Shaddim

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Shaddim!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Interlanguage links

Hi, I wanted to ask why you put interlanguage links on Commons image pages to non-identical image files on Wikipedias. Hekerui (talk) 23:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I want to create connections. To hint authors that potentially other variants are avaialble, sometimes better by format, sometimes by quality. Maybe also a local WP version could be substituted by the commons version, sometimes way around. Overall, my motivation is "awareness" of variants. cheers Shaddim (talk) 09:11, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

PS: specifically the myst file connection I find valuable. The local de:WP version is superior compared to the commons one. cheersShaddim (talk)

PPS: interwikilinks are not a mechnism to connect "duplicates", they connect the same topics. Therefore (technically, legal status etc) varying logos on the the same subject are perfectly fine to be connect by that mechanism. Shaddim (talk) 09:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

That is not what interlanguage links are used for, because images are not "topics". If you find a superior version of a Commons file then upload it to the Commons, don't use language links. Hekerui (talk) 16:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

I disagree, interwiki links are not meant for linking duplicate files they linking topics/concepts (see usage on wikipedia). The specific topic here are files, which might have varying quality, format and license. Also, your hint on uploading is shortsighted: you can't upload always to commons for license reasons, nor can you "overwritte" an inferior png with a superior svg. cheers. Shaddim (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Screen00045.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Screen00045.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

David1217 (talk) 23:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

fixed Shaddim (talk) 23:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Looks good! Thanks for being one of the few people to actually add a license and permission. David1217 (talk) 23:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

I try my best ;) cheers Shaddim (talk) 23:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Food pyramid Japan crop.png nominated for speedy deletion

Hi there,

I have nominated your upload of another user's Flickr image, File:Food pyramid Japan crop.png, for speedy deletion. The reason is that I think it is an (unintentional) copyright violation.

I realise that you uploaded this in good faith, and that the original Flickr probably did not intentionally mis-license it, but we have to be careful about things like this. Many Flickr users don't understand (or don't care) that they don't have the right to license certain things under those terms. In this case it is a derivative of a copyrighted work because the content of the (copyrighted) poster is the primary subject. (*If* the poster was clearly *not* the main subject de minimis would apply, but it doesn't).

The reason given for the speedy deletion nomination is:-

Copyvio. The original Flickr image has been cropped, but the original makes clearer that this is a photograph of a poster. In all probability, the original Flickr user does not have the right to license the image in that way (it is not de minimis as the poster is the subject) and hence this cropped derivative version is also a copyvio.

Thank you for your understanding. All the best,

Ubcule (talk) 23:39, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

N-body Equations

We are in the process of developing the n-body problem pages and when complete will convert equations to standard form. Thank you.Rudrene (talk) 18:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:NRHP Castle Hill on the Crane Estate no77000183-54.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NRHP Castle Hill on the Crane Estate no77000183-54.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:NRHP Castle Hill on the Crane Estate no77000183-54.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 00:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blake patterson space safer from the side.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blake patterson space safer from the side.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

• Next time, please put the flickr web source for the image source so that the flickr bot will pass the image immediatedly...and not say 'no source.' See this other image when the flickrbot passed the image. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Seems to be fixed now, thanks. Have to say was pretty confused what link to flickr was expected (the upload tool could be here more clear): the direct links (http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8216/8406528334_bf6382611c_o_d.jpg) were not accept beside one time (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blake_patterson_space_safer_from_the_side.jpg) regards Shaddim (talk) 15:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Cdproject--red-logo-new.svg

File:Cdproject--red-logo-new.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Psychonaut (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:FC-SR-ulik.jpg

File:FC-SR-ulik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar ⨹ 16:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Free beer label back v3.0.png

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Free beer label back v3.0.png, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 10:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Libre biere 2012.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Libre biere 2012.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 11:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, is there a discussion about the comaptiblity of the CERN OHL with the CC-BY-SA going on? While I'm not an lawyer I think it could be considered comaptible. cheers Shaddim (talk) 10:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ryzom logo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ryzom logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

released as an wikimedia commons compatibel CC-SY-BY license, see [1]. As also stated in the the creation of the logo. regards Shaddim (talk) 08:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Watchmen-cover.svg

File:Watchmen-cover.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kigsz (talk) 20:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Creative commons license spectrum.svg

 

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. File:Creative commons license spectrum.svg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

Elvey (talk) 06:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Elevey, the situation is not clear to me can you please elaborate? your commetn was "yet another cc logo mis-marked as cc-licensed." What do you mean with mismarked? The logos might be trademarked but are either trivial "below treshold of orriginality" or CC. What is the problem? cheers Shaddim (talk) 10:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

As I said, "yet another cc logo mis-marked as cc-licensed". The logos aren't CC-licensed. You can argue that they are "below treshold of originality" and mark them as such (example 1 example 2 - edit summary: "Creative Commons excludes "all of the Creative Commons license and public domain buttons and icons" from CC-licensing.- one of some 100 such/related edits). Please don't argue that they're CC-licensed, because that's been discussed ad nauseam (see previous link), so respect the precedent. We have consensus that some of the logos in this upload of yours don't meet ToO, but for some of them, I think there's no consensus - and it's a stretch.

You claim that https://creativecommons.org/about/downloads/ is the source, but this image does not exist there. Where did you get it? Since the logos are trademarked, you should tag the image to note this. Will you fix the sourcing, licensing and trademark issues? And make more of an effort to spell correctly? --Elvey (talk) 18:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

I still don't get your point: trademark has nothing to do with copyright, and we have already a big amount of trademarked logos in the commons, no problem. Also, the individual logos are not above the threshold of originality. Also, on which discussion do you refer? And as remark to you, could finally for the first time link to one of them instead of other things? EDIT: and if the individual stuff is below ToO I can release very well my work, which is above, under a CC. EDIT2: the download page offers SVG of everything, so this was the source, what is your point? Shaddim (talk) 20:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Discussion point showing consensus.

I've pointed you to a diff showing how to (not) use {{cc-by-2.5}} {{PD-ineligible}} {{trademarked}} to no avail, so

File:Creative commons license spectrum.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

We can discuss further there. This discussion here is closed. Elvey (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

What I see is that you the only one who pushes this extreme & needlessly literal interpretation (consensus is a stretch) which is clearly against the intent of Creative commons offering this license logos as elements. Also, it can be argued that the download page is indeed marked as CC-BY as it is not clearly marked that for the logos somethign else applies. Also is the their policy page ambigious and poorly worded...did someone got into contact with them? Shaddim (talk) 09:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Creative commons license spectrum.svg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Creative commons license spectrum.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Read and respect COM:SOURCE!!

AGAIN: If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source.

Looks like {{Derived from}} is also needed.

Elvey (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

File:CDProjekt-logo.svg

File:CDProjekt-logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gżdacz (talk) 19:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

File:An American Pale Ale. Free as freedom, free as in beer, now you can have it all.jpg

File:An American Pale Ale. Free as freedom, free as in beer, now you can have it all.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

. HombreDHojalata.^talk 23:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Raiden-Vector.svg

File:Raiden-Vector.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 01:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Tamatipico 1.png

File:Tamatipico 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 06:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chess (talk • contribs) 21:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Chess (User talk:Chess) Please ping when replying. 21:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Rake in grass screenshot s6.jpg

File:Rake in grass screenshot s6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No valid license mentioned at the source page. CC Zero stated by uploader is invalid and not mentioned in the source. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

-- Veikk0.ma (talk) 05:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Styrateg 1.jpg

File:Styrateg 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No valid license mentioned at the source page. CC Zero stated by uploader is invalid and not mentioned in the source. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

-- Veikk0.ma (talk) 05:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Every day the same dream Screen shot 2011-01-25 at 10.17.33 AM.png

File:Every day the same dream Screen shot 2011-01-25 at 10.17.33 AM.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 192.225.170.146.

And also:

• File:Unmanned 2.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Unmanned 1.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Tuboflex 1.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:To build a better mousetrap.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Run jesus run Screen shot 2011-01-25 at 10.28.44 AM.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Run jesus run Screen shot 2011-01-25 at 10.28.31 AM.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Phone story menu large.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Phone story factory large.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Mcdonalds video game 5.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Molleindustria Logo small.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Molleindustria Logo.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Motoria screen1.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Oiligarchy composite.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Oiligarchy title.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Operation pedopriest 1.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Orgasm simulator screenshot 2.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Leakyworld7.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Inside a dead2.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Inside a dead1.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Free culture game 1.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Faith fighter 3.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Oiligarchy iraq war.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Leakyworld1.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )
• File:Ergon logo Screen Shot 2013-07-22 at 12.16.27 PM.png ( Nominator : 192.225.170.146 - Reason : According to developer's website, this work licensed under CC by NC SA 3.0 )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Supermethanebrothers title.gif

File:Supermethanebrothers title.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

File:MAMELogo.jpg

File:MAMELogo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takuyakoz (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)