GeorgHH

Workshop zu Wikimedia und Katastrophenmanagement am 20.3. in Berlin

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, wir organisieren für den 20.3.2018 einen Workshop, der dem Austausch von Wikimedianern mit Organisationen aus dem Bereich des Katastrophenmanagements dienen soll. Ziel ist es, auszuloten, wie wir unsere Wiki-basierten Aktivitäten besser mit den Aktivitäten anderer Akteure wie dem Roten Kreuz verzahnen können. Vielleicht ist das was für Dich? Bitte gib auch anderen Bescheid, die in diesem Bereich aktiv sind. Danke & Gruß, -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 04:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Furth Turm.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Furth Turm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Marion Beer (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Heinrich Mann stamp GDR 1971.jpg

Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hermit Crabs...

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

... are Anomurans, not Brachyurans. OM2003 (talk) 03:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sea nettles....

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

... are Semaeostomeans, not Rhizostomaeans. OM2003 (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Janis Rainis Latvian writer.jpg

Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Important message for file movers

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Otto-Versand

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Otto-Versand has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Redarter (talk) 10:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:ACDC May2009 Hockenheim Germany (062).jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:ACDC May2009 Hockenheim Germany (062).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ralf Roletschek 19:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Skulptur Hammer Park 002.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hammer Park oder doch nicht?

Moin, das Foto ist zwar schon einige Jahre alt, aber dennoch eine Frage dazu: Kann es sein, dass es nicht im Hammer Park, sondern woanders aufgenommen wurde? Ich hab die Skulptur dort nie gefunden, obwohl ich seit vielen Jahren fast täglich im Park unterwegs bin, und dachte bisher immer, sie sei schlicht zerstört oder entwendet worden. Jetzt stoße ich aber auf diese zwar nicht identische, aber doch sehr ähnliche Skulptur, die dort mit "Unterm Bismark Denkmal", also vermutlich im Alten Elbpark(?) lokalisiert wird. Kannst Du Dich vielleicht erinnern (oder in deinen Archiven nachforschen), wo Du das aufgenommen hast? :) --UweRohwedder (talk) 08:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Moin, das Foto hab ich tatsächlich im Hammer Park aufgenommen. Es müsste irgendwo im Bereich der kleinen Anhöhe zwischen dem Kinderplanschbecken und den Tischtennisplatten, also Richtung Heckengarten, gewesen sein. Etwa da wo auch File:Skulptur Hammer Park 003.jpg steht. Ich kann mich noch erinnern das ich das Teil zum ersten mal sah nachdem in dem Bereich irgendwelche Umbau/Baumfällarbeiten stattfanden.

Vor Ort nachsehen kann ich leider nicht; inzwischen hat's mich in eine andere Großstadt verschlagen... GeorgHH • talk 21:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Harburg Freudenberger05.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Harburg Freudenberger05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

HFGrupe (talk) 07:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Tour de Ruhr

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo GeorgeHH, this category is not about a Television Series, but as the explanation says "Photo output of the Tour de Ruhr of the European Capital of Culture Ruhrgebiet for the Free Travel-Shirt on 20. February 2010". So it would be nice if you would remove your recent additions and create an own category to fit the Television series. --Wuselig (talk) 11:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Images_from_KIT,_Voorstelling_Object_-_handschoenen

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Images_from_KIT,_Voorstelling_Object_-_handschoenen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ecritures (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Dentro del pozo de agua.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo GeorgHH, was macht dich so sicher, dass der Brunnen in Spanien ist? lt. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/SNBACA stammen zumindest 3 der Bilder (von 5) des Users aus Mexiko. Wo man auch spanisch spricht. Ich weiß es auch nicht, daher halte ich das Verräumen nach Spanien für fragwürdig. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Moin, ich bin auch nicht sicher. Das Bild kann natürlich auch nur in die Hauptkategorie Brunnen sortiert werden. GeorgHH • talk 13:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Versehen oder verstecktes Merkmal?

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Georg, du hast vor kurzem diese Datei kategorisiert File:Qudyalçay.jpg und der Stadt Qax zugeordnet. Wenn der Titel stimmt, dann passt das nicht. Andererseits könnte der Titel falsch sein, nur sehe ich nicht, woraus sich das schließen ließe. Schaust du dir das bitte noch mal an? VG Tozina (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, wie genau ich auf die Kategorie Qax kam, kann icht nicht mehr sagen. Hab jetzt noch mal geschaut, und gesehen das es die passende Category:Qudyalçay gibt. Danke für den Hinweis. GeorgHH • talk 21:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Archives EFEO

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour GeorgHH,

J'ai envoyé un mail au responsable de la photothèque des l'Ecole Française d'Extrême Orient. Ces photos ont bien plus de 70 ans donc en principe, elle rentre dans le domaine public, de plus, j'ai bien précisé que la provenance venait des archives EFEO. Je peux leur demander de façon pus proactive en leur téléphonant. Le fait de faire connaitre leur conservateur d'Angkor que ce soit Georges Trouvé ou Jean Commaille est plutôt bénéfique pour l'EFEO. Cela permet de faire connaitre l'action de l'EFEO au travers de ces hommes qui ont consacré leur vie à faire renaitre Angkor. Je peux faire en sorte d'obtenir des réponses de l'EFEO ? Qu'en penses-tu? Merci par avance pour ton retour, --Atalante88 (talk) 08:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dear Georg, I got in touch with the Curator of the Ecole Française d'Extrême Orient owner of those Pictures regarding the use of those Pix. Then, I precise that those pix are from the Archives of EFEO. Those Pix are more than 70 years old and in addition to that, Georges Trouve and Jean Commaille curators of Angkor Conservation are dead for more than 70 years. Showing their pix allows to illustrate not only the articles of those guys who dedicated their lives to the Angkor Conservation Revival but also the action of EFEO with its Curators of Angkor conservation. I am at your disposal for further discussion on this topic. --Atalante88 (talk) 08:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello Atalante88, the decisive factor is the name of the photographer and when the photo was taken. the 70 year rule concerns the photographer, not the person who was photographed. if you provide a link to the EFEO page with corresponding information, the license status can be checked. GeorgHH • talk 11:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Transportation_in_the_Philippines

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Transportation in the Philippines has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Out of scope photos

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Thanks for nominating out of scope files for deletion, a number of which i actioned. In future you can tag them for speedy deletion using {{SD|F10}} - that will get it deleted almost immediately and you don't have to open a DR. Thanks once again Gbawden (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Gbawden, thank you very much for your hint. I was not aware that unused personal files can now be speedy deleted. In the future I will use the {{SD}} tags, which of course makes more sense than unnecessarily overloading the deletion request page. Greetings. GeorgHH • talk 16:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Brahms geburtshaus in Hamburg.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Brahms geburtshaus in Hamburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

68.194.140.13 16:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Ulamm 2014-11-30 um 00.28.19.jpg File:Ulamm 2014-11-30 um 00.28.54.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Georg, erkläre mir doch bitte, was an der Lizensierung falsch sein soll. Für diese beiden Screenshots ist es egal, sie waren spezielle Beiträge zu einer inzwischen Jahre zurückliegenden Diskussion. Für Karten von bleibender Bedeutung ist es aber relevant. Wenn so eine Karte auf OSM (normalerweise nicht Bearbeitungsmodus, sondern gerenderte Karte) beruht, muss das als Quelle, die eine entsprechende Lizenz nach sich zieht, vermerkt werden. Die Aufarbeitung eines OSM-Ausschnitts für eine Kartenanwendung kann aber viele Stunden sorgfältig überlegter Bearbeitung erfordern. Da finde ich es angemessen, beispielsweise einen {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all|migration=redundant}}-Vermerk hinzu zu setzen.--Ulamm (talk) 07:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Ulamm, der Grund für den Löschantrag ist die Frage, ob die ODbl Lizenz hier zutrifft. Die Copyrightvermerke am unteren Bildrand (GeoEye, Microsoft, bing) sprechen meiner Meinung nach dagegen. GeorgHH • talk 12:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please test new feature on the ISA Tool (computer-aided tagging)

Hello

We have just released a new version of the ISA tool on the Test Server. The new version propose semi-automatic tagging of images, which seeks to assist community in identifying and labelling depicts statements for Commons files.

We are currently looking for feedback with regards to the look, feel, and usability of the tool with the machine vision / metadata-to-concept enhancements in place. In a second stage, we will be testing the quality of the recommandations provided.

We deeply appreciate your feedback, since it will help us determine the next steps of the project.

Please sign-up to indicate interest, test the tool, and simply provide feedback in the talk page.

More information on the new feature and test campaign: Commons:ISA Tool/Image to Concept

Thank you in advanceǃ

User:Anthere

ISA Tool Workshop - Dec 12th 2022

Greetings.

We released a few weeks ago a new version of the ISA tool on the Test Server. The new version propose semi-automatic tagging of images, which seeks to assist community in identifying and labelling depicts statements for Commons files.

Now we are looking for feedback with regards to

the look, feel, and usability of the tool with the machine vision / metadata-to-concept enhancements in place.
and most importantly, the quality of the recommandations provided.

This is why we are organizing an online workshop on Monday 12th of December, 16h-17h30 UTC+1 (on zoom). We will be very happy if you find the time to join us.

More information and sign-up : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:ISA_Tool/Image_to_Concept#ISA_Workshop_-_Dec_12th

Thank you in advanceǃ

User:Anthere

File:Pics 162.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Pics 162.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect))

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Johnj1995.

And also:

File:Pics 162.jpg ( Nominator : Meno25 | Reason : Broken redirect )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 19:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Yattawmu Paya.JPG

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hans-Peter Klie

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

why did you delete ALL the pictures on the site of Hans-Peter Klie? Where do I find VRT registration? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blau-7 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

see COM:VRT GeorgHH • talk 08:06, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Recent VP discussion.

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You're welcome. The 1920s are an interest of mine, and I'm definitely learning new things as I go through historical newspapers. Feel free to message me if you need help on other photographs. Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm currently categorizing Library of Congress files. I try to use as precise name categories as possible. Many of the file descriptions are incomplete, so I try to identify the people shown - unfortunately not always successful.

Thank you for your offer to help identify, I'll gladly take you up on that. GeorgHH • talk 17:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Dalton Caldwell (43627374955 cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Dalton Caldwell (43627374955 cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Getty Image, not under CC license, per https://www.flickr.com/photos/techcrunch/43627374955/

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

C.Fred (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Event:Wiki Mentor Africa Hackathon 2024

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. You might be interested by the upcoming online event : Wiki Mentor Africa Hackathon 2024. It will take place Jan 19-21 and will be dedicated to the Commons:ISA Tool. More info about the event : m:Event:Wiki Mentor Africa Hackathon 2024. Thanks Anthere (talk) 01:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pflanze Fürstenwalder Straße

Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bist du dir sicher, dass die Pflanze auf dem Foto File:2019-07-05 Fürstenwalder Straße 16 Berlin-Friedrichshain 1.jpg wirklich ein Weißdorn ist? GPSLeo (talk) 12:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Die Kategorie hab ich vom edit des ursprünglichen Autors übernommen. Laut de:Echter Rotdorn könnte es auch eine Unterart sein, aber da bin ich raus. GeorgHH • talk 14:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ich hatte das Foto nur zwei Stunden vorher aus der Kategorien gelöscht und die Datei umbenannt. Daher dachte ich, dass du dir komplett sicher sein musst, wenn du das wieder rückgängig machst. Auf dem Bild definitiv etwas anders zu sehen und schon gar nicht das angegeben Naturdenkmal. GPSLeo (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Netto_(supermarket)

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Netto (supermarket) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

RZuo (talk) 13:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:2004 hamburg landtag result.png

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:2004 hamburg landtag result.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2003:E5:370D:C300:71BC:1855:137D:6946 23:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Latest comment: 21 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic