Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/06/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 27th, 2011
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nickelodeon_Summer_Games

[edit]

Nonsense Content Vibhijain (talk) 06:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedied as clearly out-of-scope encyclopedic article attempt. Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:270530 2129385835767 1279594596 32543004 6961963 n.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alch_Bot.gif

[edit]

The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Craigboy (talk) 04:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: All files in use are inside Commons scope. This one is used in 2 different wikipedias. Béria Lima msg 10:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alch_Bot.gif

[edit]

The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Craigboy (talk) 04:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"This one is used in 2 different wikipedias." But only on personnel pages.--Craigboy (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request was closed without discussion. --Craigboy (talk) 00:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept In use, so in scope. Yann (talk) 13:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Catagory:Rijksmonumenten_in_Het_Westland

[edit]

Nonsense Content Vibhijain (talk) 06:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy Jcb (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

just to be clear, it wasn't a nonsense category, just a duplicate of 'Rijksmonumenten in Westland' --IIVeaa (talk) 18:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sharon_on_a_sailboat.jpg

[edit]

Out of project scope; used for (now deleted) promotional article on nl.wiki. Mathonius (talk) 04:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - Silver Spoon (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kellner_diary_-_Apr_14_1943_radio_crime.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of the copyrighted diary, whose author died in 1970, so it's not in the public domain yet. Sandstein (talk) 06:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I own the copyright, and I placed this scan of the diary page on Wikimedia Commons. Please confirm that this image will not be deleted. Thank you very much. --Rskellner (talk) 13:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Uploader holds the copyright Sandstein (talk) 21:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Picanco22.jpg

[edit]

Because the Author wants the file deleted from Wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 22:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable. George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Picanco22.jpg

[edit]

Because the author wants it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 09:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EscolaSagres.jpg

[edit]

Because the Author wants the file deleted from Wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 22:44, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable. George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brudzinskis-sign-of-meningitis-picture-2.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation: http://www.adamimages.com/Brudzinski%27s-sign-of-meningitis-Illustration/PI10051/F4 Hic et nunc (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy Jcb (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brudzinskis-sign-of-meningitis-picture.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation: http://www.adamimages.com/Brudzinski%27s-sign-of-meningitis-Illustration/PI10051/F4 Hic et nunc (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy Jcb (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asplenium_onopteris_leaf_closeup.jpg

[edit]

misidentification (it's a Tanacetum corymbosum leaf) la la means I love you ¤ messages 13:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename? -- Deadstar (msg) 07:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you please, I don't have this right. la la means I love you ¤ messages 09:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neither do I! But I've added a template & taken off the deletion request. Closing this as rename will be done shortly. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as changed to rename. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Melro.jpg

[edit]

Because the author want it deleted! Valternet (talk) 18:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the picture is in PD Béria Lima msg 07:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cynomys_ludovicianus_-Paignton_Zoo,_Devon,_England-8a.jpg

[edit]

Please see the en image talk page, en:User talk:Darley62, and the flickr source. The author in question claims that the image was never available under a Creative Commons license. This claim sounds rather dubious - both an experienced user and a bot confirmed at the time that it was available under a Creative Commons license. Still, though, if the flickr user accidentally chose the wrong item in the license box on flickr, then corrected it, I don't know that we can expect to hold someone to an agreement that they did not intend to agree to. In the interest of general peace on earth and good will towards men, I suggest we abide by the wishes of the photographer and delete the image. --UserB (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I am the original author and even if I had authorized the use of the image I would have asked that it be accredited to me, not some mysterious pseudonym. If a mistake has been made it has been made by Wikipedia who did not properly investigate the licensing conditions. I do not expect to have to prove I did not licence it to you - I expect you to prove that I did!

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically be changed into a signature with your user name or IP address and a timestamp. That the bot uploaded the image is proof that the flickr page was set to use the Creative Commons license. It's not a human. From googling, the only thing that can be shown is that some of your images at one time used Creative Commons licenses, though this particular image is no longer in Google's cache. All that said, while I am more inclined to take the word of the bot, I think we should err on the side of respecting your wishes and delete the image. --UserB (talk) 21:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I also support good will deletion. Off2riorob (talk) 22:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The flickrreview bot confirms that this image was distributed under a creative commons licence compatible for upload to Commons, and further the upload script will only upload images to Commons with appropriate licences. The accreditation that was available on Flickr has been transcribed to Commons; nevertheless, the style of the accreditation can be amended according the the author's wishes. This image is useful on commons. I spent time in looking for Commons friendly images on Flickr, uploading this image, and removing the watermark. I would not like to think that this was a waist of my time, so I would ask the author to reconsider his request to have this image deleted from Commons. Please note that Creative Commons licences are irrevocable, so the change in licence on Flickr has no bearing on the status of the original Creative Commons licence. I suggest that the author removes his notice on Flickr. I suggest that the author withdraws his allegation that the copyright has been stolen by Commons. Snowmanradio (talk) 23:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep A Flickr upload bot passed this image under a freely licensed Creative Commons license...and bots do not make mistakes. This image is a permanent part of Wikimedia Commons now. The permission may not be revoked due to a license change or by deleting the picture because it was freely licensed at upload. This picture was freely licensed and publicly available at the time of upload in August 2010. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: There are Four images from this flickr account user--Steve P's account--and they were all uploaded with the Flickr upload bot. The Flickr upload bot could never upload flickr images which were licensed as 'All Rights Reserved' or had 'Non-Commercial' or 'No-Derivative' use restrictions on the Creative Commons license. It suggests the flickr owner licensed these images as "CC BY Generic." So, who does one believe? I believe the bot because two were uploaded by Kersti and not by Snowmanradio. But instead of relicensing his images restrictively as 'All Rights Reserved' or 'Non-Commercial Creative Commons', the flickr account owner attacks Wikipedia...and calls everyone here 'liars' when the Flickr bot shows otherwise and the 4 pictures all give him Full attribution. Is this right? I wish you don't belittle others or call us 'scumbags' please. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Has anyone considered the possibility that the user who put this picture on Flickr is not the photographer of the picture (and, therefore, never had the right to release it under CC-whatever in the first place)? That is what the photographer's claims suggest to me. Ucucha (talk) 03:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    It's the same Flickr user that deleted the image at Flickr and then put up the hate image that was the one attributed upon first upload of the image. – Adrignola talk 04:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Licenses are irrevocable and bots don't lie. Given that there were three others uploaded in the same way under a permissible license, that rules out any "mistakes". Perhaps they didn't understand the terms of the license. Sorry, but you should also read contracts before you sign them too. Add to that the fact that they tried to remove all uses of it at Wikipedia and I'm not sympathetic. – Adrignola talk 04:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep When the author applied the cc-by license to the image, he granted us permission to upload it here and do whatever honest things we wanted to do with it, as long as we attributed it to him. Combine that with the fact that he gave his own name as "Simple Steve" in the Flickr page, and we have no choice but to attribute it that way unless he supplies us with a better way. Nyttend (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, per UserB. If the creator of the image made an honest mistake and did not intend for it to be released as CC-BY-SA, we should, as a goodwill gesture, respect their wishes, regardless of whether we are required to. 28bytes (talk) 05:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC license is irrevocable. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:YSL_at_his_home_by_Reginald_Gray.jpg

[edit]

no evidence of permission. Disputed copyright Otrs Ticket#: 2011052410014821 Off2riorob (talk) 13:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since there are such a lot of Gray's images on the Commons, and he obviously has sent OTRS tickets before for uploads by another user, I think this may very well be a legitimate account by the artist himself. What do you mean by: "Disputed copyright Otrs Ticket#: 2011052410014821"? Has the artist written that the account is not his own? If so, we'd have to delete some more images. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the legitimate account - I was looking at that issue - have we got verification that the user is the artist? I have not been able to check that yet, I assume we must have but I haven't found it yet. My time is occupied at the moment. The 0TRS claim is of ownership of this picture from someone else. That is why I though to tag it for evidence of permission as its disputed and request confirmation from the uploader. Off2riorob (talk) 17:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 07:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The magazine claims to have commissioned it which would mean that the copyright rests with them regardless of who took it. We are going to have to delete it although of course if Reginald Gray provides further information we can review that.Geni (talk) 20:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Per OTRS #2011052410014821 being pretty clear that the magazine owns the copyrightGeni (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Character_Creation_Screen.jpg

[edit]

Screenshot of non-free computer game. Certainly not "Own Work" as claimed      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio from http://www.kidssoftwareoutlet.com/Oregon-Trail-II-p/10078.htm Darwin Ahoy! 09:36, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adnan_al-Pachachi_with_Gamal_Abdel_Nasser.jpg

[edit]

Dubious copyright status. Yann (talk) 13:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing source information since 4 June 2011, no source confirming or supporting the claimed copyright status. Martin H. (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Snapshot_20110626_5.JPG

[edit]

Cause this is me Aungthurahein (talk) 01:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete personal photo. -- Deadstar (msg) 07:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naming_Your_Pirate.jpg

[edit]

useless without any description and categories what this is about. In addition the permission is not clear. Are you the author of this game or just a player of it?
The same for File:Skill_Allocations.jpg except that it may be keepable with {{PD-ineligible}}. Saibo (Δ) 02:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I well recall, this is a screenshot from the Pirates FaceBook game (similar to Mafia, and belonging to the same enterprise).-- Darwin Ahoy! 11:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seriy_oleg.jpg

[edit]

False license Torin (talk) 03:14, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteSource: http://maricabo.com/category/image-galleries/фотографии, Author: Олег Серый. Uploader name doesn't look to match the Author name, so cc-self license is incorrect. -- Deadstar (msg) 07:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 07:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mother_with_child.jpg

[edit]

it was a mistake 24.131.111.212 04:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by that? Who are you, the photographer? --Túrelio (talk) 05:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Beautiful bit of photography. Source photo on Flickr from 2006 still there and still under a free license. Unless the nominator comes up with something specific and offers a valid reason for deletion, I suspect this is an anon nuisance or prank listing, and would support speedy closing as kept. Infrogmation (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 07:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PedroA.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: Seems like an official portrait, low resolution, no Exif Lymantria (talk) 06:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doullens_(25_juin_2011)_carnaval_009.jpg

[edit]

Derivative of a presumably non-free sculpture in a location with no freedom of panorama (France) meaning the uploader cannot issue a valid license without the consent of the artist. Sculpture/giant made in 2007.--Grcampbell (talk) 06:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No useful argument presented. Put something on OTRS. --Grcampbell (talk) 23:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doullens_(25_juin_2011)_Florimond_007c.jpg

[edit]

COM:FOP#France and COM:DW The fault is not of people in costumes, but of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of fine art--~ Grcampbell (talk) 06:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

À Grcampbell : Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FOP is not an issue for this Jcb (talk) 10:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:07.jpg

[edit]

Unused photo of unknown woman. Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Version.jpg

[edit]

Unused photo of unknown woman. Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Igor_A._Ratchkov

[edit]

Against Notability Guildlines Vibhijain (talk) 06:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Herbythyme. Yann (talk) 07:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yogacharya_Amit

[edit]

Against The Notability Guildlines Vibhijain (talk) 06:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Herbythyme. Yann (talk) 07:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abstract_(35).jpg

[edit]

Out of scope to me (no obvious educational interest). Besides, probably a doubtful source (what does "kdt" means?). Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Salmon_River_(Lincoln_County,_Oregon)

[edit]

Empty Page Vibhijain (talk) 06:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Page isn't empty, it contains 3 img: Oregoncoast.jpg, Salmon river at van duzer rest area.jpg, Salmon River mouth, Oregon.jpg. What's wrong? --TeleD (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wrong, this Page is a double one, it can be deleted. Sorry and thanks --TeleD (talk) 13:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Empty. Yann (talk) 07:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Амосов.JPG

[edit]

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern sculptures in Ukraine. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 06:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:221956_2021876788108_1279594596_32403978_5460378_n.jpg

[edit]

obviously copied from Facebook; Facebook content is not free per se. Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:54, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:270530_2129385835767_1279594596_32543004_6961963_n.jpg

[edit]

obviously copied from Facebook; Facebook content is not free per se. Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:54, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Praditya_singh.jpg

[edit]

per watermark likely not own work of uploader Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:Ek-broschüre-2.jpg

[edit]

duplicate -Hic et nunc (talk) 06:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LogoIMAGINA11.jpg

[edit]

The artwork contained in the image cannot be described as too basic not to have copyright Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 08:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:30488_1371819372944_1155562851_30927901_2443665_n.jpg

[edit]

obviously copied from Facebook. Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IFreeTabletPro_cajaA.png

[edit]

obviously promotional-purpose and -quality image; out of scope and likely a copyvio from www.ifreetablet.com. Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Livedemo1.jpg

[edit]

Likely a non-free software. See other similar images Ben.MQ (talk) 09:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Distance.jpg

[edit]

Out of project scope. Leyo 09:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John_saxon.jpg

[edit]

My mistake, it is copy from [1] ~ Bulwersator (talk) 10:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted on enwiki: "# (Deletion log); 10:34 . . Magog the Ogre (talk | contribs) deleted "File:John saxon.jpg" (F9: Unambiguous copyright violation: http://www.allposters.de/-sp/John-Saxon-Poster_i3799305_.htm)" Bulwersator (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Jafeluv. Yann (talk) 07:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Frank_Schulz,_Raeumung_Schlesische_Strasse_25.jpg

[edit]

Now [2] Bulwersator (talk) 10:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Turelio. Yann (talk) 09:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mindlag_Project.jpg

[edit]

copyright as claimed on right side of the pic JeanBono (talk) 11:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:Metacrilato de 2,2,2,-trifluoro-1-.jpg

[edit]

Incorrect formula (second carbon atom is pentavalent); low quality (jpg) -Hystrix (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A701442678bfabd71edac043492c7a0ab544ae6a06c6bc308b0a449089ab178d54c8d7b1c98e38f6d24d0adecf42a949be8017fd31e7d0dc5eac89861905d0d7b66c889c01326915019.jpg

[edit]

Probably copyrighted logo. {{PD-textlogo}} is not applicable. Leyo 12:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Montpellier_Group.jpg

[edit]

Probably copyrighted logo. {{PD-textlogo}} might not be applicable. Leyo 12:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplo opname Spoorjan (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DB_E19_01.JPG

[edit]

copyvio Spoorjan (talk) 13:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate. Yann (talk) 09:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lia_Marie_Johnson

[edit]

Against the Notability Guiidlines Vibhijain (talk) 13:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. Yann (talk) 07:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pachachi_meeting_with_Nikita_Krushchev.jpg

[edit]

Certainly not own work. Yann (talk) 13:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The_Rock2.JPG

[edit]

what the hell is this page for? JeanBono (talk) 13:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, preferably speedy. Totally out of scope. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 07:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cultural_sincretism_in_mexican_toys.jpg

[edit]

The work is unfortunalelly a derivative work of Disney princesses picture. Althought it's not the central element of the composition, it's indeed very relevant and therefore De minimis cannot apply Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep De minimis applies in this particular case for several reasons:

  1. The picture itself is not meant to depict the Disney characters, but rather the style of popular Mexican toys.
  2. How much of the part of the characters identifies them as Disney characters? The faces? The dresses? If I were to block the faces, the dresses would hardly be identifiable as Disney characters.
  3. The use of the “offending” part of the image is rather useless for commercial reproduction, for the inclined plane and cropping make it unviable. Images of these subjects for commercial use abound in the internet and outside the internet.
  4. Even if I were to take the offending part of the image, the rest of the content speaks for itself as an illustration of folk toys in Mexico, that is to say that the illustrations are by no means the central part of the image.
  5. This image was taken in a public market, in a public street, where freedom of panorama exists.

On the other hand, this image illustrates a toy tradition in Mexico, and it is useful to illustrate cultural elements of Mexican life. In this image we can appreciate the syncretism of toys and their elements: style of cartoon characters of western origin, such as the Disney characters and the paper mache dolls and the masks of Indian origin and tradition. On top of that, we can appreciate type of toys and materials. I believe that this is a relevant, academic and encyclopaedic image. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • "we can appreciate the syncretism of toys" - perhaps, but not on commons. Toys have no place on commons unless they can be certified PD-Old, or unless the deletion request is closed by a very liberal sysop. A homemade folk figurine, in the eyes of deletion "consensus", carries as much copyright weight as Disney's or Mattel's. NVO (talk) 22:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please be reminded that this "consensus" for toys does not exist, and at least a great number of German and European Commons users think it is pretrty silly and grossly overdone (= copyright paranoia). --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 07:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Welcome to the asylum ;) seriously, deletions has no moral side. Don't bring ethics into this feud. Some "German and European Commons users" contribute thousands of photographs knowing that they breach "silly and grossly overdone rules"[Yours truly does it, too]. Yet other "German and European Commons users" nominate file after file after file for breaching these rules ("No FOP in Italy. Sorry. Duralex.")[Yours truly does it too, again. Bipolar disorder?]. Guess what? 9 out of 10 anonymous copyright-warriors trace to German Arcor/Vodafone networks. And they are "valuable contributors" too, and apparently have their own insight into what's silly and what's overdone. NVO (talk) 19:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The language and rationale that user Ecemaml uses to promote the deletion of this image is contradictory and flawed. He states that the image is derivative work, and preemts in that manner the De minimis principle, instead of the other way around. One can argue that De minimis in this case has better legal references to laws than the explanation on derivative works. On the other hand, considering the spirit of the law on De minimis, the offending part of this image is really incidental, and that is the key here. The illustration has to be viewed as a style, and could have been any type of western-style cartoon, copyrighted or not, and therefore, the appearance of these particular images are incidental, generic. The photograph is a photograph of sets of different toys, not a particular toy. The interesting part of this image is precisely the mixture of cultural elements and how they express themselves in a particular manner in a society. Furthermore, I do wish to point out that user Ecemaml and user Dodo have had run ins with me in the past regarding some images and have failed to bring forth sound arguments to the table, so I am inclined to think that is could be a personal vendetta, for lack of a better argument. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The Disney artwork takes up nearly a quarter of the whole picture. The rest shows third parties' artworks whose copyright status is undetermined. OTH, Tomascastelazo is the one bringing here conspiracy theories and personal attacks instead of further arguments. Regards. --Dodo (talk) 09:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment A visit to your talk page or ecemaml clearly points out to what could be interpreted as either nasty, or incompetent behaviour, or both. Complaints about you abound. you, ecemaml and I had a nasty run in in the past, and I personally question your imparciality in this issue. Instead of looking for images to delete on bogus grounds, for I doubt that Disney would ever trouble itself in complaining about this image, therefore De minimis would be acceptable, I think you should use your time in either looking for real violations or perhaps even uploading relevant encyclopaedic material. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Meanwhile, in other talk page... --Dodo (talk) 17:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Dear Dodo, you forgot this!!! [[4]] --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As I said, your talk page is full of unhappy people with your behaviour. Too bad that many are in spanish and people cannot get the whole picture of you. You bully people and the references are just to many to post here... your talk page gives the entire story. In the case at hand, I find it very hard to believe that you couldn´t really find true cases of copyvios instead of going after this particular image of this particular user, whom I would have suspected, if I were you, would react. Your case is flimsy, or do you really think, that Disney, for example, would ask for the deletion of this image? They wouldn´t spend a second of their time! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'm afraid that (eventual) copyright violations are not admisible here on the basis of the low probability of a complaint by the owner. Apart from that, the comments received in my talk page mean that some people are upset with me (whether they are right or not is a completely different question), but my log means that I make very few mistakes (most of the files I delete are not restored later) and that my overall behaviour is pretty good (no blocks yet, low ratio of admin actions vs. user complaints, etc). Can we now stop talking about our behaviour and keep discussing whether this photo is admissible or not? Is that even possible for you? --Dodo (talk) 12:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC) PS. BTW, I find your FUD pretty sad. Lots of users can read Spanish here and everyone can use Google Translate and the like, so please stop your defamation campaign.[reply]
 Comment References to your motives are legitimate in light of our past exchanges and your attempts to censor my work... but we can leave that aside... Back to discussing the image: In here File:Cultural syncretism in mexican toys dm.jpg, you can find the same image with the blurred faces, which is what makes them identifiable as Disney characters. There is absolutely no way of knowing if the rest of the image, which is so generic, is a Disney knock of or not. The area is so small, and incidental, that De minimis applies, especially if we use Commons criteria as expressed here: [[5]], and I transcribe here the important opinion: Because the Court has noticed that, as it was shown in the incriminated images, the works of Mr X... and Z... blended into the architectural ensemble of the Terreaux plaza, of which it was a mere element, the appeals court correctly deduced that this presentation of the litigious work was accessory to the topic depicted, which was the representation of the plaza (in this case Mexican toys), so that the image did not constitute a communication of the litigious work (in this case Diney´s images) to the public. I think it is pretty much there... Regards. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If Disney princesses are accessory in this photo because its intent is to depict Mexican toys, then I definitely prefer File:Mexican paper mache figures 01.jpg. OTH, why do you only blur the faces? As I said before, Disney copyrighted artwork fills nearly a quarter of the whole photo. Too intrusive being an accessory item, don't you think? Regards. --Dodo (talk) 13:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I blurred only the faces to show that what makes them recognizable as Disney is really a small part, much like you would recognize a coca cola logo on a bottle on a scene, it is just something that is there. Incidental. OTH, I find it very, very interesting that the event that started the animosity, your overreaction to my comments to your deletion request of my image, which was kept by an administrator and magically was deleted anyway without notice [[6]], you wouldn´t know anything about it, would you? Regards.--Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Dear Dodo, looking over the arbitrary deletion of the file that established our kind relationship, I find it very, very interesting that the deleting administrator, deleted the image after if was officially kept, and his reasons given were the same that you gave in the original DR. Furthermore, and even more interesting, it turns out that the deleting administrator is a friend of yours!!! And even more interesting, he is a spanish wikipedian!!!! Is that a coincidence? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment To the admin closing the request: beyond the usual bunch of personal attacks and the like by Tomascastelazo (he seems to be completely unable to handle a deletion request as a pure technical issue), mind that the only valid argument to consider is that of item 3 (and only partially): The use of the “offending” part of the image is rather useless for commercial reproduction, for the inclined plane and cropping make it unviable --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The "Disney" thing is de minimis (we are not even sure it is by Disney). The rest is just popular folk art. Yann (talk) 09:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC) Yann (talk) 09:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mayer_Bruno

[edit]

User's home page in main space. Yann (talk) 14:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Yann (talk) 08:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Treasuevents.jpg

[edit]

I don't see how this is in scope - seems to just be an advert. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom.   ■ MMXX  talk  15:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JORQUERA.jpg

[edit]

and File:480 20100723132157.jpg. Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1175b2a087070d05ffff8a7aac144227.jpg

[edit]

and File:18ff2bdbb4df0e6affff8075ac144225.jpg. Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:11IMG_3521.jpg

[edit]

and File:163143 10150116997165306 570025305 8194588 394909 n.jpg. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:154838_172825412741416_100000418767031_508327_5766801_n.jpg

[edit]

and other uploads by MrJohnkitus (talk · contribs). Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:195540_1680233351_1168745_n.jpg

[edit]

and other uploads by Ziaebbina (talk · contribs). Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:35, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Allmänt_förbehåll

[edit]

This text is non-serious and doesn't contain anything about General disclaimers. // WikiPhoenix (Talk) 16:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Kwj2772 (msg) 13:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lori_s_acid_king.jpg

[edit]

sorry, this image has already been deleted once, copyvio of http://www.acidking.com/photos/photos/10.shtml Od1n (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schulstiftung_Compassion.jpg

[edit]

out of scope - banner Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 18:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Birgit_Ridderstedt_et_al.jpg

[edit]

It has nothing to do with me 90.130.30.87 18:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alianza_Metropolitana_de_Pastores.JPG

[edit]

Text only file, not in scope (Excluded educational content). GeorgHH • talk   19:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ice_cream_van_with_customer_in_NL.jpg

[edit]

copied from Facebook; original filename was File:40888 139699879402776 118676858171745 173831 6067007 n.jpg; Facebook content is not free per se; no EXIF data; doubt whether own work of uploader Túrelio (talk) 19:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per Turelio - Also not sure the person in the picture would agree to have his image distributed like this. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chris_Gorham_Headshot.jpg

[edit]

Claimed to be own work, made in 2011, but it was published before. See f.i. http://www.threefourwomen.com/blog/2009/07/ No proof of permission. ComMonster (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission. Yann (talk) 10:25, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Van_varmerdam.jpg

[edit]

This is a copyrighted photo of Alex van Warmerdam by Ingmar Timmer, see http://www.ingmartimmerfotografie.nl/data/1604/cache/291660400040001.jpg ComMonster (talk) 19:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission. Yann (talk) 10:25, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Danachillin.jpg

[edit]

unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TaylorAshleyParks2.jpg

[edit]

Unused user image —innotata 19:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Img-thing.jpeg

[edit]

Unused user image —innotata 19:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leonardo_magallanes.JPG

[edit]

unused image of a musician - taken from somewhere, no exif data - copy vio (looks like) Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Genry_gorc2.jpg

[edit]

unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Genry3.jpg

[edit]

unused a bit strange drawing from russia - unusable for the commons, unclear copyrights (look at the description) Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wepppee.jpg

[edit]

unused private image - out of scope (third DR for this user) Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Genry_gorc.jpg

[edit]

unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JOSÉ_IGNACIO_PULIDO.pdf

[edit]

unused private biography, self description - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Francouzska_spojka.jpg

[edit]

Unused private image, out of scope Hold and wave (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep disruptive DR (one of a set) but this time you did apparently not even look at the image, its conent and its use... --Saibo (Δ) 04:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)  Info in use in cs:Francouzská spojka and de:French Connection. --Saibo (Δ) 00:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Unused????????? An image used in two diferent pages. Private???????????? Why is a map of Europe and the world considered private image?????? where are the expectation of privacy of the map????? Out of scope, why??? Did the nominator at least looked at what was nominating or it only nominated this image because of the filename by confusing the "sokja" with spouse??????????? 15:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 08:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jun_inThailand.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soraya=image.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soraya=Caption.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aburrida.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anto_pollera.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Streeped_jaja.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antito_scu.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anto_Super_M_20-03.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hanna-Barbera.png

[edit]

This appears to be too complex to me to be PD-textlogo; the text isn't a standard font, it shows a bit of creativity, as does the arrangement of asymmetric blocks. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It doesn't get much more simple than that. A 5-year old could do it. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 07:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-simple Yann (talk) 10:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ducksleeveart1200.png

[edit]

copyrighted? JeanBono (talk) 21:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blayze.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:David_duchesne.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 21:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imagee.gif

[edit]

Imagee :) JeanBono (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eduardo_Vargas.jpg

[edit]

Unknown person, Eduardo Vargas is a famous football player who doesn't looks like him. JeanBono (talk) 21:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo_muni_de_san_jose.xcf

[edit]

blank logo JeanBono (talk) 21:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Blank. Yann (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mezz_mezzrow.jpg

[edit]

sourced to random website, no reason that this would be PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christian-Meier50098.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted (© Copyright 2009 PeliculasaFondo.com); without license, not used mickit 21:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TonyJunior.jpg

[edit]

I don't think Facebook is a valid source JeanBono (talk) 22:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tg.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 22:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandera_IB.gif

[edit]

Flag of the Balearic Islands.svg is existing SVG. No use Fry1989 (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guillermus.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 22:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isabellaparkin.JPG

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 22:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Meda1.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 22:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adam22.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 23:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexandraburch.jpeg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused private photo --~ Hystrix (talk) 23:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_L'Affreux_Luquet_9.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ste-Catherine-lès-Arras_(5_juin_2011)_parade_093.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grand-Père_Guernouillard.jpg

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in France. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Anatole_et_Gd-Père_Guernouillard_dans_rue_du_Château_1.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Anatole_et_Gd-Père_Guernouillard_dans_rue_du_Château_5.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Anatole_et_Gd-Père_Guernouillard_dans_rue_du_Château_2.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_géants_descendant_rue_du_Château_2b.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_L'Archer_2.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Airaines_(15_avril_2007)_Armandine_1a.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_L'Archer_2a.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 11:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Javier_Guzman_800x600.jpg

[edit]

Looks like official promo for this Dutch artist. Source given as "Guzmania Productions", Author Jeroen Hofman, yet uploader is VincentS. Licensed with CC-0 self license. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom, no source since 27 June 2011.   ■ MMXX  talk  15:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Dudule_et_Armandine_rue_du_Château_1.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Armandine_et_Dudule_1.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Batisse_descendant_rue_du_Château_2.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zabelle_et_Batisse.jpg

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in France. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Berthoult_(détail)_3a.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_017.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:52, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This closure is completely incredible based on the fact that no proof of folkore exception on copyright has been provided. Creation of art is basically copyrighted if no exception has been specifically written. Loreleil (talk) 20:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_019.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_021.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_020.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_018.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Sire_Berthoult_1.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:54, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(19_avril_2009)_cavalcade_021.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(19_avril_2009)_cavalcade_024.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(19_avril_2009)_cavalcade_088.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 18:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(19_avril_2009)_cavalcade_028.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Incomplete work. Acceptable to me. Yann (talk) 13:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est de toute façon bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(19_avril_2009)_cavalcade_181.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:49, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(19_avril_2009)_cavalcade_029.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(19_avril_2009)_cavalcade_031.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CaouMerville.JPG

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in France. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doullens_(18_mars_2007)_Colas_et_André_1.jpg

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in France and COM:DW. Built in 1981. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:10, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These are not people in costumes, but objects that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of fine art Perhaps you should read what you link to. --Grcampbell (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Panorama is out of question here. These objects are not works of "fine arts", but of "popular art". This means that the characters depicted are issued from a long-time local tradition, with no "author" known, and the actual representation you see here is a collective work, made by people who don’t pretend to be artists, who are generally unknown. These characters exist since a very long time and may have been only restored. It would have been different if these people, as organisators, had asked and paid some "official" artist to create and build the character according to his personal vision. Could have been, but it is not. Well, I suppose you understand, but if you keep your hands, nails, and teeth clenched on The Law… I hope you enjoy it. --Morburre (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment, wait until respont from Markus. Moreover, to me, this is not 1. panorama 2. original. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 19:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doullens_(18_mars_2007)_Colas_et_Dédé_2.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:10, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:55, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doullens_(18_mars_2007)_Colas_et_Dédé_3.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_012.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_009.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_014.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Pierre_de_Geyter_arrivant_rue_de_Noyon_1a.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_013.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_010.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dick_le_chien.jpg

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in France. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DickChien.JPG

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in France. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_035.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:25, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_036.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_cavalcade_037.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The geant puppets are de minimis here. The main subject is the people in foreground. Yann (talk) 13:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est de toute façon bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ham_(13_mai_2007)_Flipp_1.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#France and COM:DW. The photo is of objects in a public place that do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of art. The uploader has demonstrated no proof that authorization has been officially obtained for the appearance on Commons. --~ Grcampbell (talk) 23:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. J’aimerais vous rappeler la définition du terme panorama telle que donnée par le CNRTL (Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales) : « Vaste paysage que l'on découvre d'une hauteur, que l'on peut contempler de tous côtés; p. ext., vaste paysage. ». Je tiens à votre disposition les définitions de Larousse, Littré et du Grand Dictionnaire terminologique, mais celle-ci me semble suffisante pour démontrer l’absurdité de votre requête. Bien à vous, --Égoïté (talk) 10:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Le délai de 7 jours pour suppression est bien trop court ! Je demande plus de temps pour réaliser (et tenter de réussir) les démarches nécessaires. Voir mes arguments - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:09, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Folklore. Not covered by copyright. Yann (talk) 19:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:732Roos-groenehart.jpg

[edit]

Dutch artist of this image died in 1979. User cannot license with self license. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 00:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fotexs0598.jpg

[edit]

no description, not used, and what is it? JeanBono (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently some sort of home-made acoustic box. As part of the user's uploads, it comes after File:Fotexs0597.jpg and before File:Fotexs0603.jpg. ;) -- Asclepias (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Ezarateesteban 00:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fotexs0597.jpg

[edit]

no description, not used, and what is it? JeanBono (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Ezarateesteban 00:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jenday-dyhap.JPG

[edit]

what is the purpose of this picture? Two parrots driving? :) JeanBono (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Ezarateesteban 00:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Phosphorous_Trioxide.JPG

[edit]

Poor quality; better alternatives in Category:Phosphorus trioxide. Leyo 14:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Ezarateesteban 00:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stefanie-Stappenbeck-2010.jpg

[edit]

Nadja Klier is a professional (still) photographer for movies and television. There is a copyright notice on the pic. It is not very likely that the uploader and Nadja Klier are the same. There seems to exist no OTRS ticket. Delete. Paulae (talk) 14:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Hallo, ich habe das o.g. Foto direkt von Frau Stappenbeck bekommen. Sie hat mir versichert, dass die Fotografin Frau Nadja Klier ihr ausdrückliches Elaubnis für die Verwendung bei Wikipedia gegeben hat. Daher ist eine Löschung nicht notwendig. Wie kann der Löschantrag storniert werden? Keep Gruß James (User:James Pronto)
Miss Stappenbeck got an oral permission by the photographer to upload the pic on WP? And she told you that she had the permission so that you could upload the pic on WP? An oral permission for using a pic on WP is *not* enough. It does not show that the original photographer is aware of the fact that she puts the pic under a free license and that other people could use the pic on their web pages for free + that other people could print it in books and earn money with it etc. What if Miss Klier tells us now that she never gave the permission? Would you say "But Miss Stappenbeck told me that..." Would you argue like this in court? I believe not. Delete. --87.170.221.121 13:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: it has a water market Ezarateesteban 00:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VVS-Gubenko.jpg

[edit]

Derivative of a copyrighted poster which is not permanently in public place. A.S. 15:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 00:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Postkarte_der_polnischen_Volksbüchereien_Juni_1939.jpg

[edit]

The license/copyright status is inaccurate or false. The author of the work is unknown and it is unlikely that 70 years have passed since their death Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To add, this appears to be a derivative of this version of the image [7]. That version was apparently pulled form this website [8] (website name is "Strange maps of Poland"). The website itself does not give the actual author, only speculates that this image might or might not have been published in a pamphlet issued by a fringe political group during the interwar period. The license given by the original file lists "polnische Volksbüchereien" (Polish public libraries) as the author, which is clearly inaccurate and just seems to be made up. Still, if the author was "Polish public libraries", then obviously, the author has not been dead for 70 years as the license claims. The license also claims this is a postcard but this appears to be false. If the author was someone else, then they would have had to died the same year or soon after this image was published which is possible, but very unlikely. All in all this is a very likely copyright violation.Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the uploader was asked about the actual source of the file [9] back in May 2009 but failed to respond. This was the only contribution to WCommons made by this user.Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Well, if the author is anonymous, then {{Anonymous-EU}} would apply. That would mean the license isn't *that* far off. If this is a scan of a postcard, then yes, the postcard itself is sort of the source, since all relevant publication information should be on the card -- but that includes what is on the back which is not mentioned here, and a website source could also help with that. Also disagree on the derivative work bit because it's not -- different expression of the same idea. The things which give me pause are the words at the lower right, which I can't quite read -- is that a publisher or author? -- and the monogram at the bottom left, which may make it possible to determine the author. This page seems to indicate that *someone* knows what that monogram is (or maybe that is a separate author using the same monogram), but that link is a paysite and I'm not a subscriber. Know any Polish artists with the initials T B ? Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Coincidence that the same monogram is found on ammunition from Poland?: [10] -- Asclepias (talk) 03:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Odd. Maybe it is a company and not a person. Or, something else using the same initials (it's not a terribly creative monogram for the two initials...) Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure that this is in fact a postcard. The website that this image was pulled from speculates that it was a political pamphlet. I don't know all that much about the interwar Polish post office but I very much doubt that this would have been issued as an "official" postcard (in fact, I'm pretty sure it wasn't). It might have been some kind of a private issued post card but, again, that's just pure speculation. Looking closer at the image, in addition to the TB monogram, there is some writing in the lower right corner which says something like "Druk, ?,K. Zolkowski. ?????", where I substituted "?" for stuff I just can't plain read. The "Zolkowski" part is also somewhat of a guess. "Druk" means "published".
If it was some Polish artist, given the fact that this was most likely published in some fringe publication makes it very unlikely that it was some one notable enough to be identified.
If {{Anonymous-EU}} applies - not sure it does since the monogram and the lower right corner text does suggest that the author identified him or herself, it's just that WE can't identify them - does it also apply for US?Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also I can't find any confirmation that this image IS indeed from 1939. Neither the site where it was pulled from [11] nor the other site that has a similar image [12] gives a date of it publication, although the second website - which is a personal advocacy site with a very strong ideological bent - does claim that it is from the "interwar" period.Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the last word in the right hand corner appears to be "Poznan". So I searched for "Zolkowski Poznan pocztowka" (pocztowka = postcard) which yielded these results [13] with the "Poliart - Pocztówka" link appearing relevant. It includes this text"F. K. Ziółkowski & Sp. Poznań D 6650 12. Technika: Druk.", which looks very similar to what probably appears in this image. The link leads to this page [14] - which is a online bookstore/antique store - which has another image from the same company.Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, very nice sleuthing, so that is probably just the publisher (and lends credence to this being a postcard). The "TB" is yet to be resolved. As for being before 1939... I seriously doubt it was published any time after that. The 1939 may have just been the last *possible* year it could have been published, not the actual year. As for the US status, Poland had a 50 pma term (and 50-year term for anonymous works) in 1996 so it is more likely to be PD in the U.S. than in Europe. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Some little pieces from the web: "F. K. Ziółkowski i Sp. Drukarnia i Fabr. Wyrobów Papierowych, Poznań." [15] seems to confirm that this refers to a printer and paper maker. When searching for a part of the text seen on the image ("Frontière occidentale historique de la Pologne"), I got a page with that text accompanied by the comment "pocztówkach przez T. C. L." [16] (postcard by?). I don't know if that T. C. L. can help. I have no idea what that page is but it looks like it might include something from 1939. -- Asclepias (talk) 05:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that's a transcript of the right wing weekly Prosto z Mostu ([17]) published in interwar Poland between 1935 and 1939, in which apparently the image appeared - this probably why the other website says the image comes from a pamphlet. The relevant issue appears to be from May 1939. I think "T.C.L." might be "Towarzystwo Czytelni Ludowych" - a public reading house or a library in fact (though I think, privately set up) or some kind of business abbreviation designating the nature of the business, like LTD. I was also thinking that the monogram "BT" *might* (this is a long stretch) stand for BiblioTeka (bibliotheque - library).Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
en:People's Libraries Society then. It would seem to make some sense. It seems that the uploader's information meant something after all, although difficult to decipher and although he didn't provide his sources. -- Asclepias (talk) 10:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, ok, so what's the bottom line? We've tracked down the printer (F. K. Ziółkowski ...), the fact that it was a postcard, probably issued by the Library Society (a private organization) and that it was reprinted in 1939 in a political weekly. The author of the image is still unknown. What does all this mean for the copyright status?Volunteer Marek (talk) 21:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still a bit troubled by the monogram, but... Polish copyright law says:
Subject to exceptions provided for in this Act, the author's economic rights shall expire after the lapse of seventy years:
1) from the death of the author, and in case of joint works - from the death of the coauthor who has survived the others,
2) if the author of a work is unknown - from the date of the first dissemination of the work, unless the pseudonym adopted by the author leaves no doubt as to his identity or the author has disclosed his identity,
3) if, under this Act, a person other than the author owns the author's economic rights - from the date of the dissemination of the work; and if the work has not been disseminated - from the date of the establishment thereof
If that is truly a good translation (i.e. "unknown" and not just "anonymous" or "pseudonymous") then part 2 may well apply. And even if anonymous/pseudonymous it may, if the monogram was a pseudonym and the real author was never really disclosed (it would have to be common knowledge, at least at the time, who the monogram referred to). The Polish version of the law is here; check if the translation seems accurate. And even then, if this was considered a work for hire from the looks of it, part 3 would then apply, and the term would also have expired regardless of when the author died. I'm not sure we have a specific template for the part 3 case, other than maybe {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}, but that isn't quite right. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: based on the investigation during this DR as explained by Carl Lindberg Neozoon (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PaoloSica.jpg

[edit]

same fount here: http://www.paolosica.it/ JeanBono (talk) 12:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Ben.MQ (talk) 17:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:State_Legislatures.svg

[edit]

It is broken svg (it may be also mediawiki bug) Bulwersator (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Nominator has withdrawn. The issue is resolved now. RE rillke questions? 20:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File_talk:Daimler_mfd_1937_first_registered_UK_Jan_1999_1998cc.jpg

[edit]

I have uploaded a similar (NOT IDENTICAL BECAUSE VERY SLIGHTLY CROPPED) version with a more descriptive name, following wiki-discussion of this version. This version, therefore, has become surplus to requirements Charles01 (talk) 09:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File deleted as a misnamed duplicate per uploader request, file talk page then deleted as orphaned. Rosenzweig δ 10:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AHMET_ERTEGUN_(1923-2006).jpg

[edit]

flickrvio - from flickrstream with lots of random low-res publicity shots Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: License laundering. – Adrignola talk 20:59, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Angle-Ahmed_Elsamin_general_division_angle.jpg

[edit]

because it has a mistake and i have to modify it Ahmed elsamin (talk) 17:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Reuploaded by uploader as File:Angle.jpg – Adrignola talk 21:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ascari_a10.jpg

[edit]

I'm pretty sure that this is a copyright violation - TinEye pulled 70 results for this image: http://www.tineye.com/search/2a9c3f67de695f716751af4d633215e0b247b17d/ Logan Talk Contributions 17:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation: http://www.tineye.com/search/2a9c3f67de695f716751af4d633215e0b247b17d/?sort=size&order=desc – Adrignola talk 17:27, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blank_US_Map.svg

[edit]

Not enough information Foxnews (talk) 16:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Derivative works of this file:" Bulwersator (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Im all for saving it. I find it handy, it is uncopyrighted. The originator has stated "use it as you will."

Kept: All essential information present. And nothing more ironic than uploader's own file being a derivative of this one they nominated. – Adrignola talk 18:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:British_Museum_-_Wooden_figure_carving_from_Rarotonga_18-19th_century.jpg

[edit]

No indication why this photo from the British Museum website should be licensed with the FAL license. On the contrary, it is only allowed to be used in NC context. Not free nough for the Commons. Same for many other uploads by this user. AndreasPraefcke (talk) 18:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Adrignola talk 18:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cripto_junto_a_oconnor.JPG

[edit]

unused very dark image of a concert - unusable , out of scope ( the notability of "Cryptofonia" is very unclear, seems to be spanish-speaking, cannot be identified) Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Poor quality files are out of scope: Commons:Project_scope#Discussion. – Adrignola talk 16:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jose_Andino_y_Amezquita.jpg

[edit]

Image not found on source (a blogspot blog). No reason to believe it's actually PD-old. Damiens.rf 12:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission for use. – Adrignola talk 19:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La_camiseta_de_Pelé.jpg

[edit]

Picture of a picture. Original copyright may apply. Damiens.rf 16:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Adrignola talk 20:57, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lammin_kirkko_sankarihaudat.JPG

[edit]

Sculpted in 1944 or later, thus not in Public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 16:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Adrignola talk 20:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hermaphroditus_walters.jpg

[edit]

No indication at all why FAL license should be applied. AndreasPraefcke (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation. See [18] and here. – Adrignola talk 16:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Montage_San_Juan.JPG

[edit]

Composition of photos where the original photos are not credited. Damiens.rf 12:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Used widely so it pains me to delete, but too often "own work" in a montage is just the work put in combining others' photos. – Adrignola talk 19:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mr_Jagmandar_Dass_Jain.jpg

[edit]

and other photos by HARRYMAGIC (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Adrignola talk 19:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naantalin_kirkon_hautausmaan_sankarihautojen_muistomerkki,_Naantali,_2.10.2010..JPG

[edit]

Sculpted in 1944 or later, thus not in Public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 16:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, The sculpture was made in 1950. --Makele-90 (talk) 16:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Adrignola talk 19:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Old_picture_of_parents.jpg

[edit]

out of scope, no encyclopedic value for an article Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 21:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The kerfuffle over this image started here. Jbarta (talk) 03:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. – Adrignola talk 21:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nortel_DMS100_public_voice_exchange.jpg

[edit]

Factual error in description: This is a PBX installation, not a central office, and definitely not a DMS-100. — Edokter (talk) — 21:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On what grounds? Operator's choice of color scheme? Jim.henderson (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, the image shows a private branch exchange, in what looks like an IT room, not a central office; DMS-100 was never used for PBXes, and they look vastly different. — Edokter (talk) — 11:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gosh, you didn't read the talk page, did you? This was discussed under Talk:Telephone exchange several years ago. One editor identified that it is common practice in Europe and Great Britain to house telephone switching in cabinets for EMC compliance. Another editor (jim above) identified that false flooring is typical in Great Britain. Well,... read the talk page. The image you cite above is a typical North American installation with overhead cable trays, no cabinet doors, lights on the front/wires on the back, no false floor, earthquake mounts. Sure, it looks like an SL-100 to those used to seeing NA installations, but this is France. Because you cannot prove that the caption is false (you are just making an assumption from what you are familiar with), do not delete the image. — Dgtsyb (talk) 00:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see the image is just as contentious over there. Don't you think we should have an image that represent the most common appearance of a DMS-100? I just have a hard time accepting the uploader's asserting that this is a DMS-100. Given the image size and bad cropping, I don't even believe the uploader took the picture himself (the metadata contains "Picasa" as the source). — Edokter (talk) — 11:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. If there is a mistake in the description and/or filename, please correct it.--Wdwd (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. For reason stated above. — Dgtsyb (talk) 21:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, perhaps our proposer has misunderstood Commons:Deletion requests. Yes, we would always like to have better pictures, but neither the wish nor the actual presence of a better one is a reason for deleting a poorer one from Commons; we have both good and bad pictures of many things. Yes, the brown and green picture would better serve the purposes of at least one article, being a more typical example of equipment practice and showing a Speech Link Frame and probably an MTM or similar package. I have worked with DMS-100 equipment in both kinds of packaging and would be pleased if the owner of that picture would donate it to Wikimedia Commons with compatible license to use in all Wikimedia projects. If that were to happen, we would certainly want to use it, which might cause the present picture to go unused but there still would be no reason to delete it. The majority of Commons pictures are not used in articles, and that's no reason to delete them. So, I figure the deletion request, being based on a misunderstanding, should be cancelled. Jim.henderson (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Extremely widely used. Why would we delete due to an error in the name or description? Either fix the description and/or request a rename with {{Rename}}. I have suspicions about the file given the low resolution and black borders, but will have to put that aside for now. – Adrignola talk 20:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Save_paper-final_curves.jpg

[edit]

Really own work? Leyo 12:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Adrignola talk 16:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Toyoda_Gosei_logo.jpg

[edit]

Lisence　violation Lufthansa ag (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation. – Adrignola talk 19:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Salamtorontofirstpage.jpg

[edit]

There is no evidence any of the people images are freely licenced per the licence placed by the uploader Ww2censor (talk) 15:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Adrignola talk 16:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TragedyoftheEuro.jpg

[edit]

Bookcover. Claim made for free license might be correct for the website, but this content is not created or owned by the website, but lies with publisher/writer of the book. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same for File:PhilippBagus.jpg. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission for use from original photographer. – Adrignola talk 19:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schodiskovy.png

[edit]

unused derivate work from File:Twowayswitching.PNG Honza chodec, earlier known as Slfi (talk) 18:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. – Adrignola talk 16:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sonora505.jpg

[edit]

If the recording is from the 1940s as the description suggests, it is extremely unlikely that the author died more than 70 years ago. Jafeluv (talk) 21:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a standard design like the record labels of the 78 rpm era hardly has an individual "author"; it's more like a mass produced item made up mainly of descriptional text. Thus the problem here is rather that "PD-old" was a badly choosen license tag. Thus I (= the original uploader) have now changed this to the more appropriate "PD-ineligible" which seems to be the most common tag used for this kind of material (see for example the pictures in Category:Gennett Records). /FredrikT (talk) 20:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-ineligible. – Adrignola talk 17:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:White_smile1.png

[edit]

blank file JeanBono (talk) 22:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops I made a mistake, I dodn't see the white smile on a white background. Don't delete it JeanBono (talk) 22:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They call it smile these days? Looks more like a shotgun casualty. NVO (talk) 22:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. – Adrignola talk 20:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RayMuzyka.jpg

[edit]

The person in the photo is not Ray Muzyka. (Google him to verify this.) Uploader relied on a bad caption in a larger original image. Comet Tuttle (talk) 23:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Use {{Rename}} to request a rename to the correct name. – Adrignola talk 16:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sher_Shah_Suri_The_Lion_King.jpg

[edit]

wrong license. When was the painting produced? When did the painter die (approx.)? Saibo (Δ) 01:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The signature is maybe the depicted person's name 

‫ شیر شاہ سوری

--Saibo (Δ) 02:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an Afghan art work, which haven't any copy right licence at all and this piece of art is published by many other websites as well.
Note: The signature of the art work is written in Pashto language.
‫ شیر شاہ سوری

There is written Sher Shah Suri in Pashto. Which is the name of The Lion King (the person who is painted).Tofaan (talk) 07:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can also even find it on flickr click here please.Tofaan (talk) 07:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Info the license template was changed.
Thanks for your helpful comment! Yes, I know - the image is elsewhere on the web and we should upload a higher res version if this can be kept. However: The image is in "Paintings of men from India" - not "Afghanistan". A age of the painting would be nice.. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Pashtun inscription in the painting does indeed suggest that it is an Afghan work as claimed above, so I'm inclined towards a  Keep regardless of the age of this painting. If more data could be provided about it, it would be best, of course.-- Darwin Ahoy! 06:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. – Adrignola talk 16:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sher_Shah_Suri_The_Lion_King.jpg

[edit]

the Afghan license only applies if the work is made by Afghanistan and it has to be first published in Afghanistan; this is a work of non-Afghan and it's copyvio http://www.flickr.com/photos/danyalgilani/2373616235/ 2011-08-24T18:14:16 Officer (converted from copyvio to DR by Saibo (Δ) 20:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

  • do you think the flickr account owner (who has marked the image as copyrighted) is the artist? Please do not use copyvio tag if the images was already discussed and kept in a DR (see above) regarding this matter. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - The above kept is inadequate. Darwin wrote "The Pashtun inscription in the painting does indeed suggest that it is an Afghan work as claimed above...". First, we are not sure if that is Pashto, Urdu or Farsi. Second, the Pashtuns or Pashto-speakers are not limited to Afghanistan because there are 28 million of them in Pakistan and only about half of that in Afghanistan. So that argument makes no sense. Third, the flickr account owner being the artist or not is irrelevant, it was taken from there and according to that site it is a copyrighted image so it has to be tagged as copyvio because that's exactly what this is. In flickr you may upload copyrighted images as long as you mark them the same way but here we cannot do that. The main point is that we cannot use the Afghanistan license. My educated guess is that this is a contemporary painting by an Indian artist.--Officer (talk) 03:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - Jcb (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sher_Shah_Suri_The_Lion_King.jpg

[edit]

tagged no license by 2011-11-05T04:49:14‎ Officer "PD-Afghanistan does not apply to this Indian painting because 1) it is not a work of Afghanistan, 2) it was not first published in Afghanistan, and 3) the author is not an Afghan citizen". Converted to DR since there was a previous DR. Saibo (Δ) 22:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted A.Savin 20:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flight plan of 17. KG zbV 5 to Eben-Emael and the Albert canal bridges,10 May 1940 .JPG

[edit]

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

wrong geo coordinates MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete! MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't understand the reason given, but it is DW and infringes the copyrioght of the map -- no FOP in Belgium.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flight plan of 17. KG zbV 5 to Eben-Emael and the Albert canal bridges,10 May 1940 .JPG

[edit]

I think cartography and the interior of museums is not covered by Belgian FOP, so this picture should not have been restored. BrightRaven (talk) 11:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Smaller_omnia-promophoto-film-2011-logo.jpg

[edit]

From: http://www.worldofomnia.com/?p=press Site is copyrighted. Material is released to be used in press releases, so not free. Uploader does not own copyright, so incorrect license too. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should also PROD this image: File:Promo notext RGB.jpg . Too bad, like them much. SpeakFree (talk) 21:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well did it myself. Both are similarly vague in licensing so if the band wants them released on Commons they should do so under a proper license. SpeakFree (talk) 01:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is a permission statement in Dutch "Toestemming van de webmaster van www.worldofomnia.com om deze afbeelding te gebruiken. De site vermeld verder dat de afbeeldingen gebruikt mogen worden voor journalistiek gebruik" which translates to "Permission by the webmaster of www.worldofomnia.com to use this image. The site also allows journalistic use of their images." So what we need here is an OTRS confirmation from Omnia's webmaster. De728631 (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They also need to be made aware of the implications of the license. So full remix and reuse (including commercial use) allowed. The promo pic is designed by someone else than the band (Fieke van den Hurk, Orchus.nl) so that may pose a problem if the designer retains copyrights. SpeakFree (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 09:01, 7 July 2011 by Yann, closed by      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tyree_Glenn_Billiesbounce.jpg

[edit]

saxophonist is creative enough to be copyrighted Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Might be {{PD-Australia}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PD-Aus would require that the artist died before 1955. Although the tune was written in 1945, so 1955 is close, also, the first reconding other than by Parker was in 1953.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pollau_Ansicht.jpg

[edit]

Has been prematurely transferred from German Wikipedia, no evidence provided that the postcard has been published before 1923 Schwäbin (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Bogus license -- no evidence of date      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Votechecked

[edit]

File was used for POTY, POTY is over. Author Request Joe Gazz84 (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: But there will presumably be another next year.....      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Artur Balder

[edit]

All pictures have been deleted; article in en wikipedia (and most others) has been deleted. Telford (Diskussion) 16:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC) --Telford (talk) 16:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, empty gallery. --The Evil IP address (talk) 08:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Artur_Balder

[edit]

No images Vibhijain (talk) 06:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Yann (talk) 07:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seydlitz_in_port.jpg

[edit]

This image of Seydlitz in port is in the public domain in the US only, but not in its country of origin. A duplicate image (currently with watermark removed, but original upload is duplicate) is located on en.wiki at this location with the proper licensing. Discussions for the images belonging to the U.S. Naval Historical Center and their licensing—including this specific image—appears to have been originally discussed during the Featured Article Candidacy for the article on the SMS Seydlitz, at en:Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/SMS_Seydlitz/archive1 (locate beginning by keyword search "concerns over images"). Further discussions (linked within the FAC discussion) took place at Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2009Mar#Naval_History_.26_Heritage_Command, and many of these images, also uploaded by User:EAJoe, still appear on the SMS Seydlitz gallery. Because these images are not in the PD in their country of origin, they most likely need to be removed from Commons. According to the FAC discussion, File:Seydlitz steams to Scapa.jpg is actually okay to keep on Commons. (I wasn't sure how to do a batch deletion nomination, so for now I'm focusing only on Seydlitz in port.jpg, along with mention of others.) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 13:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep many words, but I do not see the problem; anonymously published old photo. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it's not in the PD in its country of origin then obviously it can't be kept here. However, I see that it's being used in several projects, including dewiki. Maybe it would be a good idea to contact some of the editors involved in the FAC discussion over the licencing as they would probably know what's best in this case. Night w (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Pieter Kuiper Jcb (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:UK_EEA_FP_mod.jpg

[edit]

This is incorrectly licensed as PD when it is a 2 dimensional scan of a UK type D visa vignette that is subject to crown copyright and not therefore public domain. Spartaz (talk) 15:02, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It might be useful then to change the copyright message instead of just nominating it for deletion? As I have know idea how to do that maybe you can step in?
If its incorrectly licensed and subject to crown copyright and specifically excluded from the open government license what do you suggest I change it to? The onus is surely on the uploader to get the licensing right in the first place. Spartaz (talk) 12:05, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:UK_EEA_FP_mod.jpg

[edit]

This is a 2 d scan of a UK government produced identity document that is specifically excluded from the open government license as its an identity document. Clearly not free and therefore outside commons' scope and mission Spartaz (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pisco.jpg

[edit]

Because the Author wants the file deleted from Wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable. George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pisco.jpg

[edit]

Because the author wants it deleted! Valternet (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Suggest speedy keep. Valternet, the issue has been explained to you repeatedly. If if you do not understand fully because your English is not good enough, please use your language of choice; we will find an admins who is fluent. Unless you have something new to say or explain, or a question, I suggest you stop what you are doing here, as it only annoys and wastes time. If it keeps up you may risk being blocked -- that is not a threat, it is an assessment of the situation. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable. Béria Lima msg 07:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pisco.jpg

[edit]

Because the author wants it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 09:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. User is now blocked indefinitely. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evarcha_jucunda.jpg

[edit]

Because the Author want it! Valternet (talk) 22:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Not in use, but it's currently the only photo on Commons of that species, and changing idea 3 years after uploading an image doesn't seem to be (alone) a valid reason to delete something on Commons. --Ianezz (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable. George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evarcha_jucunda.jpg

[edit]

Because the author wants it deleted! Valternet (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you released this image into the public domain 4 years ago. That is not revocable. --Túrelio (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept.' Valternet has had that explained to them many times. Infrogmation (talk) 20:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evarcha_jucunda.jpg

[edit]

Because the author wants it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. Dcoetzee (talk) 10:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's not under a license. It was released into the public domain. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake, I copy pasted too fast. Releasing a work into the public domain is also non-revocable. Dcoetzee (talk) 20:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Menemerus_semilimbatus.jpg

[edit]

Because the Author want it! Valternet (talk) 22:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Menemerus_semilimbatus.jpg

[edit]

Delete my photo from wikipedia - I want it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept You uploaded it! You shared it under a free license!! The license is non-revokable!!! This has been explained to you many many times!!!! Repeating yourself with exclamation marks does not change things!!!!! -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Menemerus_semilimbatus.jpg

[edit]

Because the author wants it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mylabris_quadripunctata.jpg

[edit]

Because the Author want it! Valternet (talk) 22:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable. George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mylabris_quadripunctata.jpg

[edit]

Delete my photo from wikipedia - I want it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you released this image under a free license 4 years ago. That is not revocable. Why do you want to delete it now? --Túrelio (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Infrogmation (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mylabris_quadripunctata.jpg

[edit]

Because the author wants it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 10:33, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Menemerus_semilimbatus.jpg

[edit]

Because the Author want it! Valternet (talk) 22:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Menemerus_semilimbatus.jpg

[edit]

Delete my photo from wikipedia - I want it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept You uploaded it! You shared it under a free license!! The license is non-revokable!!! This has been explained to you many many times!!!! Repeating yourself with exclamation marks does not change things!!!!! -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Menemerus_semilimbatus.jpg

[edit]

Because the author wants it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. Dcoetzee (talk) 11:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TAP22.jpg

[edit]

Because the Author wants the file deleted from Wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Commons licensing non-revocable. George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TAP22.jpg

[edit]

Delete my photo from wikipedia - I want it deleted from wikipedia! Valternet (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept Valternet, we've gone over this many times. If you have nothing new to say, repeating yourself only makes you a nuisance, Infrogmation (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2011/06/27&oldid=59080130"