Wikidata:Property proposal/year of recombination (taxonomy)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
year of recombination (taxonomy)
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science
Withdrawn
| Description | MISSING |
|---|---|
| Represents | time (Q11471) |
| Data type | Point in time |
| Domain | qualifier of taxon name (P225) |
| Example 1 | Forsteropsalis distincta (Q21270294) → 2011 (taken from Wikispecies) |
| Example 2 | Banacuniculus hunteri (Q21247772) → 2010 (taken from Wikispecies) |
| Example 3 | Alpioniscus kuehni (Q63726251) → 2018 (see Q60047864) |
| See also | complementary to Wikidata:Property proposal/recombination author |
Motivation
[edit]This proposal works toguever with the other proposal above Wikidata:Property proposal/recombination author. As well quoted by Succu. If one is successful, the other should be also successful, and at the opposite if one is not accepted, then the other should be rejected as well.
- This property is intended to be use exactly as year of publication of scientific name for taxon (P574), precisely as a qualifier to "taxon name", but the value will be here the year when the recombination has been done (as per the ICZN recommandation, see the other proposal for details). Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.
Discussion
[edit]
Support. Important property.--Arbnos (talk) 14:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)- Support. Seems well defined.--M.A. Miron (📬) 21:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn whether this property will be useful for Wikidata one day or not, it is clear that it is not now. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Comment
[edit]I see that it have been marked as ready, however it should not be created if Wikidata:Property proposal/recombination author is not created, otherwise it will be nonsense because one works with the other. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)