Wikidata:Property proposal/filial church
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
filial church
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place
Description | church which acts as the less important temple of a parish |
---|---|
Represents | filial church (Q1129743) |
Data type | Item |
Template parameter | ex: "kościół filialny" (En. filial church) in pl:Szablon:Parafia infobox (Polish Wikipedia) |
Allowed values | Q element or text |
Example 1 | Q11806777 → Q97186342 |
Example 2 | Q11805787 → Virgin Mary Queen of Poland church in Gorzów Wielkopolski (Q11746102) |
Example 3 | Q11810581 → Saint Casimir church in Trzynik (Q18431069) |
Example 4 | Surroundings of the Poznań Cathedral (Q11807390) → Virgin Mary Queen of Poland church in Zwanowice (Q30222974) |
Planned use | connecting existing Wikidata elements describing churches with its parishes |
Motivation
[edit]I want to create that property because it could be useful to organize information by linking filial churches to their parishes because, obviously, each parish has its own church, even two or more. I created already property for the parish church. Gower (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]Notified participants of WikiProject Poland Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- User:Gower can you add sources for these statements please? Lectrician1 (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Lectrician1 yes, sure, I added Q1129743 statements to P31 in churches with sources, it is that what you had in mind? Gower (talk) 12:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Uhhh looks like it. I meant originally to add them next to the statements in the property proposal like this but this works. Lectrician1 (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Gower: please see the comments above. @Lectrician1: are you in favor of this proposal? Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony – I can see only Lectrician1 comments. Gower (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I didn’t think you will see ONLY Lectrician1's comments Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 19:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony I don't understand, only you and Lectrician1 posted comments here. What do you mean? Gower (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Gower, I just follow up to close the proposal, if no support then I've close as not done! Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony – you meant sources? Now it's okay? Gower (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Gower, I just follow up to close the proposal, if no support then I've close as not done! Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony I don't understand, only you and Lectrician1 posted comments here. What do you mean? Gower (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- I didn’t think you will see ONLY Lectrician1's comments Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 19:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony – I can see only Lectrician1 comments. Gower (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Gower: please see the comments above. @Lectrician1: are you in favor of this proposal? Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Uhhh looks like it. I meant originally to add them next to the statements in the property proposal like this but this works. Lectrician1 (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Lectrician1 yes, sure, I added Q1129743 statements to P31 in churches with sources, it is that what you had in mind? Gower (talk) 12:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support, I think located in the religious territorial entity (P5607) could be its inverse property (obviously, only for filial churches only). Powerek38 (talk) 06:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- does it apply to catholic church only? Other denominations? Masti (talk) 18:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- As I know, protestant churches also could be filial, e.g. Q101850470, Q28110071. Gower (talk) 18:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, just wanted to clarify the name of property. Support Masti (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Gower, Lectrician1, Powerek38, Masti: Done: filial church (P12476). Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 16:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)