it was used in the flagicon template. I clicked on a several of these images and a LOT of uses of these images still exist, so before deleting anything, the uses need to be cleaned up and any templates that assume the existence of a (bordered) image need to be modified to instead use the Wikimarkup feature to generate a border. --UserB (talk) 03:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I think the reason is not enough, "would have a lot of work to replace them all". In the same way, there are here deletions request from these images that led to the deletion (example). If required to do cleanup work first, I offer to do it (where I can edit). Also this request is to determine whether these images should or should not be eliminated, rather than to determine when. --Metrónomo (talk) 04:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The only question is "Are they useful for an educational purpose in its broad meaning?" and the answer is a clear "Yes". In addition some of them are in use, which should mean an automatic 'keep'. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. I'm nominating for being nonidentical duplicate files. --Metrónomo (talk) 05:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I created some flags as a precaution for my wikibook Wikijunior Europa because flags with white areas were not displayed properly. The original versions work now using the "border" parameter. That concerns: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Hungary, Ireland, Czech (as well as Vatican, see example above). I'll look whether other flags are concerned, too. As soon as the links are cleaned up the "wrong" flags may be deleted. -- Juetho (talk) 07:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Some files are used thousands of times, e.g. File:Flag of Bulgaria (bordered).svg. Cleanup may be done by a bot. -- Juetho (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Question Why is File:Flag of Slovakia (bordered).svg not included in this request? 213.54.169.42 18:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Because they are too many, I'm tagging slowly. I have a very poor internet connection that I can't do much per day. --Metrónomo (talk) 01:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete There are enough flag images; ones with borders are not necessary. --Spielertyp (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- The entire Commons project is not necessary. Actually Internet is not necessary either. But the scope of Commons says that media has to be useful for an educational purpose in the broad meaning of the term. And these are useful for an educational purpose in the broad meaning. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 02:23, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Nuke them all, we have the ability to add borders without this. Fry1989 eh? 18:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- These are now entirely redundant; there is a simpler (and more scalable) way to add borders. They are also problematic in that they have a tendency to diverge from their unbordered counterparts: see several examples above where subsequent changes to the unbordered version have not been reflected in the bordered one. Delete, but not until all uses of them have been replaced. Alkari (?), 12 June 2013, 22:53 UTC
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-06-11_12-44.jpg){kind=link}
,_NewBeginningsClothing_is_a_clothin_2013-06-10_20-31.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![85 File:Luigi "Gigi" Datome.jpg](#File:Luigi_"Gigi"_Datome.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-06-11_12-44.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-06-11_12-44.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2013-06-11_12-44.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-06-11_12-44.jpg){kind=link}
,_NewBeginningsClothing_is_a_clothin_2013-06-10_20-31.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_uno.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_nueve.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_veinti_ocho.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_treinta_y_cuatro.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_setenta_y_dos.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_ochenta_y_dos.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![16:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/06/11#c-87.3.225.209-2013-06-11T16:40:00.000Z-File:Luigi_"Gigi"_Datome.jpg){kind=link}
![16:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/06/11#c-Alan-2013-06-18T16:42:00.000Z-File:Luigi_"Gigi"_Datome.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_with_border.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_with_border.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep File:Flag of Wales 28 October 2011.svg should be kept though, it's not related to the border images. Fry1989 eh? 03:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, they should be deleted, because they are duplicates of existing images, just with borders. But these borders are totally unuseful, because the border can be added using the parameter "border". But the images are still widely used, so before deleting, someone needs co clean-up all the pages where they are used and to switch to the use of unbordered flags, adding "border" parameter. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Can you please specify an exhaustive and complete list of the places that use at least one file that is to be deleted. This list must specify Wikimedia projects, all other sites that may use the file, and printed media that has ever been published that refers to it. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 11:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Delete and mass replace with their unbordered equivalents (with a border specified, if that's possible). I agree with Fry about File:Flag of Wales 28 October 2011.svg, it should be kept. It has a different rendering. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Please avoid duplicates.--Antemister (talk) 15:25, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep There is no Bot to replace. User:CommonsDelinker dont work since 2013-05-10 --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ 16:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. These images are not duplicates. And they are in use. Geagea (talk) 00:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete These are nothing but duplicates now. Per Alkari: entirely redundant; there is a simpler (and more scalable) way to add borders. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep You have to tink about much wider. The argument, wikimedia-software can display a border itself is correct. But files here are not only for wikimedia-software-related projects. See Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use: „The emphasis here is on realistic utility, either for one of the Wikimedia projects or for some other educational use.“ Or at this link, too: „Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content [...] to all. It acts as a common repository for the various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation, but you do not need to belong to one of those projects to use media hosted here.“ So, all users, most of software, many homepages, blogs etc. that were not hosted by a wikimedia-software cannot add a border. So, if I as a teacher (or my pupils) want to make a presentation on white background or white paper need a border. If this files were deleted, we have to re-add it. Unnecessary work. The files listed above are educational and they are needed (not only within wikimedia-projects, but outside, too). So there are only reasons to not delete this files. --Quedel (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Alkari, but keep File:Flag of Wales 28 October 2011.svg. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:41, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep There are people outside wikipedia who reuse the files and might need the border. Plus the memory space is gone anyway.--Cwbm (commons) (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Temporary decision
- Kept We have to keep all in-use flags for now as we currently have no way for a proper on-wiki replacement due to the CommonsDelinker failure. Also fiddling with flags is highly problematic because of usage in protected templates or strange infoboxes sometimes requiring them to have a specific name. Flags should be individually checked/replaced and nominated for deletion once Delinker (or a properly working replacement) are available to us. I will not close this DR for now to enable further discussion. And a comment: I don't see a need to delete the bordered flags, they could still co-exist as a variant but all on-wiki usage should be changed to standard flag with border option (if possible, depends on wiki usage).--Denniss (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: 1) Technical reasons replacement not easy without CommonsDelinker and there's a good chance to break some flag templates 2) No real reason to delete them as they may still have use. One may want to check the duplicate bordered flags - don't see a need for two almost identical bordered flags. Denniss (talk) 08:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Violation of copyright Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Valid EXIF. I can't find the image using Google Images. Seems original. --Alan (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Contrary to Spain, which allows the right to panorama, countries like Italy and France do not allow (i fight for change here). There is a copyright on the image of the bridge.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy and this is a modern bridge. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Taivo is right, unfortunately. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:36, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
No panorama freedom in France 81.244.109.14 13:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- This is not the museum, just a temporary building during the construction work. --Velvet (talk) 21:34, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- The rules of freedom of panorama are applicable to all public or private buildings, not just museums. In this case, the author rights of the architect are not respected.
81.244.191.113 14:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see anything copyrightable about this FASTILY 02:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution version of a professional photograph, for sale here as a stock photo for 600$, also used on the cover of a book written by the photographer [5]. The original uploader at en:wp may or may not be identical with it's author en:Justin Brice Guariglia. It's an old upload, but not old enough to be a case of Commons:Grandfathered old files. What do you think about this? El Grafo (talk) 15:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep I see no reason to delete this. We know that many commercial photographers, with substantial pricetags elsewhere, also upload here under a free licence. They may upload only a handful, or a low-res version, but this does happen. It's something we should welcome, not an opportunity to play at being grown-ups by doing wiki administrivia! We also know that a couple of such photographers have been driven away from Commons in disgust at such behaviour.
- If there's any indication that this wasn't uploaded by its photographer, then we should consider deletion. So far we've taken an article and an upload by en:User:GUARIGLIA+CHEN, speedy deleted one and are trying to delete another. We've behaved similarly to en:user:Brice777.
- If we want to hang up a flag saying "Professionals not welcome here" or "Competence is a problem", then let's do it, but in the meantime, professionalism (by either meaning) is not a reason to delete anything. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep There is en:File:Monk Bamboo.jpg that looks like the photo in this DR. If uploader has 2 files that looks much alike but is not the same file is that not an indication that uploader is the photographer? --MGA73 (talk) 19:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 02:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you explain what kind of "evidence of permission" you want ?
We own the original sources of these files.
--Ost (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: 1) No permission and 2) Commons is no room for product placement (i.e. out of scope). --Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 10:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: 1) I am the person who realized that drawing and i currently work in the company that develop and manufacture the device. So this point would be easily solved.
2) This is a more difficult point to discuss. It is a medical device that is not for a wide audience as it is focused on severe migraine and headache. It is not a miracle solution and not a generic analgesic for everything, It offers an uncommon way (Because as of today it is still a new solution. The opposite approach than the -implantable- neurostimulation but with the same technology base) to use cranial neurostimulation. Then this file has an illustrative purpose. I can make a version without the branding if it is acceptable that way.
--Ost (talk) 08:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Concerning the file File:Traitement-migraine-cefaly.png i agree that it adds nothing relevant in terms of information and as far as i am concerned it can be deleted directly.
--Ost (talk) 08:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: I think the picture helps to understand the technology better --MedicalMCU (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete unless OTRS permission is forthcoming. Looking at this page from the company's Canadian website it's clear that they are the source of the images. Mangoe (talk) 00:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Well… Somebody knows what is the difference between a manufacturer and one of its distributors and how a source file can be better than some of its copies?
Nobody noticed than the picture on wikimedia was in a higher resolution than on cefaly.ca or any other website around?
So I suggest two things :
1) Go on that page to read the very first sentence saying : "Cefaly is imported and distributed by Roxon medi-tech."
2) Write a little mail to Roxon to ask them where the images came from…
--Ost (talk) 08:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Of course Commons will start immediately - as suggested - to send hundreds of emails requesting permission to use a picture. And pigs can fly... Beyond that, what they reply is of no importance: They cannot license the pictures. Have you ever read Commons:Permission an Commons:OTRS? -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 14:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not wikimedia, only Mangoe. When it is possible It is better to check the basis of assumption before telling.
I was uploading pictures on Wikimedia with my own personal account "Ovp" before these mechanisms appear. I have read but I am not convinced. So I partially agree that I am not completely up do date. - However, you can simply read on the "Commons:permission" page: "This page is a proposed Commons guideline, policy, or process.
The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. References or links to this page should not describe it as 'policy'."
- Not wikimedia, only Mangoe. When it is possible It is better to check the basis of assumption before telling.
- So, why such an agressive behaviour ?
One of our pictures was deleted even before I had time to take action. In less than 1 day. One user here just suggested that we simply took the pictures from Cefaly.ca, despite the evidence that this cannot be true. Are you kidding? So it becomes difficult for me to really take Wikimedia seriously. - On "Commons:OTRS" everything looks really simple until you really try to go through the mail templates. For instance, considering following case. The easiest: File:Illustration-CEFALY.jpg. I created this file by myself but as an employee of my company. So if I am the creator of the file, the copyright holder is the company itself, not myself. Who has got the authority for OTRS?
For some pictures it is a complete nightmare (e.g. the deleted one). One person takes the picture, another one makes some cleaning and cropping works on the picture. Later the branding on the device has changed and the corresponding modification was made directly on the picture… So the final picture is absolutely not the raw original photo…
And everyone who made modifications worked for the company that owns this file. - And if I sent a mail to Wikipedia commons asking for permission… so what? Everybody could send this email. What would be the difference if someone like you needs to make the decision?
- I don't know if you are an admin that can actually take a look at my email address or make a whois lookup on my IP address? It could be interesting. --Ost (talk) 10:20, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- So, why such an agressive behaviour ?
Deleted: missing evidence of permission. If you are the uploader, email COM:OTRS FASTILY 02:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Internationale melody
[edit]- File:L'Internationale.jpg
- File:InternationaleChinese.jpg
- File:Internationale piano arrangement 2001.pdf
- File:Internationale-piano-Bb.mid
- File:Internationale orch2.mid
- File:Banda Bevagna.ogg
- File:Internationale orchestral arrangement.ogg
- and finally, Template:PD-Internationale used by these files
It is with great regret that I make this nomination, as I think the Internationale is an important melody which should be available at Commons. However, the result of a recent in-depth discussion (archived) at COM:VPC seems to be that it is at least very likely that the melody of the "Internationale" is still protected in France until October 2017 and that the keep comments of the earlier Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Internationale were probably in error. Please refer to said VPC discussion for more details. Even if there is still some uncertainty, COM:PRP applies. As France is the country of origin for this melody, it seems we have to delete it here, with restoration possible in November 2017. I suggest adding the files to Category:Undelete in 2018, as this is a special case - normally, files become copyright free on 1st January of the year following 70 years after author's death, we have no category for undeletion in a specific month, and "Undelete in 2017" could prompt premature undeletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment leaning to weak Keep with snowball question: Other than France and based on w:List of countries' copyright lengths, only Côte d'Ivoire (life + 99 years) and Mexico (life + 100 years) would definitely copyright the Internationale melody while copyrighting non-posthumous works for life plus more than 80 years. May I kindly ask how many other countries and areas DO honor the very long French copyright term even if longer than their domestic copyright terms? If no fourth country in this world copyrights the Internationale melody, should 200+ countries and areas still "bow" to 3 countries (France, Côte d'Ivoire, and Mexico)? We do have even more works still copyright-restricted in even more countries and areas rejecting the rule of the shorter term, so we should consider a snowball case. However, if in the worst scenario, the Internationale melody should be temporarily removed, I suggest sending them to Canadian Wikilivres:.--Jusjih (talk) 04:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Mexico doesn't copyright the Internationale melody, as the Mexico "life + 100 years" term doesn't apply to authors who died before 1952 according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico, as I already mentioned in the archived VPC discussion linked in the nomination. - The problem here is that France is the country where this work comes from. Were it any other single country (except the U.S.) where the "Internationale" is still protected, Commons could keep it. But Commons has the rule that works must be free in the U.S. and in the country of origin. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- The rule that works must be free in the U.S. and in the country of origin per Commons:Project_scope#Must_be_freely_licensed_or_public_domain already has an exception: Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Why_do_we_allow_the_.7B.7BPD-Art.7D.7D_tag_to_be_used_for_photographs_from_any_country.3F. If we cannot get consensus on whether to allow another limited exception to this case, I suggest asking the Wikimedia Foundation to decide whether users in 200+ countries and areas should "bow" to France and Côte d'Ivoire in this case. Only "disinterested" should close this discussion.--Jusjih (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- To closing administrator: If affected template and files should be deleted, please arrange to transfer them to Canadian Wikilivres: in the similar way as Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/URAA review. Many files tagged Template:Not-PD-US-URAA are being transferred to Canadian Wikilivres. After all, this discussion is to either slightly change the licensing policy or transfer the affected items out.--Jusjih (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Mexico doesn't copyright the Internationale melody, as the Mexico "life + 100 years" term doesn't apply to authors who died before 1952 according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico, as I already mentioned in the archived VPC discussion linked in the nomination. - The problem here is that France is the country where this work comes from. Were it any other single country (except the U.S.) where the "Internationale" is still protected, Commons could keep it. But Commons has the rule that works must be free in the U.S. and in the country of origin. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons. If anyone would like a copy of the deleted files, please inquire on my talk page FASTILY 02:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [6]. Yann (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
|
Any files listed here that were deleted and which are in the public domain in New Zealand have been reuploaded under their original filenames at Wikilivres, a New Zealand wiki unaffiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation.
|