Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/06/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_009a.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_020.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_009b.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_016.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_019.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_NIDA_2.JPG){kind=link}
_Anzac_Parade.JPG){kind=link}
_NIDA_Kensington.JPG){kind=link}
_carnaval_021.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_023.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_055.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_058.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_124b.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_128a.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_128.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_2.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_4.jpg){kind=link}
This sculpture was created in 1967 and is not in the public domain. :( Missvain (talk) 02:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Apologies; I uploaded this when I was still a newbie and unfamiliar with Commons. Deleted. NW (Talk) 03:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. NW (Talk) 03:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Comment is there a copyright notice on it? There's a good chance it is in the public domain, since it was publically displayed in 1967 and needed a copyright notice at that time to retain copyright.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- It was years ago that I visited Washington, D.C. I can't remember if there was a plaque near the image, though I can't see why there wouldn't have been one. NW (Talk) 19:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free toy in a location with no freedom of panorama (Italy) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the manufacturer. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination withdrawn. --Grcampbell (talk) 06:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
artist still alive (born in 1944) Ben.MQ (talk) 07:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted rubin16 (talk) 07:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
artist still alive (born in 1944) Ben.MQ (talk) 07:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted rubin16 (talk) 07:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Santosga (talk) 15:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- It was to demonstrate my userpage. It can be speedy deleted if needed but I do not see the point since we wont be winning drive space. -- Cat ちぃ？ 19:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted. Besides the scope issue it also contained the non-free copyrighted Wikipedia logo, which we want to avoid needless proliferation of. Dcoetzee (talk) 21:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Probably not own work. Yann (talk) 17:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, See http://jeocaz.wordpress.com/. Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 06:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
I don't think the uploader holds the copyrights. There are many of these found on the internet before the uploading date. See for instance http://308518.forumromanum.com/member/forum/forum.php?action=ubb_show&entryid=1097402763&mainid=1097402763&USER=user_308518&threadid=1103320699 Lymantria (talk) 16:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Darwin Ahoy! 06:00, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
delete it Anandchintu007 (talk) 10:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted by User:Matanya: "Copyright violation: stolen porn" (non-admin closure). Jujutacular talk 18:40, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio image Dismas (talk) 10:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted by User:Matanya (non-admin closure). Jujutacular talk 18:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
photo with unrecognizable plate available Tvabutzku1234 (talk) 20:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by User:Túrelio (non-admin closure). Jujutacular talk 18:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Image of Kristelle stolen by this copyfraudster. Original file was not free, and logo was removed against expressed wish of copyright holder: http://eimanjjong.tumblr.com/post/6480569343/110611-shinee-sm-town-paris-credits-kristelle Darwin Ahoy! 06:31, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Unused private photo. theMONO 00:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No license for more than seven days. --ZooFari 01:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
incorrect content Milind.s.dixit (talk) 15:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per request, insufficient license/copyright status anyways. --ZooFari 01:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Ukraine has no freedom of panorama DS (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I was hoping to use this logo for the Restore Hetch Hetchy page on wikipedia but could choose a different one if neccessary. Please don't delete if it doesn't need to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mweste01 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy close. No DR on image, no reason given for this DR, this DR is then only edit of this editor Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:54, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Flag of Libya (1951).svg is pre-existing SVG, no use Fry1989 (talk) 01:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned company logo, used in a now deleted copyvio on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 01:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Suspect to be license laundering. Uploader's username is same as that in flickr. It is highly possible that this image is an unauthorized copy from a poster or some like that. Wcam (talk) 02:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Composition is not made from free-license images, but caught from internet. Yanguas (talk) 03:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Delete, montage of unfree images. --Martin H. (talk) 17:05, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Unclear who the source is. Uploader has been gone since 2006 and has a bunch of deletes in his in box. A shame if he drew it, but unclear if he did. TCO (talk) 05:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
A combination of non-free logos and (possibly) unfree photos. Seems not de minimis. Any ideal? Bad name anyway. Plus I don't think is uploader's work or released under the license. Ben.MQ (talk) 05:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free toy in a location with no freedom of panorama (USA) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the manufacturer. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- As the contributor, I oppose the deletion of this image and, quite frankly, fail to understand the rationale. Does this mean that one needs to get permission from the manufacturer in order to take pictures of any purchased item? I have trouble imagining the justification of such a bizarrely restrictive policy. --199.17.218.250 17:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- Not on any item, but such is the state of the copyright law in present day that most toys are considered art and a photograph of them is a derivative work. See COM:DERIV#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. I am not certain on this case, as these are simple plastic miniatures, but copyright law may still consider them protected for the life+70 years. MKFI (talk) 10:40, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- So if they had not been identified as Airfix, would the picture be ok? If it were a generic looking picture of army men, would it be ok? This policy seems to be taking copyright law to an extreme. If Airfix is even in existence anymore, I think they would be more upset by all the Chinese produced imitations of their molds that are being sold in places like Walmart than by a picture on a Wikipedia article. Has anyone tried to contact the company? If they gave permission, would the picture be ok?
- No, it would still not be ok if the manufacturer had not been identified; it would still be a derivative work, with an unknown copyright holder. What Airfix thinks of Chinese imitations does not make it permissive for us to ignore copyrights, see COM:NOT#Commons is not concerned about whether copyright holders care and Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Requesting permission is generally the task of the uploader. If a proper OTRS ticket is received the file can be kept. This file was originally uploaded to en-wiki; if it is deemed unsuitable for commons because of copyright concerns it can be re-uploaded to en-wiki locally and used under fair use principle (also for other wikis where that is allowed). MKFI (talk) 17:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --Grcampbell (talk) 06:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC). Grcampbell (talk) 06:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's sourced to a state website (© 2010, Oregon Secretary of State), not to federal gov; thereby likely not PD-USGov. Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete No FOP in Belgium (regrettably). Moros y Cristianos 07:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Sourced to a state website, which - in addition - is not active, not to federal gov; thereby likely not PD-USGov. Túrelio (talk) 06:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_009a.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_009a.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_009a.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:10, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 13:54, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_009a.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_020.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_020.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_020.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Only a small part is visible. Acceptable for me. Yann (talk) 13:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est de toute façon bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per Yann. Only legs... --Ben.MQ (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_020.jpg){kind=link}
because unable to set copyrights permission, very difficult. Guddurahul (talk) 08:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Possible copyright problems Bulwersator (talk) 08:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- It is not possible to push under "This file is in the public domain because it was created by NASA. NASA copyright policy states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted". (See Template:PD-USGov, NASA copyright policy page or JPL Image Use Policy.)", as it is image from ROSAT (ROSAT (short for Röntgensatellit) is a no-longer operational German X-ray satellite telescope (in German X-rays are called Röntgenstrahlen, in honour of Wilhelm Röntgen).). If it is not copyvio it is possible to improve description and upload better picture from this site. PS Tineye is great! Bulwersator (talk) 08:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Poor quality, not used anywhere, replaced by File:Acetalbildung Aldehyd gesamt.svg. Leyo 09:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Low quality. Png versions are available in that svg file. German captions make the file unusable internationally. Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:SCOPE: A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough. --High Contrast (talk) 09:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Only use is in 2005 discussion of whether the image was accurate. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
uploader has long history of claiming ownership of images downloaded from various sources, including of this same subject. Again this one appears to be a professional/staged PR or screen-test shot DMacks (talk) 09:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Indian Hills Community College is no federal institution - No PD-USGov Lymantria (talk) 09:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
copyrigthed song JeanBono (talk) 10:05, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
isolated, disused in any article CCC999 (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Striking image, lack of use is not a reason to delete. Please tell us where it is. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
the source website displays a copyright on the bottom of their page JeanBono (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement, out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Do not want to upload the logo for public usage Viva Infomedia (talk) 12:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: User's request, not used. Yann (talk) 14:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Looks like a photo of a book, which would make this a derivative work. Jafeluv (talk) 12:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Scan. Yann (talk) 14:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Do not want to use the logo for public use Viva Infomedia (talk) 12:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: User's request, not used. Yann (talk) 14:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
private photo - not notable band Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
not notable band Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
not used, useless Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
test file, not used Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 14:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
test file, not used, not usefull Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Test file, not used, description "can be deleted later". Probably later is now. Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- please delete :-) ----Erkan Yilmaz 13:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 14:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:A large penis.jpg
Clearly not the uploader's own work, obviously a studio shot probably handed out at an autograph session. ukexpat (talk) 15:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by Ayoub salidor (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: missing EXIF, files exist in Facebook, SkysCrapperCity. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- I deleted, and then restored the image after a user's request. I asked her to upload the original image. Yann (talk) 09:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Deleted and redirected to full-size, at File:Béatrice Tillier.jpg. – Adrignola talk 18:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by Antoinexxxx (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Also out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
There's no evidence that all of the photos in this montage are public domain or freely licensed. —Angr 15:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- I've listed where I got them from. These sites (Irrawaddy, Myitzuri, etc.) themselves are reprinting stock photos they got from other Burmese sites. It is difficult/impossible to find public domain/freely licensed information from the Burmese sites because IP laws don't exist there. Photos are freely reused by everyone. If these sites don't mention anything about reuse, does it mean we don't use any of them on Wikipedia, even though they are freely reused everywhere else? If so, we won't have many Burma/Myanmar-based photos here. What are possible alternatives other than deletion? Hybernator (talk) 06:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since February 2010 Hystrix (talk) 15:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Most likely delete as "sources unknown, not own work - per duck test". No comments on "private photo". Last name in image description matches uploader's username, but it's all I know. Who is this guy and when was it taken? NVO (talk) 17:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Facebook image. Yann (talk) 13:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since February 2010 Hystrix (talk) 15:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Facebook image. Yann (talk) 13:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since January 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Facebook image. Yann (talk) 13:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since May 2007 Hystrix (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Facebook image. Yann (talk) 13:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Mbdortmund. Yann (talk) 14:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Tento soubor má nesprávné jméno a je navržen na rychlé smazání. Správné jméno má tato kopie: Leader-V70.jpg Tivann (talk) 16:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- speedy delete and don't reupload copies. Not here, not on Cz-wikipedia. The file comes from a copyrighted site (Copyright © 2010 | azhobby.cz) - end of the line. Unacceptable even as fair-use on wikipedia. Unacceptable even if you took the photograph - box art is, by default, copyrighted by the manufacturer and/or software vendors. NVO (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by ZooFari. Yann (talk) 14:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since March 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 16:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
It says from facebook but no indication of a free license. also does not seem to be the real source Ben.MQ (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable band. Hystrix (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable band. Hystrix (talk) 17:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable band. Hystrix (talk) 17:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable band. Hystrix (talk) 17:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable guy. Hystrix (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Poor quality, unused, better alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 12:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable guy. Hystrix (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Poor quality, unused, better alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per low quality. Better alternatives could be File:Aspirin-skeletal.svg and File:Acetylsalicylsäure2.svg. Materialscientist (talk) 04:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 12:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 18:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 18:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 18:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, blurry, vanity photo, used in a now deleted page on en.wikipedia. low quality, out of scope, no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 18:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable band. Hystrix (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
This was just a test upload of a roof J 1982 (talk) 19:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Image obviously copied from Facebook. Facebook content is not free per se, i.e. has to be proven. Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Facebook image. Yann (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
This file does not load on Wikimedia or can't be seen. Schoi040 (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. Yann (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable band. Hystrix (talk) 19:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since May 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since May 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 19:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Age, used to claim PD status, probably not enough: probably British, so at this age we need to know the author's date of death or be reasonably sure the author is unknown (and then a better source) —innotata 19:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: private photo; unused since April 2010 Hystrix (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
unused nearly private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
unused nearly private image - out of scope (musicians from france with unclear notability) Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I removed a no source tag. Really? A railway schedule from 1849. I cannot believe this project sometimes. Anyway I've been yelled at for removing tags before. If someone can think of any possible reason this should be deleted, let them say it here, but seriously. Some deletionists are a bit over the top. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 21:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Copy from Gustav Hempel & J. V. Kutscheid, Reise- und Eisenbahn-Buch Enthaltend die Eisenbahn-, Post- und Dampfschiffahrtsverbindungen in Deutschland sowie von da nach dem Ausland (journey- and railway-book containing the railway-, post- und steamship-connections in Germany and from there to the foreign lands), original Berlin 1847. The book was reprinted 1988 by Verlag Dr. Bernhard Abend in Stuttgart and ZA-Reprint in Leipzig with ISBN 3-926243-03-1. --Loegge (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Added source from DR. Yann (talk) 15:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope (not realistically useful, not really good) Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
wrong filename and license Avatar200910 (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
unused private montage - advertisement for something (but for what?) - unclear copy rights, no exif (not really usable) Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Atlantis_imagined_being_in_the_Atlantic_Ocean_and_fitting_with_Dr._Emad_Kayyam_observations_and_view_of_similarities_with_the_nasal_cavities_and_sinuses_in_the_human_face.JPG
[edit]
strange unused montage - private theory - unusable for the commons - the author can publish his private theories where he wants, but not in the commons Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
To be complete: Emad Kayyam has made a statement about it at my talk page, see [1] Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
PS: As far as I see, the DR should fit to all file of Dr. Emad Kayyam. Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope (unclear notability) Cholo Aleman (talk) 22:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused private montage - unclear copyrights - unclear notability ( = out of scope) Cholo Aleman (talk) 22:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I doubt this is realistically useful for an educational purpose. GeorgHH • talk 22:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- Muscarix (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: user request Jcb (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Copyvio: Still image from BBC's Top Gear (Series 13, Episode 7) MB-one (talk) 22:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 13:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_009b.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_009b.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_009b.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_009b.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_016.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_016.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_016.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 16:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_016.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_019.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_019.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_019.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 16:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_019.jpg){kind=link}
I think this file contains copyrighted material without the proper permission. The people on the lower left of the boat are clearly Ralph Moeller, Russel Crowe and Djimon Hounsou in a still of the movie Gladiator. Coatilex (talk) 12:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Info The issue had been discussed here, yesterday (German Wikipedia). I have notified the author User:SvenLittkowski (User:Grand-Duc just did the upload via Commonshelper). --Schwäbin (talk) 12:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- "are clearly..."? Not really, I think. I would envisage a case of de minimis. And is anything copyrightable in a fashion of standing somewhere? Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 21:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- After having read the article about the "de minimis" and believing this might be applicable due the small amount of pixels and no details of faces and body, I would like to hear some more voices about if "de minimis" can be applied. Thanks to the community. SvenLittkowski (talk) 23:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- The small figures are de minimis, but it is mentioned all right reserved above the banner in the water. Yann (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's simply a kind of watermark with no binding legal effect: the creator of the file licensed it by himself using a Commons compatible license. Grand-Duc (talk) 15:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. De minimis indeed Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
copyrighted song? JeanBono (talk) 12:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
copyrighted song (beyonce) JeanBono (talk) 12:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
out of scope - U.S. presidents on time line in PNG - should be in table in text, not used, not usefull (too small) Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
out of scope, not notable band logo Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
User Pimvantend is not the creator of this image so he can't pass it into PD without OTRS ticket proving that Rob Rutten released it as PD. SpeakFree (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Probably not own work. Yann (talk) 17:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal promotional picture of a not notable band. Hystrix (talk) 17:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal promotional picture of a not notable band. Hystrix (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal promotional picture of a not notable guy. Hystrix (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
unused advertisement - out of scope (unusable, unclear copy rights) Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 22:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (Belgium) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 22:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
used only for deletion request (see description) Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Not needed now. George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by Janith Kodagoda (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Ben.MQ (talk) 14:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned badJPG image was transferred to Commons; replaced by File:AD-Kurve.svg and therefore out of scope. Leyo 09:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Look also at the "badSVG" → the right end of the AD curve is bend wrongly. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- I asked the original uploader of the SVG version to fix this issue. --Leyo 05:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- The file is now correct. Just the thumbnail is showing the old version. --Leyo 21:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- visible here. Thanks. On the topic here: can be deleted if you really want - although I would not have nominated it. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Superseded by File:AD-Kurve.svg. While File:AD-Kurve.svg is based off this file, this file is in the public domain and so is the other, so keeping the original is not needed per the licensing. – Adrignola talk 20:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
The person's on the right of the picture head is cut - defective image. Greatakela (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requests deletion of unused file. – Adrignola talk 19:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
_NIDA_2.JPG){kind=link}
_NIDA_2.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this is a poor quality image that has now been superceded by better quality images Sardaka (talk) 21:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_NIDA_2.JPG){kind=link}
- Superseded by what? Wknight94 talk 02:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No superior alterative provided. – Adrignola talk 19:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
_NIDA_2.JPG){kind=link}
_NIDA_2.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Poor quality pic now superceded by better quality pic Sardaka (talk) 09:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Not a reason to delete. We generally keep more than one image of a subject. In any case, we certainly will not delete an image for this reason unless the nominator cites the better image in the DR. Please do not nominate this again. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
_NIDA_2.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Poor quality shot superceded by better shots, (1)_NIDA_Kensington1-5 etc 220.237.50.220 10:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept What did you not understand about the two closures above? I'm going to block both User:220.237.50.220 and User:Sardaka for a week to give you time to consider whether you want to follow our rules or simply waste time. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
_Anzac_Parade.JPG){kind=link}
_Anzac_Parade.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this is a poor quality image that has now been superceded by better quality images Sardaka (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_Anzac_Parade.JPG){kind=link}
- Superseded by what? Wknight94 talk 02:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No superior alternative proposed. – Adrignola talk 19:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
_Anzac_Parade.JPG){kind=link}
_Anzac_Parade.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This is a poor quality pic that has been superceded by better pix Sardaka (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per previous deletion request, no alternative given, from a quick glance at Category:Kensington, New South Wales I did not find anything better. MKFI (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept Do not nominate this again without a better reason or citing a better file. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
_Anzac_Parade.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Very poor quality pic shouldn't be here. 110.33.198.48 11:36, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not nominate this image again -- if you do, you will be blocked from editing on Commons. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
_Anzac_Parade.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
Horrible quality, too much noise. Plenty of other alternative shots in the same category. Sardaka (talk) 09:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No alternative presented. The existence of a category is not a substitute for a named alternative. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
_NIDA_Kensington.JPG){kind=link}
_NIDA_Kensington.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this is a poor quality image that has now been superceded by better quality images Sardaka (talk) 21:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_NIDA_Kensington.JPG){kind=link}
- Superseded by what? Wknight94 talk 02:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No superior alterative provided. – Adrignola talk 19:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
_NIDA_Kensington.JPG){kind=link}
_NIDA_Kensington.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This is a poor quality pic that has been superceded by better quality pix Sardaka (talk) 12:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept Do not nominate this again without a better reason or citing a better file. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
_NIDA_Kensington.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Poor quality pic that shouldn't be here (all my own work, too). 110.33.198.48 11:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Do not nominate this image again. If you do, you will be blocked from editing on Commons. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
_NIDA_Kensington.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
Poor quality shot now superceded by better shots, (1)_NIDA_Kensington1-5 220.237.50.220 10:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept per discussion above and another instance like this, I have blocked this user for a week. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_021.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_carnaval_021.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_021.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission received. – Adrignola talk 16:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_021.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_023.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_carnaval_023.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_023.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission. – Adrignola talk 16:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_023.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_055.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_carnaval_055.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_055.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission. – Adrignola talk 17:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_055.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_058.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_carnaval_058.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_058.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission. – Adrignola talk 17:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_058.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_124b.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Florimond_124b.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_124b.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission. – Adrignola talk 17:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_124b.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_128a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Florimond_128a.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_128a.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission. – Adrignola talk 17:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_128a.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_128.jpg){kind=link}
_carnaval_128.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_128.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission. – Adrignola talk 17:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_carnaval_128.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored This is folklore, out of copyright. Yann (talk) 02:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Florimond_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_2.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission. – Adrignola talk 17:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_2.jpg){kind=link}
_Florimond_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Florimond_4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of a non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 07:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_4.jpg){kind=link}
- Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France. It has been over three weeks with no OTRS permission. – Adrignola talk 17:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
_Florimond_4.jpg){kind=link}
and other uploads by Nikle3000 (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. – Adrignola talk 18:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by Lazos Familiares CEMEX (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: 720 px also indicates Facebook grab. – Adrignola talk 16:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Unused file, better version at File:THC structure.svg Ronhjones (Talk) 19:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, superseded by File:THC structure.svg. – Adrignola talk 19:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
This file was created by me, but it's full of mistakes: bad SVG, validator failed etc. ianusius ✆ Disk. 21:05, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requests deletion of unused bad quality file. – Adrignola talk 16:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence that the image was published without a copyright notice or that its copyright was not renewed. See also en:Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_June_27#File:MissSharonBrown1961.jpg. UserB (talk) 20:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: This photo would have certainly been taken and published in 1961 due to its context. Is there grounds to show the image is still copyrighted? I don't know. While we should get some (limited) evidence that the image is still under copyright before we delete it this might be sufficient to delete it. So, perhaps the uploader never had the rights in the first place? --Leoboudv (talk) 04:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep As was stated on wikipedia, the source web page that is now defunct contained a PD release. In any account, the photo is pre-1964, which due to age and lack of copyright renewal (if there ever was one to begin with) would make the photo public domain. These nominations for deletion never came about when the source site was still up because the release was clearly visible. 166.214.244.147 22:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Since the municipality wasn't founded until 1992, it seems unlikely that its coat of arms was commissioned prior to 1983. (The {{PD-BrazilGov}} template was incorrect at the time the file was uploaded, and was substantially rewritten after Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-BrazilGov 2.) —LX (talk, contribs) 14:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nom. Trixt (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Too small image, possibly not taken by the uploader Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
de Webmaster PTS pts.webadmin@gmail.com para permissions-commons@wikimedia.org fecha 5 de julio de 2011 09:56 asunto Declaración de permiso para todas las peticiones
Declaración de permiso en base al modelo que se encuentra en : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Modelos_de_mensajes
Por la presente declaro que soy el único propietario de los derechos de autor exclusivos de las imagenes y textos del sitio www.pts.org.ar.
Consiento publicar dicha obra bajo la licencia libre Creative Commons http://creativecommons.org/licenses.
Reconozco que concedo a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades.
Soy consciente de que siempre retendré los derechos de autor de mi imagen, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para mi obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no me serán atribuidas.
Soy consciente de que la licencia libre sólo afecta a los derechos de autor, y me reservo del derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas.
Reconozco que no puedo retractarme de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia.
04/07/2011
Email correspondiente al sitio www.pts.org.ar : pts.webadmin@gmail.com (bajo el cual está registrado el dominio en NIC Argentina)
Partido de los Trabajadores Socialistas - Guillermo A. Ermili (Apoderado)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Files of Category:Scarlet Sails 2008
[edit]- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(003).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(004).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(006).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(007).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(008).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(009).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(010).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(011).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(013).jpg
File:Алые_паруса_2008_(014).jpgфайл используется "глобально" (Global file usage) Antonynizh (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(015).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(016).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(017).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(020).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(021).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(022).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(023).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(024).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(025).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(026).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(027).jpg
- File:Алые_паруса_2008_(028).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This images are not associated with the holiday Scarlet Sails, despite they are in such category. Photos did not use in any articles. Wikipedia was not founded for photo sharing. --Antonynizh (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Those images was taken in 2008 from Scalet Sales. Those people (on images) is completely stranger for me. I'm actually have some difficulties with thesis 'not used in article - must be removed'. #!George Shuklin (talk) 02:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- These photos are not photos of the holiday. No matter when these photos has been taken. These are just photos of different unknown people and litter. Antonynizh (talk) 15:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted all, except a few. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)